<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Evangelicals for Torture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/</link>
	<description>A Blog by Jim Wallis and Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:27:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: God’s Image and Caesar’s Image: Torture and the Currency of Empire &#124; Mission &#38; Justice</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87663</link>
		<dc:creator>God’s Image and Caesar’s Image: Torture and the Currency of Empire &#124; Mission &#38; Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87663</guid>
		<description>[...] White Evangelicals for Torture Brian McLaren; 1/5/09 Brian McLaren (brianmclaren.net) is a speaker and author, most recently of Everything Must Change and Finding Our Way Again. Too many white evangelicals stand for torture, according to a recent Pew Forum study reported by CNN.com. White evangelical Protestants were the religious group most likely to say torture is often or sometimes justified — more than six in 10 supported it. People unaffiliated with any religious organization were least likely to back it. Only four in 10 of them did. These are disturbing statistics, and I hope they engender some dialogue among white evangelicals. These figures reminded me of something I wrote last year for Christian Century: Consider this question: Is it ever justifiable to intentionally target innocent civilians in order to achieve other political or military ends? 86, 81, and 80% of American, Canadian, and British citizens say never. But only 46% of Iranians say never. A striking 24% say attacks on civilians are often or sometimes justified, and 6% say such attacks are completely justified. See: http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] White Evangelicals for Torture Brian McLaren; 1/5/09 Brian McLaren (brianmclaren.net) is a speaker and author, most recently of Everything Must Change and Finding Our Way Again. Too many white evangelicals stand for torture, according to a recent Pew Forum study reported by CNN.com. White evangelical Protestants were the religious group most likely to say torture is often or sometimes justified — more than six in 10 supported it. People unaffiliated with any religious organization were least likely to back it. Only four in 10 of them did. These are disturbing statistics, and I hope they engender some dialogue among white evangelicals. These figures reminded me of something I wrote last year for Christian Century: Consider this question: Is it ever justifiable to intentionally target innocent civilians in order to achieve other political or military ends? 86, 81, and 80% of American, Canadian, and British citizens say never. But only 46% of Iranians say never. A striking 24% say attacks on civilians are often or sometimes justified, and 6% say such attacks are completely justified. See: <a href="http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87590</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87590</guid>
		<description>I don&#039; t know - it&#039;s Wikipedia. As I said, I wasn&#039;t under the impression that the other schools were teaching universal redemption. My understanding has always been that it was a few stragglers - such as Origen - who pushed for it, and were dismissed or marginalized as a result. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand - if it is true, I have no trouble placing the blame at Augustine&#039;s doorstep. Miserable man. It&#039;s a cruel irony that Christian theology has been shaped by some of the most mean-spirited, dysfunctional personalities in history. Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Calvin (that abomination) - they took a bad situation and made it worse than it had to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39; t know &#8211; it&#39;s Wikipedia. As I said, I wasn&#39;t under the impression that the other schools were teaching universal redemption. My understanding has always been that it was a few stragglers &#8211; such as Origen &#8211; who pushed for it, and were dismissed or marginalized as a result. </p>
<p>On the other hand &#8211; if it is true, I have no trouble placing the blame at Augustine&#39;s doorstep. Miserable man. It&#39;s a cruel irony that Christian theology has been shaped by some of the most mean-spirited, dysfunctional personalities in history. Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Calvin (that abomination) &#8211; they took a bad situation and made it worse than it had to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthurpena</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87577</link>
		<dc:creator>arthurpena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87577</guid>
		<description>Right. As far as I know, evangelicals do not usually believe in universal&lt;br&gt;salvation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. As far as I know, evangelicals do not usually believe in universal<br />salvation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthurpena</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87576</link>
		<dc:creator>arthurpena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87576</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t done much research on this, but, for what it&#039;s worth, here&#039;s what wikipedia says:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Universalism was a fairly commonly held view among theologians in early Christianity: In the first five or six centuries of Christianity, there were six known theological schools, of which four (Alexandria, Antioch, Cesarea, and Edessa or Nisibis) were Universalist, one (Ephesus) accepted conditional immortality, and one (Carthage or Rome) taught the endless punishment of the lost.[3] The two major theologians opposing it were Tertullian and Augustine.[citation needed]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the seventeenth-century and eighteenth-century Europe and America, other Christian reformers came to believe in a universally loving God and felt that God would grant all human beings salvation. They became known as the Universalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#39;t done much research on this, but, for what it&#39;s worth, here&#39;s what wikipedia says:</p>
<p>Universalism was a fairly commonly held view among theologians in early Christianity: In the first five or six centuries of Christianity, there were six known theological schools, of which four (Alexandria, Antioch, Cesarea, and Edessa or Nisibis) were Universalist, one (Ephesus) accepted conditional immortality, and one (Carthage or Rome) taught the endless punishment of the lost.[3] The two major theologians opposing it were Tertullian and Augustine.[citation needed]</p>
<p>In the seventeenth-century and eighteenth-century Europe and America, other Christian reformers came to believe in a universally loving God and felt that God would grant all human beings salvation. They became known as the Universalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dukie74</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87574</link>
		<dc:creator>Dukie74</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87574</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think the Evangelical view was &quot;Universal&quot; Redemption; I thought it was just redemption for those who accept JC as their Lord and Savior.  I left Christianity for a time since I was told my Jewish father would not go to heaven if he did not accept JC as his Savior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t think the Evangelical view was &#8220;Universal&#8221; Redemption; I thought it was just redemption for those who accept JC as their Lord and Savior.  I left Christianity for a time since I was told my Jewish father would not go to heaven if he did not accept JC as his Savior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87560</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87560</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that Rome was the only one - as far as I know, the Orthodox churches aren&#039;t pushing universal redemption, either - but it would be wonderful if true. Fundamentalists are always going on about how they want to get back to &quot;real, original&quot; Christianity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t know that Rome was the only one &#8211; as far as I know, the Orthodox churches aren&#39;t pushing universal redemption, either &#8211; but it would be wonderful if true. Fundamentalists are always going on about how they want to get back to &#8220;real, original&#8221; Christianity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthurpena</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87494</link>
		<dc:creator>arthurpena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87494</guid>
		<description>Amen to that!&lt;br&gt;I just wish I could be sure that there were no such being, or that the concept of such a being did not reflect any spiritual reality.  The physical universe itself seems to be &quot;survival of the few&quot;, after all.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that!<br />I just wish I could be sure that there were no such being, or that the concept of such a being did not reflect any spiritual reality.  The physical universe itself seems to be &#8220;survival of the few&#8221;, after all&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthurpena</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87493</link>
		<dc:creator>arthurpena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87493</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard from a few different sources (and it seemed to pan out on wikepedia as well) that the majority view during the first few centures of Christianity was universal salvation.  I believe Rome was the only one of the 5 or 6 main Christian centers that did not ascribe to universal salvation.  Perhaps, then, it is not surprising that it was Rome that also became the Church of the Inquisition, and it was Western Christianity that splintered with the reformation, and then continued to splinter over and over again....?  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if there is a connection between &quot;salvation of the few&quot; theology and torture, and violent internecine quarrels....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve heard from a few different sources (and it seemed to pan out on wikepedia as well) that the majority view during the first few centures of Christianity was universal salvation.  I believe Rome was the only one of the 5 or 6 main Christian centers that did not ascribe to universal salvation.  Perhaps, then, it is not surprising that it was Rome that also became the Church of the Inquisition, and it was Western Christianity that splintered with the reformation, and then continued to splinter over and over again&#8230;.?  I wouldn&#39;t be surprised if there is a connection between &#8220;salvation of the few&#8221; theology and torture, and violent internecine quarrels&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1Grace</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87483</link>
		<dc:creator>1Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87483</guid>
		<description>&quot;Did Isay that Christians shouldn&#039;t seek office?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I took your comments as so , I see now you are going by history and the &quot;reasons&quot; Christians took power . As a means of forcing others to do what they believed to be right . I totally agree with you .  I was speaking to perhaps you as a person running for office , and knowing that person in office has a higher accountablilty to God , in my opinion means he or she will be less likely to ly .  Jimmy Carter for instance started WIC ,  a preogram designed to help poor women who were pregnant .  I realize just because your a Christian does not make you a better President or office holder.  I did not think Jimmy Carter was a good President for instance . &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&quot;he power which He brought was something quite different - the power of self-emptying and self-sacrifice and total love. A power which only really works if it is used from the bottom up, not from the top down. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes indeed . I believe those qualities would do people weel if they were in leadership . &lt;br&gt;The examples you gave were all of people who used Religion as power .  I think we agree actually .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Did Isay that Christians shouldn&#39;t seek office?&#8221;</p>
<p>I took your comments as so , I see now you are going by history and the &#8220;reasons&#8221; Christians took power . As a means of forcing others to do what they believed to be right . I totally agree with you .  I was speaking to perhaps you as a person running for office , and knowing that person in office has a higher accountablilty to God , in my opinion means he or she will be less likely to ly .  Jimmy Carter for instance started WIC ,  a preogram designed to help poor women who were pregnant .  I realize just because your a Christian does not make you a better President or office holder.  I did not think Jimmy Carter was a good President for instance . </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;he power which He brought was something quite different &#8211; the power of self-emptying and self-sacrifice and total love. A power which only really works if it is used from the bottom up, not from the top down. &#8220;</p>
<p>Yes indeed . I believe those qualities would do people weel if they were in leadership . <br />The examples you gave were all of people who used Religion as power .  I think we agree actually .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meurig</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87482</link>
		<dc:creator>meurig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87482</guid>
		<description>Did I say that Christians shouldn&#039;t seek office?  I don&#039;t think I did, though I&#039;m pretty disgusted with the conduct of most of the Christians who have obtained high office both in the countries where I&#039;ve lived and in the US.&lt;br&gt;I agree with you about servant leadership - but that generally doesn&#039;t happen through the official channels.&lt;br&gt;What we have seen more often from Christians in charge is domineering leadership.   The crusades.  The inquisition.  The persecution of Jews throughout Europe.  (What happened when the Christians reconquered Spain? - Jews were tortured, killed, subjected to forced &quot;conversion&quot; or expelled.  And they fled not to another Christian state where they could expect more of the same but to muslim Turkey...)  Church support for slavery and for the slave trade.  (It was the Christians who &lt;b&gt;weren&#039;t&lt;/b&gt; in a position of secular power that got slavery outlawed in the British empire, and it was apparently powerless black Christians that brought an end to the horrors of segregation and discrimination and lynchmobs in the US south.)  Church support for 19th-century imperalism.  Active church involvement in stripping the culture of indigenous peoples from them, through residential schools, through legal bans on traditional ceremonies, through physical dislocation.  Church support underpinning dictators from Louis XVI to Franco to Verwoerd to Pinochet.  Unthinking backing for whatever wars the US may decide to enter into.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think it is an accident that Jesus chose not to be part of the religious establishment (like the pharisees and saducees), not to form close relationships with the Roman authorities (like the herodians) and not to attempt to wrest power out of their hands (like the zealots).  The power which He brought was something quite different - the power of self-emptying and self-sacrifice and total love.  A power which only really works if it is used from the bottom up, not from the top down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I say that Christians shouldn&#39;t seek office?  I don&#39;t think I did, though I&#39;m pretty disgusted with the conduct of most of the Christians who have obtained high office both in the countries where I&#39;ve lived and in the US.<br />I agree with you about servant leadership &#8211; but that generally doesn&#39;t happen through the official channels.<br />What we have seen more often from Christians in charge is domineering leadership.   The crusades.  The inquisition.  The persecution of Jews throughout Europe.  (What happened when the Christians reconquered Spain? &#8211; Jews were tortured, killed, subjected to forced &#8220;conversion&#8221; or expelled.  And they fled not to another Christian state where they could expect more of the same but to muslim Turkey&#8230;)  Church support for slavery and for the slave trade.  (It was the Christians who <b>weren&#39;t</b> in a position of secular power that got slavery outlawed in the British empire, and it was apparently powerless black Christians that brought an end to the horrors of segregation and discrimination and lynchmobs in the US south.)  Church support for 19th-century imperalism.  Active church involvement in stripping the culture of indigenous peoples from them, through residential schools, through legal bans on traditional ceremonies, through physical dislocation.  Church support underpinning dictators from Louis XVI to Franco to Verwoerd to Pinochet.  Unthinking backing for whatever wars the US may decide to enter into.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think it is an accident that Jesus chose not to be part of the religious establishment (like the pharisees and saducees), not to form close relationships with the Roman authorities (like the herodians) and not to attempt to wrest power out of their hands (like the zealots).  The power which He brought was something quite different &#8211; the power of self-emptying and self-sacrifice and total love.  A power which only really works if it is used from the bottom up, not from the top down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1Grace</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87476</link>
		<dc:creator>1Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87476</guid>
		<description>&quot;For Christian groups to achieve dominance in secular society is a very dangerous thing. We follow a Lord who gave no guidance for what to do when you are in a position of dominance &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meuring I really disagree with your belief that Christians should not seek office . And your example of what leadership I believe is from a secular view . Or possibly you are referencing leadership by Christians from what the Christian Right , religious Right tried to do .  Christ gave us the example of leadership , of being in charge . He took the shoes off of his disciples and Washed THEIR feet . &lt;br&gt;To be a great leader , you need to be a great servant .  I believe Christians should be in charge , much more would appear to get done that was good in my opinion .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For Christian groups to achieve dominance in secular society is a very dangerous thing. We follow a Lord who gave no guidance for what to do when you are in a position of dominance &#8220;</p>
<p>Meuring I really disagree with your belief that Christians should not seek office . And your example of what leadership I believe is from a secular view . Or possibly you are referencing leadership by Christians from what the Christian Right , religious Right tried to do .  Christ gave us the example of leadership , of being in charge . He took the shoes off of his disciples and Washed THEIR feet . <br />To be a great leader , you need to be a great servant .  I believe Christians should be in charge , much more would appear to get done that was good in my opinion .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87456</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87456</guid>
		<description>Really, anything that deals with the development of the Talmud would do it. You can find it in most libraries today. There is a concept of post-mortem judgment, but most rabbis rejected the idea of eternal suffering for all but a few irredeemable personalities, represented by archetypes of evil such as Pharoah, Amalek, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve even come across a reference that Zoroastrianism, in its earliest form, advocated universal redemption. I think it might have been more of a later Greco-Roman idea (but it&#039;s probably more complicated than that).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, including the book of Revelation in the NT might have been the factor most responsible for the theological nightmare conservative evangelicalism has become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, anything that deals with the development of the Talmud would do it. You can find it in most libraries today. There is a concept of post-mortem judgment, but most rabbis rejected the idea of eternal suffering for all but a few irredeemable personalities, represented by archetypes of evil such as Pharoah, Amalek, etc.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve even come across a reference that Zoroastrianism, in its earliest form, advocated universal redemption. I think it might have been more of a later Greco-Roman idea (but it&#39;s probably more complicated than that).</p>
<p>Yeah, including the book of Revelation in the NT might have been the factor most responsible for the theological nightmare conservative evangelicalism has become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonabark</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87454</link>
		<dc:creator>jonabark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87454</guid>
		<description>see below, I couldn&#039;t get your reply link to work at first. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; In essence the idea of hell has very primitive roots. One of the most universal aspects of human culture is the treatment of prisoners of war, enemies, criminals etc which frequently involves extended torture leading to death, slavery, sexual subjugation or assimilation/redemption. In that sense hell is  a mythologizing of cultural practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see below, I couldn&#39;t get your reply link to work at first. </p>
<p> In essence the idea of hell has very primitive roots. One of the most universal aspects of human culture is the treatment of prisoners of war, enemies, criminals etc which frequently involves extended torture leading to death, slavery, sexual subjugation or assimilation/redemption. In that sense hell is  a mythologizing of cultural practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonabark</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87453</link>
		<dc:creator>jonabark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87453</guid>
		<description>This is in reply to cipher whose reply link was not working. Yes I am speaking of how the idea enters and becomes dominant in  the New Testament. I see the roots going back to Zoroastrianism, and some pagan mythology and probably entering Judaism via the medo-persian empire. In many ways it is still somewhat spiritualized  and vague until the Book of the Revelation at which it appears in its vengeful , hateful fruition, and then it deepens into its darksome orthodox form via post Constantine church leaders and medieval fantasies.  I may be wrong but I do not see a direct route from Judaism to this doctrine. If you can recommend some writings related to the topic I would be very interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in reply to cipher whose reply link was not working. Yes I am speaking of how the idea enters and becomes dominant in  the New Testament. I see the roots going back to Zoroastrianism, and some pagan mythology and probably entering Judaism via the medo-persian empire. In many ways it is still somewhat spiritualized  and vague until the Book of the Revelation at which it appears in its vengeful , hateful fruition, and then it deepens into its darksome orthodox form via post Constantine church leaders and medieval fantasies.  I may be wrong but I do not see a direct route from Judaism to this doctrine. If you can recommend some writings related to the topic I would be very interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cipher</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87449</link>
		<dc:creator>cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87449</guid>
		<description>jonabark, you beat me to it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Although I&#039;d suggest you look a little more closely into the history of rabbinic thought. Eternal torture isn&#039;t really a Pharisaic idea.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jonabark, you beat me to it!</p>
<p>(Although I&#39;d suggest you look a little more closely into the history of rabbinic thought. Eternal torture isn&#39;t really a Pharisaic idea.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonabark</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87445</link>
		<dc:creator>jonabark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87445</guid>
		<description>I think you are wrong. If God intends to torture the majority of humans for eternity, and salvation is release from eternal torture, how are people who believe this picture of god prevented from using these methods?  After 20 years of living with this monstrous Pharisee theology I realized I could never love such a God and would rather be lost than praise and worship such a being.  Fortunately for all mankind and for the universe, there is no such being. This is the creation of religious   fearmongers  for profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are wrong. If God intends to torture the majority of humans for eternity, and salvation is release from eternal torture, how are people who believe this picture of god prevented from using these methods?  After 20 years of living with this monstrous Pharisee theology I realized I could never love such a God and would rather be lost than praise and worship such a being.  Fortunately for all mankind and for the universe, there is no such being. This is the creation of religious   fearmongers  for profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthurpena</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87444</link>
		<dc:creator>arthurpena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87444</guid>
		<description>Much has already been said about this post.  I realize it was a hoax.  But to even consider posting it reveals a dreadful ignorance of American history, and a dreadful appeal to American Exceptionalism.  We have been an empire very much like other empires (better than some, maybe worse than a few), and the list of the terrorist atrocities WE have committed around the world and here on our own soil (against the native Americans) is quite long.  No, the perpetrators of 911 did not &quot;start&quot; the war.  It started a long time ago...around the the time of the first man.  And we, as a nation, are FULLY complicit (along with the rest of the nations of the world) in the continuing story of injustice and man&#039;s inhumanity to man.  Far too many American Christians buy into American Exceptionalism, and have merged their nationalism with their faith.  It&#039;s a self-righteous strain of American life that began with the Puritans of Massachussetts (who could see themselves as the &quot;new Israel&quot;, and rejoice that so-called &quot;God&quot; had sent smallpox to clear the new Promised Land before them).  Fortunately, there has always been another current alongside the reactionary one.   Roger Williams of Rhode Island, for example.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has already been said about this post.  I realize it was a hoax.  But to even consider posting it reveals a dreadful ignorance of American history, and a dreadful appeal to American Exceptionalism.  We have been an empire very much like other empires (better than some, maybe worse than a few), and the list of the terrorist atrocities WE have committed around the world and here on our own soil (against the native Americans) is quite long.  No, the perpetrators of 911 did not &#8220;start&#8221; the war.  It started a long time ago&#8230;around the the time of the first man.  And we, as a nation, are FULLY complicit (along with the rest of the nations of the world) in the continuing story of injustice and man&#39;s inhumanity to man.  Far too many American Christians buy into American Exceptionalism, and have merged their nationalism with their faith.  It&#39;s a self-righteous strain of American life that began with the Puritans of Massachussetts (who could see themselves as the &#8220;new Israel&#8221;, and rejoice that so-called &#8220;God&#8221; had sent smallpox to clear the new Promised Land before them).  Fortunately, there has always been another current alongside the reactionary one.   Roger Williams of Rhode Island, for example&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonabark</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87443</link>
		<dc:creator>jonabark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87443</guid>
		<description>Maybe they should be feeling lousy. Failed to stop 9-11 attack, engaged in atrocities, helped a president deceive the public about a threat  that didn&#039;t exist, sent thousands to be tortured in Egypt, Poland , Jordan, Syria etc.  What&#039;s to be proud of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they should be feeling lousy. Failed to stop 9-11 attack, engaged in atrocities, helped a president deceive the public about a threat  that didn&#39;t exist, sent thousands to be tortured in Egypt, Poland , Jordan, Syria etc.  What&#39;s to be proud of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Patriot&#8217;s Bible, and Christians Debate Torture, Really?!?! &#171; One beggar trying to lead other beggars to bread&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87437</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Patriot&#8217;s Bible, and Christians Debate Torture, Really?!?! &#171; One beggar trying to lead other beggars to bread&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87437</guid>
		<description>[...] according to a new Pew Forum on Religion &amp; Public Life poll and this article from CNN and this post by Brian McLaren at God&#8217;s Politics. Wow, that makes my soul weep and deeply grieves me. It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] according to a new Pew Forum on Religion &amp; Public Life poll and this article from CNN and this post by Brian McLaren at God&#8217;s Politics. Wow, that makes my soul weep and deeply grieves me. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaveTossed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/01/white-evangelicals-for-torture/comment-page-2/#comment-87439</link>
		<dc:creator>WaveTossed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8319#comment-87439</guid>
		<description>&quot;I wouldn&#039;t cut their heads off. Our intel community is being &lt;br&gt;castigated for things that are being called torture that basically &lt;br&gt;fall into the category of a college hazing week. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Truly? A &quot;college hazing week?&quot; And how do you know? Were you there?  I doubt it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I saw on TV where Sean Hannity volunteered to be water-boarded and a certain amount (I don&#039;t remember exactly how much) would be paid to organizations supporting U.S. Service people for each minute that he endured the water-boarding. Later in the week, Hannity had rescinded his offer. So perhaps you might want to offer yourself to be water-boarded in order to donate money to U.S. Service people. If you do that, I would be the first person to offer you donations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wouldn&#39;t cut their heads off. Our intel community is being <br />castigated for things that are being called torture that basically <br />fall into the category of a college hazing week. &#8220;</p>
<p>Truly? A &#8220;college hazing week?&#8221; And how do you know? Were you there?  I doubt it.</p>
<p>I saw on TV where Sean Hannity volunteered to be water-boarded and a certain amount (I don&#39;t remember exactly how much) would be paid to organizations supporting U.S. Service people for each minute that he endured the water-boarding. Later in the week, Hannity had rescinded his offer. So perhaps you might want to offer yourself to be water-boarded in order to donate money to U.S. Service people. If you do that, I would be the first person to offer you donations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
