RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Are Single Moms the New Widows?

by Steve Holt 06-24-2009

Throughout the Bible, God’s people are instructed to care for those who often cannot thrive on their own, most often widows and orphans. Because of the lack of honorable employment available for women in ancient times, widows were in an especially difficult position. Without secular institutions to care for these women, widows either relied heavily on family members for financial assistance or lived in poverty.

Throughout scripture, God instructs his people in no uncertain terms to take it upon themselves to make sure these women are provided for. No fewer than 66 Old Testament passages mention widows, saying (among many other things) that widows are not to be taken advantage of (Exodus 22:22), that God defends them (Deuteronommy 10:18), that food is to be left for them to eat (Deuteronomy 24:20-21), and that those who withhold justice from them are cursed (Deuteronomy 27:19). In the New Testament, Jesus — even on the cross — entrusts the care of his mother, Mary, to the disciple John, demonstrating even in his anguish the importance widows play in his kingdom (John 19:26-27). The church is implored on a number of occasions to take care of the widows in their midst. James’ language is actually rather direct along these lines: “True religion” is taking care of widows and orphans (James 1:27).

Today, our world is quite different. Women have access to a formal education that prepares them for careers on par (though still not equal, sadly) with men in both pay scale and advancement. Even a less educated woman can receive a decent hourly job and provide for herself. In this way, a woman’s options for provision have not run out should her husband or partner pass away.

I suggest we update our definition “widow” to include single mothers, perhaps the most vulnerable members of our contemporary societies and churches. I am not suggesting we cease our financial, spiritual, and emotional care for women (and men) who have lost their spouses. But as Christians who read our Bibles as “living and active” words from God for all people in all contexts, we seek to broaden our traditional understandings of certain scriptures based on changes in our context. In saying this, I am also not detracting from the strength and courage of many single mothers. For most single moms in America, though, the math just doesn’t work in their favor: Even one child that is not yet school-aged can prevent the only able-bodied worker – mom – from having a job outside the home, without shelling out hundreds of dollars in day-care bills each week.

Sadly, the church has a shameful reputation in its treatment of single mothers, primarily because of the stigmas associated with being a single mom. Our views on divorce and irresponsible premarital sex often underlie this bias. Those who hold most of the resources are too often the ones casting judgment on those whom they believe had a central role in creating their own fate, translating this into a general stinginess of time and money toward single moms. Religious people most often play the part of moral judge and jury, shunning fellow members who divorce and never completely welcoming those single moms who come to them following their “sin.” It is no secret that the church is often quite a lonely place to be for a divorced woman, let alone a woman who had her children out of wedlock.

We must update our spiritual lexicon regarding the word “widow” to include single moms. Right next door to many of our churches – and too often within them – these courageous women are sacrificing greatly for the well-being of their children while Christians look on primarily with judgment rather than compassion. We must consider the possibility that, placing ourselves within the story of the adulterous woman “caught in the act” in John 8, we are in fact the Pharisees and teachers of the law to whom Jesus sternly says, “Let anyone who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.”

Steve Holt seeks joy and justice in East Boston, Massachusetts. Steve enjoys gardening, being a husband, community life, and writing. He blogs about spirituality and his garden at harvestboston.wordpress.com.

Categories: Gender, Ministry, Poverty
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • ando
    Our church has a number of single-moms and grandparents raising grandchildren. I don't see anyone there who does anything but accept them for who they are and for the enormous responsibility they carry. And the largely African-American church which meets right after ours also has a number of single mothers. Perhaps these congregations are exceptions, but it also seems unfair to use the church as a punching bag until you have some more facts about how the church is ministering to these women and their children. You might be surprised.
  • weiwentg
    I believe the injunction in the Bible to care for widows and orphans must have had something to do with economics. It was probably near impossible for widows to earn a living once their husbands died, placing them and their children at grave risk. In today's society, the church must not let its perceptions of single mothers cloud its advocacy for their needs. Single mothers face a disproportionate economic burden.

    Moving on to public programs, though, poor parents generally have supports available to them like Medicaid, CHIP, food stamps, child support and others. The quality of these programs can vary greatly by state - frankly, many Southern states are more likely to skimp on these programs and treat vulnerable communities badly - but they are there. However, childless adults are not eligible for Medicaid in most states. This is a hole that is likely (I pray) to be fixed in health reform, but nothing's certain.
  • Daylight
    Best thing we can do to help single moms and their children is to encourage and support the proper place of fatherhood - the missing equation in most discussions about this issue. For example, instead of witlessly participating in feminist motivated bashing of men (just about every family sitcom portrays dad as a helpless idiot), we must honor their special role in the family and society. We must also deconstruct the welfare state that has made it all too easy to replace them as if bringing home the bacon is their only purpose. This pathology is now so deep in our society that most men are convince themselves that they are second class citizens. They are living up to the low expectations place on them.
  • WaveTossed
    "(just about every family sitcom portrays dad as a helpless idiot), we must honor their special role in the family and society. We must also deconstruct the welfare state that has made it all too easy to replace them as if bringing home the bacon is their only purpose. "

    There is a great article in the current READERS DIGEST about men who are taking care of their children while their wives are serving in the armed forces in Afghanistan and other war zones. The article deals with all of the stereotypes that these men face -- sometimes these care-taking men are not always welcome at military spouses support groups because women make up most of these groups and the women's husbands (serving overseas) get worried and jealous about their wives making friends with other men.

    In all, there is too much stereotyping and emphasis on rigid gender roles in our society. Of course it is getting a lot better than it was. But women aren't the only victims of rigid gender roles; men are also victimized by this as well.
  • ando
    daylight, I largely agree with you, but you are treading on thin ice with the Sojo crowd. The connection between welfare and personal responsibility has a long history, up until the 1960s when welfare became more of a crutch than a springboard for the poor of this country. One can see how immigrants historically and now have seen this country as one of potential for them to gain a better life economically, politically, and otherwise. The church should do all it can to foster the importance of the family through job training and other programs such as better relationships between the sexes.
  • Daylight
    Thanks ando for the warning. I understand and truly appreciate the Sojo crowd. My stance on the issue is biased by personal experience of being a fatherless welfare baby of a 15 year old Appalachian mother. My view is also influence by over 26 years as a trained social worker. You used the word "crutch" to describe the negative affect of Welfare. A crutch is a wonderful tool when someone needs help walking but it becomes a horrible obstacle when it keeps them from learning to walk on their own. The state will never be a suitable substitute for either parent.
  • PASTOR JEFF
    Widows are widows and single mothers are single mothers. Verses in Timothy are quite clear on the treatment of each. Paul says it is God's will for younger "widows" to remarry. There is an age requirement as well as service requirements for the other widows to qualify as widows indeed. An injunction is placed on those who do not care for their own families. This establishes the priority of resource allocation. We have widows in our churches that are being neglected by their own families while their children scheme to protect their inheritance by finding ways to place them on the public rolls and shelter the families resources. The church turns it's head, unwilling to exercise the discipline- "worse than an infidel".
    "Single mothers" are no more a monolith than "gays" or "immigrants". Women are increasingly choosing single motherhood. Are these "widows"? I agree that the church has some growing to do in terms of it's sympathy for single moms, but I think redefining a group as something they are not does not address the core issue of estimating a person's worthiness by their lot in life.
  • Chosen
    I agree that the best thing we can do is to encourage respect for the role of the father. Movies and T.V. haved glamorized single parenthood but in reality it's a difficult road. As for the welfare state, on my way to work, I pass by neighborhoods where strong able bodied men are wandering around, apparently not working. This breaks my heart, because they are not being encouraged to live up to their manhood and are consequently prime candidates for trouble. God set up families with a mother and father and said people should work for a living. Why do we have to make a complete mess of things by trying to improve on the Creator's plans? He knows what he's doing.
  • Disagree with Pastor Jeff, and love the article. Great points. Steve Holt!
  • hatlady
    It's a great commentary, Steve. Friends and I have had this same conversation. I also respectfully disagree with Pastor Jeff. I have worked with these ladies in the church for years. Sure, many have college degrees and try to work a 9-5 job (once the kids are old enough) so they can be home when their kids get home from school. And widowed, unwed or divorced, the best thing is not always for them to "remarry!" Many of the widows and older ladies in the church come forward to help these younger ladies in crisis times. And I only know of one woman who chose single motherhood. She adopted a foreign orphan and has raised the child along with the church who has been beside her all the way. I really doubt that Jesus would split hairs over who "qualifies" for church support.
  • PASTOR JEFF
    In what way might this Scripture inform our discussion and answer Steve's original question then?

    1 Timothy 5

    3Honour widows that are widows indeed.

    4But if any widow have children or nephews, let them learn first to shew piety at home, and to requite their parents: for that is good and acceptable before God.

    5Now she that is a widow indeed, and desolate, trusteth in God, and continueth in supplications and prayers night and day.

    6But she that liveth in pleasure is dead while she liveth.

    7And these things give in charge, that they may be blameless.

    8But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

    9Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore years old, having been the wife of one man.

    10Well reported of for good works; if she have brought up children, if she have lodged strangers, if she have washed the saints' feet, if she have relieved the afflicted, if she have diligently followed every good work.

    11But the younger widows refuse: for when they have begun to wax wanton against Christ, they will marry;

    12Having damnation, because they have cast off their first faith.

    13And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.

    14I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.

    15For some are already turned aside after Satan.

    16If any man or woman that believeth have widows, let them relieve them, and let not the church be charged; that it may relieve them that are widows indeed.
  • This is really one of the best articles I have read on this topic, thanks a for caring to write this article, I was quite impressed with the way people taking part in the discussion around!
  • DHFabian
    How sad to see that the common myths about welfare continue to thrive, but understandable, given how this issue has been handled by politicians and the media. Our policies define who we are, and what our country is all about. We make our choices, even if the choice is simply to remain silent when we see injustice. What we see today indisputably confirms that the character of this nation is defined by scapegoatism, arrogance, judgmentalism, and good old greed (all contrary to Christ's teachings, but hey, it works for us). I thought my fellow citizens would speak up on behalf of our poorest, calling their legislators, writing letters to the editor, at least questioning if turning our backs on the poor was really the right thing to do. Very, very few spoke up.
    So, as it was two thousand years ago, we do automatically condemn all families not under the direct ownership of men. Whether the mother is single, widowed or abandoned, or has fled from a violent spouse, she is bad, is blamed, and therefore deserves our contempt and harshest treatment. We can more-or-less accept a fatherless family IF the mother is able to earn a fairly good living while remaining a full-time parent, but that's as far as we'll go. We have our standards, you know.
    We like our welfare "reform" policies, which effectively lock these parents into something very much like indentured servitude (i.e., "workfare"), because we want to know that single mothers are adequately punished for failing to secure a husband. One policies enable us to automatically blame the mother, regardless of the situation. It doesn't matter is she is a single parent, abandoned or widowed. It doesn't matter if she (like so many of us) is unable to secure a job (much less childcare, transportation, etc.), or if she is too ill to work. "Nothing is new under the sun."
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008