RSS
More Feeds

Looking for new books, music, etc.? Purchases made through this search box benefit Sojourners' ministry:














Culture Watch

Eschatology or Bigotry?

by Gareth Higgins 05-28-2009

A couple of weeks ago on Glenn Beck’s talk radio show, a woman called in to suggest that because President Obama appears to be raising the tax rate to around the same as what it was under President Clinton; is exercising some accountability mechanisms with banks and car manufacturers; and has approached the nations of the world with humility, he is a prime candidate for the Antichrist.  Such absurd and offensive speculation has been around for nearly 2,000 years; and, of course, there is a 100 percent failure record among those who would predict the time of the end of the world, along with the identity of the person who, dispensationalists allege, will lead us there.

The general principle — that those who make eschatological guesses tend to be socially bigoted and give the appearance of suffering from religious neurosis — combines with this specific example of some people so outraged by Obama’s election that they need to find a theological justification for their anger to produce some of the most debased public conversation I’ve ever heard.  Glenn Beck’s response to this woman appeared to endorse her religious terror, with mysterious allusions to people he says he has met and talked to and heard things from that he isn’t ready to tell us about yet.

The sum: I don’t know what Glenn Beck actually believes about the book of Revelation (for what it’s worth, I happen to think it’s an amazing book of metaphorical prose offering comfort to people being persecuted and naming the metaphysical core of the universe: that the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it, rather than a dimestore almanac of future events), but he’s certainly happy not to challenge his listeners when they suggest that President Obama is in league with Satan.  I know many of us feel like we say this every day: We need a better conversation in this country.

In Doctor Zhivago, Boris Pasternak is at pains to develop the notion that human freedom is found in facing reality.  This is not a new idea, of course; we need only remember ‘the truth will set you free’ to be aware that it didn’t originate with Russian novelists. But Pasternak adapts an old Chinese proverb and announces his prophecy – in his case, of resistance to the death-dealing ways of Stalinist Russia, but really it could stand for anywhere, anytime, by stating that the beginning of wisdom is ‘to call everything by its right name.’ He means that life is a journey through confusion to clarity.  That wisdom, and healing, and growing up derive from seeing things as they really are.

This does not mean, of course, that we understand all things – that would make us into God.  No, it just means that a key function of being human is the power, and responsibility, to discern – to distinguish between this thing and that, and that thing and this.  The psychologist Carl Jung knew this – he could tell the difference between organized religion and what we call God.  Desmond Tutu knows this – he can tell the difference between a religion of the superficial intellect and the spirit that gives rise to human revolution.  The Irish mystic John O’Donohue knew this – he understood the difference between the frightened functionaries of fundamentalism and the vast riches of the mystic tradition to which they think they hold the keys. Our task is to learn the difference between form and content.  Our task is to learn the difference between what we believe and how we believe it.  Our task is to call everything by its right name.  Our task is discernment.

Every day we are given the opportunity to find beauty in the face of other human beings.  I come from a religious tradition that sometimes left its members unable to encounter other people without seeing them as missionary targets.  We failed in discernment.  Of course, those who harbour anti-religious sentiment are also often incapable of having a conversation with believers in which they treat their opinions with respect.  They fail in discernment too.  Yet if human beings really are made in the image of God, then perhaps we might find it in ourselves also to learn that every encounter between you and me, or me and anyone, or you and anyone should be an opportunity for God, or whatever you want to name the ground of all being, to speak to both of us.

Gareth HigginsGareth Higgins is a writer and broadcaster from Belfast, Northern Ireland, who has worked as an academic and activist. He is the author of the insightful How Movies Helped Save My Soul: Finding Spiritual Fingerprints in Culturally Significant Films. He blogs at www.godisnotelsewhere.wordpress.com and co-presents “The Film Talk” podcast with Jett Loe at www.thefilmtalk.com.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • The key point is to remember what the Bible says about the "end times": Just be about God's business until then. Jesus in His humanity said that He didn't know when He would return, and Paul's admonition that "he who will not work will not eat" was given to people who were just sitting around waiting for that moment. All this speculation about the Antichrist -- I no longer believe there is actually only one -- has been a distraction.

    An aside: After careful study of theology I have come to reject dispensational theology, and one of the most ridiculous prophecies about the "mark of the Beast" I've ever seen was the Visa card. (I'm not kidding -- I thought after that, "Are then American Express, Discover and MasterCard safe?")
  • SisterMarie
    "Are then American Express, Discover and MasterCard safe?"

    Yes - as long as they do not include the digits "666."
  • Actually, that was the point -- someone tried to say that VI, S and A (in another numerical system) put together stood for that.
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    The number 666 in the Book of Revelation actually refers to human beings in general. In the Greek Text the word "anthropos" is used instead of "andros." "Andros" refers to a man while "anthropos" refers to any human being.

    The author of the book of "The Revelation of Jesus Christ" does not state that the number 666 is the number that will be used on credit cards, etc. I find that those who believe in the Rapture are more superstitious about the number 666 than those who don't.
  • Although I don't agree 100% with Obama's economic policy, I don't think that makes him the Antichrist. According to the Bible, the Beast will exalt himself higher than God, and I haven't heard President Obama say anything like that yet.

    As BlueDeacon says, the most important thing is to continue doing God's work until Christ comes back.
  • deartheophilus
    The beast and antichrists are different...

    This might help in clarifying: http://deartheoph.blogspot.com/2009/05/anti-chr...
  • Something I just remembered: Some years ago the Christian rock band Petra, at the height of the "back-masking" controversy, placed at the beginning of one of its records a little announcement. When played backwards, it said, "Why are you looking for the devil instead of serving the LORD?"
  • WaveTossed
    Some people (like this woman on the radio) tossing around the word "Anti-Christ."

    As much as I might think that Rush Limbaugh or Michael Savage are idiotic, I certainly do NOT see either of them as "the Anti-Christ."
  • jamesggilmore
    Just a heads-up: I've posted a (quite supportive) response and expansion to this post on the Matthew 25 Network's blog:

    http://matthew25.org/2009/05/gareth-higgins-esc...

    This is a great post... most enlightening. Thanks.
  • slindsley
    Let's not forget that the word "antichrist" doesn't appear anywhere in Revelation, nor does it ever denote some "son of Satan" figure who sets out to destroy the world. The word "antichrist" appears three times in the entire Bible - in 1 and 2 John - as a label for a teacher gone astray. They were teaching a doctrine that the writer of 1 and 2 John considered to be false teaching: "against" Christ, or antichrist.

    Also, you'll never see the word with a capital "A," as if pointing out a specific person.

    Just thought this would be good to add to the conversation.
  • deartheophilus
    I think it is five times... better check that again! It is 5 times in 3 verses I believe. Here is my blogs about dispensationalism for any one else...

    This is the beginning of the series ~ http://deartheoph.blogspot.com/2009/05/dispensa...

    This is about the anti-christ and how we get what we have without it actually being scriptural ~ http://deartheoph.blogspot.com/2009/05/anti-chr...

    This is about the fake tribulation ~ http://deartheoph.blogspot.com/2009/05/tribulat...

    And this wraps it up (though I think I am going to do one on the rapture since everyone likes the subject) ~ http://deartheoph.blogspot.com/2009/05/last-of-...
  • JamesM
    I stopped believing in the Antichrist when George W. Bush came out as a false positive on my anti-Christo-meter.
  • letjusticerolldown
    I frankly am quite surprised that we have not seen more frequent "Obama as Anti-Christ" charges appear. I think this is good news.

    I am, frankly, also quite alarmed at the readiness of the world to follow and grant unlimited power to one who would guide us out of tragic crisis. We get uneasy when mobs of poor people grab rocks, molotov cocktails and burn their neighborhoods. Knock out the energy grid, shut off the water, and empty the bank accounts for a few days--and the calm and stable class will be grabbing their guns--and we will see in whom the church has placed its trust.
  • jkc1945
    All the pooh-poohing notwithstanding, it still behooves us as followers of Jesus, to continually watch for 'anti-Christ' behavior, beliefs, and even personalities. How else can we stand against evil, by word or deed? We, of all people, ought to be "as wise as serpents and as gentle as doves." A maintenance of spiritual alertness is a commandment of New Testament scripture, as I recall.
  • ando
    A former pastor of mine gave a series of sermons on Revelations. He saw the anti-Christ as not so much a person as a way of thinking and living. We live in a time with a great reliance on institutions, be they financial, educational, government, or a myriad of others. So-called free trade plays into this one-world connection that was touted to bring peace and prosperity. These institutions take the place of the one true God in the form of our reliance and worship. Instead of thinking of a person, we should be wary of an over-reliance on governments, business, and philosophies that take us away from the worship of our Creator and Sustainer.
  • gayost
    You are correct that those who make predictions about the end times have failed miserably. However, your statement, as a general principle, that such folks are socially biggoted and suffer from some sort of releigious neuroses seems to make you guilty of your own brand of social bigotry.

    Dispensationalism is a respected theological positon hand has some pretty bright people that make a good case for that position. One thing that can be agreed upon is that Christ will return and we are to be watchful and aware of the signs of the times. Some, in enthusiam, make predictions when they should be silent.

    I think it would be good if you were more charitable in this matter.
  • TedVothJr
    "A couple of weeks ago on Glenn Beck’s talk radio show, a woman called in to suggest that because President Obama appears to be raising the tax rate to around the same as what it was under President Clinton; is exercising some accountability mechanisms with banks and car manufacturers; and has approached the nations of the world with humility, he is a prime candidate for the Antichrist. "

    This illustrates why the Church in the United States needs a robust, Biblical, eschatology now.

    Many are fascinated by the Last Things, 'Prophecy', as it's colloquially called.

    Bishop Tom Wright's got a good start on it, with his emphasis that going to heaven 'isn't the end of the world,' that ''There's life after life after death.' His point is that any disembodied existence with the Lord after the death of the body is temporary, an interim state, and that the final state of believers to forever is a corporeal existence in the resurrection body in the New Heavens and the New Earth.

    Wright derives from this encouragement for the Church to be about her Lord Jesus' business, demonstrating to the world what his Kingdom'e going to be like, preaching the gospel at all times, even using words when opportune. I know Wright's on the right track, because when I think of his coming Kingdom his Spirit urges me in his words to 'keep busy till I get back.' [Luke 19:13] 'Thy Kingdom come' in my life.

    But he's been scared off eschatology by the 'Left-Behinders,' as many main-liners and liturgicals have. The Rapture isn't called such but it's in the Bible, in the first book written of the New Testament:

    '13 But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who are asleep, that you sorrow not, even as others who have no hope.
    14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so those also who sleep in Jesus God will bring with him.
    15 For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive, remaining till the coming of the Lord shall not prevent those who are asleep.
    16 For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet of God: and the dead in Christ will rise first:.

    [Cf Psalm 47:5 God is gone up with a shout,
    the LORD with the sound of a trumpet.]

    17 Then we who are alive, remaining, will be caught up [harpagêsometha] together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so we will be with the Lord for ever.

    [In our Mk II resurrection bodies; Christ's present body is the Prototype.]

    18 So, comfort each other with these words. 1st Thessalonians 4. MyV.'

    This fits right in with the Resurrection; it's simultaneous with 1st Corinthians 15:51:

    'Behold, I show you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed…'

    We need a valid, robust, scholarly Biblical eschatology; I'm workin' on it: you'll all be the first to know.

    [I was reluctant to get into eschatology myself, but (some of) the People, the Jews, are back in the Land, Palestine, and that is significant…]

    Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008