RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

The End of Christianity?

by Soong-Chan Rah 05-22-2009

Last month, in an issue of Newsweek, Jon Meacham describes what he perceives to be “The End of Christian America.”  Meacham asserts that “Christians are now making up a declining percentage of the American population,” leading to the “end of a Christian America.”  In the opening paragraph of the Newsweek article, Al Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, laments what he perceives to be a disturbing trend. “As Mohler saw it, the historic foundation of America’s religious culture was cracking.”  Mohler is particularly disturbed by the decline of Christianity in New England, as he states: “to lose New England struck me as momentous.”

As many lament the decline of Christianity in the United States in the early stages of the 21st century, very few have recognized that American Christianity may actually be growing, but in unexpected and surprising ways.  Let’s take for example the Northeastern city of Boston in a region of the country that Mohler believes we have “lost.”  In 1970, the city of Boston was home to about 200 churches.  Thirty years later, there were 412 churches.  The net gain in the number of churches was in the growth of the number of churches in the ethnic and immigrant communities.  While only a handful of churches in 1970 held services in a language other than English, thirty years later, more than half of those churches held services in a language other than English.

Between 2001 and 2006, 98 new churches were planted in the city of Boston.[1] In a city the size of Boston, 98 new church plants in a six year time periods is not spiritual death, it is spiritual life and vitality. Of the 98 churches planted during that six year time period, “76 of them reported the language of worship.  Of those 76 churches, almost half of them … [have] non-English or bi-lingual [services], 19 worship in Spanish, 8 in Haitian Creole, and 9 in Portuguese.”[2] The perception nationally was that Boston was spiritually dead because there was noticeable decline among the white Christian community.  In contrast, there has been significant growth among non-white Christians and churches.

When I was a pastor in Boston, I consistently heard the lament over the decline of Christianity in the city of Boston.  However, the Boston I knew was filled with vibrant and exciting churches.  New churches were being planted throughout the city.  Christian programs and ministries were booming in the city.  Boston is alive with spiritual revival, particularly among the ethnic minority communities.  But very few seem to recognize this reality, even as this trend begins to appear nationally.

As sociologist R. Stephen Warner points out, “What many people have not heard … and need to hear is that the great majority of the newcomers are Christians. … This means that the new immigrants represent not the de-Christianization of American society but the de-Europeanization of American Christianity.”[3] Contrary to popular opinion, the church is not dying in America; it is alive and well, but it is alive and well among the immigrant and ethnic minority communities and not among the majority white churches in the United States.  As we enter into a new era for American Christianity, we may indeed identify this era as a post-Western, post-white American Christianity.  But we may also assert that this development may actually be the salvation of American Christianity rather than the decline and demise of American Christianity.

Instead of the collapse of evangelicalism, we are actually seeing the revival of American Christianity in a vastly different form.  Evangelicalism has been consistently portrayed in the media as a group of white, upper-middle class, suburban, Republicans.  Is it any wonder that the black church will oftentimes refuse this designation?  Or that other ethnic minority Christians feel marginalized from the very community that shares their basic values and beliefs?

But now there is a new era for Christianity in America.  A Next Evangelicalism — an evangelicalism that crosses across racial and ethnic lines with a shared value system rather than a political agenda.  Evangelicalism is not dead, it is being redefined by a new constituency – hopefully for the better.

Soong-Chan Rah is the author of The Next Evangelicalism: Freeing the Church from Western Cultural Captivity and the Milton B. Engebretson Associate Professor of Church Growth and Evangelism at North Park Theological Seminary.  www.ProfRah.com


[1] Brian Corcoran, “The Growing Edge of Boston’s Church Community,” New England’s Book of Acts (Boston: Emmanuel Gospel Center, 2007), 11.

[2] Ibid., 12.

[3] R. Stephen Warner.  “Coming to American” (Christian Century, February 10, 2004). p.20.

Categories: Faith and Politics
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • obholmen
    I have quoted from this post and linked to it in my blog, http://www.theliberalspirit.com/?p=412
  • ando
    This was an important post. Thank you for broadening the perspective, soong-chan rah. The denomination of my current church -- Evangelical Covenant -- is one of those at the forefront of minority church planting in the US. I believe immigrants bring a decidedly different perspective to the American culture, often dominated by the rantings of both the left and right. The key is whether they can maintain the integrity of their cultures and not acquiese to the dominant American paradigm of money, sex and power.
  • 1Grace
    "The key is whether they can maintain the integrity of their cultures"

    I am in one of those denominations that is actually growing . But I would say it might have some to do with those new immigrants coming to this country , our denomination has diverse congregations.

    But The American church culture appears dominated by rationalizing , and I think it would be wrong to say even growing denominations do not have to deal with it .. As you say keeping the integrity of their culture . The culture of humanism and the rationalizing behind it almost always is seen going for the greater good. But it is not Christian , and it is is becoming more and more doctrinal in our churches .

    If you can't figure out the scripture , it was written in correctly .
    Humanism is the religion of academia, and its influence our culture is dominating it in my opinion. My pastor says America has a bank roll of Christian Spirituality . Sort of like why does a person prosper perhaps when we all see he or she is doing everything wrong . Well someone is praying for that person , or he had a Grand Ma that prayed for him and never gave up .
  • PASTOR JEFF
    Where might we have acquired this "bankroll"? I'd love to hear some of your pastor's sermons.
  • 1Grace
    The bankroll ? Say after a life of your excellent example of a Christian
    life , your prayers for those you love and those you do not . You leave
    behind examples of a God loving life . Even though people such as myself,
    say your kids perhaps, who do not follow the God Of Truth , we follow our
    own idols and dreams of success. Perhaps never actually following Christ ,
    but still following much of the examples you gave to our lives but we still receive
    the benefits of those examples that they cause , and also the
    benefits of your prayers you had given . Thats the spirtual bankroll Jeff . The lives of the saints now and those who lived before us .
    The prayers you gave and others
    like you . So it may give some people much concern that
    a person like me and others appear exempt from the Lord's Justice , it is
    actually because we have had people in my and other lives such as your self
    who loved God so much and gave us enough of a legacy to receive the benefits
    say of following God , without really actually following Him , in some cases
    not even trying .
  • PASTOR JEFF
    Those are fine sentiments, but Scripture clearly states "the soul that sinneth, it shall die". Each person, generation, institution or nation is responsible before God for it's own spiritual reward. You may want to check in on our Catholic friends on that whole "reservoir of grace" thing.
  • WaveTossed
    "The culture of humanism and the rationalizing behind it almost always is seen going for the greater good. But it is not Christian , and it is is becoming more and more doctrinal in our churches."

    Do me a favor and please define "humanism." And please show me in what ways this doctrine is not "Christian," even if some Christian churches are (according to what you say) adopting this doctrine.

    I'm not trying to argue with you. I'm trying to understand. I've heard the term "secular humanism" before. I've visited a site dedicated to self-described Humanist thought. I don't see that much difference between what was advocated at this Humanist site and what is advocated at many Christian churches. Other than that some of these Humanists don't explicitly worship Jesus or God. Some of these Humanists might be atheists, but I didn't get the impression that all of them were. And some of them may be explicitly Christian, believing in God and in Jesus Christ as the Son of God.

    So please tell me why "the culture of humanism" is -- as a whole -- "not Christian." It would seem that some Humanists are Christian and many are not.
  • 1Grace
    Wave Humanism to me is basically the human rationalizing of life , and it is
    geared towards the greater good .
    My arguemnt with Humanism is it is godless or can be godless. Its a philospy
    we use because it makes sense to us .
    Working and volunteering for the schools I saw schools change an approach to
    discipline , education , and community values .
    For instance a 14 year old having sex , one time considered immoral ,
    unhealthy . Its still unhealthy , immoral , destrutive to
    that child . But even Christians accept humanism as part of our "universal
    " method of dealing with the culture . We see it as neutral.
    President Obama used it in his Notre Dame speech, it was a great speech .
    But his neutrality was abortion being ok and ok to be against it .
    Thats not neutral , a great speech , but not neutral from a Christian
    perspective . Or the Pope's . I agree that civility and working together is
    a good idea . Maybe that is Humanism also . But its logical to me .

    It would be inappropriate now in a school district to have a teacher or
    Nurse tell this young girl what she is doing is wrong .
    Secular Humanism is considered neutral .It is anything but for that 14 year
    old little girl .
    Nothing is new under the Sun, we have always tried to take on the role of
    God and rationalize life out for ourself .
    But if it is disguised for good or evil , I believe the results end up the
    same .
  • WaveTossed
    Thanks for your answer. A few comments on each of your points and also more questions:

    You wrote: "Wave Humanism to me is basically the human rationalizing of life , and it is
    geared towards the greater good .
    My arguemnt with Humanism is it is godless or can be godless. Its a philospy
    we use because it makes sense to us ."

    Wow! I didn't know that there is actually a philosophy called "Secular Humanism." There is a Website:

    http://www.secularhumanism.org/

    Here is their basic statement of beliefs:

    "Secular Humanism is a way of thinking and living that aims to bring out the best in people so that all people can have the best in life. Secular humanists reject supernatural and authoritarian beliefs. They affirm that we must take responsibility for our own lives and the communities and world in which we live. Secular humanism emphasizes reason and scientific inquiry, individual freedom and responsibility, human values and compassion, and the need for tolerance and cooperation."

    Needless to say, I am not a Secular Humanist because I believe in religion and I believe in God. And I believe in Jesus Christ as God's Son and Savior. I was in church today and as always, we recited together the Nicene Creed to affirm our beliefs in One God the Father, His Son, and the Holy Spirit.

    However, some of the values expressed by this site we do have in common: Human values, compassion, taking responsibility for our own lives. Agreeing with some of these values doesn't make me a Secular Humanist.

    "Working and volunteering for the schools I saw schools change an approach to
    discipline , education , and community values .
    For instance a 14 year old having sex , one time considered immoral ,
    unhealthy . Its still unhealthy , immoral , destrutive to
    that child . But even Christians accept humanism as part of our 'universal
    ' method of dealing with the culture . We see it as neutral."

    I don't know about your church, but my church doesn't see 14 year old having sex as "neutral." We see it in our lives and we believe that it is unhealthy. I don't know of any Christian churches that see sex performed by 14 year olds as being "healthy" and needs to be accepted as part of any "universal" method of dealing with our culture. I also failed to see any statement like that on the Secular Humanist site.

    Teen age sex and also pedophilia is a serious problem. In too many instances, people seem to see sex between teen-agers and adults as being something "perfectly natural" as long as it is "consensual." This is true especially when the sex is between a teen-age boy and an adult woman. Too many people seem to think that this isn't child abuse, that this is "a teen-ager's wet dream" or some such nonsense. Fortunately, some of the teachers, including female teachers having sex with teen-age boys have been prosecuted and sentenced. However, there was a famous case a few years ago where an older female teacher made a boy have sex with her and she got pregnant: she received seven years in prison, but many people were sympathetic with her. I believe that she received custody of the child once she got out of prison, which is a travesty. The Hollywood media even made a TV movie of this travesty.

    "President Obama used it in his Notre Dame speech, it was a great speech .
    But his neutrality was abortion being ok and ok to be against it .
    Thats not neutral , a great speech , but not neutral from a Christian
    perspective . Or the Pope's . I agree that civility and working together is
    a good idea . Maybe that is Humanism also . But its logical to me ."

    There isn't a consensus among Christians about abortion. Not all of us follow the Pope; I know I don't because I am Episcopalian, not Catholic.

    "It would be inappropriate now in a school district to have a teacher or
    Nurse tell this young girl what she is doing is wrong ."

    Really? Which school district?

    Though knowing the idiocies of most present-day school administrators, I wouldn't be surprised. I taught in inner-city public schools for many years before changing my career.

    "Secular Humanism is considered neutral .It is anything but for that 14 year
    old little girl .
    Nothing is new under the Sun, we have always tried to take on the role of
    God and rationalize life out for ourself .
    But if it is disguised for good or evil , I believe the results end up the
    same . "

    I think that you might be confusing Secular Humanism with moral relativism. For instance, I know that divorce is a horrendous evil wrought upon our society. So many children get hurt by divorce. And yet I don't see any movement within our churches to try and end divorce and help people get married in a wiser way. And then once married, stay married. I keep hearing and seeing people knowing each other for a few weeks and then they rush off to the marriage alter. At my church, our pastor counsels any couple seeking marriage through several sessions to make sure that they are right for each other and understand the solemnity of their marriage vows. Ignoring the evils and pitfalls of divorce is an example of moral relativism practiced by too many Christian churches.

    I even once read where a minister of a church wrote that marriage between a 10 year old and an adult -particularly between a 10 year old girl and an adult man - was perfectly OK. This is advocating child abuse, pure and simple.
  • ando
    I agree Igrace. I know my grandmother, a devout Catholic, prayed for her children and grandchildren daily. We're not without problems, but I'm sure it made a difference in our lives, especially trying to not stray to the left or the right (and I don't mean politically)/
  • WaveTossed
    Usually Gay Christians get ignored in these discussions. This is because many "mainstream" Evangelicals refuse to even acknowledge them as Christians. However, in spite of anti-Gay prejudice shown by too many who defined themselves as Christians: the number of Gay Christians is growing.

    http://whosoever.org/index.shtml
  • JamesM
    Thanks for sharing that web site, Wave.
  • JamesM
    "Christian America"-- it sounds like an oxymoron to me.
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    "The Way" was started in 30 AD on the Day of Pentecost. The politicized religion of Christianity did not officially begin until 325 AD when the Byzantine Emperor Constantine decided to organize the churches in his empire and he presided over the 1st of the Seven Church Councils.

    We need to get back to a New Testament type church like in the book of Acts.

    There is actually no scriptural support for a "Christian Nation" anyway. And Jesus himself said in, words to this effect, that he did not come to set up a political kingdom.

    In fact, the early church did not call themselves "Christian;" they called themselves "Believers."

    I am openly gay and I have been a Believer in Jesus since I was 8 years old. I am now 66.

    If Jesus said anything about those whom we would call gay, the Gospel writers never mentioned it. There is no word in the original languages of the Scripture that can even be correctly interpreted or translated as "homosexual."
  • PASTOR JEFF
    ""The Way" was started in 30 AD on the Day of Pentecost. The politicized religion of Christianity did not officially begin until 325 AD when the Byzantine Emperor Constantine decided to organize the churches in his empire and he presided over the 1st of the Seven Church Councils."

    Wasn't that the same time that "that which is perfect" of 1Corinthians 13 came and now we don't need anything other than "The Word"? ; )
  • Amen. White American Christianity needs to find ways to connect with, submit to, and support the larger move of the Spirit or we'll find ourselves on the outside looking in. Folks like me need to constantly baptize our imaginations with the Gospel of Luke/Acts, which shows a Gospel that often subverts the religious dominance of the powerful with a Gospel that goes to the supposed outsiders.

    Chrisitianity is indeed alive and well...and it is experiencing vibrancy in places that mainstream white Middle America finds uncomfortable. But we ignore or resist this shift to our own peril.
  • DRJ
    When I read Meacham's article in Newsweek, I came away with a sense of hope. My hope is that the data in the survey cited by the writer represents a rejection of the movement which has been masquerading as Christianity lately. Perhaps the people surveyed did not want to identify themselves with a label that has been associated with pastors who stand at gravesites with signs that read "God hates faggots." Perhaps, they did not want to be associated with a movement which preaches being "pro-life" but is really just anti-abortion. Perhaps, they are people more interested in social justice than the gospel of wealth. Instead of being all-inclusive as Jesus was, American Christianity has presented itself as an exclusive club or a subsidiary of the Republican Party. As Joe Allen Doty said, I am a believer in Jesus Christ and try very hard to be His ambassador in this world. Spreading His gospel by my words and actions is what really identifies me.
  • ando
    Jesus was not "all inclusive." I think the Pharisees got that message. So, did the prostitute. He forgave her, but also told her to "go and sin no more." God loves the sinner, but he hates the sin. Whether it's false idols, greed, or sex outside the bounds of marriage......We would do well to study Scripture more and acquiese less to our culture.
  • WaveTossed
    "Jesus was not "all inclusive." I think the Pharisees got that message. So, did the prostitute. He forgave her, but also told her to "go and sin no more." God loves the sinner, but he hates the sin. Whether it's false idols, greed, or sex outside the bounds of marriage..."

    Here we go again, and I know where this is going. Condemning certain people as "outsiders" or "outcasts," not like "us,." "not truly Christian."

    Fortunately, Jesus ministered to the outcasts, those who were considered "others." Which is why I maintain my faith in Him.
  • ando
    And the outcasts included homosexuals? If they did, you don't think Jesus
    would have told them that he didn't condemn them, but that they should leave
    their life of sin.? It's one thing to be an "outcast", it's another to be
    renewed by the Spirit and lead a renewed life. But that's for you to
    decide.
  • WaveTossed
    I hate to tell you that the word "homosexual" didn't even exist during Jesus' time.

    For that matter, the word "Dalit" didn't exist either. And yet Dalits are still considered "outcast" by many Christians.

    http://www.dalitchristians.com/

    So therefore, according to what you say, Dalits wouldn't be included either. Because many Christians (mostly in India) have stated that they are "polluted" And Jesus never mentioned Dalits specifically in his Word.

    So I gather that, in your mind, some people truly are Untouchable, polluted, abominations -- even by those who would worship Jesus.

    However, Jesus held no people at all to be "untouchable" or "abominations" in His own Word.

    I pray that you may someday lead a blessed, Jesus-inspired life, without regarding anyone as "outcast."
  • ando
    Ah yes, the old strategy of relating racism to homosexuality. We can always
    find justifications for our lifestyles. People are born into cultures and
    races. None should be an outcast. Lifestyle choices are distinct.
  • WaveTossed
    In India, some of the higher-caste Christians believe that Dalits, even Dalit Christians, are "untouchable" and "choose certain lifestyles" such as eating meat and working at certain jobs that are "polluting."

    And then there are people like you who also see certain Christians as "abominable" who "choose certain lifestyles."

    If Christianity is dying, it's because of those who exclude in ways going against Jesus and His Word. Declaring certain people as "untouchable," "abominations," and then using various justifications for excluding them goes against everything that Jesus taught.

    But if certain Christians are "untouchable" or "abominations" to you, then all I can do is do what Dalit Christians do in India and what Gay Christians do in the U.S. and pray for your soul. Jesus' Word will survive in spite of the sin of unjust exclusion.

    By the way, I would read Acts chapter 8, verses 26 through 40. Phillip didn't worry that the person who wanted baptism had a "lifestyle" of being Ethiopian and a eunuch. The eunuch expressed his praise to Jesus and that was enough.

    God bless and keep you.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008