RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Washington Update: Abortion Funding Not in Health-Care Bill

by Sojourners Policy Team 07-31-2009

The health-care reform debate in Washington, D.C., has many components, but one that has drawn enormous attention from the pro-life community is a concern over whether health-care reform would provide funding for abortions.

Jim Wallis wrote a blog post two weeks ago about the issue, when it was still unclear what direction the Congress would take. Last night, a key committee in the House of Representatives voted on how the issue would be addressed in their version of the bill.

Here is what they decided, as reported in a NY Times article (emphasis added):

On Thursday night, the Energy and Commerce Committee also voted to allow health plans to cover or not cover abortion, as they see fit, but stipulated that insurers must use money from private sources to pay for any abortions…

The amendment said abortion could not be included in the “essential benefits package” to be defined by the government. Further, it said insurers would not be required or forbidden to cover abortion. But, it says, in every part of the country, the government must ensure that there is at least one plan that covers abortion and at least one that does not.

Under the bill, health plans would receive federal subsidies to help pay premiums for low-income people. But under the amendment, subsidies could not be used to pay for abortions.

The amendment is an attempt to resolve the issue of whether health-care subsidies included in the reform bill would be subject to the Hyde Amendment, a long-standing rule prohibiting public funding for abortion services. Although much of what is in the bill is new territory, the amendment effectively maintains the status quo on denying any government funding for abortion.

None of the Senate committees working on health-care reform have passed similar amendments on abortion funding at this time. We’ll post updates on God’s Politics as the issue is addressed both by the full House of Representatives and the Senate.

- Sojourners Policy Team

To learn more about health-care reform, click here to visit Sojourners’ Health-Care Resources Web page.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • sara02
    I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

    Alena

    http://grantfoundation.net
  • ShazamMan
    So many sources are claiming that abortion and euthanasia would be covered under the Obama plan, not to mention sex-change operations. Why is it that so many other sources are wrong and only Sojo is correct? Surely Sojo wouldn't deliberately disseminate misinformation just to support their beloved President
    and the socialist agenda they've been trying to enact for years? Would they?
    You know, I'd really like to think that they wouldn't, but somehow I have my serious doubts.
  • It may not always be, but that is Rep. Stupak's position. Stupak is a progressive, pro-life Democrat. He strongly favors strong health care reform, but also opposes including abortion. He proposed an amendment to keep abortion out of health care reform. It lost. Pro-life Democrats oppose the Capps amendment because explicitly permits the Secretary to include abortion in the services offered by the public plan. Indeed, if the Hyde amendment is reversed, the amendment would actually require that the public plan cover abortions.
  • michaelclay
    Good day. I am a follower of Jesus that was an alcoholic drug user saved by the love of God through faith in Jesus and delivered from addictions 30 years ago. I have been so blessed. 3 daughters with God loving son in laws, 3 grandchildren, everyone in my extended and immediate family a believer; liberals, moderates and conservatives, that live their faith in Jesus with love towards one another. God has been so good to me though i deserve nothing.

    I participated in the abortion of my child through supporting my girlfriend to have the abortion because it would eliminate and inconvenience. I believe I have a girl who is 30 now, waiting to meet her earthly dad with forgiveness and love in her heart. God forgave me and I am not guilty because of Jesus work on the cross for me.

    The "world" is so subtle and seductive. I have to daily trust The Holy Spirit to give me eyes to see and ears to hear because it's all very logical and even sounds like good. Your article here seems like the world, the one Jesus talks about when He said "the world", and it grieves me. Thanks for the comments by others. That encourages me to know there is salt and light emanating from His children in the dark. My comment, well it's not mine, "friendship with the world is hate towards God."
    Let us pray for discernment to understand the "world" Jesus refers to and have the grace to hate this "world" that wants us to be its friend and thereby hate God.
    Pro 24:11 Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.
  • michaelclay
    Good day. I am a follower of Jesus that was an alcoholic drug user saved by the love of God through faith in Jesus and delivered from addictions 30 years ago. I have been so blessed. 3 daughters with God loving son in laws, 3 grandchildren, everyone in my extended and immediate family a believer; liberals, moderates and conservatives, that live their faith in Jesus with love towards one another. God has been so good to me though i deserve nothing.

    I participated in the abortion of my child through supporting my girlfriend to have the abortion because it would eliminate and inconvenience. I believe I have a girl who is 30 now, waiting to meet her earthly dad with forgiveness and love in her heart. God forgave me and I am not guilty because of Jesus work on the cross for me.

    The "world" is so subtle and seductive. I have to daily trust The Holy Spirit to give me eyes to see and ears to hear because it's all very logical and even sounds like good. Your article here seems like the world, the one Jesus talks about when He said "the world", and it grieves me. Thanks for the comments by others. That encourages me to know there is salt and light emanating from His children in the dark. My comment, well it's not mine, "friendship with the world is hate towards God."
    Let us pray for discernment to understand the "world" Jesus refers to and have the grace to hate this "world" that wants us to be its friend and thereby hate God.
    Pro 24:11 Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.
  • jesse3
    An Associated Press story now says "Gov't insurance would allow coverage for abortion" Why does Sojo says something completely different? Who's telling the truth?

    http://asia.news.yahoo.com/ap/20090805/twl-us-h...
  • prk
    When we end up with only the "public option" how will this be?
  • The Weekly Standard does not appear to be the most objective source on this issue.
  • And that is exactly the reason why "just a little government involvement" is not a good argument, because it never just ends there.
  • bhaack
    ...yet.
  • jesse3
    I'm not yet convinced: http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/200... .

    "Congressman Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) believes the Capps amendment is a "phony compromise", according to his press secretary. Congressman Joe Pitts (R-Pa.) said in a statement that "The amendment would still allow for taxpayer funding to pay for plans that cover abortion. This is a fig leaf, designed to lure votes from Members who want cover on the issue. The American people will not be fooled. We want an explicit exclusion in the bill to prevent any taxpayer funding from paying for abortions. Anything else is wrong, and contrary to overwhelming popular opinion.”
  • MattyK
    I'm thrilled to hear this! Though much work remains to ensure the most basic human right to society's most vulnerable members: the right to life for the unborn.

    Accessable healthcare itself is a step towards making the world more hospitable to the unborn. Lets hope this legislation works!
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008