RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Obama’s Public Promise to Reform Immigration this Year

by Allison Johnson 04-09-2009

Hundreds of faith leaders and immigrant advocates across the country visiting their members of Congress at home this week just got a huge boost from the Obama administration.

How so? The front page of The New York Times today declares “Obama to Push Immigration Reform,” and senior administration officials said on record that it will happen this year.

Some say it cannot be done — that it isn’t feasible to reform immigration during a recession or that Obama is spread too thin. However, the urgency of children being separated from their parents and the impact of enforcement raids which tear communities apart cannot be ignored any longer.

To those who doubt us, we say — yes we can. Reforming immigration is a challenge that the faith community is ready and willing to tackle. We are on the front lines in providing services and compassion to immigrants in our neighborhoods and parishes, and we know the daily challenges that over 12 million undocumented immigrants face due to their lack of legal status in this country.

We also know the power of prophetic advocacy. The gospel compels us to act in the face of injustice, and the majority of Americans believe that the system we have in place doesn’t work or keep us safer. We insist on humane immigration reform which reflects the best of America’s values, not the worst. We acknowledge that times are tough, but we believe we should always strive for the common good, and fixing immigration benefits us all.

The following video is just a taste of what people of faith have been up to this past year as we lead in the vast and growing movement for immigration reform. Watch it, share it with your loved ones, and let your representatives in Washington know that you care by sending it their way.

Allison JohnsonAllison Johnson is the campaign coordinator of Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Her commentary “Shackling the Stranger” appears in the April issue of Sojourners.

Categories: Immigration
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • WaveTossed
    Here is a reasoned artcle published online by the Cato Institute. The Cato Institute has some of the most logical and intelligent commentaries about immigration that I've seen.

    http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/pr-immig...
  • letjusticerolldown
    I know that was really bad writing.

    I have this image in my mind of the most impactful government in the world (U.S.); a world with hundreds of millions of people on the move (the greatest human migrations in human history); with the planet teetering on climate change that may alter all population patterns; and with technology and food production that has both enabled massive population growth and puts it at risk (and at the least caused massive social change and population moves).

    And I have this strange notion that one of the primary roles of government, in such an environment, would be the administation of how populations can legally migrate across borders: when, how, why, who.

    I think we currently have a lot of bad policy, outdated policy, dysfunctional policy, and unenforced policy. I do think it calls for comprehensive immigration reform.

    But fundamentally, the governments of the world (first and foremost our own) must define and accept the responsibility to govern borders and human migrations. This is not just a matter of compassion for undocumented residents, 'stemming the flow,' caring for families, protecting the borders, fighting terrorism, etc.

    A nation has borders. Nations have responsibilities for the human population of the planet that is not static and stationary. Borders do not match populations. We must cease abdicating our responsibility to govern migration (hence, the line I wrote which you asked for clarification on).

    The world has not long been divided up into clearly defined nation-states. This could change. However, for now, human governance is based on these geographic entities and these entities must be responsible for migration--or the people are going to rise up and declare the nation-states to be null as they decided the Berlin Wall did not exist.
  • WaveTossed
    "I think it is called the, 'Cease the abdication of governance bill of 2009.'"

    Could you explain exactly what you are trying to say here? I'm confused. Thanks!
  • nuclearferret
    Many of these people say that they support "humane immigration reform" but in fact, some of these people oppose any kind of border enforcement as well.
  • letjusticerolldown
    I personally think we are not looking for comprehensive immigration reform. I think it is called the, "Cease the abdication of governance bill of 2009."
  • WaveTossed
    I imagine that unfortunately, Obama and his people will be flooded by pressure by the anti-immigration people. Many of these people say that they opposed "illegal immigration" but in fact, some of these people oppose legal immigration as well.

    I truly hope that one of the reforms will be to do something to unblock the huge logjam at the INS. People applying for legal residence shouldn't have to wait for months or for years.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008