RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

‘Good Guys and Bad Guys’ on the Border

by John Fanestil 02-27-2009

On Saturday, Feb. 21, I was almost arrested for committing assault with a tortilla.  Or was it my communion cup that the border patrol agent took to be a threat?

The setting was Friendship Park, a historic venue overlooking the Pacific Ocean on the U.S.-Mexico border.  For generations people have met at this location to visit through the border fence.  I have seen lovers kiss through the fence, grandparents greet newborn grandchildren through the fence, people say goodbye to dying loved ones through the fence.  No more.

As part of its commitment to build 670 miles of double and triple barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border, the Department of Homeland Security has announced its intent to permanently eliminate all public access to this unique site.

Call us naïve, but we who are aficionados of the park had assumed that there would be at least some small allowance for friendship in the complex formula of U.S. border policy.

Apparently not; customs and border patrol having concluded that incidents of people passing contraband through the fence warrant shutting down the park.

I know nothing of contraband, and so now have the ignominious distinction of being the first U.S. citizen to be forcibly prevented from entering Friendship Park.

All I was trying to do was serve communion.  For the past eight months I have served communion weekly there, to people on both sides of the border.  I have done so in solidarity with the thousands of people who have broken bread peacefully at this location across so many years.

On Saturday I offered communion to a group of 150 or so who had gathered in the U.S.  I then turned to the south, intending to serve the crowd in Tijuana.

A border patrol agent blocked my way, determined to make an impression.

“You don’t want to do this,” he shouted at me, unsnapping the handcuffs on his uniform.

I told him I just wanted to serve communion, but he stepped in front of me, holding out his hand.  “If you bump into me,” he shouted, “you’ll be charged with assaulting an officer.”

“Okay, then,” I replied. “I guess you’ll have to arrest me, because I’m going to serve communion.”

“Okay, I will,” he said.  “Turn around and put your hands behind your back.”

I did as I was told and the lead agent told a colleague to remove me from the premises.

As we climbed the hillside that overlooks the beach at Friendship Park, the second agent asked me, “What did you have to go and do all that for?”

“I meant no disrespect to you,” I explained.  “My problem is with the policy, with the decision by your higher-ups to shut down the park.”

“The ones who ruin it,” he replied, “are the bad guys who pass crap through the fence.”

“I understand that,” I said, “but this is exactly the problem with all our border policies.  There’s got to be some way we can distinguish between the bad guys and the good guys.”

The agent shrugged.

As it turns out, the lead agent chose not to arrest me after all.  I was detained for about 30 minutes and then released.

I am left with a bad taste in my mouth.  I find it unpalatable that I was not permitted to serve communion.  There is a young homeless man, Adrian, who lives on the beach right there in Tijuana.  He is there every week — was he less worthy of communion on Saturday than my friends in the United States?  What about Oscar, who was deported eight months ago and is separated from his wife and children?  Had I been allowed to offer him a piece of tortilla and a swig of juice, would that have compromised our national security, or our nation’s nobler principles?

Of course Friendship Park is a symbol, one that points to a larger question: What is to become of our nation’s southern border?  Is this strip of land — more than 1,850 miles long — to be turned over to the Department of Homeland Security and reduced to a “zone of enforcement,” straddled by walls?

I cannot abide it because I know the border as an altogether different place.  For millions of us whose relationships straddle the international boundary, the border is a place where human beings meet, a place of friendship, a place of communion.

And that’s why I’ll be going back next Sunday afternoon, to try once more to serve communion at Friendship Park.

Rev. John Fanestil is an ordained elder in the United Methodist Church and executive director of the Foundation for Change.

Categories: Immigration
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • smokem
    Not to sound insensitive, but are there no churches in Tijuana where Mexicans can recieve communion.
  • WaveTossed
    I'm on the good reverend's side here. Why shouldn't he be allowed to serve communion? Whatever happened to loving the lord God and loving one's neighbor as oneself?

    Part of the problem of course is the so called "war on drugs." Which is a travesty. Prohibition failed with alcohol back in the 1920s and it is failing right now with drugs other than alcohol. Legalizing and regulating drugs in a similar manner that alcohol is legal and regulated would do a lot to rid our cities and borders from a lot of the violence that now infests these places.
  • learner64
    "There’s got to be some way WE can distinguish between the bad guys and the good guys.”

    Isn't that the problem? Rev. Fanestil has neither the duty (nor the inclination?) to do the difficult work of distinguishing between the bad guys and the good guys. I applaud his desire to serve communion as a sign of grace, and I agree that border policies need to be fixed, but it's naive to think the bad guys are going to suspend their drug operations while we try to work it out. I'd love to hear not only Rev. Fanestil's outrage at being detained, but also how he intends to help stop drug trafficking across the border. Or was that simply the royal "WE" he was using?
  • NMRod
    How do we intend to stop drug trafficking on this side of the border?

    Once the enforcement-only, legalism begins, it's increasing failures lead to ever more draconian "solutions" until the final abject failure is a police state.

    Already, within the USA, we incarcerate 25% of all the world's prison population, though we make up 3% of the world's entire population. Shouldwe move up to 50% or 75% to see if that works?
  • WaveTossed
    "Already, within the USA, we incarcerate 25% of all the world's prison population, though we make up 3% of the world's entire population. Shouldwe move up to 50% or 75% to see if that works?"

    As I said before: if drugs were legalized and regulated the way that alcohol is, we'd see our imprisonment rate go quickly down. As well as much of the violence in our society. Prohibition didn't work for alcohol, and it's not working for other drugs.

    As for those who use drugs in an addictive way (just like those who drink in an alcoholic way): Drug addiction, like alcoholism, is a medical condition. These medical conditions should be treated by health professionals rather than law enforcement. People shouldn't be arrested simply for possessing any drugs, any more than a person in this day and age would be arrested simply for possessing a case of beer.

    Now if someone were to get high on booze or drugs and drive a car, operate machinery, or commit a crime -- they should get arrested and face the full consequences of their actions.
  • JoannaCW
    I think drug trafficking should be a legally punishable offense if anything should. It's not just that people are apt to commit crimes when high--I've seen the physical and spiritual damage that addicted parents pass on to their children. And many of the drugs being trafficked are higly addictive.
    But I'm not convinced that closing the border with Mexico will take care of the problem. So long as norteamericanos want a quick-fix example from reality we'll get it. There's already plenty of domestic production of meth and marijuana and probably anything else that can be obtained from Mexico.
    Drugs aside, it makes no economic sense to let products cross borders freely and restrict the movement of labor, and our current border/immigration policy clearly violates the commandment to love our neighbors as ourselves.
  • canucklehead
    Why doesn't Homeland Security just blare CDs of John Ashcroft singing "Where the Eagle Flies" at infamous border points? The desire for anybody to enter America would evaporate instantly.
  • carlcopas
    ROFL
  • WaveTossed
    "I think drug trafficking should be a legally punishable offense if anything should. It's not just that people are apt to commit crimes when high--I've seen the physical and spiritual damage that addicted parents pass on to their children. And many of the drugs being trafficked are higly addictive."

    One of the great illusions in life is that protection from the spiritual damage of addiction is something that can be legislated. Alcohol has been shown to be one of the most addicting and physically damaging drugs around. And yet trying to legislate alcohol use out of existence: well we all know where that one went.

    Spiritual recovery and renewal is something that comes from the heart. It's not anything that can be legislated.

    I do agree that closing the borders won't solve any addiction problem. Any more than making drugs or alcohol illegal would.

    As for addicted/alcoholic parents inflicting damage on their children: this can be dealt with using current laws against child abuse. One element that could be helped by not spending money on the Black Hole known as the "War on Drugs" is that this money could be used to strengthen social service agencies that could help children trapped in abusive parenting.
  • code4nh2o
    First - I am of the opinion that Holy Communion is not to be used as a form of political protest. I wouldn't want to answer for that one.
    Secondly - it seems to me that the fence isn't about immigration or drugs. It is about the security of our nation, which gives us our freedom of religion, and freedom to protest.
    Lastly - for those that have not been there, Mexico is an open Christian country - anyone can get communion anytime without fear of persecution.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008