advertisement
RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Crossing the Line Between Legitimate Criticism and Anti-Semitism

by Duane Shank 01-08-2009

It is appropriate and necessary to criticize Israel’s excessive military attacks in Gaza.  We have and will continue to do that, much as we criticize our own government for its excesses in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Military means are not the solution to political problems.

It is not appropriate, and is in fact unacceptable and deplorable, to condemn Israel ’s existence or that of  the Jewish people.  But, as Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby writes, those manifestations of anti-Semitism are seen in the chants and placards at some demonstrations:

Demonstrators chanted “Nuke, nuke Israel!” and carried placards accusing Israel of “ethnic cleansing” and bearing such messages as: “Did Israel take notes during the Holocaust? Happy Hanukkah.” To the dozen or so supporters of Israel gathered across the street, one demonstrator shouted: “Murderers! Go back to the ovens! You need a big oven.”

He went on to say that

The Arab-Israeli conflict induces strong passions, and the line that separates legitimate disapproval of Israel from anti-Semitism may not always be obvious. But it’s safe to assume the line has been crossed when you hear someone urging Jews “back to the ovens.”

Indeed.  Not only has “the line been crossed,” but such behavior is outrageous.  In a society that correctly condemns racism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of oppression, anti-Semitism must also be condemned wherever and whenever it arises.

Jacoby concluded by noting a column written some years ago by Rep. John Lewis:

Once again, the words of King ran through my memory, “I solemnly pledge to do my utmost to uphold the fair name of the Jews — because bigotry in any form is an affront to us all.”

During an appearance at Harvard University shortly before his death, a student stood up and asked King to address himself to the issue of Zionism. The question was clearly hostile. King responded, “When people criticize Zionists they mean Jews, you are talking anti-Semitism.”

Dr. King was right then, and the sentiment he expressed is right today.

Duane Shank is senior policy advisor for Sojourners.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • erbe
    Zionism and Zionists should be thought of separately from Judaism and Jews. And Israel, as a Zionist state, can be equated with apartheid South Africa and prewar Japan in their "racial" attitudes. Thought of in this way, people can legitimately ask for the destruction of Israel as a Zionist state without hating or behaving with prejudice towards all Jews. Jews should be able to live in Israel/Palestine, Israel/Palestine should not however not be a "Jewish" state.
  • Mark86
    I agree, I don't think that King knew enough about the differences between Zionism and Judaism when he made his comment. I think the Zionistic juggernaut wasn't truly perfected until Ariel Sharon touched it. Zionism must be thought of as a colonizing racist thought process. I don't think it is wrong to associate Zionism with the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. But it is wrong to associate any of these things with the Jewish people. Most of the settlers in Palestine (outside of the more radical sites like Hebron) don't even realize the fact they are occupying someone else's land. All they know is that the Israeli realtors offered them cheap rent to live in a land where they would be secured. Who wouldn't take that in this day and age? But it is, as it is everyones, the responsibility of the Jewish people to educate themselves on the history of the conflict and stand-up to their government.
    The international world gave Israel far to much latitude to repeat the cycle of violence. The best way we all could have responded to the Holocaust is to not let it happen again. But I guess we will have to wait until this round of genocides is over...
  • nuclearferret
    I couldn't disagree more. It is any individual nation-state's decision to determine if it will intermingle religion and state; the US model of secular, religion-less government has its place. But if a nation decides to be a Christian, Muslim or Jewish (or any other) religion-based state, that is their business.

    But you are right about one thing: A "Israel/Palestine" shouldn't be a Jewish state, because it shouldn't exist at all, and shame on the world if that is the "solution."
  • erbe
    I'm sure Jesus was thrilled to see the Zionists appropriate Palestinian land with trickery and subterfuge and when that didn't work with the Irgun and Stern Gang. And I'm sure he was thrilled at how the Zionists went about establishing their state with land appropriated from the Palestinians. And what must really please Jesus now is how the Zionists show their love and compassion to their "enemies". Did Jesus say we were to love our enemies? Turn the other cheek? Oh, I forget the Zionists live by another moral code, promulgated by their "spiritual" ancestor Jacob. And we shouldn't forget the other tenet that is a cornerstone of their moral philosophy - eyes for an eye, teeth for a tooth.

    And of course, the United States government, as the worlds leading "Christian" moral authority, supports Israel's Zionists completely.
  • I made a comment that was a mistake, but one can't "delete".
    So let me say that I would prefer that people used a direct style, and assume that the reader is open.
  • JoannaCW
    Please. I am neither Jewish nor well-versed in Judaism, but certainly honesty, justice for the oppressed and mercy are all well grounded in the Hebrew Scripture. Read the prescriptions for the year of jubilee. Read the prophets. Read the provisions for sanctuary cities. Blaming Israel's present conduct on the Old Testament is as unfair as blaming our own country;'s wars on Christianity.
  • erbe
    Read where the God of the Old Testament told the Israelites to go in and kill every man, woman, and child in the land He was giving them.
  • truthonfire
    Israel is a nation founded on terror and blatant racism. It came into existence principally at the hands of secular Jewish fanatics who had no compunction about brutally murdering the local non-Jewish population. I don't throw around words loosely--the acts of the Haganah, Irgun and Stern Gang ,which were the militarized arm of the Zionist movement ,were unconscionably atrocious and inhumane The state of Israel has systematically continued their reign of terror, murder and deception.

    Israel is anything but a democracy. It features a race-based, multitiered society with apartheid conditions and official preference for Judaic orthodoxy. And as this latest incursion into Gaza has shown, freedom of press is a myth.

    Israel perpetuates an "abused victim" mantra as its national ethos in order to congeal its Jewish citizenry into a paranoid military state and to silence any and all criticism.

    Israel's official stance is that it has a right to defend itself. My question is this: "does a robber have a 'right' to self-defense, even as it ransacks another's property and threatens their lives?" American taxpayers alone spend 3 billion dollars a year arming Israel to the teeth, and yet Israel has the audacity to make an issue about Palestinian resistance and their comparatively miniscule efforts at arming themselves.

    Then there is the insidious movement to stealthily infuse Christianity with Zionist propaganda. That propaganda is that Jews as a people and Israel as a state are sacrosanct--end of story. It is this religious dogma which underlies the indiscriminate financial-political support by the Christian Zionists and which helps ensure Israel's continued impunity. That is not to mention the American Israeli Political Action Committee and its immeasurable political clout.

    If Christians are to assess Israel's existence in light of their sacred text, they must not forget the very words of their lord and savior the Christ himself: "If you (Jerusalem) had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes..."(Luke 19:43) Immediately after saying this Jesus entered the heart of Israel's existence (the temple) and unleashed his fury over their hypocrisy. Why are Christians still cowering to the Zionist hoax of untouchability? There is nothing uniquely sacred about a Jew or Israel--nothing at all. All life is sacred.
  • NMRod
    The challenge is, how can we encourage each other to express love, even when we have grown to think of ourselves as "enemies" and to put the other person first?

    This is the challenge and its fulfillment the blessing of becoming the peacemakers Jesus wants us to be.
  • In response to NMRod, I'd commend Michael Lerner's piece on the "Tikkun" website (http://files.tikkun.org/current/article.php/200...). It was reprinted earlier this week in the London "Times".
  • carlcopas
    Tony, this is a powerful article. Thanks for the link.
  • BuckeyeDon
    I agree with Carlcopas. Thank you.
  • BuckeyeDon
    The points vampire took a point away from Tony_D. Shame. I restored it.
  • pedrud
    I guess that I fail to see how accusing the State of Israel of ethnic cleansing is anti-Semitic. Ethnic cleansing (apartheid, whatever you wish to call it) as Websters defines it is "the expulsion, imprisonment, or killing of an ethnic minority by a dominant majority in order to achieve ethnic homogeneity". These (expulsion, imprisonment, & killing) are the exact actions that the State of Israel and the IDF have taken against Palestinians. This is not anti-Semitic. This is speaking truth and many who support these actions do not want to hear it. Many Christians in America blindly support the State of Israel, yet do not know what actually occurs - nor do they want to. If they did, their consciences would be burdened with such a weight over the inhumane practices used against the Palestinians that they could no longer blindly support Israel.

    Violence begets violence.

    According to the author's logic, condemning Israel for ethnic cleansing is anti-Semitic. Then the next logical step would be that condemning Hamas for their actions would be anti-Palestinain/Arab. However, many freely condemn Hamas for their actions, yet they are a governing body as much as the State of Israel is a governing body. So this argument is not logical.

    If the condemnation of Israel for their political/military actions is anti-Semitic. Then condemnation of Hamas for their political/military actions is equally anti-Palestinian/Arab. However, if Hamas can be criticized and condemned for their political/military actions and it is not seen as anti-Palestinian/Arab, then Israel can equally be criticized and condemned for their political/military actions without it being anti-Semitic.

    Peace, I only hope and pray for peace for us all.
  • cantabrigian
    Amen to that!
  • kevin47
    Ethnic cleansing is violence with the intent to eradicate an entire race in favor of a different race. Israel has demonstrated no interest in ethnic cleansing. Hamas has, though, and Israel is simply defending itself from the aggressor.

    Pretending that responding to rocket attacks constitutes ethnic cleansing may not be anti-Semitic, but it is utterly dishonest.
  • We need a delete. or I do.
  • SisterMarie
    martingugino,

    Although you can't totally delete a comment that you have made, if you write something that you'd like to take back or rephrase, you can click on the reblog link and that will take you back to your post and then you can rewrite it or backspace over it.
  • I agree with your article. A very timely and important point.

    But- not all of the placard examples you gave would be anti-Semitism. Most would be, but I'd pull out two examples as exceptions. To state that what Israel is doing is ethnic cleansing is a statement of fact (true or not), one that President Carter made, and many would agree with.

    And while I disagree with the angry and hate-filled tone, there is a certain truth that many scholars like Walter Wink have noted, in the principle of violent mimicry- we become that which we hate. Many who are pro-Jewish or Jewish themselves have noted with sadness the similarities of tactics *to a certain degree* between the aggressors of WWII and the practices of the IDF. Even in '48, some of the heroes who helped the Jews escape the Nazis, and were present during al Naka, were noticing with horror the similarities. It should be noted, this is nothing like genocide, but there is a certain degree of ethnic cleansing, and eerie similarities between what the Jews faced in '45 and the Palestinians have faced thereafter.
  • rgf
    ARABS ARE SEMITES -- Many Israelis are NOT -- who is concerned about the anti-
    Semitism lobbed at Arabs -- especially by Israelis and their government?
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertisement
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008