RSS
More Feeds

Looking for new books, music, etc.? Purchases made through this search box benefit Sojourners' ministry:














Culture Watch

You Can’t Say That on TV, Mr. President

by Katie Van Loo 03-20-2009

I woke up this morning to Donnie Simpson’s voice (yes, my alarm clock is tuned into morning hip-hop jams on 95.5) discussing Barack Obama.  Over the last several months, hearing Obama’s name in the morning has been anything but a rare occasion.  But what shocked me out of my sleepy stupor much quicker than usual was the clip of Obama’s interview on Leno last night.  From President Obama’s mouth:

“I bowled a 129 …. It’s like — it was like the Special Olympics, or something.”

That is the presidential equivalent of saying, “That’s retarded.”  Well, isn’t this fitting in light of Eugene Cho’s blog post yesterday? Calling out Miley Cyrus and the one Jonas Brother for racist photo poses is one thing, but what do you do when it is the president of the United States making an offhand joke about the Special Olympics? And not just any president, but a recently-elected and much-beloved president who is also publicly heralded as evidence of the progress our country has made toward equality.

I think Donnie Simpson provided a solid analysis of the situation.  Despite the multiple e-mails he’d received that morning dismissing the comment and relieving the president of any bad intent, Simpson made clear that the comment was offensive and should not have been said.  What Simpson was saying is that President Obama was wrong.  Take a moment and let that sink in.

And yet, he went on to say that he understands there are times in comedy where people make jokes about certain groups.  Some people find those jokes funny and others do not (and you can argue whether this is right or wrong), but that is the nature of comedy.  Simpson made clear, however, that the president is not a comedian. While the lightheartedness of the interview did much to show the president in a human light (we all joke around, we all create March Madness brackets, and we all slip up with what we say), Barack Obama holds significant influence over the American people and must always be aware of his responsibility.

Simpson’s final words before I hit the snooze button highlighted the importance of Obama’s response to the event.  Before the interview even aired, Obama called the director of the Special Olympics from Air Force One to apologize profusely about his statement. He conveyed his regret over his comment and his deep respect for the Special Olympics.  The president also offered to fly Special Olympics participants to the White House for a visit.  According to TimesOnline, the president recognized the weight of his words in the instant he said them.

Of course, Barack Obama has swarms of people paid to analyze his every word and action, righting wrongs before they even happen.  But, for once, I care little about who told him to do what.  As president, Obama sets an example.  It’s clear here that his example was to educate yourself so you know when something is offensive, to admit when you are wrong, to apologize, and to seek reconciliation. As a Korean-American woman, I’m offended by this recent trend of slitted-eye photo poses, but I’d feel a bit more at ease if people started to follow the president’s lead.

Everyone’s wrong sometimes and everyone offends sometimes.  Know when you’ve done it.  Say that you’re wrong.  That’s what forgiveness and grace are for.  Then do something to build that relationship, that bond, rather than let your pride and self-righteousness dig you into an insensitive hole.

And let’s not forget to give credit where credit is due: Thanks, Donnie Simpson, for being an example of how to honestly critique and hold accountable those around us, even when it’s the president of the United States.

Katie Van Loo, a former Sojourners intern, lives in Washington, D.C.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • canucklehead
    "He didn't have his teleprompter with him. It was predictable that he would say something stupid"

    "I think think these rare moments when President Obama doesn't have a teleprompter to read from gives us clues into who he really is."

    Those comments are LOADED with presuppositions, judgments and negative inferences. If you don't understand that, I'll leave off wasting my time with you.
  • jeffp
    What assumptions and presuppositions are you referencing? You are making some wild accusations, you need to produce some proof. First you say I'm unforgiving, proof please. Now you say I am prejudging, again proof please.

    I think the only person making assumptions and prejudging is you.
  • jeffp
    So yes, in my life I have and will say things I regret. But what's your point. All I've said is that as we see our President talk without a teleprompter, we will see more clues in who he is. I made no judgement about his character, was not unforgiving, pre-judgemental or did I wish for him to fail. All things I have been accused of based not on my words but on your assumptions and the assumptions of Canucklehead and bluedeacon.
  • squeaky
    Ah, Jeff--'tis you who needs to read more carefully. Your response was

    "Yes to the first question."

    The first question was

    "Are you arguing that you have never, ever, in your entire life, said something that you regret? "

    So, to restate that in the context of your answer--

    "Yes, you ARE arguing that you have never, ever, in your entire life, said something that you regret."

    I was hoping that wasn't what you meant, and I'm glad you cleared that up.
  • canucklehead
    go back and re-read your/the opening comment on this thread - your assumptions there are both huge and instructive and I don't buy them; you'll never find the true Obama with the presuppositions you have; sorry, but it sounds to me that you're not truly open to finding the true Obama b/c you already have your mind made up on certain things about him; you're not trying to find anything, you've already found what you appear to be looking for
  • jeffp
    No, please reread more carefully.
  • squeaky
    Really? You have never said anything you regret?
  • jeffp
    Yes to the first question.

    I believe I did answer the second question. Which was really a clumsy accusation with no merit.
  • jeffp
    I wrote nothing that would suggest that our President's comments were premeditated. You will also see that early on in this discussion I acknowledged that he apologized and we should move on ( I'm assuming he made a blanket apology to the disable, not just to Mr. Shriver).

    Passing judgement on true nature? You assume way to much. I am trying to find the true Obama.
  • squeaky
    You didn't answer my question.
  • jeffp
    Back to my original post. Our President has been carefully "handled" to the point that we have very few clues on who he is. The whole picture, good and bad will continue to be seen.

    I wrote that the comment gives a clue on who he is (not "true nature" which is a response summing up Canucklehead's argument). A peak into his soul? Maybe. I was thinking about "depth" and eloquence and ego.

    I stated in another post that he has apologized and it should be the end of it. What is truly entertaining is seeing his defenders twist themselves into knots trying to compare a misuses of a word to a demeaning slur.
  • jeffp
    Thanks for the laugh Rick.
  • canucklehead
    you miss the point - when you're stressed, rushed, tired, not to mention, human, you make mistakes, some being worse than others; you're talking as if Obama went on Leno intending to offend/demean the disabled - sorry, that's naive and reveals your prior agenda; agreed, it was a foolish thing to say, which he realized and apologized for; your obligation now, presumably as a Christian, is to forgive - 70 x 7 if necessary; instead, sounds to me, like you're passing judgement on his true nature which I don't believe you're in any position to do
  • squeaky
    Are you arguing that you have never, ever, in your entire life, said something that you regret?

    Do you think it would be fair of others to judge your "true nature" based on words you wish you had never spoken?
  • jeffp
    so if I'm tired or rushed my true nature comes through, I'm a poor editor

    Obama is tired, his true nature comes through. Demeaning the disabled.

    Are you sure this is what you want to suggest?
  • canucklehead
    it's not incoherent at all; you made a communication gaffe in typing the word "think" twice in a brief blog comment; that despite the fact that you face nowhere near the number of stresses the POTUS faces everyday in the communication realities he is faced with; he's every bit as human as you demonstrated yourself to be, so you of all people should be cutting him some slack
  • I don't have to assign motives or read minds. Your previous posts suffice.
  • jeffp
    this is incoherent, could you expand your snipe into a coherent comment that would open dialogue further
  • jeffp
    Come on Rick, cut out the assigning of motive and mind reading. You're not good at it.
  • I was specifically referring to the slam on Obama; jeffp basically took his misstatement as a weakness of character, meaning that people should turn against anything he believes in. It's another way of saying, "I hope he fails."
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008