RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

The Real History of ‘Saint Patrick’: The Saint He Wasn’t, the Man He Was

by Jeff Brazil 03-17-2009

It is said that everyone in the world is Irish today in honor of Saint Patrick. It would be a very worthwhile endeavor this year, given the cloud of dispiritedness that seems to have settled on us, if we would all honor him by striving to be more like him.

The lesser-known aspects of this remarkable slave-turned-social justice advocate are far more important and inspiring than any of the enchanting myths and legends we associate with him.

In actuality, Patrick wasn’t officially ever anointed a saint, he wasn’t a fan of green beer, and he wasn’t even Irish.

The elements of Patrick’s story and life unornamented by folk tale are that he was born somewhere in Roman Britain around 385 C.E. His name was Patricius. He came from a wealthy family. And it is not believed that he was particularly religious.

As a teenager, around the age of 16, he was abducted and taken to Ireland, where he was enslaved and forced to work long, hard days as a hillside shepherd until he escaped after about six years.

He made it back home, but at some point he felt a calling to join the priesthood and, further, believed he needed to return to Ireland. Ireland was not only the country of his enslavement and a place regarded by civilized societies of the day as primitive, but it was also a most perilous spot to choose to take up residence if one didn’t have to. Incessant tribal warfare, human sacrifice, and pervasive enslavement marked Irish culture at the time. Those in Ireland who were inclined toward religious customs tended to favor naturalistic belief systems.

The mystery of why Patrick returned to Ireland and committed to spending the rest of his days there is addressed in his own hand in Confession, one of two pieces of writing validated as his. What is known about Patrick is, to a large degree, drawn from this strikingly honest autobiographical work and an emotional letter he penned to a slave trader, “Letter to Coroticus,” as well as his enduring legacy in the form of the monasteries and parishes he founded and the humanitarian entities and causes that formed in his wake.

Although it’s generally agreed that Patrick didn’t write Confession until later in life when he was esteemed as the bishop of Ireland, he characterizes himself as a “simple” and “imperfect” man who had to overcome a fear born of his lack of formal education. He regarded himself as “unlearned” and even as somewhat of an outcast.

However, despite a life of difficulty, he expressed deep gratitude for “great favors in this world” and spoke of the “wonders” of life.

Patrick stood up for those who were looked down upon, including people who were impoverished; women, whom he afforded great dignity; and slaves, who, he said, “suffer the most.”

At one point, he was captured again, probably by one of the many powerful warlords, and “fettered … in irons.” “… daily I expect to be murdered or betrayed or reduced to slavery,” he wrote.

He denounced slavery in his impassioned “Letter to Coroticus,” singling out Coroticus for preying on women and distributing them as “prizes.”

It was the practice of the times for warlords and powerful people to lavish gifts on others of influence as a way of assuring alliance and allegiance. But as Patrick’s reputation and standing increased and he was the recipient of such gifts, he quietly navigated around the practice, so as to work hard to preserve his integrity.

While the church and his own superiors often employed violence, coercion, and threat to pile up religious converts, Patrick’s abiding love and affection for the Irish people, countryside, and culture – though very different from his own – is what won him their appreciation, affection, and following.

Historians and scholars agree that Patrick had a stunningly positive impact on Ireland. By the time he died sometime around 461 C.E., he had made great strides in helping Ireland renounce enslavement and human sacrifice, and had helped them adopt far more peaceful approaches to problem-solving, as well as instilled in their society a spirit of aiding the poor.

Patrick’s teachings and deeds had a profound impact on a young girl named Brigid of Kildare, whose life’s work on behalf of the dispossessed carried on when Patrick’s time came to an end. Like Patrick, Brigid is believed to have come from a wealthy family, but she demonstrated an extravagant love for those of lesser means. She, too, went on to become one of Ireland’s patron saints.

Of all of Patrick’s lasting contributions, historian and author Thomas Cahill credits Patrick with doing the world the great service of helping to preserve Western literature and classic works of antiquity. In his delightful book, How the Irish Saved Civilization, Cahill asserts that the thousands of Early Middle Age monks who can be traced back to Patrick’s missionary work in Ireland toiled ceaselessly writing and preserving copies of classic texts during a long period of decline in the rest of Western Europe commonly referred to as the dark ages.

On the issue of slavery, Cahill asserts that Patrick was the first person in history to oppose slavery. After Patrick, more than a millennium would pass before abolitionists risked their reputations and livelihoods in England and then in the United States fighting to scotch slavery once and for all.

Looking back through the lens of contemporary times, what may be most remarkable about Patrick is that his popularity is as deep as it is wide. It slices across nearly all of the things that are commonly used to divide us – politics, nationality, race, gender, creed, and even religion.

Protestants, Catholics, evangelicals, mystics, and New Agers all lay claim to him and his achievements and maintain that his core beliefs are in accord with their own.

Likewise, politicians from across many aisles and leaders on opposing sides of even wider ideological chasms ennoble Patrick’s work.

Of course, perhaps the single largest group to lay claim to Patrick’s legacy are those who will take time out from their anxieties, rendezvous with lovers, friends, and family, and merrily lift a moist pint of Murphy, Smithwick’s, or Guinness.

That, too, is as it should be on Saint Patrick’s Day, because by all accounts Patrick seems to have been an earthy, warm, humble person of good humor.

In the gallery of time, he is one of those souls who appears to have been preternaturally well suited to his moment and place in history. But he is a person for our own times, too. He knew joy, fulfillment, love, and pleasure, even in the midst of pain, sacrifice, and discomfort.

That people from all walks of life all around the world will honor him and hoist a glass in his memory speaks well of the true nature of the human spirit and reminds us of the sort of acts, qualities, and virtues that most of us universally admire. It is something in which we can find hope, encouragement, and empowerment. These are articles that have been in short supply of late, yet do not have to be.

It was Benjamin Franklin who once said beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. That is a cheery sentiment that the vivacious Patrick would probably find worthy of its own toast.

Patrick is proof that even in the face of great personal adversity and immense social trial there are those better angels among us – and within us.

Jeff Brazil is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and writer based in Southern California who is working on a popular history book rooted in medieval Europe.

Categories: Human Rights, Ministry
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Mabon
    The snakes idea comes from the term used for the Druid priests of Ireland and Old England. They were referred to as "Serpents of Wisdom." Yes, St. Pat is held responsible for driving the serpents off the island. Some accounts in Roman records say that the Druids were massacred at the Isle of Iona, some were exlied to Northern Scotland, but most were probably killed defending their religion against those who would call them heretics. Like most saints, the killing of non-Christians does not count against one's sainthood. As long as the killing is or was in the name of Jesus it is not frowned upon. Hmmm, I wonder what Jesus would say about that...
  • meurig
    Personally I'm grateful to the Catholic church for bringing to our attention the lives of some of the great heroes of the faith in the past. It's always good be be able tor read about God transforming people towards greater Christlikeness.

    But of course that's not going to stop me seeing the same thing in heroes that the Catholic church hasn't honored in this way, whether that's Wulfstan of Worcester or Conrad Grebel or Dirk Willems or George Fox or John Wesley or Thomas Clarkson or Rhys Howells or whoever.

    If Rome's use of the word saint to mean some saints but not all of them is a stumbling block, it is surely a rather small one that is quite easy to jump over...

    [Btw, I understand that several of the leaders of the Celtic church are recognised as saints by the Orthodox churches but not officially by the Catholic church.]
  • meurig
    And nobody knows precisely where that was. There are several possible candidates in Wales, the west of England, NW England and (usually presented as the most likely) SW Scotland.
  • BuckeyeDon
    ...or any weekday, testifying before Congress about the large bonuses they gave out.
  • Nathan Bedford
    "But...what about the snakes?"

    They all emigrated to America. you can see them every Sunday by turning on your TV.
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    If you have accepted Jesus into your heart, you ARE a SAINT!
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    CORRECTION HERE: Patrick's birth place was at "Banna Venta Berniae."
  • BuckeyeDon
    Yes, God through Jesus Christ makes all who believe on him saints. That's in the New Testament after all, and all Christians (including Catholics--big "c") believe that. But individuals who lived noteworthy lives in the faith have always been held up as examples to other believers; this practice has existed since the beginning of the Christian church.

    No religious group makes anyone a saint. God does. But the Christian church can and does honor the memory of individual Christians, just as we do in our own communities and families. One does not have to be Roman Catholic (big "c") in order to recognize the exemplary lives of many of the saints that they honor, or to try and live by their example. Non-Catholic Christians also have their honored "saints," even though they may not be given that title officially. Just think of "heroes of the faith" that you may have learned about in Sunday school, or who may have been preached about in your own church. How is that different in substance from calling them saints?
  • neuro_nurse
    If I was dead & canonized I'd be the Patron Saint of Nitpicking.

    See piccolaserenata8's comment below. St. Patrick was grandfathered in.
  • neuro_nurse
    “By canonizing some of the faithful, i.e., by solemnly proclaiming that they practiced heroic virtue and lived in fidelity to God's grace, the Church recognizes the power of the Spirit of holiness within her and sustains the hope of believers by proposing the saints to them as models and intercessors. "The saints have always been the source and origin of renewal in the most difficult moments in the Church's history.” Indeed, "holiness is the hidden source and infallible measure of her apostolic activity and missionary zeal."
    Catechism of the Catholic Church, 828
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    Patrick's birth name was "Banna Venta Berniae."

    "Catholic" (big or little "c") make people saints usually after they are dead. But, in the 1st Century AD, EVERY person who believed in Jesus was made a saint by salvation in Jesus.

    If a person is NOT a saint while they are living, no religious group can make them a saint when they are dead.
  • piccolaserenata8
    Regarding St. Patrick's sainthood (yes, he is a saint):

    http://www.americancatholic.org/Messenger/Mar20...

    "St. Patrick died around 461 A.D. The first saint formally canonized by the pope—for which we have a record, anyway—was St. Ulrich, bishop of Augsburg, Germany, in the year 993.

    For most of Christianity’s first 1,000 years, canonizations were done on the diocesan or regional level. Relatively soon after very holy people died, the local Church affirmed that they could be liturgically celebrated as saints.

    That was the case with St. Patrick, whose feast has not been dropped from the Church’s universal calendar. Because it usually falls on a weekday during Lent, the opening prayer at Mass can be for St. Patrick, but everything else comes from the Lenten weekday prayers.

    If St. Patrick is the patron of a diocese or a parish, the feast can be celebrated with greater solemnity. If March 17 falls on a Sunday, the feast is not observed liturgically that year. Patrick’s admirers find many other ways to celebrate!"
  • squeaky
    My guess is that the author thought it was a given, especially with his calling to go into the priesthood and minister to those who originally enslaved him.

    But...what about the snakes?
  • BuckeyeDon
    I presumed that Jeff meant "canonized" when he wrote "anointed."

    It's true, isn't it?--that Patrick was never officially canonized, that is.
  • How can we have an article titled "The Real History of ‘Saint Patrick’" without mentioning anything about him as a Christ-follower? It seems to me that it was this reality which gave him the strength to be a justice advocate. A portion of his Breastplate reads: "I arise today Through the strength of Christ’s birth with his baptism, Through the strength of his crucifixion with his burial, Through the strength of his resurrection with his ascension, Through the strength of his descent for the Judgment Day." Without Christ St. Patrick is not St. Patrick.
  • neuro_nurse
    "Patrick wasn’t officially ever anointed a saint"

    Saints are not 'anointed,' they are canonized - and they are long dead before that process is complete, so you'd have to dig up the body to anoint it. Besides, Catholics anoint the sick, not the dead.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008