<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dick Cheney’s Contempt for Americans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/</link>
	<description>A Blog by Jim Wallis and Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:46:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LShave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-2/#comment-110361</link>
		<dc:creator>LShave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-110361</guid>
		<description>Really? This is the point of Sojourners? Blog entries from a purely liberal standpoint to tear down politicians?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? This is the point of Sojourners? Blog entries from a purely liberal standpoint to tear down politicians?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LShave</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-106516</link>
		<dc:creator>LShave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-106516</guid>
		<description>Really? This is the point of Sojourners? Blog entries from a purely liberal standpoint to tear down politicians?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? This is the point of Sojourners? Blog entries from a purely liberal standpoint to tear down politicians?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mscynthia</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-106517</link>
		<dc:creator>mscynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-106517</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always wanted to lock up Rice and Cheny in the same room for a month and bug the room with microphones.&lt;br&gt;Keep talking Mr. Cheney.  Blab to all.&lt;br&gt;Then we will finally know what the last 8 years was all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve always wanted to lock up Rice and Cheny in the same room for a month and bug the room with microphones.<br />Keep talking Mr. Cheney.  Blab to all.<br />Then we will finally know what the last 8 years was all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wonder</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-106518</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-106518</guid>
		<description>Blue Dog Coalition.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue Dog Coalition.</p>
<p>Google it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lysager</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-106519</link>
		<dc:creator>lysager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 20:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-106519</guid>
		<description>Reading most of the contentious commentary really helps me. It helps me to pray &quot;Thy Kingdom Come, Thy will Be Done, On Earth as in Heaven&quot;. Most of the bickering here, on talk radio, and other venues begins to take on all the charm of freeway noise. The solution to the problems in America and the world are not political ones. They are indeed the matters of the heart and spirit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading most of the contentious commentary really helps me. It helps me to pray &#8220;Thy Kingdom Come, Thy will Be Done, On Earth as in Heaven&#8221;. Most of the bickering here, on talk radio, and other venues begins to take on all the charm of freeway noise. The solution to the problems in America and the world are not political ones. They are indeed the matters of the heart and spirit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US security: battle for hearts and minds heats up &#124; Mission &#38; Justice</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88456</link>
		<dc:creator>US security: battle for hearts and minds heats up &#124; Mission &#38; Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 04:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88456</guid>
		<description>[...] Obery M. Hendricks, Jr. is Professor of Biblical Interpretation at New York Theological Seminary and the author of The Politics of Jesus: Rediscovering the True Revolutionary Nature of Jesus’ Teachings and How They Have Been Corrupted (Doubleday, 2006). See: http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obery M. Hendricks, Jr. is Professor of Biblical Interpretation at New York Theological Seminary and the author of The Politics of Jesus: Rediscovering the True Revolutionary Nature of Jesus’ Teachings and How They Have Been Corrupted (Doubleday, 2006). See: <a href="http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justice_seeker</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-106520</link>
		<dc:creator>justice_seeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-106520</guid>
		<description>You guys are certainly not afraid to duke it out on here. But that&#039;s what I appreciate about this place. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;This article says more about SOJO than it does Cheney.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure it&#039;s a post allowed by SOJO, but granted it was written by an individual who has their own opinions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whether we agree with this article or not, we need to welcome the prophetic who speak out against those who decieve. Jesus loves all of mankind everyone, but did not fail to rebuke the pharisees of their hypocrisy. I believe that Hendricks is doing just that, here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are certainly not afraid to duke it out on here. But that&#39;s what I appreciate about this place. </p>
<p>&#8220;This article says more about SOJO than it does Cheney.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure it&#39;s a post allowed by SOJO, but granted it was written by an individual who has their own opinions. </p>
<p>Whether we agree with this article or not, we need to welcome the prophetic who speak out against those who decieve. Jesus loves all of mankind everyone, but did not fail to rebuke the pharisees of their hypocrisy. I believe that Hendricks is doing just that, here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaveTossed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-106521</link>
		<dc:creator>WaveTossed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-106521</guid>
		<description>&quot;The problem with Ron Paul is that he won&#039;t make the necessary compromises to govern properly, which is why his campaigns go nowhere despite fervent support. He actually first gained attention because from the start he opposed the war in Iraq on principle, not because of the waste in troops and money.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is because Rep. Paul is a person of principle. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;BTW, I was not referring to Ron Paul in that post -- it was Paul Quillman, who had also posted on this thread.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ooops! &lt;embarassed grin&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The problem with Ron Paul is that he won&#39;t make the necessary compromises to govern properly, which is why his campaigns go nowhere despite fervent support. He actually first gained attention because from the start he opposed the war in Iraq on principle, not because of the waste in troops and money.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is because Rep. Paul is a person of principle. </p>
<p>&#8220;BTW, I was not referring to Ron Paul in that post &#8212; it was Paul Quillman, who had also posted on this thread.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ooops! &lt;embarassed grin&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpd</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-106522</link>
		<dc:creator>cpd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-106522</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if someone else commented on this or not (I can&#039;t get all the comments to show) but this line from the article is baffling:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Rather than one possessed of a servant’s concern for the American people, he is a man apparently possessed by a startling but consistent contempt for senior citizens, for poor and needy Americans and their children, for desperate workers stripped of their only source of income, and for everyday Americans struggling to educate their children, put food on their tables, and maintain decent homes – in other words, for almost all of those he claims to serve.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think those votes are clearly an attempt to serve Americans by calling us to live to a higher standard.  Not a higher standard of living but of personal responsibility.  All the people the author mentions (old folks, poor, children, etc) should be helped by the church, not the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t know if someone else commented on this or not (I can&#39;t get all the comments to show) but this line from the article is baffling:</p>
<p>&#8220;Rather than one possessed of a servant’s concern for the American people, he is a man apparently possessed by a startling but consistent contempt for senior citizens, for poor and needy Americans and their children, for desperate workers stripped of their only source of income, and for everyday Americans struggling to educate their children, put food on their tables, and maintain decent homes – in other words, for almost all of those he claims to serve.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think those votes are clearly an attempt to serve Americans by calling us to live to a higher standard.  Not a higher standard of living but of personal responsibility.  All the people the author mentions (old folks, poor, children, etc) should be helped by the church, not the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckeyeDon</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-106523</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckeyeDon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-106523</guid>
		<description>Well, we wouldn&#039;t be discussing Cheney&#039;s 20-year-old voting record at all if he hadn&#039;t been in our faces with his criticisms of Obama, true? Obrey Hendricks wasn&#039;t motivated to write a &quot;hit piece&quot; on George W. Bush, for example, because the former president is behaving graciously, and not like an attack dog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can decide whether you think this is a Christian sentiment, but I believe that Cheney is well deserving of whatever he gets in the way of verbal counterassaults. We must counter him because his criticisms are poison--it&#039;s not for the sake of the nation that Cheney speaks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we wouldn&#39;t be discussing Cheney&#39;s 20-year-old voting record at all if he hadn&#39;t been in our faces with his criticisms of Obama, true? Obrey Hendricks wasn&#39;t motivated to write a &#8220;hit piece&#8221; on George W. Bush, for example, because the former president is behaving graciously, and not like an attack dog.</p>
<p>You can decide whether you think this is a Christian sentiment, but I believe that Cheney is well deserving of whatever he gets in the way of verbal counterassaults. We must counter him because his criticisms are poison&#8211;it&#39;s not for the sake of the nation that Cheney speaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueDeacon</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88371</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueDeacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88371</guid>
		<description>Finally -- someone here who&#039;s talking sense.  As I said, they used principles for their own aggrandizement -- and, ironically, eventually lost it all in the process.  I confess to being gratified when Bill Clinton called Gingrich&#039;s bluff on a balanced budget and put an end to that &quot;revolution.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally &#8212; someone here who&#39;s talking sense.  As I said, they used principles for their own aggrandizement &#8212; and, ironically, eventually lost it all in the process.  I confess to being gratified when Bill Clinton called Gingrich&#39;s bluff on a balanced budget and put an end to that &#8220;revolution.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaveTossed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88365</link>
		<dc:creator>WaveTossed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88365</guid>
		<description>Xfree9, I&#039;ve learned in the past few years that there are three basic types of &quot;conservatives.&quot; There are neo-conservatives. This tendency was started by the ideas of Irving and William Kristol. They decided that big government really wasn&#039;t so bad as long as big government was there to uphold their ideas of &quot;conservative principles.&quot; The Neo-cons also wanted to &quot;spread freedom&quot; i.e. invade various foreign countries such as Iraq. They also believe that government&#039;s role is to legislate private behavior in line with what they see as &quot;moral.&quot; Which would mean that they oppose states&#039; rights when it comes to the rights of states to make drugs legal or else legalize Gay marriage. In these cases, they want the Federal government to over-ride states&#039; rights. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then there are the &quot;Paleo-Conservatives.&quot; These are people such at Pat Buchanan, who oppose foreign entanglements. However, they also depend upon government control of free-trade, such as putting up tariffs on foreign goods. They also have a tendency to believe that government can legislate &quot;morality.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then we have Libertarians (you and I). In many ways, we are political &quot;orphans.&quot; We don&#039;t quite fit in either the &quot;conservative&quot; or &quot;liberal&quot; camps. Libertarians believe in small government and civil liberties and want government to stay out of our personal lives.  We also believe in free trade with less (or no) restrictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xfree9, I&#39;ve learned in the past few years that there are three basic types of &#8220;conservatives.&#8221; There are neo-conservatives. This tendency was started by the ideas of Irving and William Kristol. They decided that big government really wasn&#39;t so bad as long as big government was there to uphold their ideas of &#8220;conservative principles.&#8221; The Neo-cons also wanted to &#8220;spread freedom&#8221; i.e. invade various foreign countries such as Iraq. They also believe that government&#39;s role is to legislate private behavior in line with what they see as &#8220;moral.&#8221; Which would mean that they oppose states&#39; rights when it comes to the rights of states to make drugs legal or else legalize Gay marriage. In these cases, they want the Federal government to over-ride states&#39; rights. </p>
<p>Then there are the &#8220;Paleo-Conservatives.&#8221; These are people such at Pat Buchanan, who oppose foreign entanglements. However, they also depend upon government control of free-trade, such as putting up tariffs on foreign goods. They also have a tendency to believe that government can legislate &#8220;morality.&#8221; </p>
<p>Then we have Libertarians (you and I). In many ways, we are political &#8220;orphans.&#8221; We don&#39;t quite fit in either the &#8220;conservative&#8221; or &#8220;liberal&#8221; camps. Libertarians believe in small government and civil liberties and want government to stay out of our personal lives.  We also believe in free trade with less (or no) restrictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaveTossed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88364</link>
		<dc:creator>WaveTossed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88364</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, Cheney has twisted and violated the role of government. The Founders wanted restraints on the government. Cheney wants big, overriding intrusive government that invades foreign countries without reason, wire-taps Americans without warrants, holds people without being charged. True conservatives (such as Goldwater) are undoubtedly rolling in their graves at Cheney&#039;s perversion of American government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Cheney has twisted and violated the role of government. The Founders wanted restraints on the government. Cheney wants big, overriding intrusive government that invades foreign countries without reason, wire-taps Americans without warrants, holds people without being charged. True conservatives (such as Goldwater) are undoubtedly rolling in their graves at Cheney&#39;s perversion of American government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neuro_nurse</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88362</link>
		<dc:creator>neuro_nurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88362</guid>
		<description>I agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wordherder62</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88357</link>
		<dc:creator>wordherder62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88357</guid>
		<description>The problem you talk about is the &quot;sideline conservatives.&quot; They never run for office, they never do any public service and they whine about how the people they voted for have &quot;stolen&quot; conservatism. No, it wasn&#039;t stolen. It was freely given away to people who clearly only desired power. Newt Gingrich is the poster child here after promising America a new way of doing business when a Republican majority was elected to Congress he immediately set about to increase the power of himself personally and that of his part in general with a vicious campaign against anybody who dared to question his efforts in Congress--attacks that were personal and rarely based on the arguments being made. It was a new way of doing business--one so vicious you&#039;d have to go back to the early years of the Republic to replicate it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The evangelicals in America were sold a different bill of goods and it is every bit as vicious in that there has been nothing Bibilical about the past administraiton and its policies. But they were told the same thing that the sideliners were told:  &quot;Hey, you&#039;ve got to vote for us because we&#039;re all you&#039;ve got.&quot; Well, no, the truth is the sideliners and evangelicals should have long ago simply withdrawn their support for this bunch of neer-do-wells so they would have dried up and gone away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem you talk about is the &#8220;sideline conservatives.&#8221; They never run for office, they never do any public service and they whine about how the people they voted for have &#8220;stolen&#8221; conservatism. No, it wasn&#39;t stolen. It was freely given away to people who clearly only desired power. Newt Gingrich is the poster child here after promising America a new way of doing business when a Republican majority was elected to Congress he immediately set about to increase the power of himself personally and that of his part in general with a vicious campaign against anybody who dared to question his efforts in Congress&#8211;attacks that were personal and rarely based on the arguments being made. It was a new way of doing business&#8211;one so vicious you&#39;d have to go back to the early years of the Republic to replicate it.</p>
<p>The evangelicals in America were sold a different bill of goods and it is every bit as vicious in that there has been nothing Bibilical about the past administraiton and its policies. But they were told the same thing that the sideliners were told:  &#8220;Hey, you&#39;ve got to vote for us because we&#39;re all you&#39;ve got.&#8221; Well, no, the truth is the sideliners and evangelicals should have long ago simply withdrawn their support for this bunch of neer-do-wells so they would have dried up and gone away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anothernonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88344</link>
		<dc:creator>Anothernonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88344</guid>
		<description>&quot;There&#039;s a rationale for each of these votes based on the long-established conservative understanding of the role of government.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That may well be, but then I am rationally entitled to say that a person who would cast such votes is not a person to whom I would entrust the well being of my family and friends. That is a statement motivated by love, not hatred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There&#39;s a rationale for each of these votes based on the long-established conservative understanding of the role of government.&#8221;</p>
<p>That may well be, but then I am rationally entitled to say that a person who would cast such votes is not a person to whom I would entrust the well being of my family and friends. That is a statement motivated by love, not hatred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffp</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88342</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88342</guid>
		<description>My point exactly.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This article says more about SOJO than it does Cheney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point exactly.  </p>
<p>This article says more about SOJO than it does Cheney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anothernonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88341</link>
		<dc:creator>Anothernonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88341</guid>
		<description>&quot;I know that there are people who do not love their fellow men, and I hate people like that.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Tom Lehrer, &quot;That Was the Year That Was&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I know that there are people who do not love their fellow men, and I hate people like that.&#8221;</p>
<p>- Tom Lehrer, &#8220;That Was the Year That Was&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neuro_nurse</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88329</link>
		<dc:creator>neuro_nurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88329</guid>
		<description>&quot;is it fair to attribute contempt to another person&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;is it fair to attribute contempt to another person&#8221;</p>
<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffp</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/20/the-contemptible-cheney%e2%80%99s-contempt-for-america/comment-page-1/#comment-88322</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8735#comment-88322</guid>
		<description>Criticism is fair but, as far as I’m concerned, attributing hatred to another person is not. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting, is it fair to attribute contempt to another person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Criticism is fair but, as far as I’m concerned, attributing hatred to another person is not. </p>
<p>Interesting, is it fair to attribute contempt to another person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
