RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Be Not Afraid: Faith and Reason in the Notre Dame ‘Scandal’

by John Gehring 04-09-2009

Notre Dame President Rev. John Jenkins is facing furious backlash after inviting President Barack Obama to give the university’s commencement address next month.

The Cardinal Newman Society, a watchdog group for perceived breaches of orthodoxy on Catholic campuses, calls it an “outrage and a scandal” and has circulated a petition admonishing Notre Dame to “halt this travesty.” Randall Terry, founder of Operation Rescue, warns that the commencement would represent the “cultural rape of true Catholicity.”  These stark responses betray a rich Catholic intellectual tradition revered for centuries for promoting the values of civil debate, prudence, and reasoned engagement.

In response, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good has drafted a petition we hope you consider signing here to show your support for Fr. Jenkins and the virtues of civility and engagement.

The Catholic university is not a defensive fortress walled off from diverse ideas that flourish in a pluralistic democracy. As Fr. Jenkins eloquently articulated in his 2006 statement, Academic Freedom and Catholic Character:

We are committed to a wide-open, unconstrained search for truth, and we are convinced that Catholic teaching has nothing to fear from engaging the wider culture … After all, a Catholic university is where the church does its thinking, and that thinking, to be beneficial, must come from an intellectually rigorous engagement with the world.

The Archbishop Emeritus of San Francisco, John Quinn, worries about the precedent set when Catholics are perceived to be hostile to even hearing from a sitting president elected by a majority of citizens (including 54 percent of Catholic voters):

We must weigh very seriously the consequences if the American bishops are seen as agents of the public embarrassing the newly-elected president by forcing him to withdraw from an appearance at a distinguished Catholic university… It is in the interest of both the church and the nation if both work together in civility, honesty, and friendship for the common good where there are grave divisions, as there are on abortion.

Notre Dame has a long tradition of inviting newly-elected presidents from both parties to deliver the commencement. Fr. Jenkins clearly explained that the invitation should not be taken as “condoning or endorsing” President Obama’s “positions on specific issues regarding the protection of human life, including abortion and stem cell research.” Instead, the president will be honored as an “inspiring leader who faces many challenges” and has done so with “intelligence, courage, and honor.” He made particular note of welcoming “our first African-American president, a person who has spoken eloquently and movingly about race in this nation.”

Some critics of Notre Dame have expressed their disagreement in measured tones that foster fruitful debate. Sadly, this controversy has largely been exploited by ideologues and culture warriors more interested in scoring political points than advancing common ground and principled dialogue. What’s at stake in this controversy is more than the essential need to defend the proper role of faith and reason at a Catholic university. It’s also about whether the public face of Catholicism is represented in its fullness. Fr. John Kavanaugh, a Jesuit priest and a professor of philosophy at St. Louis University, is right to ruminate on the question of whether Catholics are

in danger of becoming known not by how we love, but by how we hate. We will be known as the group that can be outraged only by abortion and stem cell research – not torture, nor the yearly death of 15 million children under 5, nor the reckless launching of wars, nor other deadly sins. We will also present ourselves as oblivious to our fundamental Catholic teachings on the nature of conscience, the judgment of others’ interior lives and the sin of slander.

While the Catholic Church disagrees with our president on issues of grave importance, President Obama has advanced a range of policies that do align with Catholic social teaching. The president’s commitment to a budget that uplifts the poor, universal health care as a human right, and finding common ground on divisive issues reflects traditional Catholic values in the public square. Catholic Charities USA and other faith-based advocates for the poor have applauded the president’s budget proposal as a fundamental break from policies that favored the privileged few over the common good.

Abortion and stem cell research are matters of profound moral consequence.  Yet many urgent moral issues bear on questions of human life and dignity, and these issues interrelate. Economic stress and poverty, for example, increase the abortion rate as the AP recently reported. “We are not a one-issue church,” Auxiliary Bishop Gabino Zavala of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles told Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne, Jr. in this column. Faithful Citizenship, the U.S. Catholic bishops’ election year political responsibility statement is clear that “direct assaults on innocent human life and dignity, such as genocide, torture, racism, and the targeting of noncombatants in acts of terror or war,” are also actions that “can never be tolerated.”

I’m still waiting to hear from outraged culture warriors when it comes to those moral scandals.

Please consider signing our petition to stand up for Fr. Jenkins and Notre Dame.

John Gehring is a Senior Writer for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

Categories: General
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • vkdetroit
    Fr. Jenkins has shown courage and grace in the face of fierce attacks led by extremists like Randal Terry. The real "severe embarrassment" to Catholics is the shallow narrow-mindedness and partisan conduct of our Bishops.
  • nuclearferret
    We get it: Catholics for Obama want the support for Notre Dame's actions. Because other Catholics did not protest, or protest loudly enough, about American policies in the Middle East, they should shut up and accept the expansion of abortion access and rights not only in the US but across the globe.

    Notre Dame should honor whoever they want to. However, cloaking it as some grand gesture of engaging a President who has, through his actions, demonstrated that abortion will become more pervasive is deceptive at best.

    And how many additional troops are being sent to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Somalia under this Administration?
  • squeaky
    "Notre Dame should honor whoever they want to."

    Exactly.

    "And how many additional troops are being sent to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Somalia under this Administration?"

    Well, sadly, the Iraq war diverted resources away from Afghanistan, allowing the gains against the Taliban and Al Quaida to slip away from us, and further gain a foothold in Pakistan. I suppose he could just continue ignoring these hotspots for terrorism, though.
  • There is a difference between hearing people who take morally reprehensible positions and honoring them. The critics of Notre Dame are often not concerned about that, since many Catholics take the position - I think indefensible for a university - that no one who disagrees with key moral positions of the Church should be allowed to speak.

    Here we have a President committed to abortion, war and the death penalty being honored by a Catholic university. I think it is legitimate to question the university honoring him. Of course he has areas where he is much closer to Catholic moral thinking, but the areas of difference are so great that I think it is legitimate to object to honoring him.

    Hearing him seems to me a different story, but here I think it would be important to provide opportunity for dialogue. As I understand it, there really isn't such opportunity in terms of dialogue directly with the President in connection with the commencement address. However, there could be opportunities for dialogue within the university community around the position of the President and moral imperatives.

    I am disappointed that most of the objection refers only to abortion and related matters. This is a President who is engaging in major escalation of war. Surely that is also an issue for the Christian conscience. Pope Benedict has made peace a cornerstone of his papacy.
  • Joe225
    I understand that there is a definite difference between allowing a person to speak and honoring that person with an honorary degree. But I believe that you are right, Mr. Gehring, that President Obama should have both opportunities.

    Although this really isn't an argument in favor of President Obama, I would like to point out the hypocrisy of the Catholic right. There was absolutely no outcry when President Bush, the most pro-death penalty Governor in recent American history, was honored by Notre Dame during his first year in office, in 2001. And the argument that the death penalty is not an intrinsic evil does not work, because the Catholic position is that, in a developed nation with this advanced prison system, all capital punishment is a moral evil.

    I believe Notre Dame had the right to invite Bush in 2001 and has the right to invite Obama in 2009. The confusion comes from the idea that by honoring the president, Notre Dame is automatically supporting all of the actions of the president. The office is above any one issue. He is not bailout Obama. He is not pro-choice Obama. He is President Obama. Bush was not Iraq-invading Bush. He was not death-penalty Bush. He was President Bush.

    Notre Dame is honoring Barack Obama simply because he holds the highest office in the land. He is being honored as President, not as a pro-choice man. Notre Dame is not compromising its own Catholic position on abortion by honoring the president just as their invitation of President Bush in 2001 was not an award for all his work in support of capital punishment. Notre Dame can honor the President as President without honoring all of his actions.
  • davidtbuckley
    In both his 2006 speech to Sojo's Pentecost gathering and his Philadelphia address on race and religion, President Obama broke some important new ground for not only progressive religious outreach, but for the general place of religion in the American republic. There's no doubt in my mind that some of the conservative backlash against Notre Dame is out of fear that he will do the same in South Bend. My hope is that he uses the opportunity to engage substantively on areas of disagreement with Catholics. He's done some of this already with his abortion reduction focus, but left more to be desired on stem cells, for instance. BTW, the President will be at Georgetown tomorrow, so maybe we'll get a sense of what some of his Notre Dame comments will include...
  • IndianaLutheran
    Thanks to John Gehring for this article. I am in northern Indiana and it seems the newspapers and tv news are only interested in the most controversial side of this story, and the whole of Catholic (and Christian) beliefs is reduced to one issue that is painted only in black and white. I hope Fr. Jenkins continues to resis the over-zealous factions and pursue dialogue and academic excellence. It is shameful to me that northern Indiana, not just Catholics or Notre Dame, is gaining a bad reputation when we should be honored that the President is coming to our area for the 2nd time in less than 5 months as president.
  • In both his 2006 speech to Sojo's Pentecost gathering and his Philadelphia address on race and religion, President Obama broke some important new ground for not only progressive religious outreach, but for the general place of religion in the American republic. There's no doubt in my mind that some of the conservative backlash against Notre Dame is out of fear that he will do the same in South Bend
  • Fr. Jenkins has shown courage and grace in the face of fierce attacks led by extremists like Randal Terry. The real "severe embarrassment" to Catholics is the shallow narrow-mindedness and partisan conduct of our Bishops.
  • Fr. Jenkins has shown courage and grace in the face of fierce attacks led by extremists like Randal Terry. The real "severe embarrassment" to Catholics is the shallow narrow-mindedness and partisan conduct of our Bishops.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008