RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Stop Starbucks

by Anna Almendrala 05-27-2009

When Robert Greenwald, founder and president of  Brave New Films — an organization that uses new media and internet video campaigns to take action on social issues nationwide — first told us that our next campaign was going to be about Starbucks, a lot of us here were very surprised.

We’ve all had the “Starbucks experience” — smooth folksy music, leather couches, community book shelves, luxury drinks, and cheerful barista service. It just feels good to be inside a Starbucks, and why shouldn’t it? All around the store are signals that coffee makers and drinkers are part of a blissful, ethical community where everyone is taken care of with health care and dignity on the job. Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz says that workers should “believe in their hearts that management trusted them and treated them with respect … If they had faith in me and my motives, they wouldn’t need a union.”

I’m not naive enough to believe that a transnational mega corporation truly is all that it claims to be, but when our production teams started investigating Starbucks’ corporate response to coffee roaster and barista unions, I was shocked. Starbucks has forced store managers to work overtime without pay, fired people for talking about a union, discriminated in hiring against people with a past union affiliation, and is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA. Oh, and those health benefits for “partners” they make a big deal about? You need to work 240 hours a quarter to be eligible – and anyone who has worked retail or service jobs part-time knows that we have almost no control over the amount of hours that are set for us.  Just to put it in perspective, Starbucks insures less than 42 percent of its workers — while Wal-Mart insures 47 percent.

If you want to work full-time for Starbucks, you have to make yourself available 80.5 hours of the week. Daniel Gross, a founding member of the Starbucks union, describes the full-time scheduling like this: “Starbucks can schedule you on any day, at any time within those hours … How are you supposed to get a second job or plan for child care if you have to be available 80.5 hours?” To learn more about these issues, visit the Stop Starbucks truth page.

Firing people for organizing is not an employer’s right — it’s against federal law. Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz likes to remind people that he grew up poor in New York, and that his father never made more than $20,000 a year. His father probably could have used a union. Watch the video and sign the memo to CEO Howard Schultz demanding that he allow his workers to form unions here at Stop Starbucks.

Anna Almendrala was a Sojourners intern from 2007-2008. She now lives in Los Angeles, California, and works for Brave New Foundation as the Marketing & Distribution associate. Follow her on Twitter to keep updated on the Stop Starbucks campaign.

Categories: Activism, Human Rights
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Torres10
    Great Work !

    Regards

    {Name}
  • Torres10
    where do i get more information on this

    Regards

    name
  • KevinLewis10
    Nice Read

    Regards

    {Name}
  • KevinLewis10
    Hi nice to read this I realy like to


    Thanks for such a nice post.

    Regards

    {Name}
  • altarofego
    Capitalism is not driven by greed and social justice not by envy. Greed and envy are the motivators driving sinful people to exploit capitalism and manipulate social justice, both for purely self-serving ends.
  • American_Values, that's just common sense. But why would you expect anti-Starbucks folks to "get it"?
  • The very fact that the number used was 240, to make it sound like a lot, is proof that this article was not fair to Starbucks. 20 hours a week for ANY benefit from a company (other than discounts on items if it's retail) is awesome!
  • Thanks. If there are areas where oppression, fraud, deceit, or illegal acts are involved, then those need to be exposed. That's a given part of a free society, because it's an assault on the idea of a "free society" to begin with (when one is oppressed, that is).
  • atlp
    xfree9-about your first comment-"social justice is driven by envy"-i would partly agree with you, to a degree. There are those that do social justice work for the sake of doing social justice work, and there are those that do it for the people. The former usually burn out and give up after the thrill/envy/hatred subsides a little, while the latter stay put until their brothers and sisters receive justice and fairness.
    I know plenty of social activists that do what they do, not because money is bad or anything, but because some people oppress others in their acquisition of it.
  • Is this, like, the coke at Subway Sandwiches?
  • justintime
    If working at Starbucks is such a great job, then why would Starbucks workers want to join a union?
    Shulz is firing Starbucks workers who want a union.
    This is illegal.
  • justintime
    So why shouldn't Starbucks employees be allowed to organize for union representation?
  • justintime
    Why shouldn't Starbucks employees be allowed to organize for union representation?
    Do you really think this would destroy Starbucks?
  • Why do you presume I haven't already examined the viewpoints and philosophy of those whom I disagree? How do you know I didn't come from that viewpoint, found it void of good answers, and therefore embrace what I do because it offered sufficient and satisfactory answers to the questions I had/have about social justice?

    When did I claim that these ideas are original? What talking points am I "pasting," because honestly I don't really care about talking points; I care about real people, and the consequences of the actions and interactions of those in society.

    As for judgment, my philosophy in life stems from both an understanding of Scripture, seeking to apply it in ways that are not contradictory, and my observations of the interactions between people in an economy. If you want to call that "co-opted," that's your prerogative, but I do not see it as at odds with reality.

    I'm sorry we disagree. You can visit my website and engage specific things I write, and I hope to learn from those engagements. Otherwise all you're doing is metaphorically screaming at me about your perception of who I am. You don't know me, really.
  • justintime
    What's wrong with Starbucks employees organizing for union representation?
  • Alsaints
    “The economy must serve people, not the other way around. Work is more than a way to make a living; it is a form of continuing participation in God’s creation. Employers contribute to the common good by creating jobs that uphold the dignity and rights of workers—to productive work, to decent and fair wages, to adequate benefits and security in their old age, to the choice of whether to organize and join unions, to the opportunity for legal status for immigrant workers, to private property, and to economic initiative."
    - United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
  • justintime
    If you're not "justontime" you can ignore my last post.
  • justintime
    Xtrafree,

    As I've been trying to point out to you, the arguments you've been posting here are not original.
    You are merely using standard libertarian talking points, which we've seen before and which have been engaged repeatedly, long before you showed up on the God's Politics blog.

    If you are curious enough to critically examine your narrow positions on social justice, you should do as I have -- take responsibility for your own intellectual integrity, seek out the opposing positions and weigh them all in light of the present economic situation.
    I'm pretty certain you have not taken the trouble to do this.
    You've allowed your judgment to be co-opted by libertarianism, an abstract philosophy at odds with reality in many ways.

    If you are truly open minded and need help in breaking out of your mindset, I would be more than happy to provide you with some avenues for inquiry.

    Sincerely,
    justintime
  • justintime
    Carl,

    That wouldn't be the painter Chuck Close would it?
  • I apologize about generalizing all in Michigan. That wasn't my intent. I'm no fan of unions, of course, and not all union members are "greedy."

    As for the envy piece, and the raise, and all that, my point may not have been clear, but I was trying to say that I live in a salary much less than most auto workers, and I live a good and decent life. I have no debt, paid-for cars, a wife and two kids. I do not lose sleep over an auto worker who may not get a raise this year, or who may need to take a pay cut to even continue to work at GM or Chrysler, so their company can afford to stay in business in the United States. They work very hard for their wages, and they should be compensated fairly. But I do not believe that the rest of society should pay higher prices for cars and trucks that could otherwise be sold at much lower prices. If something can be produced at a lower price, it should be, because resources are scarce, and in order to be good stewards of our planet, we need to be using resources where they can be allocated usefully and resourcefully. If my very own job is causing resourced to be used wastefully, on a macro-scale I would prefer my job be shifted to other resources in the economy. On a personal scale, it hurts, there's often a struggle, and hard decisions must be made. But there's nothing progressive about job guarantees when it means poor stewardship of scarce resources which have alternative uses.

    Change sucks, often. It's not easy. I don't wish a job loss on anybody. I've been through it before myself. But trials and struggles make us better people, and we grow and learn from it.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008