<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good News About Yesterday’s Duel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/</link>
	<description>A Blog by Jim Wallis and Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:05:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lumens</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-111886</link>
		<dc:creator>lumens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-111886</guid>
		<description>Giannii Calvert, May 25 09:11 am:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kevin,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve responded several times via email and the site has you on their block list. You would need to consult the owner of the site to remove you. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the record, Mr./Ms. Calvert did not e-mail me several times, though I inquired frequently as to the situation.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My username has been blocked, and I have crafted a couple others that have also been blocked.  If you want to split hairs as to whether that constitutes banning someone, have at it.  I mostly made the effort to get in touch with Neuro, and I have succeeded in doing so... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I was never asked not to post here, nor was I ever given a reason (not that I couldn&#039;t guess at it) why I am not allowed to post.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do continue to get the requests for money, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giannii Calvert, May 25 09:11 am:</p>
<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I&#39;ve responded several times via email and the site has you on their block list. You would need to consult the owner of the site to remove you. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>For the record, Mr./Ms. Calvert did not e-mail me several times, though I inquired frequently as to the situation.  </p>
<p>My username has been blocked, and I have crafted a couple others that have also been blocked.  If you want to split hairs as to whether that constitutes banning someone, have at it.  I mostly made the effort to get in touch with Neuro, and I have succeeded in doing so&#8230; </p>
<p>That said, I was never asked not to post here, nor was I ever given a reason (not that I couldn&#39;t guess at it) why I am not allowed to post.  </p>
<p>I do continue to get the requests for money, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lumens</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-107930</link>
		<dc:creator>lumens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-107930</guid>
		<description>Giannii Calvert, May 25 09:11 am:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kevin,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve responded several times via email and the site has you on their block list. You would need to consult the owner of the site to remove you. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the record, Mr./Ms. Calvert did not e-mail me several times, though I inquired frequently as to the situation.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My username has been blocked, and I have crafted a couple others that have also been blocked.  If you want to split hairs as to whether that constitutes banning someone, have at it.  I mostly made the effort to get in touch with Neuro, and I have succeeded in doing so... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I was never asked not to post here, nor was I ever given a reason (not that I couldn&#039;t guess at it) why I am not allowed to post.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do continue to get the requests for money, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giannii Calvert, May 25 09:11 am:</p>
<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I&#39;ve responded several times via email and the site has you on their block list. You would need to consult the owner of the site to remove you. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>For the record, Mr./Ms. Calvert did not e-mail me several times, though I inquired frequently as to the situation.  </p>
<p>My username has been blocked, and I have crafted a couple others that have also been blocked.  If you want to split hairs as to whether that constitutes banning someone, have at it.  I mostly made the effort to get in touch with Neuro, and I have succeeded in doing so&#8230; </p>
<p>That said, I was never asked not to post here, nor was I ever given a reason (not that I couldn&#39;t guess at it) why I am not allowed to post.  </p>
<p>I do continue to get the requests for money, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyBri2000</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-107931</link>
		<dc:creator>CyBri2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-107931</guid>
		<description>I have to say, I supported a lot of Bush&#039;s policy, so when I read an article like this I naturally get on the defensive and start looking for the holes in the argument.  However, you helped me to remember that there were parts of the previous administration&#039;s policy that I did really struggle with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Terrorism begins with hatred, and much of the violence of the last several years has fueled the already existing hatred.  If we want to stop terrorism, instead of increasing the amount of violence in the world, we should try to reduce the amount of hatred in the world.  This cannot be done with a gun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your reflection and for reminding us that every administration, including the current one, has both strengths and weaknesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I supported a lot of Bush&#39;s policy, so when I read an article like this I naturally get on the defensive and start looking for the holes in the argument.  However, you helped me to remember that there were parts of the previous administration&#39;s policy that I did really struggle with.</p>
<p>Terrorism begins with hatred, and much of the violence of the last several years has fueled the already existing hatred.  If we want to stop terrorism, instead of increasing the amount of violence in the world, we should try to reduce the amount of hatred in the world.  This cannot be done with a gun.</p>
<p>Thank you for your reflection and for reminding us that every administration, including the current one, has both strengths and weaknesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aebh</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-107932</link>
		<dc:creator>aebh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-107932</guid>
		<description>Unbelievable!  Jim Wallis is worse than James Dobson has ever been.  Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelievable!  Jim Wallis is worse than James Dobson has ever been.  Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canucklehead</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-89267</link>
		<dc:creator>canucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 04:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-89267</guid>
		<description>in order to follow this conversation, please clarify whether it&#039;s Pat Robertson, Pat Buchanan or Pat Nixon you&#039;re referring to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in order to follow this conversation, please clarify whether it&#39;s Pat Robertson, Pat Buchanan or Pat Nixon you&#39;re referring to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nad2</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-88576</link>
		<dc:creator>nad2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88576</guid>
		<description>ljrd,&lt;br&gt;your points are well taken.  my point, i suppose, is that yes, if my wife &amp; i talked about abortion on a weekly basis, i think we would grow weary of that particular exercise.  i have had much to say here on the matter, poured my thoughts into some posts on it, but i cannot get excited about responding to such posts anymore or reading the posts of others whose thoughts i have heard before unless &amp; until there is change on the issue for us to discuss (at which point i would certainly enjoy your thoughts &amp; others&#039; on that).  ditto for torture, women in the ministry, iraq, and challenging the RR to take social justice seriously.  the staleness is not in the relationships (sidestepping the staleness in the mirror issue!), it is in the topics of conversation.  that is an overstatement, and i must give sojo immense credit for interspersing some very interesting and powerful posts amongst those mentioned above (seminary at sing sing prison, the new non-religious, christmas consumerism, to name only a few), and i do post here still from time to time, but far less on the primary topics of conversation, which i think is healthy for me &amp; the forum.  and of course, i recognize the importance of having this forum to discuss these topics not just for those who started out posting here who have had these conversations, but for the continuous stream of people who post, so by all means i do not mean to be critical of jim &amp; sojo, who have a wonderful blog, the only blog i ever post on btw.  peace to you,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ljrd,<br />your points are well taken.  my point, i suppose, is that yes, if my wife &#038; i talked about abortion on a weekly basis, i think we would grow weary of that particular exercise.  i have had much to say here on the matter, poured my thoughts into some posts on it, but i cannot get excited about responding to such posts anymore or reading the posts of others whose thoughts i have heard before unless &#038; until there is change on the issue for us to discuss (at which point i would certainly enjoy your thoughts &#038; others&#39; on that).  ditto for torture, women in the ministry, iraq, and challenging the RR to take social justice seriously.  the staleness is not in the relationships (sidestepping the staleness in the mirror issue!), it is in the topics of conversation.  that is an overstatement, and i must give sojo immense credit for interspersing some very interesting and powerful posts amongst those mentioned above (seminary at sing sing prison, the new non-religious, christmas consumerism, to name only a few), and i do post here still from time to time, but far less on the primary topics of conversation, which i think is healthy for me &#038; the forum.  and of course, i recognize the importance of having this forum to discuss these topics not just for those who started out posting here who have had these conversations, but for the continuous stream of people who post, so by all means i do not mean to be critical of jim &#038; sojo, who have a wonderful blog, the only blog i ever post on btw.  peace to you,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlcopas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-88575</link>
		<dc:creator>carlcopas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88575</guid>
		<description>letjustice,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;all valid questions. Doubtless, the fault lies with me and not with other posters or indeed with the stars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>letjustice,</p>
<p>all valid questions. Doubtless, the fault lies with me and not with other posters or indeed with the stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: letjusticerolldown</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-88574</link>
		<dc:creator>letjusticerolldown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88574</guid>
		<description>What is the point of staying in dialogue going nowhere??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Couldn&#039;t you pretty much say the same about most human relationships? &quot;Oh, dear wife, your thoughts this morning are so wonderfully new. I never would have imagined you thought like this!&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is not the primary capacity for productive dialogue rooted in our own capacity to be transformed and to be transformative?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the staleness in relationship about the relationship or about the one in the mirror?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m only asking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would not encourage anyone to spend time at the computer screen churning out comments unless they sensed clear purpose in doing so. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our world has conflicts dating back thousands of years. I would guess they also conclude dialogue to be stale. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How do you most like to contribute and receive in these kinds of conversations?  What makes it productive or not productive towards your own vitality and growth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the point of staying in dialogue going nowhere??</p>
<p>Couldn&#39;t you pretty much say the same about most human relationships? &#8220;Oh, dear wife, your thoughts this morning are so wonderfully new. I never would have imagined you thought like this!&#8221;</p>
<p>Is not the primary capacity for productive dialogue rooted in our own capacity to be transformed and to be transformative?</p>
<p>Is the staleness in relationship about the relationship or about the one in the mirror?</p>
<p>I&#39;m only asking.</p>
<p>I would not encourage anyone to spend time at the computer screen churning out comments unless they sensed clear purpose in doing so. </p>
<p>Our world has conflicts dating back thousands of years. I would guess they also conclude dialogue to be stale. </p>
<p>How do you most like to contribute and receive in these kinds of conversations?  What makes it productive or not productive towards your own vitality and growth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueDeacon</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-88573</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueDeacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88573</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why I suggested that the person leave -- he was getting personal and speaking inappropriately, which detracted from the actual discussion.  It happens more often than you might believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s why I suggested that the person leave &#8212; he was getting personal and speaking inappropriately, which detracted from the actual discussion.  It happens more often than you might believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watkins</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-88572</link>
		<dc:creator>watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88572</guid>
		<description>sounds like a few at least are straying from the code of conduct for this forum? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will express my disagreements with other community members&#039; ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will not exaggerate others&#039; beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like a few at least are straying from the code of conduct for this forum? </p>
<p>&#8220;I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21) </p>
<p>I will express my disagreements with other community members&#39; ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22) </p>
<p>I will not exaggerate others&#39; beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlcopas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-88558</link>
		<dc:creator>carlcopas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88558</guid>
		<description>Nad,&lt;br&gt;as always, you&#039;re one of the all-time nice guys. There are half-dozen or so of us who are dialoguing via Facebook. If you&#039;re interested, contact me at &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:bhikku_bum@yahoo.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bhikku_bum@yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Otherwise, see you on here once in a blue moon my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nad,<br />as always, you&#39;re one of the all-time nice guys. There are half-dozen or so of us who are dialoguing via Facebook. If you&#39;re interested, contact me at <a href="mailto:bhikku_bum@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">bhikku_bum@yahoo.com</a>.</p>
<p>Otherwise, see you on here once in a blue moon my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnH54</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-88557</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnH54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88557</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s fair. I&#039;m not suggesting that we don&#039;t take it to the Lord,&lt;br&gt;but in my judgment, just sitting back and doing nothing is irresponsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#39;s fair. I&#39;m not suggesting that we don&#39;t take it to the Lord,<br />but in my judgment, just sitting back and doing nothing is irresponsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wonder</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-2/#comment-88538</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I get your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure I get your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nad2</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-1/#comment-88536</link>
		<dc:creator>nad2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88536</guid>
		<description>well, it was certainly an engaging run for a time (and wasn&#039;t the avatar selection fun!), but i reckon it wears thin after a while with the same basic posts.  from one semi-retired poster to another, peace brother,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, it was certainly an engaging run for a time (and wasn&#39;t the avatar selection fun!), but i reckon it wears thin after a while with the same basic posts.  from one semi-retired poster to another, peace brother,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calledme</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-1/#comment-88531</link>
		<dc:creator>calledme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88531</guid>
		<description>Or we can look at 9-11 like this:  &quot;You&#039;ve been good to us, Lord, but we can take it from here -- thanks.  We&#039;ll let you know when we need you again.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am waiting for the day when we stop dismissing one another as &quot;liberal&quot; or &quot;conservative,&quot; and consider the possibility that the one who disagrees with us might be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or we can look at 9-11 like this:  &#8220;You&#39;ve been good to us, Lord, but we can take it from here &#8212; thanks.  We&#39;ll let you know when we need you again.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am waiting for the day when we stop dismissing one another as &#8220;liberal&#8221; or &#8220;conservative,&#8221; and consider the possibility that the one who disagrees with us might be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: letjusticerolldown</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-1/#comment-88514</link>
		<dc:creator>letjusticerolldown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88514</guid>
		<description>What would need to be present in these dialogues for them to be of higher value to you and the Kingdom?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could you entertain the possibility of cutting back the quantity of time you spend here by at least 50%, but simultaneously doubling the value of your contributions, and doubling again the value of what you get from it??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How would that look??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A big question for me is Sojo&#039;s commitment. They cannot guarantee strong dialogue.  But they can pretty much guarantee it does not succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would need to be present in these dialogues for them to be of higher value to you and the Kingdom?</p>
<p>Could you entertain the possibility of cutting back the quantity of time you spend here by at least 50%, but simultaneously doubling the value of your contributions, and doubling again the value of what you get from it??</p>
<p>How would that look??</p>
<p>A big question for me is Sojo&#39;s commitment. They cannot guarantee strong dialogue.  But they can pretty much guarantee it does not succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neuro_nurse</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-1/#comment-88510</link>
		<dc:creator>neuro_nurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 23:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88510</guid>
		<description>Based on my observations, GP/Sojourners/DISQUS - whoever moderates this blog - only block usernames, not IP addresses. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The &#039;banned&#039; need only register a new username and fly under the radar for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on my observations, GP/Sojourners/DISQUS &#8211; whoever moderates this blog &#8211; only block usernames, not IP addresses. </p>
<p>The &#39;banned&#39; need only register a new username and fly under the radar for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckeyeDon</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-1/#comment-88509</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckeyeDon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88509</guid>
		<description>How has Kevin S. been banned? I didn&#039;t think anyone was ever &quot;banned&quot; since they moved to the Disqus format. Only individual posts are deleted if they attract enough down ratings or if people report them. But that only involves individual posts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if Kevin truly has been banned, how did he get back on here to tell us he&#039;s been banned? In short, I would like to see actual evidence that he&#039;s been asked or told not to post here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How has Kevin S. been banned? I didn&#39;t think anyone was ever &#8220;banned&#8221; since they moved to the Disqus format. Only individual posts are deleted if they attract enough down ratings or if people report them. But that only involves individual posts.</p>
<p>And if Kevin truly has been banned, how did he get back on here to tell us he&#39;s been banned? In short, I would like to see actual evidence that he&#39;s been asked or told not to post here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neuro_nurse</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-1/#comment-88502</link>
		<dc:creator>neuro_nurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88502</guid>
		<description>Carl,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Email address I posted above (&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:aeauooo@yahoo.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;aeauooo@yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;) is quasi-anonymous and not the same as the one I use on ‘other web tools.’</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl,</p>
<p>The Email address I posted above (<a href="mailto:aeauooo@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">aeauooo@yahoo.com</a>) is quasi-anonymous and not the same as the one I use on ‘other web tools.’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlcopas</title>
		<link>http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/22/the-good-news-about-yesterday%e2%80%99s-duel/comment-page-1/#comment-88501</link>
		<dc:creator>carlcopas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sojo.net/?p=8866#comment-88501</guid>
		<description>&quot;The conversation here has, IMO, gotten stale – the same circus of arguments repeated ad nauseam.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly. It&#039;s become something of an echo chamber, which is why a number of us post far less frequently. But we continue to dialogue in fruitful ways via other web tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The conversation here has, IMO, gotten stale – the same circus of arguments repeated ad nauseam.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. It&#39;s become something of an echo chamber, which is why a number of us post far less frequently. But we continue to dialogue in fruitful ways via other web tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
