RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

My Obama Inauguration Benediction: A Singular Moment in Time

by Joseph Lowery 01-14-2009

Rev. Joseph E. Lowery, dubbed “the dean of the civil rights movement” by the NAACP and co-founder with Rev. Martin Luther King of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, will deliver the benediction at the inauguration of President Obama on January 20. Sojourners asked Rev. Lowery to reflect for us on how he feels to be asked to lead the benediction at the inauguration of American’s first African-American president. We are grateful for his generous response. —The Editors

You would think attempting to summarize my feelings on having been asked to deliver the benediction at the inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama would be simple.

In fact, it’s quite a challenge, given the flood of emotions I have experienced in the past few weeks and months

Of course, at one level, I’m humbled and honored.

Like most Americans of a particular age, I never thought I’d live to see the day….

At an entirely different level, I’m engaged in a spiritual experience like nothing I have ever been exposed to—at any point in my life.

And this comes from one who shared in the Dream my friend and colleague Martin Luther King Jr. taught the nation about one hot August afternoon 45 years ago.

It comes from one who fought for the Voting Rights Act, for a Civil Rights Bill, and to free South Africa and liberate Nelson Mandela from 27 years of confinement as a political prisoner.

But, there’s something much greater at work here.

I first sensed it in the snows of Iowa and New Hampshire where I saw the ruddy, frozen cheeks of white college students standing in snowdrifts up to their knees in support of the candidacy of  Barack Obama.

I saw it as I watched a new generation text-messaging and using their iPods to spread the word about this extraordinary man.

I watched in awe, and with great satisfaction, as record numbers of Americans — black, white, young, old, Latino, gay and straight, rich and poor — registered to vote in order that they might participate in the greatest calling of a democracy: the right to engage in participatory democracy.

And it was a beautiful thing to see.

Finally, like most of us, I’m conscious of being called on to say something for those who are no longer here to share in this incredible event.

I think of Martin, Medgar Evers, and Ralph Abernathy. I wish Jimmy Lee Jackson, Viola Luizzo, and Rev. James Orange could be here to share in this.

I think of countless, unheralded heroes and heroines, and their innumerable acts of personal courage, struggle, and sacrifice that built the movement that on November 4, 2008, delivered Change to America.

I thank a loving and caring God who has allowed me to witness this watershed moment.

Like all Americans of good will,  I say a prayer that a wise God will continue to guide and bless our new president as he navigates the ship of state through dangerous and challenging seas.

But I know too, as always, that the God on whom we depend did not bring us this far along the way to abandon us.

And, I know that what we  are about to witness is an omnipotent God using his faithful and trusting children to continue the labor of bringing the Beloved Community to reality here on earth.

Amen

portrait-joseph-loweryRev. Joseph E. Lowery is founder of the Joseph E. Lowery Institute for Justice and Human Rights at Clark Atlanta University.

Categories: Activism, Diversity, Race
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • nuclearferret
    As benedictions go, that was a real disappointment. It utterly failed to convey any of the spirit expressed in the post made above.
  • WitnessforPeace
    Joe_Allen_Doty: Correct! Any speculations I enter in my blog may or may not be helpful applications of what Jesus originally meant.
    Carolcopas: Just 5 minutes ago I read another hearty recommendation of Bauckham on Revelation(Cambridge University Press 1993). Thank you for the confirmation!
  • carlcopas
    Jonabark,
    I would strongly urge you to read either of the two books by Timothy Keller that WitnessForPeace mentions.

    You might also look at Richard Bauckham's book on theology and Revelations. BuckeyeDon is right about the original intention of Revelations and about how it's been badly misinterpreted by the dispensationalist crowd.
  • hammerud
    Ando, So you would be willing to use force to protect them -- it seems
    you do not reject military strength, just the misuse of military
    strength. In my mind, the national defense is the valid purpose of
    the military, and is the reason I agree with you that most of our
    policies since WWII have been misguided. National defense though
    means more when we maintain a culture worth defending; and it, in my
    mind, is deteriorating rapidly, right before our eyes. By the way,
    what does "BTW" mean? Both Joshua and Gideon followed directions from
    God in their battles. They didn't dismiss military might, unless, as
    with Gideon, God limited the force. Winston
  • ando
    hammerud-
    My wife and children are not "goods." They're made in the image of
    God. Two way different things.

    BTW: If we are living like God wanted us, wouldn't we rely on Him
    leading us to victory in war, ala Joshua and Gideon, instead of having
    to really on a huge military. Just a thought. I don't have an
    answer....





    Quoting Disqus <>:
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    Actually Jesus was talking to the hypocrites who "searched the Scriptures to find loopholes to support their hypocritical lifestyle" and they thought by doing that they would have eternal life.
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    Scriptural authority? You mean the kind as in the Old Testament that if you have an adult son who is lazy and/or refuses to obey your wishes, you can take him and your case to the town elders and if they agree with you, they will execute him by stoning him?

    Jesus' authority on the earth is the Holy Spirit. There is no scriptural authority against same-gender marriages.

    And when one really knows the Bible texts in their historical and cultural context, there is no condemnation of homosexuals in the Bible either.

    Same-gender sexual activity done in pagan fertility temples (see Leviticus 18 through 20 and Romans 1) is not homosexuality. What would a homosexual be doing participating in a fertility ritual honoring a pagan god or goddess as in those chapters?
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    When retired US Army General, Wes Clark was on Chris Matthews' Hardball show on MSNBC, Matthews tried to get Wes to say "Civil unions for gays and marriages for the heterosexuals."

    But, Wes, a fellow Vietnam Veteran, refused and he said, "Equal rights for all under the law! Let the churches call same-sex marriages whatever they want; but, give the same equal marriage rights for gays and lesbians."

    If a couple in any state has a marriage license filed with a civil court clerk or local government marriage bureau, it really is a civil document.

    Churches don't issue marriage licenses in the United States of America. Church weddings are not even required by law in the USA.

    Interracial marriages used to not be legal in all states. But, the US Supreme Court got that changed.

    So, if a same-sex marriage is legal in another state, it should be recognized as legal in all 50 states, too.

    Almost all of the arguments against same-sex marriages are (theoretically) based on the Bible, even when the person arguing against it is an atheist.
  • BuckeyeDon
    "The revenge fantasy I was talking about is Revelation which many discount as a valid christian document"

    I have to disagree, jonabark, even though, yes, you are correct that Revelation has had detractors within the Christian community from the beginning.

    However, just because the document is commonly grossly misinterpreted (e.g., by the Left Behind crowd, who see it as a detailed outline of how the world will end) doesn't mean it isn't legitimately Scripture. Revelation's original audience was Christians coming under increased pressure and persecution from the Roman empire. The book was intended as an aid and comfort to such persecuted Christians, and the highly symbolic language would have been so understood. The theme is that God is in control of history, not that God is going to unleash some awful tribulation on the world at some point in the future.
  • hammerud
    I absolutely agree that we are an empire in decline -- morally,
    culturally, spiritually, and economically. What is a little shocking
    to me is the rapidity with which it is happening. I also agree with
    our policies since WWII. I certainly do not defend decisions I
    disagree with your view of Revelation and the Gospel of John. I don't
    put much stock in these critics that come up with those conclusions.
    If we cannot depend on the Word of God, then there is no reliable
    frame of reference for anything. I know that the Word is completely
    reliable. For me personally, it is like having been thirsty and then
    having someone give me a drink of water, quenching my thirst.
    Following that, someone comes along and argues with me that water
    really is of no value (which is what these critics do by undermining
    the "water of the Word"). Well, argue as he will about water, I know
    that when I was thirsty, water quenched my thirst. So it is with the
    Bible. In my own experience, 45 years ago, I remember the Word be dry
    and uninteresting to me. Then, at age 19, I came to know Christ. One
    of the most startling things that occurred in my experience is that
    the Word became alive to me. A thirst I had in my soul for an answer
    to what I perceived as the vanity of life, disappeared once I invited
    Christ into my heart and has never returned. My thirst was quenched
    and the Word has spoken to my heart ever since. I have been reading
    11 chapters a day, every day for the last nearly 40 years now. I know
    the Word fairly well, and I know it is the Word of God. This is what
    I read every day: 1 chapter from the chapters from Genesis 1 thru the
    end of Job; 5 Psalms; 1 Proverb (gets you thru Psalms and Proverbs
    every month); one chapter from the beginning of Ecclesiastes thru the
    end of the O; one chapter from the gospels; one chapter from the
    beginning of Acts thru the end of Revelation; and one chapter from the
    beginning of Romans thru Jude (sometimes the last two sort of
    overlap). It takes me about 45 minutes a day, but the Word is alive to
    me and I know it is God's Word. I do the reading because it comforts
    my soul and helps me draw close to God. It also enables me to teach
    an adult SS class each week. A knowledge of the Word enables me to do
    so. Arguments about all the problems with Scripture just don't mean
    anything to me -- like someone telling me water won't quench thirst
    when it quenched mine. I find it interesting that the first
    interaction of Satan with man was to question the Word, with his "Yea,
    hath God said." I don't mean all of this to attack you -- just
    letting you know my experience and my rationale for dismissing the
    critics. Anyway, Ando, good interacting with you. Winston
  • jonabark
    The revenge fantasy I was talking about is Revelation which many discount as a valid christian document, or an accurate prophecy, or vision of Jesus . It is extremely unlikely to be the work of John the beloved. Neither is John's Gospel.

    I can understand why you see the strength of the military separately from the abuse of military power , but the truth is that boys with toys want to play. We spend more on the military than t rest of the nations combined. If you had a neighbor who did that you would wonder about his mental health. Our borders are North america to Canada, Hawaii, and Alaska. Why do we need over 700 military bases around the world? What I am speaking of is not mistakes or misuse, but a consistent policy of using military power for the economic interests of the powerful. This is best documented in the work of Chalmers Johnson, but also in ex Nixon Republican Kevin Philips.

    I am not asking us to disarm, but we spend more pom the ilitary as a percentage of our budget than we did in WW2. This is profoundly immoral and typical of empires in decline.
  • WitnessforPeace
    P.P.S.Jesus also spoke things such as "You search the Scriptures--they testify of me." Far from defending the powerful, Jesus and his followers accept ridicule and scorn (or ought to!) whether it is in the form of physical danger or rebuke and distortion in the media for our positions on poverty and sexual ethics. You can find comments on the modern day Pharisees at joyfulreality.blogspot.com
  • WitnessforPeace
    Thanks for sharing your opinion, Jonaberk. Such beliefs are common in the US and Western Europe, and not just among the liberal elite. But historic Christianity has found acceptance in a diverse array of cultures, "strong" and "weak" alike, some of which are starting to send missionaries to the skeptical West. A pastor in the heart of the unbelieving “First World” has written a couple of humble, thoughtful books you might find unexpectedly interesting: “The Prodigal God” and “The Reason for God.” Tim Keller has been called a 21st century C.S.Lewis, although he might find the comparison a bit embarrassing and intimidating. Blessings, Witness for Peace
    P.S. Analogia scriptura would flow naturally from passages such as “All Scripture is God breathed and profitable....”
  • jonabark
    This so-called principle can only be found in fantasyland. It is not in the Bible which has quite a few contradictions, unscientific statements, historical fabrications, and fables.

    This kind of "interpretation" is like blind patriotism: it produced the Inquisition, and a great many holy wars. For some reason the God of this interpretation always wants the strong to destroy the weak, the well armed to crush the unarmed, the rich to get richer and the poor can wait for "heaven", neatly positioned after death. Jesus challenged all this nonsense. All of it.
  • jonabark
    A lot of the bad "out there" is the long history of US militarism, apart from WW2, almost entirely aggressive and involving terror violence against civilians for political purposes, or seizure/control of land or natural resources. The book you refer to is a sick revenge fantasy and nothing to do with Jesus' life or teachings.
  • hammerud
    Ando -- there definitely is something to be said for that, but would
    you protect your family (wife and children) if they were being
    threatened with harm?
  • hammerud
    Jona - I agree with you on the misuse of the military and faulty, self-
    serving, and evil policy decisions; but that does not mean that a
    strong military is unnecessary in a world where there are many other
    similar, evil forces.
    If a nation is godly and righteous in a world such as we have, that
    nation will need a strong military to protect itself. Admittedly, the
    military can be, and has been, misused; but that is a separate issue
    from the fundamental need for protective strength in this sick world.
    By the way, I did not refer to a book when I mentioned "analogia
    scriptura." It is a concept based on the fact that "all Scripture is
    given by inspiration of God." So, when there seems to be
    contradictory verses, proper interpretation will reconcile the
    apparent contradictions. I'm not sure what you mean by a "sick
    revenge fantasy." All use of force is not necessarily revenge. It may
    simply be for protection. Jesus even referred to taking up the sword
    in Luke 22. He recognized the need for personal protection in this
    fallen world. Appreciate your thoughts though. Winston
  • ando
    Then we shall respectfully disagree. I don't believe that the goal of
    this life is to "keep our goods". I think that's called materialism
    -- or what Ronald Reagan called "Americanism"

    Andy Anderson

    Quoting Disqus <>:
  • WitnessforPeace
    I intended to say “Sabbath which is explained as...” Pardon my lisping/lithping. No offense to lispers!
    This is a free country and I heartily invite you to believe anything you want. I'm explaining the historic Christian position. On the rare occasions when Sojourners talks about theology, they seem to affirm basic Christian beliefs. The historic doctrines of Protestants and Catholics generally agree with one another more closely than, say, liberal Presbyterians and conservative Presbyterians today. That's because the pre-modern/modern split [truth is absolute/truth is relative] is a much deeper divide than an argument over transubstantiation by two theologians who nonetheless were arguing according to the same rules. Please post at joyfulreality.blogspot.com if you think this is getting off topic
    Blessings,
  • WitnessforPeace
    A good book on this is “How to read the Bible for all its Worth” by Gordon Fee et al. Christians can learn much from the Hebrew Bible, which are the Scriptures the New Testament talks about (I Tim....)
    But Fee says that nothing from the OT is binding unless it's affirmed in the New. And a lot is, including all Ten Commandments. Jesus even strengthened some of them[lust, anger]. A possible exception is keeping the Sabbath with is explained as “made for humans” not the other way around. And, of course, these are standards for behavior, not a means of obtaining favor before God or to keep up good appearances among men and women.
    Blessings,
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008