RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

The Unique Awareness, Insight, and Wisdom of Women

by Mimi Haddad 05-18-2009

As friends and I met for dinner to enjoy pictures of mutual friends’ wedding, their four-year old joined in the fun. At one point I asked this child which picture was her favorite, and she quickly pointed to one saying, “This one!” When I asked why, she pointed again and uttered the name of her best friend. Her parents and I strained our eyes to have another look. We’d been focusing on the images of adults and failed to observe a little girl—her best friend—poking her head just slightly around her mother’s knee. We all broke into laugher realizing we had missed something very precious to this child. It took another little girl to observe what had been invisible to us adults. It was one of those profound moments when you suddenly realize how experience shapes observation.

This was what happened in the 1800s, as slaves began to read and interpret Scriptures. When slaves learned to read the Bible, they saw themselves in the Exodus story. Their experiences of slavery greatly informed an understanding of Scripture that is beneficial for all of us!

The same is true of women. As women entered universities in the 1800s, they began making significant theological contributions, interpreting astutely those texts that concern gender. Consider the seminal work of Katharine Bushnell (1856-1946), a medical doctor who learned Greek and Hebrew in order to understand God’s message on gender. Her groundbreaking scholarship, God’s Word to Women, informed by her medical work among abused women, continues to enlighten the work of egalitarians today!

Because women bring specific and different insights to Scripture, it is important to include their voices in the decisions we make as the church. A recent example makes this point clear. Invited to participate in a week’s discussion on evangelism, 24 male and 3 female delegates gathered to explore key issues impacting the church, including gender. It was a woman in the group who noticed that the version of Scripture selected often rendered women invisible, interpreting words like anthropos—Greek for “people”—as “men.” When it came time to review proposed speakers for a future conference, it was a woman who noticed a total absence of female speakers. It was a woman who resisted the request that a woman serve as their secretary. When the group selected articles to publish, a paper on gender—written by a woman—was declined. Who will notice? Women and those who support them. This experience highlights the challenges women encounter when working for change within the churches and organizations they serve.

If our experiences as women bring awareness, insight, and wisdom to our understanding of God’s Word, and if only men are permitted to teach and interpret Scripture, we deprive the church of the insights of more than half its members! Is this a wise practice, and does it engage the contributions God intended women to make?

Consider how differently Christ behaved! Is it not interesting that our Lord (who lived in a very patriarchal society) used females as key figures in many of his parables and other teachings? Clearly, Jesus loved and valued women, and he made this clear by including their voices and experiences throughout his work. If we are followers of Jesus should we not be doing the same? And should we not be demonstrating it in our churches and Christian organizations?

Mimi Haddad

Mimi Haddad is president of Christians for Biblical Equality. Join her this July 24-26 and consider these themes more closely at CBE’s 2009 conference, titled “Are Men from Mars and Women from Venus? A Biblical Response to Gender Difference.”

Categories: Diversity, Gender, Ministry
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • mazbeth
    to Keith Smith
    you do not seem to be fully aware of the culture of that day, and the dangers...
    you said;
    "If Jesus wanted to send a message to a patriachial society, why would he had not chosen a woman as one of the 12 apostles?

    because he would have not wanted her to be stoned/killed before the message could be passed onto others after his departure...
    a woman preaching would have been, in that society as it was then...
    and as they still are, metaphorically in some quarters today, even in the so-called civilised West.

    useful: scroll down
    http://www.churchofgoddfw.com/monthly/junia.shtml
  • Bideshi
    Keithsmith, you missed my point. Mary may not have been named as "one of the 12", but in this story she is accepted by Jesus as a disciple. As BlueDeacon says, it was considered uncouth - but still Jesus did it. We sometimes have to look beyond the words spoken and look at what the recorded actions say. Jesus accepted Mary in the position of a disciple. Despite Paul's words that we wrestle with, take a look at the number of women ministering in the churches that Paul establishes in Acts, and the number of women that Paul greets by name and role in his Epistles, and then you have to realise that there must be something different to what we have understood behind his words.
  • canucklehead
    no Amway salesmen, neither
  • squeaky
    I don't think you can decide who has authority in the church based on the identity of the disciples. If you do, why are you stopping at gender? You might note there were no Gentiles amongst the 12. Should that also mean that only Jews have the right to authority in the church? There also were no Pharisees amongst the 12. Should that mean that Paul shouldn't have had any authority? I don't think any of the 12 were very old or very young--does that mean that only people of a certain age can be church authorities? Should only fishermen be allowed church leadership roles? If you are going to start excluding people from leadership roles based on the character and identity of the 12, then go all the way with it. Don't just stop at gender.
  • squeaky
    It may be because our world view is very different from the world view of 1st century Judaism. Jesus' actions that elevated the status of women doesn't seem that ground breaking or earth-shaking to us, in a 21st century western world where women have the same rights as men and are seen as equal (but remember, this only has happened to the degree it does today within the last 30 years). Any elevation of women's status in Jesus day was very earth-shaking.

    There is a cultural context that needs to be considered before coming to the conclusion that Jesus didn't intend women to ever take on leadership roles, and we lose a lot of meaning when we try to interpret Scripture from our western mindset.
  • WaveTossed
    A "rector" is the lead minister of an Episcopal church. I believe that Catholics also use this term.
  • keithsmith
    Absolutely, women have major roles to play in Jesus' ministry. But did any women serve as one of the 12 Apostles.

    And absolutely, Jesus rocked the boat with tax collectors, prostitutes and even women.

    Which even gives more credibility to the point that if Jesus wanted to really rock the boat by giving a woman a position of leadership as one of the 12 Apostles, He would have had no problem to do so. And yet he did not.
  • keithsmith
    1) We have hundreds of woman playing vital and the most important roles in the church. They are reflecting his glory, his mercy, his love and his sacrifice in their everyday lives.

    THAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT AND VITAL ROLE AND ALL ELSE IS SECONDARY.

    2) I don't know what a rector is.
  • Several years ago, a man I knew went to Israel and got a crash course in Middle Eastern and Jewish culture. After further study, he explained all these to us with a series of lectures.
  • Bideshi
    BlueDeacon, Where did you get that one from????
  • Bideshi
    Keithsmith - Read again the story of Martha and Mary. Part of Martha's problem was that Mary was sitting in the place of a disciple, not in a woman's "place". As far as Martha was concerned Jesus and Mary were 'rocking the boat'. Jesus told Martha "Mary has chosen the right thing..." the right thing being that she was sitting in the place and role of a disciple.
  • teller
    I'd love to discuss this with someone good at ancient Hebrew and Greek. I tend to think that we misunderstand the actual meaning of the 'otherwise they might' phrase. Jesus repeatedly asks those with ears to 'use them'. So I think the meaning really is that they look but refuse to see and they hear but refuse to understand.
  • WaveTossed
    I don't know about your church. But my church (an Episcopal church) has a woman playing a vital and important role in our church. She is the rector.
  • The 12 didn't become the 12 till later in Jesus' ministry.

    That's not necessarily the case, as parts of the Gospels, especially Matthew's account, are not sequential.
  • keithsmith
    The 12 didn't become the 12 till later in Jesus' ministry. He had 72 disciples that he sent out in pairs in Luke 10. The 72 had power to heal the sick and demons submitted to them.

    And puzzling, there were some that he told them NOT TO HEAL THE SICK if they did not welcome him.

    Again, an incident that Jesus' ministry was not 100% inclusive.
  • It's likely that they had turned to fishing only after they were turned down by other rabbis. The tradition of that day was that you went to a rabbi to study under him, generally around the age of 14; Peter was probably around 18. (In this, Jesus also turned convention on its head by calling them.) What probably happened was that the Twelve were thinking, "Here's the 'super-rabbi,' with teaching we haven't heard before, and he's inviting me? Heck, yeah!"
  • keithsmith
    I agree, the early church had that same problem. So, in essence we are not much different than those walked with Jesus in regards to this.
  • keithsmith
    We discussed this in another thread about parables (especially seed of the sower) in which Jesus was questioned on why he taught in parables and he responded by saying "otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them."

    Jesus can be very puzzling at times.

    But I hold the view that we only get to see part of the picture. When we get to Heaven, we will see His view and then understand.
  • teller
    Indeed!! As you note, even the patriarchs were told that they were to be a 'light to the nations.' My point was to ponder why Jesus would use 'dog', conventional (to his culture) exclusive type language, at one point when all nations were to be included. Sometimes Jesus seemed to puzzle, and offend, religious folks of his day and, when we look close, he even puzzles his followers today.
  • keithsmith
    It won't let me edit the above post, so I will add to it here.

    I guess I could be upset that he did not bless me with the same gifts that he did for TobyMac, Michael W, Mac Powell, etc, etc. Or I can accept that he has a different role for me and try to play that role to the best of my abilities.

    I choose the latter instead of the former.

    Instead of being upset about the gifts I don't have and the roles I am not to play, be thankful for the gifts I do have and the role I am asked to play.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008