RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

An Open Letter On Health Care to Conservative Christians in the U.S.

by Brian McLaren 08-11-2009

Dear Friends,

Although today I would not call myself a political or social conservative, I am grateful for my heritage as an evangelical Christian: My faith is rooted in a personal relationship with God through Jesus Christ, I honor and seek to live in harmony with the scriptures, and I love to share the good news of God’s love with others. Since my teenage years when I decided to follow Jesus, I have pursued wholehearted discipleship, and my life has been shaped by that commitment. After completing graduate school and teaching college English, I became a church planter and pastor and served in the same congregation for 24 years.

But for almost that many years, I have been growing more and more deeply troubled by the way so many from my heritage in conservative Christianity – in its evangelical, charismatic, and Roman Catholic streams – have allowed themselves to be spiritually formed by various conservative political and economic ideologies. It’s been disturbing to see how many Christians have begun to follow and trust leaders who live more by political/media/ideological codes than by moral/spiritual/biblical ones.

As a result, I sometimes think that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, and Fox News may now influence many conservative evangelicals, charismatics, and Catholics more than Billy Graham, Rick Warren, T.D. Jakes, Pope Benedict, or even the four gospels.

Now in a free country, people certainly have the right to choose their ideology. But Christians of all sorts, I think we all can agree, have a special calling – to increasingly harmonize our lives (including our lives as citizens) with the teaching and example of Jesus. My concern is that many of my sisters and brothers, without realizing it, have begun seeing Jesus and the faith through the lens of a neo-conservative political framework, thus reducing their vision of Jesus and his essential message of the kingdom of God. As a result, too many of us are becoming more and more zealous conservatives, but less and less Christ-like Christians, and many don’t seem to notice the difference.

Thankfully, many Christian leaders are far more thoughtful and nuanced in their integration of faith and public life. They don’t jump on talk-radio’s latest conspiracy theory bandwagons, nor do they buy flippant talk of “death panels” or inappropriate comparisons to Hitler and so on. But still, so many of them remain silent about what’s going on, and thereby grant it tacit approval.

I too was silent for a long time during my years as a pastor. But during the lead-up to the Iraq War, as I saw how little discernment was being exercised regarding the moral logic of pre-emptive war, I began taking risks that I hadn’t taken before. I was similarly moved to speak out when, in the aftermath of Abu Ghraib, relatively few Christians in America took a stand against torture. (In fact, according to survey data, Southern white evangelicals were the group most likely to support doing unto others as they would never want done to themselves.) And when I heard Christians (mis)using the Bible to argue against environmental responsibility, again, I could not be silent.

Now, in the debate about health care, I am similarly disheartened to see the relative silence of thoughtful Christian voices as counterpoint to the predictable rhetoric of the more reactive voices. Over the last few weeks, I’ve been getting mass e-mails and Web links from evangelical and charismatic organizations that present frightening and outlandish claims about what President Obama is planning to do regarding health care. I’ve checked into these claims, and in case after case, they are simply false. They’re based on rumors spread by certain dramatic radio and cable-tv personalities, but they are not based in truth.

Again, people are free to disagree humbly and respectfully with their fellow Christians and their government. (As readers of my books know, I take this freedom seriously in my own life). But we Christians, it seems to me, have a high calling – to be radically committed to integrity and civility, even (especially) with those with whom we disagree. God, after all, is merciful, generous, and kind to “the just and the unjust”: How can we not have that same obligation regarding those with whom we disagree? Even if others resort to dirty political tricks and distortion of the truth through exaggeration and fear-mongering, we simply cannot. At the very least, we should be seekers of truth, seekers of wisdom, not consumers (or purveyors) of propaganda – even if it comes from members of our own political party and people who quote a lot of Bible verses (often out of context). We have a higher calling.

So, without going into health-care reform specifics (which is still difficult to do, since there are many fast-changing proposals in play and the process of developing a vote-able proposal is far from over), I would simply like to plead with conservative Christians – conservative evangelicals, conservative charismatics, conservative Catholics, and so on – to take a stand for integrity and civility in the health-care debate, alongside and in solidarity with those of us who love Christ just as you do, but do not rally around the conservative political banner.

If you take this stand, you will be heard by your fellow conservatives in ways that some of the rest of us can’t be heard. And lives could be saved as a result of our joint calls for Christian integrity and civility: We’ve already seen what happens when people translate religious and ideological passion into violent action. Recalling the words of that great 19th century British conservative Edmund Burke, think of what could happen in the next few years if too many good conservative people sit back and do nothing … while less scrupulous and more desperate conservative people whip their followers into a frenzy through fear and inaccurate information.

I will continue to speak out on these issues as I have done in the past. But I don’t expect the most extreme Christian conservatives to listen to me much. Since I was an outspoken supporter of President Obama’s candidacy, and since before that I was equally outspoken against torture, against the invasion of Iraq, for environmental stewardship, etc., many of them have written me off (sometimes with quite spicy language). But if you are a conservative Christian who cares about integrity and civility in communication and debate, perhaps they will still listen to you when you call them to a higher standard. I hope you will take the risk of speaking out with that in mind.

As my friend Jim Wallis recently said so eloquently in his last blog post on health care, we may have honest differences with our fellow Christians on the issue of health care and many other issues too, but even in our differences we can agree that debates should take place in the light of truth and civility, not in the shadows of misrepresentation and prejudice.

Be assured, I am no uncritical supporter of health-care reform. I am no more in favor now of rushing into expensive health-care reform without sufficient debate than I was a few years ago when we rushed into an expensive pre-emptive war without sufficient care and discernment. I’m eager, like many of my conservative friends, to see the kind of reform that encourages small business and entrepreneurship. I’m interested in the kind of reform that reduces the power of both unaccountable mega-corporations and unaccountable government bureaucracy. I’m eager to see the kind of reform that doesn’t pave the way for powerful health insurance companies to do to the public in the next few decades what “too big to fail” Wall Street debt-repackagers did to us over the last few. I’m eager to see the kind of reform that in the long term reduces rather than increases our growing national debt, and that truly helps our poorest neighbors without creating reductions in real service for our more prosperous neighbors.

Getting the kind of reform we need won’t be easy, especially with so many powerful interests spending huge amounts of money to achieve their own ends, with too little concern for justice, the common good … or the truth. That’s why, for there to be the kind of debate that produces good results, we who call ourselves Christians –  conservative or otherwise –  need to stand for full integrity in communication, whatever our political leanings. We need to be sure that the best arguments on both sides are heard … not being satisfied to compare “our” best with “their” worst, as unscrupulous politicians and media personalities so often like to do, and not reducing the views of others to absurdity, even if we disagree with them vehemently.

The moral authority of Christians has been severely compromised in our culture in recent years. The most serious kinds of sexual scandals have rocked the Catholic, evangelical, and charismatic communities, not to mention financial scandals, ugly denominational lawsuits, and high-profile divisions. Studies have shown that some kinds of Christians are not only more likely to support torture – they are also more likely to hold racist views, to engage in domestic violence, and to end their marriages in divorce. No wonder young people are turned off as never before to a hypocritical face of Christianity that radiates shame, anger, and judgment rather than grace, love, and truth.

Even if we disagree on health-care reform and other political issues, I hope we can agree that it is time for us to start walking – and talking – more worthy of the calling to which we have been called, to use Paul’s words, to speak the truth, and to do so always in love. Or as James said, we must remember in this fire-prone political climate that the tongue can set off tiny rhetorical sparks that create huge flames of unimagined and unintended destruction. It can spread a false wisdom that sounds good on the surface, but beneath the surface is driven not by love but by bitter envy and selfish ambition. In contrast, he said (3:13 ff),

The wisdom that comes from above is first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere. Peacemakers who sow in peace raise of harvest of righteousness.

Wise and needed words to guide us in the weeks and months ahead as health-care reform is debated for better or for worse. May both the debate and the outcome bring us to a better place.

By the way, if you’d like to do some fact-checking about the health-care debate, here are some faith-based sources that I believe can be trusted to avoid uncritical and inaccurate reporting about health care. I understand they will be offering correctives to rumors and misinformation in the months ahead.

http://blog.faithinpubliclife.org/
http://www.sojo.net
http://www.catholicsinalliance.org/

Brian McLarenBrian McLaren (brianmclaren.net) is a speaker and author, most recently of Everything Must Change and Finding Our Way Again.

To learn more about health-care reform, click here to visit Sojourners’ Health-Care Resources Web page.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Great post, Brian! Whether we agree with Obama's health care policies or not (I'm still on the fence, personally), we need to discuss it and debate it with civility and respect. Especially us Christians.
  • letjusticerolldown
    I appreciate the fullness, clarity, and passion of this piece. And I agree with the appeal.

    In addition, I would highlight that each of the appeals to honest dialogue that I have seen do not mention listening.

    If I observe two people; one is yelling and the other is quiet--I am tempted to tell one to quiet down.

    However, from my fathering experience observing children, I realize one party yelling is often the result of another party not listening.

    Talk radio has become so rabid partly because it rode the sentiments of many who felt their views were not conveyed, or even heard, in the mainstream. The 'moral majority' did the same. It seems to me as their voices have become more amplified--there has been a tendency to keep talking louder and forget they may face the same temptation to not listen.

    Mr Mclaren--I am sure you digest enough public dialogue to know many will take your post as part of a slap-down of those who disagree with Obama. You point out clearly you are critically reviewing the components of healthcare reform proposals. But if you want your appeal to conservatives for moderation of dialogue--then why start out with a slap at their faith, intelligence and integrity. Maybe they are using words that sound like Hannity and others because they have legitimate concerns. Maybe they enter public discourse using those words because they lack others. Why not start the dialogue with listening instead of critique?????

    Maybe the zinger makes for more engaged readers and stimulated conversation. Which might be the same reason the conversation got this hot in the first place.
  • jesse3
    Couldn't agree more. I find it odd that this piece was called "An Open Letter to Conservative Christians..." How can you ever even dialogue with people when you include so many swipes and zingers in such a letter? When you make GBA (guilt by association) after GBA? Are you even attempting dialogue with such a piece?
  • 1Grace
    I wondered where else his letter appeared Jesse ? Does he not realize how insulting and arrogant it appears ? According to him and his data , The body of Christ is just manure , with of course himself a beacon ? The arrogance is quite amazing , the Bodies of Christ I have been involved in , mostly Evangelical but some mainstream have been abundantly full of kind people , concerned with their neighbors , yes have met some folks who use scripture to promote I am better then you " see McClarens essay here " based on race, economic position , also education . Jesus I have forgotten what college he graduated from , but somehow his method of reaching out to the body of Christ , and lifting it to greater heights is based on The Word, Holy Spirit and a Relationship with Christ . Not based on voting the way the McClarens or Robertson''s of this world direct us to . MANY Christians who are not racist or find torture their cup of tea find Brian McClarren's own religious views quite out of the normal understanding of the church , Regardless He is responsible for that ,. The belief of hell as a fairy tale shows a heretical view of the Atonement and its meaning . Jesus spoke more about hell then any prophet in the Bible, Christ was not manilipating us Brian . I suggest he had our best interest at heart , a I am sure our Lord did , you ? You speak from a position of intolerance saying you support tolerance. McClaren support for President Obama during the election shows a political bias the very least that should be noted in his essays .




    President Obama White House email sign up is sending out e mails to counter the other protesters . Its hard to get people to show up I agree. And any person that disrupts a town hall meeting regardless which view he supports hurts all of us . Recently a person was put into a hospital by folks in a Union who supported Obama care . Does this now mean that he be put into that thugs category as Another Anonomous has also ? Or Air America, a liberal secular sound piece of the left which takes on the same issues of support that God's politics does , but ridicule Catholics and Evangelicals because of the stupidity of their Faith , not just their politics. McClaren leaves the lesser intelligence in place , just changes the reasoning to listening to the wrong people.





    If he wants a dialog , insulting the intelligence of the person you are having the conversation with shows really you don't want a conversation , a one sided one , because your side is receiving all the propaganda and my side from my sources is for truth justice and the Americvan way .


    Whats strange is I have come to ther place in the debate where i think government and the the free market can do better on this issue joining somehow , keep standards of medical care high, research and availability high , using the best of both the government and private sectors . I would go to a town hall meeting , but I don't think the average American has a voice anymore . The experts know it all , and know how stupid we are from either side of the political boundaries. What gets me is McClaren does not get he is part of the problem, worse he pits Christian against christian .

    Having said all that , why does a person who has such a low opinion of Christians expect anything but support from the far left and rejection from the majority in Christianity .
    Perhaps that is why the organization itself has seen its failure to gather support from Evangelical Christianisty amd mainstream beliefs that still Hold Jesus Lord not politics, power, or I am smarter then you are politics or my god is nicer then your GOD like those who changes the scripture to fit his own world views.
  • thesource62
    Brian Mclaren never misses any opportunity to trash Evangelicals, or conservative Christians. He dismisses their preferences, their views & their legacies & shows us repeatedly that his ability to conceptualize can be usually trumped by his own arrogance. His own personal hangups that are left over from his early years have led him to espouse many doctrinally unsound and perhaps heretical positions. I think he needs to grow up spiritually and quit wasting his time bashing other believers under the pretext of a reformist. He is as the emergent church is; reactionary in style without substance, unbiblical and loose in respect of canon, and highly inclined toward vociferous denunciation of those who do not share his love of novelty for its own sake.
  • wednesday4
    Jesus would spend his time loving and listening to the people that he doesn't agree with instead of arguing with them.
  • billdalton
    Well, well, this is how we get to listen to each other. I would say please go to http://www.factcheck.org/ and actually check to see what is truth. Please do this in order that we can have a true dialogue regarding health care. Incidently, there are other truths there as well, both for and contrary to our president. May God bless you and yours.
  • myfanwy
    I agree. I couldn't even understand the first group of posts. They are mostly incoherent and don't even seem to address the essay we are supposed to be discussing. I am so sad and tired of this hatefulness. I would be ashamed to have any of my non-Christian friends read this discussion so. This has nothing to do with the Jesus I love, who teaches and molds people with incredible gentleness. It sounds more like angry people trying to sanctify their own far-from-Godlike predjudice by slapping on a label that reads "Holy."
  • ellie46
    Such anger. You may have been reading - but you weren't listening - you were just waiting to talk. I don't have strong opinions - but I can tell when someone has love in their heart and someone else is dangerous and toxic. By the way, someone sent a button with Hitler's picture on it. The caption said "Hitler gave wonferful speeches too', Nancy didn't sent it.
  • JamesM
    I see your point! If I were a conservative strongly opposed to healtcare reform, I too would find it difficult to find any common ground with Brian McLaren-- especially when he calls for honesty in the debate. Such a modus operandi (honesty) would be so contrary to the way I have conducted myself (as a conservative) for the past 8 years that I would not hqve the vaguest idea of what a honest dialogue means.
  • letjusticerolldown
    In fairness, he asks whether the McLaren piece represents a desire to dialogue. That is not the same as expressing his unwillingness to dialogue.
  • Eric77
    Apparently it's not just conservatives who have a problem with honesty. Here's today's Washington Post:

    "Another myth that we've been hearing about is this notion that somehow we're going to be cutting your Medicare benefits. We are not," Obama replied. "AARP would not be endorsing a bill if it was undermining Medicare, okay?"

    But after the event, AARP issued a clarification. "While the President was correct that AARP will not endorse a health care reform bill that would reduce Medicare benefits, indications that we have endorsed any of the major health care reform bills currently under consideration in Congress are inaccurate," the statement by chief operating officer Tom Nelson said.


    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...

    There's dishonesty on both sides here.
  • JamesM
    If Obama misstated facts he needs to be called on it. But your ¨tu quoque¨ argument is just another effort at obfuscation. To equate the President's misstatement of fact--factual error (you do not know if it was purposeful misrepresentation or a mistake) with what the conservative PACS are doing is clearly bad faith. He is not lying about "death panels" a la Sarah Palin or circulating patently false emails scaring the heck out of people to become hysterical like the conservatives are doing. It is your prerogative to see the two actions as being equivalent but that would say more about your debating ethic than it would about the substance of your argument:
  • Eric77
    You're right that I'm making an assumption about Obama. He's a pretty competent, intelligent man. I'm assuming that he knows whether or not one of the most influential organizations in Washington has endorsed the bill. Perhaps he's not as competent as I thought though.

    On the other hand, why assume Palin is lying? If Obama is an 8 on the competence scale she's more like a 4. Why not give her the benefit of the doubt you'd give Obama that she doesn't know how to read legislative text is or is confused?

    My larger point is, dishonesty is used on both sides of the political aisle and is unfortunately lacking in this health care debate. Implying this is somehow inherent on the conservative side is lame.
  • myfanwy
    I know that I have seen an AARP ad with a supportive message on health reform in general. Perhaps that is what the president meant. I'm sorry to disagree, but most of the wildly ridiculous fables about the content of the healthcare bills under construction has come from the conservative side, and has been repeated by elected representatives who darn well know what they are saying is a lie and say it anyway.
  • billdalton
    Go to http://www.factcheck.org/ to get the skinny on that and a lot of other stuff
  • McLaren says, "We need to be sure that the best arguments on both sides are heard … not being satisfied to compare 'our' best with 'their' worst."

    On that point, I completely agree with him. Unfortunately, when McLaren assumes that all opponents of healthcare reform can be represented by the rantings of Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly etc, he is doing exactly what he expects others not to.

    I'm a big supporter of universal coverage, but this is not the way to go about obtaining it.
  • droslovinia
    I'm a big supporter of universal coverage, too, but I think you miss the point that, while not everyone who opposes healthcare reform is a hysterical right-wing demagogue, they cede the platform to such folks. Blatant lies, like "death-panels" and "socialist takeover" myths, are being sold to the American people at an accelerated rate, and the plain old conservative who has honest doubts is a dying breed.

    Even "Grace," writing above, is unable to get out a response that is not nuanced by her dislike for Brian and his thoughts that surely had to have been nurtured by someone looking to "work a religious angle." At this point, we're all tainted by something that someone has said. It's human nature and the nature of the Internet. Does that make Brian wrong when he asks people to disagree a bit less hatefully?

    So a lot of you don't like Brian McLaren. Does that mean that asking people to be more civil is such a bad thing? Does it mean that asking you to consider what the best of your faith would call you to do, which we all know we should do at all times, is such a bad thing?
  • 1Grace
    "Does it mean that asking you to consider what the best of your faith would call you to do, which we all know we should do at all times, is such a bad thing?"

    Not at all , but your beleif Brian has done this above is what Cool Hand Luke would call a failure to communicate .
  • myfanwy
    I have never heard of Mr McLaren before now--but I totally got what he was saying. Perhaps the people who missed it just didn't want to hear it because they dislike him already--which kind of underscores his point about our need for improvement in this area.
  • I have nothing personal against Brian so I don't know where you got that. Like most 20-something progressive evangelicals, I've got a few of his books on my shelf and I suspect we vote the same way on most issues.

    And I'm all for civility and constructive, respectful dialogue between those of opposing viewpoints, which means I agree with his basic point that scare tactics are not helping the health care debate.

    My particular issue with this post is that Brian seems to be (to use his words) comparing 'our' best with 'their' worst, and thus, he's not following his own prescription. If a conservative evangelical were to write "an open letter to liberal Christians" telling us that Michael Moore, Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher have brainwashed us into believing socialist left-wing propaganda, I would find this presumptive and condescending.

    I'm sure Brian is very sincere in attempting to cultivate some desperately needed civility in what has become an increasingly nasty culture war skirmish over health care reform, but I'm not convinced that cheap shots at conservatives are an effective way to go about it.
  • WaveTossed
    "I'm a big supporter of universal coverage, too, but I think you miss the point that, while not everyone who opposes healthcare reform is a hysterical right-wing demagogue, they cede the platform to such folks."

    Thanks. I believe in coverage as universal as possible. However, I happen not to believe in big government plans -- I don't think that they will work in our society.

    However, there are too many people, particularly a few libertarians and free-market people, who somehow have believed that the Limbaughs/Becks/Hannitys/Palins, etc. actually represent their views.

    I've posted this article several times. It seems that we still need it. From the Cato Institute, one of the voices of reason:

    http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6800

    Relevant excerpts:

    "Conservatism itself has changed markedly in recent years, forsaking the old fusionist synthesis in favor of a new and altogether unattractive species of populism. The old formulation defined conservatism as the desire to protect traditional values from the intrusion of big government; the new one seeks to promote traditional values through the intrusion of big government. Just look at the causes that have been generating the real energy in the conservative movement of late: building walls to keep out immigrants, amending the Constitution to keep gays from marrying, and imposing sectarian beliefs on medical researchers and families struggling with end-of-life decisions."

    Any liberty-loving person who believes that the Limbaugh/Beck/Hannity/Palin folks truly believe in liberty: well, I have some nice swampland in Arizona to sell to you.
  • clairhochstetler
    Ok people, so all of you who have made comments thus far don't like Brian McLaren's "tone." But do you like his substance? The jouney he has been on personally speaks volumes to me.

    And if he isn't saying it the way you like it to be said, who is? Give us some links!
  • karna
    i so agree...all i kept thinking throughout the piece was...its just okay to disagree with conservatives who do not want socialism in our country ... lol
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008