RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Executions Worldwide Nearly Doubled in 2008

by Rose Marie Berger 07-10-2009

The number of executions worldwide nearly doubled last year compared with 2007, according to a study released in March by Amnesty International.

At the same time, Europe and Central Asia have become virtually death penalty-free zones, with only Belarus still maintaining capital punishment. The United States is the only country in the Americas that consistently executes, but the number of executions in 2008 was the lowest since 1995.

In response to these convicting statistics (see Global Death Penalty, Sojourners, July 2009), Marie Dennis, co-president of Pax Christi International, the world’s largest Catholic peace organization, told Sojourners:

I am concerned about the increase in executions because it reflects a loss of respect for the basic dignity of every human life. It represents a failure to believe in the possibility of reform and reconciliation, a failure to recognize the injustice and inadequacies of our justice system, and a misguided belief in the deterrence effect of the death penalty.

I hope people of faith will respond to the increased use of capital punishment around the world by deepening our commitment to the gift of each person’s life. We need to nurture relationships with people who have been victims of violent crime as well as with people who are on death row and probe our own experiences of reconciliation. It is time for all people of faith to advocate for social and racial justice and for an end to the death penalty.

I appreciate Marie’s perspective. I also appreciate that of arch-conservative — and also a Catholic — Richard A. Viguerie who wrote When Governments Kill in the same issue of Sojourners. Using the rigors of Catholic social teaching, both these Catholics come to the same inevitable conclusion—the death penalty is wrong and unacceptable for Christians to support in any way, shape, or form.

The U.S. is slowly retreating from capital punishment — it’s barbaric, ineffective, and very expensive. Christians can use this political and economic moment to light a fire for the end of capital punishment in the United States. It’s time for this country to also be counted among those civilized nations who are considered a “death penalty-free zone.”

Rose Marie Berger, an associate editor at Sojourners, blogs at www.rosemarieberger.com.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • WaveTossed
    "The context of "Thou shalt not kill" has to do with murder."

    Absolutely. Many modern translations translate this Commandment as "Thou shalt not murder." Which is correct.

    The execution of even one innocent person is a murder, an abomination before God, and a violation of His Commandments. If human beings were God or equivilent to God -- and thus could be perfect and guarantee that no innocent people would ever be executed -- then perhaps this conversation might be different. However, human beings can never be God and thus human mistake will come in sooner or later. For the state to allow human mistakes to result in the killing of even one innocent human being: this is murder and a violation of God's Commandments.
  • WaveTossed
    "but how many people have committed murder , served time , been released and murdered again . How many have murdered , sent to prison and murdered while in prison . Those statistics and aspect of the conversation should be brought into the conversation , for the sake of justice."

    I agree. But these are failures of the justice system. And you are correct: the more money a defendant has (and the whiter his skin is), the less likely this defendant will be executed. The killing of even one innocent person by the state is a bigger failure of the justice system.

    And you are correct. If you are pro-life, then you must be completely pro-life. This is what Catholic Bishops refer to as "the seamless garment."
  • hammerud
    The context of "Thou shalt not kill" has to do with murder. Murders are to be executed. The shedding of innocent blood is an abomination to God, but murders do not fit into that category.
  • hammerud
    Numbers 35:16,17 -- one OT example.
    Affirmed by Paul by inference in Acts 25:11, 25 NT example.
  • 1Grace
    What would you call it when an innocent person gets a life sentence ?
    is that any less of a sin by the state ? Just playing with you , I do see your point , but its an isolated one and when you look at the over all picture one I believe should be part of the conversation but how many people have committed murder , served time , been released and murdered again . How many have murdered , sent to prison and murdered while in prison . Those statistics and aspect of the conversation should be brought into the conversation , for the sake of justice .

    Also what i have against the death penalty now is it seems if you have money , or even still the right race , you have a better chance of escaping the death sentence . Till we get a better system that looks out for victims and protects potential victims , the death penalty appears to be something that is not useful in this culture.

    The Catholic Church Bibi cal arguments are the same for protecting the unborn. man should not destroy what God has made. Makes more sense to an Evangelical like myself understanding of the scripture . The Catholic church uses the sacredness of life as their main focus , different then the Ten Commandment logic. And as I said , Jesus said we are all murderers who have ill feelings toward another .

    the fact is also that as many people who have to deal with the fact a loved one was murdered, a child at times , must have the hardest trial concerning this . Their ill will towards the murderer being seen as bad as the murderer himself in the eyes of God . Their ability to forgive is the message I get from all of this , forgive those who do such things , but what to do with those who do commit such crimes from a society standpoint should be to make sure they never do it again.
  • WaveTossed
    How much more clearer can Scripture be?

    Exodus 20:13

    "13 Thou shalt not kill."

    Killing an innocent person, even by the State is a clear violation of Scripture.

    I believe that the Episcopal Church and the Roman Catholic Church understood this in their opposition to the death penalty. When even one innocent person is killed, it is a violation of the Ten Commandments.

    Now this doesn't mean that a convicted murderer should go scott-free. Nobody is saying that. It's not a choice between execution and just letting murderers go scott-free. Convicted murderers should get life sentences without parole. And not in a "country-club" prison either. There is plenty of work that prisoners can do while serving their sentences. And if it turns out that a conviction was done in error, at least the person can be exonerated and set free and compensated for the error. However, once an innocent person is executed than he/she has been murdered by the state and cannot be brought back to life.
  • 1Grace
    "However, my biggest problem is if even one innocent person were executed, that would be a sin, against the Ten Commandments. "

    I do see your point , but also the same point can be said if one murderer is allowed to go free and murder again , using your religious arguement that would be also breaking the ten commandments.

    And hammerud what scripture are you saying supports the death penalty . The death penalty was used , in the Old testament I agree was used . But remember Jesus told us to hate in our hearts was committing murder , we do not execute a person for hating right ?
  • hammerud
    There are issues in Scripture where different interpretations butt heads, but the position of Scripture on many issues, including this issue, is clear. Scripture is the plumb line. The points of view of various churches, denominations or people on this or other issues must be evaluated in light of Scripture. Acts 17:11 makes this very point.
  • WaveTossed
    1Grace is correct in that Scripture is frequently open to interpretation (or else mis-interpretation). However, my biggest problem is if even one innocent person were executed, that would be a sin, against the Ten Commandments.

    I'm Episcopalian. The Episcopal church is opposed to the death penalty.

    http://www.deathpenaltyreligious.org/education/...

    And an update, even stronger opposition:

    http://www.episcopalchurch.org/1866_70079_ENG_H...

    From the U.S. Catholic Bishops site, quoting John-Paul II. I don't believe that Pope Benedict has overruled his predecessor:

    http://www.usccb.org/sdwp/national/deathpenalty...
  • hammerud
    The death penalty is supported in both Old and New Testaments (Numbers and Acts examples). The messed up legal system needs to be fixed, but the fundamental question of imposing the death penalty is supported by Scripture.
  • WaveTossed
    Capital punishment is simply wrong. Jesus said: Mathew Chapter 5:

    "38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: 39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also."

    Jesus refuted the entire idea of "an eye for an eye." And that's basically the principle that capital punishment is founded on -- the idea that two wrongs makes a right. Not true.

    The other problem with capital punishment is the fact that sometimes innocent people are executed. If even one "mistake" is made and even just one innocent person is executed, that would violate the Ten Commandments: "Thou shalt not do murder."
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008