RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Green My Hood

by Leroy Barber 02-25-2009

Is it possible to create a new economy in the hood that would create jobs, lower energy costs, reduce the carbon footprint of an urban neighborhood, and allow neighbors to get to know one another at the same time? I think there just might be a way to make this a reality. I would like to green my hood.

The problem in urban neighborhoods is that they are some of the most dangerous places, environmentally speaking. Trash dumps, tow lots, expressways, and chemical plants create places that are quite unsafe. Our neighborhoods can begin to help themselves and lower some of the risk by starting their own green projects. We could hire and train people to do home audits for seniors and families in homes that are full of lead paint, leaky windows, clogged gutters, and uninsulated water heaters. This training would give jobs to people and lower energy bills for residents, as well as reduce the carbon footprint of the neighborhood.

We can grow neighborhood gardens and farmers’ markets, which would offer places for neighbors to have better access to nutritious food and vegetables that are otherwise very costly. When we make neighborhoods walkable and livable, neighbors can get around without driving, and that means less asthma-causing air pollution, fewer emergency room visits, and fewer sleepless nights for worried parents. Caring for the environment has hit the hoodand is now a major urban issue , and people of faith have opportunity to offer good news in a new way. This is no longer just an issue of global warming and saving rain forests — it is about protecting some of our most vulnerable citizens.

Clothing the naked, visiting the prisoner, and feeding  the hungry now needs to include providing clean air, safe streets, and healthy neighborhoods for our poor urban neighbors. I am committed to greening my hood for a number of reasons. If you want to learn more about it, you should check out The Green Collar Economy, by Van Jones.  This is his idea, and I have become a fan.

This is one topic I’ll be addressing at a conference I’m speaking at, May 13-15, in metro Atlanta. Flourish 2009 will help churches understand environmental issues in the context of justice, missions, compassion, and sound theology, and it features an amazing diversity of speakers. Come and join me. My organization, Mission Year, has arranged a 25 percent discount for readers of this blog — just use the code “missionyear25” when you register for the conference at flourishonline.org.

Leroy BarberLeroy Barber is president of Mission Year, a national urban initiative introducing 18- to 29-year-olds to missional and communal living in city centers for one year of their lives. He is also the pastor of Community Fellowships Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and author of New Neighbor.

Categories: Environment, Poverty
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • DITE
    You could also pay people in your hood to move dirt from one pile to another. It creates jobs and there is no carbon footprint.

    While were at it, lets use taxpayer money to set aside space for unicorn grazing.
  • Eric77
    When he writes "we" I didn't necessarily think he means "the taxpayers" or at least not federal ones. Of course, "we" isn't very specific. I assumed he meant his community could employ these people to do "audits". I actually appreciate Leroy's focus on community-based solutions. Most of the things he advocates are things that his community/city can do without getting the federal government involved. If it fails, then we'll know either not to replicate it somewhere else or to change the formula. I applaud his efforts and wish him Godspeed.

    These types of changes should start in our local communities.
  • kevin47
    I dunno, the book to which he links calls for a "green new deal", so it's probably safe to assume he'd like to see some government funding.

    Which introduces a flaw in his argument. If you take taxpayer money to train a guy to fix your gutters, and pay for him to fix your gutter, you are indeed creating a job. But you are taking away money from all of the other would-be recipients of those taxpayer dollars, whether they be clothing manufacturers, hammer makers, or even other gutter replacement companies.
  • squeaky
    Why don't you be specific about what you disagree with in the article rather than just offering snarky potshots?
  • DITE
    The very moment the author provides specifics on the budget for his urban-solar-powered-life-garden-lead-paint-reduction-project, I will give you a detailed report of disagreement.
  • squeaky
    You probably could have expressed that concern without the sarcasm, though, right? So, since you are capable of doing so, why don't you?
  • kevin47
    He could, but why would it be necessary? Sarcasm is a valid means of communication (the Sojo bloggers employ its use all the time), and I think his comment took an intellectually honest stab at Barber's post, which is high on rhetoric, but low on specifics.

    Given the realities of the situation, he might as well have proposed unicorn grazing. At least, that's DITE's argument. I'm sure he wouldn't mind a counterargument.
  • squeaky
    Well, because, believe it or not, some of us value honest discussion. And comments like that do not promote honest, thought-provoking discussion. It's very easy to just take pot-shots at one another. Far more difficult to respectfully consider what another person is saying. And oddly enough, I expect the latter on a Christian blog. So, like it or not, I will continue to hold people to higher standards of discourse.
  • kevin47
    Will you call out Sojo bloggers on their use of sarcasm, then?
  • squeaky
    Sure, will you? It's hard for me to understand why this is something you disagree with, so please explain it to me. I'd really like to understand how comments like DITE's promote thoughtful discussion in a Christ-like manner.

    I"m not at all interested in the "they do it too" argument.
  • kevin47
    Will I? No. I don't have a problem with sarcasm. I do have a problem with disregarding the argument being advanced, but that's not the case here, given the original author's lack of specifics. I think Christ is on the record having used sarcasm to illustrate a point. Would you disagree?
  • squeaky
    Apparently we have different definitions of what intelligent, respectful, Christlike dialogue amongst believers on a Christian blog should look like, so there's no point in arguing about it.
  • kevin47
    I think it's a gender thing. As a rule, men appreciate sarcasm and irony, whereas women do not. On a board with both perspectives, I think you need to err on the side of letting it pass.
  • carlcopas
    Squeaky,
    that would require an effort to see things from Barber's point of view. Much easier to sit back and take sarcastic potshots. It's an old American tradition (think H.L. Mencken or, today, people like Rich Lowry).
  • DITE
    Yes, much easier. And more fun.
  • squeaky
    And Christlike how?
  • canucklehead
    which of course begs the question - how much time would Jesus devote to a blog site? wwjb?
  • BuckeyeDon
    "The very moment the author provides specifics on the budget for his urban-solar-powered-life-garden-lead-paint-reduction-project, I will give you a detailed report of disagreement."

    DITE:
    The logical flaw in this comment is that, even without seeing the kinds of specifics you are asking for here, you are already presuming you would disagree with Mr. Barber.

    If you're going to disagree with him out of hand no matter what he writes, why bother saying you want details?
  • DITE
    I disagreed with his general idea generally. I'm assuming that I'll disagree with his specifics specifically.
  • BuckeyeDon
    So you think developing community gardens, removing lead paint, weatherizing homes, and cleaning up and beautifying eyesores in our neighborhoods are bad ideas?

    Why?
  • pastorrobin
    DITE, I believe that you have violated the site's Comment Code of Conduct in the ways described::

    I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

    I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

    I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

    I will participate in community accountability by rating posts up or down based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed, and will flag posts that violate these rules of conduct. (Proverbs 12:18)

    Therefore, I have flagged your comment and given a down arrow to your post, as Sojourners has asked.

    To all other readers:

    I'd like to suggest that when a comment occurs that does, indeed, violate the Code, we all simply respond to the writer by calling her/him out on it and refusing to converse any further. A person commenting in ways that violate the Code do not have any interest in entering into dialogue about the original issue; rather, they seek to dismiss and to shame the person(s) to whom the are responding. This diverts following readers' attention away from the original issue and onto the Code violator and/or other issues (e.g., above, genres of commentary and criticism, gender identities), and too often elicits a response in kind, resulting in further Code violating. Let's just be Jesus-like in our behavior: call-out and walk away! Blessings to all!
  • squeaky
    Exactly. Thank you.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008