RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Pastor-in-Chief

by Diana Butler Bass 02-10-2009

In this week’s town hall meetings, President Obama demonstrated an important aspect of his office: Pastor-in-Chief.

Americans do not elect a president on the basis of theology or denomination, but we do elect presidents on the basis of how well they comfort us in times of crisis and fear. In Elkhart, Indiana, and Fort Myers, Florida, President Obama listened to people’s concerns and answered questions with a kind of intellectual and emotional honesty that is too often rare in public life. As President Obama heard homeless Henrietta Hughes plead for assistance, I thought of the many times I have held someone’s hand at the church door after preaching and how people pour out their hearts to leaders who listen. As the president engaged the crowd, he maintained the demeanor of pastoral politics—holding the nation’s metaphorical hand and offering comfort, reassurance, and help.

Although Americans separated church and state long before other western countries considered the possibility, we kept the longing that somehow our president would serve in the role of a communal comforter, a leader who would make meaning out of trials and suffering, and steady the rudder of hope. A “pastor” to the nation.

Of course, not every president has had to engage pastoral politics and not everyone has been good at it. And in peaceful times, the nation has no need of a pastor-in-chief. But this is not one of those times.

Abraham Lincoln, whose bicentennial we celebrate this week, was—among other things—a good pastor-in-chief. We do well to remember his words in 1865, at the time of the nation’s worst political crisis:

With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation’s wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan – to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.

Pastor-in-chief is only one of the myriad roles we ask our president to embody. We also need President Obama to be a tough politician, a wise coalition builder, a savvy economist, a military commander, and an expert in international relations. We expect a lot. We need a lot. But we are ready to bind the nation’s wounds and care for the sick, widows, and orphans. It is time to both comfort the flock and rally the troops of compassion. In these days, it is good to know that the president is also a pastor.

Diana Butler BassDiana Butler Bass (www.dianabutlerbass.com) is the author of the forthcoming A People’s History of Christianity: The Other Side of the Story (March 2009).

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Rustyskid
    Is this a joke? Seriously.
  • Ditto that here.
  • squeaky
    Well, I have to admit, I think the title is a bit strong. That said, I remember my aunt from Tulsa (a pretty strong Republican) telling me how much it meant to the citizens of Oklahoma City when Bill Clinton spoke there after the Oklahoma City bombing.

    I wouldn't go so far as to say part of the job is "pastoring", but I do agree that part of the job is offering words that give comfort, hope, and encouragement during difficult times, as well as words to rally citizens around a common goal.
  • Guest
    Sure Squeak , I think the president takes on a role of somewhat like a Political Father , sort of taking care and protecting all of us . Its why I think some of us get so mad at each other when you put down a Presdent as a liar , fear monger , etc . Why even those on the left were disgusted with Bill Clinton with his sex capades . You don't want your Father acting like that .

    But thinking well of Obama should not stop us from looking at things objectively . Dads can make mistakes .

    I think that is where Dianna goofs up as far as being a blogger here . She allows her idealogy to get in her way of seeing "everything" and other sides of the problem . Regardless if even she agrees with them .


    .
  • Its why I think some of us get so mad at each other when you put down a Presdent as a liar , fear monger , etc .

    That had to to with political tactics to get one's agenda enacted, never mind the law or common sense. The truth is that GWB did do those things to pump himself up as a "leader" -- but he ended up falling on his face and many fell on their swords. Remember the "war on terror?" That cost the Republican Party big time.
  • nuclearferret
    Pastor-in-Chief? No. Being comforting to a homeless woman at a rally is a kind thing. Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before. The threat is different: It no longer is a Muslim waiting to blow up the Piggly Wiggly, it is a recession that will close said store. Unless Congress spends another $750B-$1T dollars on a huge variety of programs, most of which are operating on continuing resolutions because this "crisis" must be spent towards now.

    Have to admit, Joe Biden's honesty is refreshing, even if the President doesn't know what he is talking about. 30% chance of failure, even if they do everything right (which, as demonstrated by the appointments of Tom Daschle and Timothy Geithner) won't happen.
  • kevin47
    "Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before."

    I thought about that, too. Where is the hemming and hawing about the politics of fear?
  • False. GWB used the politics of fear to fight an enemy "out there," spending billions on a wasteful and unnecessary war to prop himself up. Obama is addressing problems right here, right now that affect virtually everyone in this country -- including yourself, I'm sure.

    Are you ever willing to give Obama a break instead of just back-benching?
  • Empire abroad and an empire at home are the same false god, and using the politics of fear is wrong in both areas.
  • There's a difference, however, in being a servant and being a bully.
  • Yep, there sure is. That doesn't excuse bullying at home. We are being bullied into agreeing with the Administration on his ideas to "save our economy" (which was largely caused by government interference in the first place).
  • That's the first misinterpretation because making a strong case does not equal bullying, as much as you may want it to. On top of that, Obama has a habit of listening to the other side to try to seek consensus. The conservatives who run the Republican Party, on the other hand, are the real bullies in all this -- they want their way BAMN and will hamstring their opponents in the process. Someone needs to tell them off but good, and he's about to do that.
  • kevin47
    He didn't say making a strong case equals bullying. He said, correct me if I'm wrong, that threatening economic collapse and telling the American people they "don't need to be convinced," is bullying.
  • Excuse me -- but what's bullying about speaking the truth? Are you denying that we're in economic free fall? Or is it, as I suspect, that you object to both the messenger and the specific plan that he proposes? Let's see his critics come up with something better -- those in Congress can't because they helped cause the problem in the first place.
  • kevin47
    "Are you denying that we're in economic free fall? "

    He didn't say that we are in economic free fall. He said that we will be if we don't support the stimulus bill, which will doing nothing to stem such a free fall should it occur. At present, no I don't think we are in free fall.





    ________________________________
  • Then I will say you're in total denial.
  • squeaky
    Why don't you think we are in economic free fall?
  • kevin47
    We haven't really seen how the economy responds, or whether new developments influence the economic cycle. In particular, social media has the power to reshape the way people utilize the Internet, which is going to create demand for new products and services.

    If the innovation fails to restore the economy, then we know we are in trouble.






    ________________________________
  • derelicte
    Okay, I gotta say something here. Thing is, if you think the Pelosi, Reid and the far Left crew isn't bullying here, you're kinda out of it. Moveon.org and a couple other groups actually ran commercials against Republicans who were causing trouble for the bill. Why? Silence the opposition and cause them to SUBMIT. If Obama were making a strong case, fine. But, here's the thing: He hasn't been. Even the people over at Salon.com and the Times could tell. No, what he's been doing lately is telling us that if we don't pass the bill, right now, without examining it a little more, modifying it, taking out the crap that even Democrats admit is nothing but wasteful, pork-barrel spending, then the economy will suffer. The amazing thins is that the vast majority of the bill is for spending in 2010 and 2011. Stopping, waiting for some debate and REAL consensus would be a good thing. But Obama isn't doing that. Instead he's taking his trump card, "I won", shoving it down the opposition's throat and then trying to scare us all into supporting the bill. Its the politics of fear. I don't care what you say about Bush or the Republicans, just don't be blind to what's happening currently.
  • jeffp
    Great contribution
  • jeffp
    Wow, I lost points for complementing someone.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008