RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Crossing the Line Between Legitimate Criticism and Anti-Semitism

by Duane Shank 01-08-2009

It is appropriate and necessary to criticize Israel’s excessive military attacks in Gaza.  We have and will continue to do that, much as we criticize our own government for its excesses in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Military means are not the solution to political problems.

It is not appropriate, and is in fact unacceptable and deplorable, to condemn Israel ’s existence or that of  the Jewish people.  But, as Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby writes, those manifestations of anti-Semitism are seen in the chants and placards at some demonstrations:

Demonstrators chanted “Nuke, nuke Israel!” and carried placards accusing Israel of “ethnic cleansing” and bearing such messages as: “Did Israel take notes during the Holocaust? Happy Hanukkah.” To the dozen or so supporters of Israel gathered across the street, one demonstrator shouted: “Murderers! Go back to the ovens! You need a big oven.”

He went on to say that

The Arab-Israeli conflict induces strong passions, and the line that separates legitimate disapproval of Israel from anti-Semitism may not always be obvious. But it’s safe to assume the line has been crossed when you hear someone urging Jews “back to the ovens.”

Indeed.  Not only has “the line been crossed,” but such behavior is outrageous.  In a society that correctly condemns racism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of oppression, anti-Semitism must also be condemned wherever and whenever it arises.

Jacoby concluded by noting a column written some years ago by Rep. John Lewis:

Once again, the words of King ran through my memory, “I solemnly pledge to do my utmost to uphold the fair name of the Jews — because bigotry in any form is an affront to us all.”

During an appearance at Harvard University shortly before his death, a student stood up and asked King to address himself to the issue of Zionism. The question was clearly hostile. King responded, “When people criticize Zionists they mean Jews, you are talking anti-Semitism.”

Dr. King was right then, and the sentiment he expressed is right today.

Duane Shank is senior policy advisor for Sojourners.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Joelschwartzman
    I didn't respond to the question to enter a debate. You wouldn't agree with my point of view, nor I with yours. Dialogue is not possible when world views are as different as yours and mine. But, I offer thisa prayer on your behalf: God save you from ever facing an enemy like Hamas.
    Joel> Subject: [godspolitics] Re: Crossing the Line Between Legitimate Criticism and Anti-Semitism> From: > To: joelschwartzman@hotmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:54:04 +0000> > PASTOR JEFF wrote, in response to Joelschwartzman:> > Thank you Kevin and Joel. I have no doubt that Israel has the technological capacity to identify their enemies. Unfortunately you both subscribe to the myth of "clean" technology. My doubts are with the fallibility of the users of the technology and it's transition from data to reality.> > Link: http://www.sojo.net/blog/godspolitics/2009/01/0...> > --> You may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off notifications, go to your Disqus settings at: http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/
    _________________________________________________________________
    Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
    http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGL...
  • PASTOR JEFF
    Thank you Kevin and Joel. I have no doubt that Israel has the technological capacity to identify their enemies. Unfortunately you both subscribe to the myth of "clean" technology. My doubts are with the fallibility of the users of the technology and it's transition from data to reality.
  • Joelschwartzman
    The Israelis have informers...what we call HUMIT. They also trace cell phone calls. They have some pretty sophisticated equipment. They should. They invented it!
  • Joelschwartzman
    David Harris, the Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee wrote and your readership might do well to contemplate as they criticize Israel:

    As Israel pursues its military operation against Hamas, preparations are under way around the world for Holocaust Remembrance Day on January 27.

    The two are not disconnected.

    Israel’s policy should be scrutinized like any other state’s, and the loss of any innocent life should be mourned. But some of Israel’s fiercest critics go far beyond the limits of what might be termed rational debate. They have obscenely tried to turn the Holocaust on its head, portraying Israel as committing Nazi-like crimes—the ultimate libel against the Jewish state.

    A Catholic cardinal—and leading Vatican official—refers to Gaza as a “concentration camp.”

    A Greek newspaper entices readers with the banner headline “Holocaust,” referring to Israel’s alleged actions in Gaza.

    A Brazilian newspaper publishes two cartoons—one of Hitler wearing an armband emblazoned with the Star of David and swastika, saluting, “Heil Israel!”; the other of a Star of David casting a shadow in the form of a swastika over the Gaza Strip.

    On his website, white supremacist David Duke reacts to the Gaza crisis by lamenting that Hollywood portrays Jews as Holocaust victims rather than perpetrators.

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez calls on Venezuela’s Jewish community to denounce the “Holocaust” being committed in Gaza.

    Posters equating the Star of David with the Nazi swastika are ubiquitous at anti-Israel rallies around the world.

    A demonstrator in Holland confidently asserts that “Anne Frank would be turning over in her grave” if she saw what was happening in Gaza.

    Shame!

    Israel seeks to defend itself in a highly complex environment, where the adversary, Hamas, cravenly uses civilians as shields and mosques as armories. For that right to protect its citizens, which any sovereign nation would exercise under similar circumstances, it is labeled as the successor to the demonic force that wiped out two-thirds of European Jewry, including 1.5 million children.

    How many times does it need to be said?

    Israel left Gaza in 2005. Israel has repeatedly renounced any territorial ambitions there. Israel gave Gazans the first chance in their history to govern themselves.

    Israel has a vested interest in a peaceful, prosperous, and developing Gaza. This point cannot be stressed enough. After all, the two are destined to share a common border.

    Israel has only one overarching concern in Gaza: Does it pose a security threat to neighboring Israel? The answer, tragically, is clear. That was the result of a decision taken in Gaza, not Israel. Hamas was chosen to rule, and choices have consequences. After all, Hamas denies Israel’s right to exist.

    Why were tunnels built across the Egyptian border? What are the Iranian-made Grad missiles going through those tunnels to Gaza meant for? And why are Hamas fighters going through those tunnels in the other direction for training in Iran and Lebanon?

    More than 10,000 rockets, missiles, and mortars have been fired at southern Israel from Gaza in the past eight years. Towns and villages have lived under constant threat. If some of those projectiles were crude and missed their targets, it was not for lack of trying. Their aim is to kill, maim, and intimidate as many civilians as possible. Everything is fair game—homes, hospitals, schools, playgrounds. The trauma this has created cannot be adequately described.

    And for what? To “liberate” Gaza? Well, Gaza is already under Hamas, not Israeli, rule. No, more likely, to eventually “liberate” Israel from Israeli rule.

    But wait.

    What about all the clergy, cartoonists, protesters, and politicians so concerned about the human rights of those in Gaza? Have they ever uttered a peep while those 10,000 rockets, missiles, and mortars were raining down on southern Israel? Did they ever take to the streets to support the human rights of Israelis? Did they ever read the Hamas Charter and hear the echoes of Mein Kampf and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, two European books that helped to condemn Jews to their death?

    Did they ever put two and two together and ask what would happen if Hamas married its annihilationist goals with ever more advanced weaponry? And did it occur to them that, yes, nearly six million Israeli Jews would be in the crosshairs?

    To ask these questions is to answer them, which probably means one of two things.

    Either the accusers are totally clueless about the Holocaust and, therefore, incapable of understanding why their words and actions are so outrageous.

    Or they are deliberately manipulating history, distorting the truth, and twisting facts for a larger political purpose.

    What could that purpose be?

    Well, for starters, extreme right, extreme left, and radical Islamic groups have found something to agree on—the Holocaust complicates their goals.

    For the extreme right, by seeking to deny or minimize the Holocaust, the crime of their predecessors, they have tried to burnish their credentials as a “responsible” element in more mainstream society.

    For the extreme left, the Holocaust is seen as a basis for the subsequent creation of the State of Israel, a nation whose right to exist they single-mindedly deny.

    And for radical Islamic groups, the Holocaust is regarded as a perennial source of sympathy for Israel, undermining efforts to chip away at its legitimacy.

    These three movements can’t agree on much, but they seem to have a convergent interest in hijacking the Holocaust and using it against Israel.

    And there are others, especially in Europe, who don’t fit into any of these three categories but may have their own Holocaust-related agenda.

    Perhaps it’s an effort to get out from under the moral weight of the genocide. After all, it was the sins of commission by the perpetrators, abetted by the sins of omission on the part of bystanders, that amounted to the Final Solution. How could Europe – especially the Europe that today sees itself as a source of such enlightenment and reason – have been the stage for such a monstrous crime against humanity just a few short decades ago?

    And, of course, the Europe in which the Holocaust unfolded was a continent already haunted by the crowded presence of Jewish ghosts—victims of centuries of expulsions, pogroms, ghettos, pales of settlement, inquisitions, forced conversions, discriminatory laws, professional restrictions, conspiracy theories, blood libels, and the teaching of contempt.

    Pinning a swastika on Israel, and, by extension, its supporters, can be unburdening. It allows for a catharsis of the spirit. Given a measure of power, the argument goes, the Jews behave no differently than the Nazis. According to this inverted, not to mention perverted, logic, the only lesson of the Holocaust is to stand up for targeted “victims.” And who is that targeted victim today? The Palestinians of Gaza, of course.

    The Holocaust taught several lessons. This January 27th would be a good time to remind the world of what they are.

    First, sometimes people mean what they say. Hitler spelled out his ambitions well in advance. Too few took him seriously. Until late in the day, there were those leaders in Europe who believed that he could be reasoned with, that his words were simply hyperbolic, that negotiations were possible, and that compromises could be reached. Is it possible that Hamas and its patron, Iran, actually mean what they say when they speak of a world without Israel?

    Second, there is such a thing as a just war. War should be the last option, but there are times when it must remain an option. Had the Allied nations not declared war on the Third Reich, how would the world have looked? Mind you, that war was neither “clean” nor “surgical,” and Allied leaders were hardly preoccupied with debates over “proportionality.”

    As diplomacy offered no solution and restraint met with no reciprocity, what was Israel supposed to do in the face of Hamas’s arms buildup and daily barrage of fire? Simply accept the role of sitting duck so that it might aspire to the moral high ground of victimhood?

    And third, defenselessness is no strategy. Jews were defenseless against the Nazi onslaught. They had no army, no recourse to weapons, and few who sought to defend them. Jews learned, at high cost, never to permit such vulnerability again.

    So, as January 27th approaches, and we recall the six million, spare us the lip service and the crocodile tears from those who would accuse Israel of Nazi-like crimes.

    Remembering dead Jews is important, yes, but protecting living Jews is no less significant.
  • vetcurt
    Oops, I just never heard about the vast forest or swamp lands of Gaza. I keep hearing and reading that it is one of the most densely populated areas on earth. I remember that there were olive orchards that families had earned a living from for generations that the Israelis bulldozed. Some of that happened after their brave soldiers shot some olive pickers and Israel was stung by the criticism. So they solved that problem.... I didn't realize that the dust I see blowing around over there came from swamps.
    To paraphrase you: Killing the Palestinians is just a means to an end. Getting them to flee to refugee camps in Egypt or Lebanon or Syria of Jordan would work just as well.
    Sad how similar both sides are. Both want the land but not the people on the land. Considering the Holocaust, it would have been more just to carve a Jewish state out of parts of Germany and Austria. Of course, the French, Italians, Poles Czechs and most other Europeans had their share of guilt also, but I don't recall that at that time the Arabs were slaughtering the Jews.
    Maybe if the Jews would go back to the 1967 borders of Israel peace would have a chance. But who wants peace unless they can have their way first?
  • kevin47
    Wrong answer.

    For starters, they hide themselves among people, not trees or swamps.

    The reason they do so is so that they know that Israel will be condemned for any civilian casualties accrued while targetting Hamas. Killing the Jews is really just a means to an end. Getting them shipped back to Europe through diplomatic pressure will work just as well.
  • kevin47
    Seriously?

    For starters:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossad

    You know how terrorist organizations will capture intelligence officers, kill them, and trade their corpses for political prisoners? What do you suppose those officers were doing? Profiling?
  • Hanita
    Love shown to Palestinians by Israelis:

    Arafat had no choice but to start a first and second Intifada because the 'Palestinian' population was losing interest in a separate state. Why? there was so much contact, true connections made, good economic cooperation, friendships, intermingling, that the borders faded. Economic data is available about business cooperation for those interested in digging up facts.
    When the second Intifada began and the creation of artificial borders were put into effect, a huge population of Arabs were cut off from work and money. Israelis, in large numbers, past employers, friends, went into the countryside, where there were still no walls and fences, and handed over money to help those stranded without money. The Israeli Army patrols knew of this and looked the other way, ignoring these contacts to allow for the relief. No one Newspaper ever reported this. It was not fashionable. These acts were not done by a few, but very large numbers. Until today, there are some Moslems who detest at what Arafat and company and the Hamas have done to the People and Land. There are many among them who cheer on the Israelis. Just ask yourselves, how do the Israelis know where all the heads are? Who do you think is telling them?
    What is most unfortunate is the the children are being trained as suicide bombers in large numbers. If parents will open up their mouths, the children are taught to spy on the parents and they are killed. More people are killed at their own hands of the Hamas among themselves, than all the Israeli fire. But you won't hear this either, at least not yet. It will come out in the future, when Gazans will gain freedom to speak and not be killed for speaking. That is the tragedy, the training of the children in large numbers as a suicide army, and it is not only directed against Judaism, but also Christianity. Anyone who will not abide by the strictest code of Shariyah is not to be left alive. That is what they teach and brainwash the children. Is that what you want to give love to? That is self destruction. But Israel has not wanted to ever let down friends, Moslem or Christian. There is room in Israel for all, despite what is written.
  • PASTOR JEFF
    How do they "target Hamas"? Does Hamas wear identifying clothing or do they just profile them?
  • kevin47
    The problem is that Hamas is all too willing to hide themselves amongst the people who elected them, which Israeli soldiers also do not do.

    Do you know why they do this?
  • vetcurt
    1. If you were Hamas looking at the enormous advantage of Israel's military, would you choose to fight on the open? They are not that stupid either. Our generals also complain that al-Qada won't fight in the open, just like they complained about the Viet cong. The enemy seldom chooses to fight on your terms. Guerilla warfare is nothing new. Before Israel was a state, they did not challenge the British to a fight in the open either.
    2. Since Gaza is not a state and is not allowed to have a military, they do not have bases or military vehicles, planes or ships to defend.
    I read at a civil war site that the reason Lincoln and Grant pursued Lee so relentlessly after Gettysburg was that they were afraid Lee would melt into the hills and fight a guerilla war. The next statement was that they knew a standing army had never won a war against a guerilla insurgency. It that was true then, I believe it is still true today. I don't think Israel has any new answer to that. Are they willing to be as ruthless in "draining the swamp" as the Russians in Afghanistan or Georgia? It appears perhaps so, but Russia hasn't made it work either.
  • vetcurt
    So what? I assume you are referring to the story in the Old Testament about God giving the land to the Jews. We do not have the government enforce the particular laws or beliefs of any religion in this country. It is called separation of church and state. No title office would recognize a claim based on "God gave it to me". No matter how zealously you or anyone else may claim your rights based on your holy book, the United States Government should not be using its power to enforce your beliefs I am one taxpayer that doesn't want to be taxed to provide defense of the land claims of Israel's Jews.
    What land are you claiming anyway? If it is the land of the 12 tribes, when will the land east of the Jordan be claimed?
  • vetcurt
    I would hope it is a gross misunderstanding but Israel would have to prove that. It is not deceit (concealment of the truth in order to mislead). We do not know what the truth is but indications are that there isn't much hesitation to shoot. If a group of unarmed Palestinian protestors marched toward one of the illegal settlements or checkpoints, can you guarantee they wouldn't be shot? It is my understanding of international agreement that they are citizens of Israel, or Israel is at least responsible for their well being, since Israel claimed captured of the land.
    I don't buy for an instant that Israel makes a significant effort to minimize civilian casualties. If I was mugged and robbed and the mugger ran into a crowd and then I pulled a gun and shot into the crowd, I could claim I wasn't targeting the crowd but I doubt the courts would agree.
    I was in artillery fire direction control in the military. Don't tell me artillery pieces are precision weapons. Tanks shooting other than line-of-sight are worse. The pictures of ordinance from planes spreading across the sky before descending on a city do not indicate precision weapons. When a multi-story building in a dense urban setting is destroyed by a bomb and the blast rips the walls off the surrounding buildings, I don't care if it was a precision weapon or not. If a nuke could be precisely dropped down a specific manhole, would the precision of the drop have any significance?
    This is how you minimize civilian casualties: stop bombing where they are. Continuing to bomb and repeatedly saying you are sorry doesn't relieve one of moral responsibility.
    According to Israel, Hamas has been shooting thousands of rockets and have hit about 10 people. They don't seem to be capable of targeting much of anything with their relatively rudimentary rockets.
    I think both sides should be disarmed and prevented from re-arming. Since we believe in fair fights in this country, the alternative if they insist on fighting is to arm both sides equally. Maybe a MAD policy would inhibit both sides. It worked during the cold war.
  • kevin47
    "They could all line up and march like Ghandi had the Indians do, but I don't think Israel has the aversion to shooting unarmed resistors like the English did."

    This represents a gross misunderstanding (or outright deceit) regarding Israel's actions. They are targetting Hamas, and always make an effort no minimize civilian casualites. Hamas, on the other hand, targets only civilians.
  • djd1258
    How about carved out by gods hand. Do you know the origin of the palistinians?
    a Roman general named Hadrian hated the jewis people so much that after 70 ad he changed the maps to read "palistine" they never were nor are they now intitled by God or anyone else as heirs to the land they claim belongs to them
  • djd1258
    How about carved out by gods hand. Do you know the origin of the palistinians?
    a Roman general named Hadrian hated the jewis people so much that after 70 ad he changed the maps to read "palistine" they never were nor are they now intitled by God or anyone else as heirs to the land they claim belongs to them
  • kevin47
    Ethnic cleansing is violence with the intent to eradicate an entire race in favor of a different race. Israel has demonstrated no interest in ethnic cleansing. Hamas has, though, and Israel is simply defending itself from the aggressor.

    Pretending that responding to rocket attacks constitutes ethnic cleansing may not be anti-Semitic, but it is utterly dishonest.
  • djd1258
    How about carved out by gods hand. Do you know the origin of the palistinians?
    a Roman general named Hadrian hated the jewis people so much that after 70 ad he changed the maps to read "palistine" they never were nor are they now intitled by God or anyone else as heirs to the land they claim belongs to them
  • djd1258
    How about G
  • vetcurt
    Are you talking about the minority of Palestinians that refuse to recognize the state that was carved out of that part of the world by the U.S. and Europeans in payment for Europe's involvement in the Holocaust?
    Or are you referring to the minority of Jews who claim the lands of Palestine are theirs based on a couple of versus out of the old testament?
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008