RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

India’s Women Stand Up to Religious Bullies

by Julie Clawson 02-23-2009

At the end of January in Mangalore, India, a group of right-wing extremists, the Sri Rama Sena, entered a bar and assaulted the women there.   This pro-Hindu group is known for its moral policing and told the authorities that they attacked the women “because of the attitude of the young women.” They accused the women of “involving themselves in immoral activities, including consuming alcohol, dressing indecently, and mixing with youths of other faith.”  These men used their religion and personal conception of Indian culture as excuses to violently lash out against those whose lifestyles they disagreed with.  The attack, which involved the men beating, chasing, and kicking the women who fell down, was caught on tape and aired on Indian television to a shocked public.

The response from women was swift.  Since the Sena also threatened to attack any couple they found celebrating on Valentine’s Day, a campaign was created asking women to stand up against extremism and bullying on February 14.  Supporters were asked to send the Sena pink chaddis (Indian slang for underwear) and to deliberately go to pubs on Valentine’s Day.  A group called the “Consortium of Pub-going, Loose and Forward Women” formed on Facebook and in about a week’s time grew to over 50,000 members (one of the fastest growing groups ever).   The Sena has yet to comment on the protest and consortium members are moving forward in a new campaign to help assert the diversity of Indian culture.

I applaud these women for taking a stand against those who would use violence to control them, but it was a sobering reminder of the ways religion is used to bully women.  Perhaps women aren’t always being brutally attacked in the streets, but they still have violence perpetrated against them.  Violence also consists of emotional insults used to belittle and demean, as well as manipulative strategies employed to exert control over others.

I’ve been a part of Christian culture long enough to hear my fair share of violent talk from men attempting to bully me into their vision for the world.  I’ve been condemned for the same “immoral activities” the Sena attacked the Indian women for.  As a student at a Christian college, I constantly read fliers or letters in the student newspaper about how indecently the girls on campus dressed.  We were told that it was our fault for causing the men to stumble and that if we were good Christians we would dress differently.  Looking back, I know that in that conservative Midwestern environment we actually were extremely modest in our dress, but had been manipulated into feeling sinful and guilty by those wishing to control us and abdicate their personal issues onto us.

This same violent manipulation is used by those who blame women for getting raped because of their appearance or who tell women that they deserve to be hit by their husbands.  Choosing to emotionally terrorize women and force blame onto women for the sins of men is simply just another form of violent control.  And using religion and cultural ideology as rationales for the violence makes its impact all the more damaging.

So I find campaigns like the pink chaddis to be inspiring.  These are rallying cries that bring together women in order to overturn the manipulation and control.  The violence and bullying can easily continue controlling women unless an effort is made to take a stand.  These women are telling the world that they have a right to not be humiliated, guilt-tripped, or terrorized by ideologies.  They will not let fear permit the strong arm of violence to destroy their lives.

And unlike in ages past where women were bullied into silence, thankfully these days it is difficult for women’s voices not to be heard.  We just have to speak up.

Julie Clawson is the author of the forthcoming book Everyday Justice (IVP 2009).  She blogs at julieclawson.com and emergingwomen.us.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • BuckeyeDon
    Based on this person's previous comments posted on this blog, it seems, Marie, that we've attracted an ultra-legalist to this forum.

    Unbelievable.
  • LilPixy
    Some say the busy body neighbors who press their faces into someone elses window should sit down and find a mirror. Privacy in private for actions and ways are just that. People are as God made ,society and how raised playing factor to being. The absurd complaint then return as if pride for being lowclass and lewd women,forward ,against the grain of a society, time and place for everything, if you do not like something, do not go looking for it either. If someone inappropriate tries to be rude on purpose against established ways, I am on the Sena side to correct the wrong.
  • john316
    Absolutely amazing.

    Julie, I hope that you have the good sense to ignore that request. It sounds to me like the cyberworld equivalent of someone who goes around peeking into windows.
  • ourfoundingtruth
    Julie Clawson: I know that in that conservative Midwestern environment we actually were extremely modest in our dress,

    You would need to describe in exact detail what exactly you all wore, and line that up with the greek definition of modesty from the Bible. If it crossed the line, you were in the wrong. Please post how you dressed.
  • kevin47
    Apology accepted
  • PASTOR JEFF
    James: I don't intend to reignite you but I think I may be able to see why Kevin's assertion about "Biblical" modesty pushes your buttons. Women's dress is entirely cultural and has nothing to do with "natural male urges" or Biblical world view. How do tribal Africans "dress modestly"? What would these verses mean to them? Scripture is often used/abused by those appealing to their (the Scripture's) authority in the maintenance of the ruling cultural mores. In this sense, the Taliban, the Sri Rama Rena and certain elements of western fundamentalism seek to keep women and others in their place. I haven't seen that strain of fundamentalism in Kevin though. His comments are usually dealing with intellectual integrity through the lens of conservative (Biblically and politically) thought. Thank you for your apology to him. It speaks volumes to your own character.
  • JamesM
    Kevin, I think I went over the top with you on this. My apologies.
  • squeaky
    Hear-Hear!

  • PASTOR JEFF
    He may be limited in his options. After all, he lives in New Orleans and tomorrow is Mardis Gras. Good for you, Neuro!
  • letjusticerolldown
    Mr. Kevin and Mr. James--How about if you both just make the most thoughtful and compassionate and wise responses you can muster and leave it there. You are both fully able and responsible to do so.
  • squeaky
    SisterMarie, Kevin,
    It's a classic case of miscommunication. Kevin, when I read your initial post, I thought "he couldn't possibly be saying what I think he's saying" which, taken out of context, can easily be misunderstood in the way SisterMarie misunderstood it, as well as Lord Voldemort. You did not clearly express your meaning.
    SisterMarie, if you go back and read the quote in Julie Clawson's original post, I think you may understand that wasn't what he meant.

    So, in all fairness, both of you failed to communicate clearly--SisterMarie because you didn't look at the context of the excerpt Kevin quoted, and Kevin because you assumed everyone would know what you meant without offering more context or explanation.
  • JamesM
    Did your mother ever envision the master spin word doctor?
  • Lord_Voldemort
    Okay. I was a little confused. My main gripe isn't that the women were wrong, but the casual assumption that any group of religious nitwits can be labelled "right wing".

    LV
  • kevin47
    You rest your case? What case? I don't know what I'm being accused of, here.

    I didn't say women deserve what they get, and nothing in my quote comes close to doing so. Saying that women can help their brothers out by not accidentally contributing to their propensity to lust is not the same as saying those women deserve to be lusted over.

    Moreso, it is certainly not the same as saying those women deserve to be raped. That is something entirely different.

  • john316
    "This same violent manipulation is used by those who blame women for getting raped because of their appearance or who tell women that they deserve to be hit by their husbands." - Julie Clawson in Original Post

    "No it isn't. Saying women should dress modestly is biblical. Saying that men will be more likely to lust if women are dressed in skimpy clothing is a biological observation." Kevin47 Response

    I rest my case. My mother used to tell me that telling the truth means that you never have to remember what you said.
  • kevin47
    While your general point is spot on, the Sri Rama Sena are, within the Indian political context, right-wing, advocating a return to traditional values. They have also been responsible for attacks on the church in India, which would be a left-wing activity here, but not in India, where the right of the Christian church to exist is a somewhat progressive stance.

    But yeah, you infrequently hear the phrase "left-wing militants", even though the efforts of Islamic extremists in Europe qualify as left-wing.



  • JamesM
    You're probably right. I probably don't even know what a fundamentalist is.

    Keep on writing, though. Your highly enlightening posts continue to reaveal fascinating facets of fundamentalism of which I was not aware until now.

  • kevin47
    You don't even know what a fundamentalist is, or why that insult has (or does not have) any merit.

    Comparing a biblical precept (that women should dress modestly), with which just about everyone in the nation agrees, to the Taliban's oppressive, sexist regime is flatly stupid.

    I called you on it, and your best response was "I know you are, but what am I?"

    Keep up the good work, indeed.
  • kevin47
    "Now, that may rank high on your "snark meter", but it really pisses me off to think that anyone could possibly offer the slightest justification for the actions of these men."

    What men are we talking about? The Sri Rama Sena, the people who put up the fliers, or men who look at women?

    I nowhere said that women deserve what they get.
  • JamesM
    Why thank you. Your comments are always refreshing-- unlike so many knee-jerk, reactionary fundamentalist ones that others make. Keep up the good work.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008