RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Obama’s Call to Rebuild

by Jim Wallis 02-25-2009

This wasn’t really a budget speech, or even a State of the Union. It was a call to rebuild a country – from its infrastructure, to its economy, to its values. Last night, Barack Obama called a new generation to a new American future. And from the “twittering” and Facebook status updates I am aware of going on last night, the new generation stayed up late to watch and got the speech they wanted—a vision for the new America they hope to raise their children in.

There hasn’t been as much political vision or ambition in the chamber of the House of Representatives for decades as there was last night. It wasn’t just a list of little ideas or a recitation of familiar symbols; it was a substantial diagnosis of America’s crisis and the bold promise to find the solutions necessary. If the inaugural speech disappointed some for being more sobering than visionary, the call to action they were waiting for came last night.

The new president boldly declared that it is time to meet the big challenges. After telling Americans for the last month what we were up against, he said that America can and will rise to meet the challenge.

… while our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken; though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this: We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before.

After succeeding in passing the most aggressive economic recovery plan in memory, despite a united opposition, Obama sounded absolutely optimistic about the budget he will present this week.

In the next few days, I will submit a budget to Congress. So often, we have come to view these documents as simply numbers on a page or laundry lists of programs. I see this document differently. I see it as a vision for America – as a blueprint for our future.

He said both his stimulus plan and his budget will focus on beginning to fix the biggest issues—energy dependence, broken health care, and failed education. He said our crisis has come from ignoring, neglecting, and postponing solutions to core problems like these while, at the same time, spending money we didn’t have to buy things we didn’t need.

But the “day of reckoning has arrived,” said the new president, and “now is the time” to solve our biggest problems—and while the problems are great, we will solve them.

Some of the most important ideas, lines, and promises were:

Stressing that the economic recovery is “not about saving banks, but helping people.”

Reminding us that “responsibility for our children’s education begins at home.”

Promising to support both soldiers and veterans, but to also get rid of outdated Cold War weapons systems.

Pledging to cut unnecessary subsidies to agribusiness and eliminate no-bid contracts like in Iraq — big tasks that politics has been unwilling to take on.

Committing that we will no longer hide the price of war in the budget.

Stating emphatically that “the United States of America does not torture,” especially saying it the night after Jack Bauer and 24.

Recognizing that the biggest deficit we face is the “deficit of trust” that Americans feel for their leaders and their lack of solutions.

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, a rising star for the Republicans, could not muster a compelling vision counter to what the president proposed. He admitted that his party had failed the country but then used the story of incompetent political appointees and the bureaucratic mess they created in response to Katrina to try to make a point that government never works. But that didn’t work.

In contrast to the simple Democratic reliance on the government or the Republican mantra of the invisible hand of the market to solve our problems, Obama called for a new commitment to the common good, collective action, and a new combination of both personal and social responsibility.

He said, in closing:

Those of us gathered here tonight have been called to govern in extraordinary times. It is a tremendous burden, but also a great privilege – one that has been entrusted to few generations of Americans. For in our hands lies the ability to shape our world for good or for ill.  I know that it is easy to lose sight of this truth – to become cynical and doubtful; consumed with the petty and the trivial.

But in my life, I have also learned that hope is found in unlikely places; that inspiration often comes not from those with the most power or celebrity, but from the dreams and aspirations of Americans who are anything but ordinary.

Some people don’t like strong leadership. I do. And this is the kind of leadership that calls and inspires people to act themselves and be part of the solutions we need. I like that too. And it’s a new kind of leadership that invites being held accountable to results. That’s fair.

Obama has a vision and last night offered a road map. And he invited citizens across the political spectrum to bring their own ideas but to join the journey and stop standing by the side of the road with their arms folded in critique. Disagreement comes with a responsibility to offer better ideas, says this president.

The words of Ty’Sheoma, a school girl from South Carolina, sitting in the gallery next to Michelle Obama, were lifted up by President Obama last night. She wrote the Congress to ask for help for her school but wanted them to know, “We are not quitters.”

Categories: Economics, Health
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • kevin47
    "Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, a rising star for the Republicans, could not muster a compelling vision counter to what the president proposed."

    That's because conservatives don't believe that government can fulfill visions of hope and solve all of our problems.

    Big talk about providing jobs, helping people, eliminating wasteful spending etc... Is just talk. Obama shouldn't get credit for making promises until he delivers on them.
  • DITE
    Kevin, Shhhhhh. Shhhhhh. Stop standing by the side of the road, unfold your reptilian arms in critique, and embrace the hope.
  • kevin47
    Sure thing, O'Brien...
  • JaneinWNY
    "...because conservatives don't believe that government can fulfill visions of hope".

    I don't believe anyone would have expected that kind of vision from Gov. Jindal. Do Republicans have no vision of their own to offer? (Aside from the tired "government is the problem" and "it's MY money" mantras, that is.)
  • kevin47
    "I don't believe anyone would have expected that kind of vision from
    Gov. Jindal. Do Republicans have no vision of their own to offer? "

    I repeat, conservatives don't believe government can fulfill visions of hope. I don't think he said "it's my money", even though you have it in quotes, not that it is unreasonable to note that it is in fact our money, and not the governments, that Obama will be using to try to provide hope for us.

    Republicans, or, at least, conservatives, have a vision to offer for government. You just don't agree with that vision. That doesn't make it not a vision.
  • JaneinWNY
    I didn't make myself clear, apparently. You said the reason Gov. Jindal didn't offer a vision was because (paraphrased) conservatives don't think government is the solution. My response is, then he should have presented his own vision. Maybe he did; I didn't hear either speech. If he did offer his own vision, you didn't say what it was. You only said what it wasn't.

    I put the phrases in quotes because they are often repeated, not because he said them.

    Jane
  • Eric77
    I thought Sojourners was supposed to speak truth to power, not be a cheerleader for it. Is there nothing Obama's done so far or nothing he said in the speech worthy of critique? Does he not even need to be reminded that many, many other presidents before him have promised similar things and fallen far short?

    For some reason I'm picturing those videos of screaming 16-year old girls at the edge of a stage in the 1960s listening to the Beatles.

    Curmudgeon signing off for now.
  • kevin47
    Does a congregation talk back to its pastor?
  • commonsense247
    evidently not enough, nowdays, when it seems the pastor has become unbalanced. where are the bereans?
  • PASTOR JEFF
    Are you referring to Rush?
  • Eric77
    zzzzzzzzz...
  • nuclearferret
    Funny how two people can view the same speeches differently. The President and Mr. Wallis see the current government as being called to govern in extraordinary times; I see those governing, save for those who were just elected to DC for the first time, as the people who weren't doing their jobs for the last 2-50 years, ranging from the elected from 2006 to the Robert Byrds and Edward Kennedys no longer even able to physically or mentally fulfill their duties of the job.
  • letjusticerolldown
    I didn't watch.

    I say:

    "Go ahead Obama"
    "Go ahead Democrats"
    "Go ahead Jim Wallis"

    I agree government can do alot--and it can't do everything. So go ahead--fulfill your job.

    I agree with nulearferret that the mini-mob of presidential candidates all promising great vision and new orders were all in power before November--and remain in power. So if all of them have had a conversion to effective governance that brings the bureacuracy to bear on critical issues in appropriate ways---I am all for it.

    Go ahead. Do it. You need not convince me that you need to work. Don't waste your energy convincing me of a crisis nor overstating the merits of any particular governmental intervention. We elected you. Go ahead.

    What I do want you to speak to is granting the respect of clearly explaining your proposed actions in intelligent, rational, understandable presentation to the public. Have you heard of CSpan?

    If you want to do 9,000 earmarks this go-around -- then stand up and explain why you believe it just to tax my pocketbook and shuffle it out the door outside of any public process??

    Don't be so grandiose. Do the basics -- in daylight. Govern your actions today with control and good justice.

    To Obama I give credit for acting like the nation needs the leadership of both political parties. The power does not go to the party that can roll the other party, nor the one who can win the negotiations, nor the one who can posture the best, nor the one who can be 'most pure to its principles.' nor the one that compromises the most. The power goes to the one that can stand with clarity as to its foundation, commitments, morality, and limitations----and from that base respond/flex with intelligence and humility to the best input/challenge from the other side. The power goes to the one able to enhance the capacity of their own party by receiving the best contribution of the other; and can enhance the power of the other by contributing the best to the other.

    There are many voices on both sides that seriously do not get this. It is very corrosive!! It is very sad to see leaders who have been granted wonderful platforms in politics and media wielding that power in such petty, degrading ways.
  • kevin47
    If Sojourners were as serious about moving past partisanship and speaking truth to power as they claim to be, this would be the kind of posts you'd find here. Well done. I think you should write a guest blog, even if you don't have a book to sell.
  • It takes two to be bipartisan, if you haven't noticed. From the outset the conservatives in the GOP had no interest in the issue, preferring the attitude "my way or the highway," and to say they ever intended otherwise is simply delusional. There's a reason people outside the South are leaving the Republican Party, and it's not simply the failed ideology it subscribes to.
  • kevin47
    Rick, you have said the same thing over and over. You aren't even responding to any of the points people have made here.
  • And I will keep saying it until people understand -- it is a foundational, propositional truth without which anything else makes sense. You want to deny this, of course, but doing so is utterly delusional and it is that kind of poisonous atmosphere that voters are now rejecting. If the conservatives really wanted bipartisanship they wouldn't have gone out of their way to trash anything Obama is or does. (This is not simply about "disagreement" -- they simply make demands and pout when they can't get their way, which is frankly juvenile.)
  • kevin47
    "And I will keep saying it until people understand --it is a
    foundational, propositional truth without which anything else makes
    sense."

    For once, we agree.
  • Read the rest of what I wrote, however. Conservatives have complained that they "weren't consulted" -- but I know of no situation over nearly 30 years where they actually admitted, "Hey, the other side has some good ideas that make sense." You can hold out your hand in good faith for only so long and being rebuffed before you have to say, "The heck with them -- we're going to do this, with them or without them."
  • kevin47
    Which liberals have said "Hey, the other side has some good ideas that make sense."?
  • That's irrelevant because "liberals" were never as power-obsessed as the conservatives, who in the first place really didn't care about governing. That said, they do it all the time -- in fact, that's part of liberal parlance. That's why the opposition even to Reagan was fairly muted. Only during the GW Bush years did "liberals" (I use quotes here because the definition of a liberal from that perspective is someone who doesn't subscribe to "purist conservatism," which represents the views of most people) recognize what was happening -- that the conservatives want to destroy them.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008