RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Whose Truth Do You Trust in the Gaza Conflict?

by Ryan Rodrick Beiler 01-07-2009

In addition to the obvious and outrageous tragedy of those killed by the Israeli bombing of Gaza (640 killed so far in this incursion)  and Hamas’ terrorist rocket attacks against Israeli civilians (22 killed since the year 2000), add that first casualty of war: truth.

Who do you believe when both sides trade accusations of terror and war crimes? Even the horror of 30 civilians killed by the shelling of a designated U.N. refugee compound is complicated by allegations that Hamas militants were intentionally firing mortars from nearby.

But also add this critical fact of the ongoing conflict from yesterday’s coverage (emphasis added):

Gaza health officials said that 562 Palestinians had been killed — including at least 111 children — and some 2,500 wounded. The figures can’t be independently verified because Israel has barred foreign journalists from Gaza since the offensive started.

So if foreign journalists aren’t allowed, the media must rely on Gaza residents who are under attack, and the official spokespersons of Hamas and Israeli forces who are fighting — all unlikely sources of unbiased information — though it is an important distinction that it is the Israelis and not Palestinians who are barring foreign journalists.

Full disclosure: I travelled to Gaza in 2004 as a freelance photojournalist visiting humanitarian projects. At two different points while touring damaged buildings and bulldozed homes of Palestinians, I was shot at by Israeli forces. Warning shots, most likely — though it is inconceivable how I could have been perceived as a physical threat as I walked around in the open in broad daylight. And my experience as a journalist in the Occupied Territories is not unique.

But for those still looking for credible testimony about what’s really going on in Gaza, here is some heart-wrenching testimony from a Norwegian doctor working with the U.N., as broadcast by CBS:

Ryan Rodrick Beiler is the Web Editor for Sojourners.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • calledme
    She also said, "Religion without humanity is very poor human stuff.”
  • calledme
    The problem with what you say, erbe, is not the content -- it's the fact that both sides will claim wht you say as their own truth, to justify their own behavior. Back to Lincoln -- rather than justifying ourselves by claiming God is on our side, we should be asking God how we can be on His side.

    It's incorrect to talk about the "Palestinians" and the "Israelis". Very few, relatively speaking, have any say in this at all. On either side they're running with -- or to -- their children, crying in fear and grief. A handful from each side of the border will sit down at a table, as they have in the past, and commit themselves to an agreement they'll support according to their own interests. Their interests will decide when the other side has violated the agreement and war can begin.

    I don't know exactly what I can do about any of this, but I keep praying for some insight into that. Sojourner Truth once said, “If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these together ought to be able to turn it back and get it right side up again.” It seems we can paraphrase this to fit all of us who want the killing -- all of it -- stopped.
  • meurig
    Aquaman, I cannot blame you for repeating the line that the media have fed us about a "credible peace offer" at Camp David. You probably haven't delved into the details of that offer. The problem is, the media - throughout the west but especially in the US - mostly didn't either, and therefore fed us misleading information.

    One group that did do the necessary research was the Israeli peace movement Gush Shalom. You can read what they said about it at the time at http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/ar... . Unfortunately there are flaws in the html coding there, but it explains pretty comprehensively why the Camp David proposal could not have resulted in viable Palestinian self-determination and therefore was unacceptable.

    I would also invite you to do a mental comparison between the way that Israel "responds to attacks on its citizens within its internationally recognized borders" and the way that Britain did when faced with IRA terrorism. I'm not saying that the latter was always a perfect model of restraint and prejudice-free justice - but the differences should be self-evident to anyone with a passing knowledge of both situations.
  • erbe
    So I guess if I steal your car you shouldn't make any attempt to get it back from me?

    And, I guess you're just as much to blame for your car being stolen as I am for stealing it.

    Trying thinking of "accountability" when you want to use the word blame.

    You've been listening to too many politicians...the last thing they want is to hold somebody accountable (blame someone).
  • miteypen
    I am weary of hearing all the arguments based on past evidence. No matter who was "wrong" in the past, does that justify the actions of the present? The main reason that peace is unattainable is this conflict is because both sides are playing the blame game. How can they start anew? Is there any answer in God's word?
  • anotherbob
    The immediate truth is very clear -- hundreds are dying. Why is Sojourners silent on this with regard to taking action? Why no email asking the religious community to speak out against this violence?
  • erbe
    I'm sure Jesus was thrilled to see the Zionists appropriate Palestinian land with trickery and subterfuge and when that didn't work, with the Irgun and Stern Gang. And I'm sure he was thrilled at how the Zionists went about establishing their state with land appropriated from the Palestinians. And what must really please Jesus now, is how the Zionists show their love and compassion to their "enemies". Did Jesus say we were to love our enemies? Turn the other cheek? Oh, I forgot, the Zionists live by another moral code, promulgated by their "spiritual" ancestor Jacob. And we shouldn't forget the other tenet that is a cornerstone of the Zionist moral philosophy - eyes for an eye, teeth for a tooth.

    And of course, the United States government, as the worlds leading "Christian" moral authority, supports Israel's Zionists completely.
  • jonabark
    The reports on this process and the substance of any proposal is not clear. Neither the US nor Israel has ever put forth a clear, written proposal that returned the West Bank and gave the Palestinians full sovereignty. Robert Malley, a participant in the Summit said "Barak refused to hold any substantive meeting with him( Arafat) at Camp David out of fear that the Palestinian leader would seek to put Israeli concessions on the record."


    There is good reason to think Arafat should have done more to take up what was offered and work toward a final deal. But if the proposal was good, why not make it to Abbas whom Israel's leaders describe as reasonable? There is also serious question whether Barak could have carried out these proposals.

    Until the US withdraws its un-questioning support of Israel and demands the cesssation of new settlements in the West Bank land acquired by war I foresee no progress.

    Many heroes have given their lives for peace, but so far a US president will not even risk his job for peace.
  • the_Tmac
    My pastor friends visited Israel and Palestine last year. They were welcomed by the Palestinians and stayed in many of their homes. They stood with Palestinian families as Israeli tanks came to bulldoze their homes for new Israeli settlements. They met with parents whose children had been shot by Israeli soldiers as they played on the playground at school.

    They also saw great signs of hope, however. There were groups of former Israeli soldiers who spoke out against the occupation and the way they were taught to hate their Palestinian neighbors. They were working alongside these neighbors for nonviolent paths to peace.

    Citizens of both Israel and Palestine are realizing that there will be no lasting peace for either country until there is justice for Palestinians. But the military escalation of violence is doing such great damage to the cause of peace. It is not addressing the root cause of the problem, which is that Palestinians have been robbed of their native land, their farms, access to hospitals and good schools, their freedom and their dignity.

    If we truly care about Israel, we must demand justice for Palestine and an end to this illegal and cruel use of our tax dollars on military violence against an impoverished people.
  • nuclearferret
    Considering the organization's record, I will pass on the UN as a distributor of unbiased truth.
  • aquaman
    I love Sojourners' witness to the Biblical call to peace and justice. I regret, however, that after seeming to take a more balanced approach in recent months, this blog has reverted to the old, one-sided view of the conflict in Israel-Palestine.

    Palestinians did in fact hold the moral high ground for a long time, but the ground shifted in 2000 when Ehud Barak made a credible peace offer and the Palestinians responded not with a counter-offer, but with war. Continuing to judge Israel's actions as though they were not at war with an adversary that has sworn itself to Israel's destruction is unfair. It also invites charges of anti-Semitism, because Israel is the only nation-state so harshly judged for responding to attacks on its citizens within its internationally recognized borders.

    As for the question at the top of this post, isn't truth the first casualty of war?? Of course we don't know how many Palestinians have died in Gaza, how many of those dead were children, or whether those deaths were the result of reckless military tactics. Such is the nature of war, which is evil. (War is sometimes a necessary evil, but that's a whole other discussion. Even a necessary evil is evil.)

    I continue to pray for peace in the Holy Land-- not just the absence of violence, but the presence of justice.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008