RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

A ‘Truth-telling’ Ministry for People of Faith

by Jim Wallis 08-13-2009

Every so often, the issues at stake in the public debate become so clear and compelling, so alarming and disconcerting — or both at the same time — that I feel a need to speak out in a more personal way.

It’s happened before around the 9/11 attacks, the war in Iraq, and the consolidation of power by the Religious Right after the 2004 elections (which was when I released God’s Politics and began a 50-city book tour).

The issue that compels me to speak out today, and to send this personal column, is the moral drama surrounding the health-care debate.

I have a dear friend named Janelle Goetcheus. She is a doctor and a modern-day saint, and the moral conscience of health care in Washington, D.C. Janelle is a doctor to the homeless, the undocumented, and the vulnerable poor in the nation’s Capital. She is the founder of Christ House, a medical facility for the homeless who are too sick to stay on the street; it is a ministry of the Church of the Saviour. We were talking about health-care reform the other day, and she said, “People don’t seem to understand that this really is a life-and-death issue. People who have good health insurance will live and live longer; those who don’t will die and die sooner.”

We have a health-care crisis. The health-care system in the U.S. is sick and broken, 46 million of God’s children are left out with no health insurance coverage, and 14,000 more are losing their coverage every day. Without change, costs will continue to go up, and we all will pay more and more for health care — without reform.

President Obama has made health-care reform his top domestic policy priority, and Congress is slowly moving to embrace a plan for reform. But as members of the House and Senate went home for their August recess, the opposition forces to health-care reform have mounted a ferocious offensive.

We have a democracy crisis, with right-wing forces trying to prevent and destroy a civil debate with their “mob rule” campaigns. Fueled by right-wing conservative talk-show hosts and funded by special interests in the health-care industry who are afraid they will lose money if the system is really fixed, a vicious campaign to defeat health-care reform has begun. The “storm troopers” of political demagoguery, such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck, have mobilized their followers to disrupt town meetings and defeat comprehensive reform by yelling louder than anybody else. The campaign tactics include lies, intimidation, character assassination, verbal abuse, and even mob behavior against members of Congress trying to conduct town hall meetings on the issues. In some places violence has broken out, and it has been threatened in other instances. Their approach seems to be to confuse and scare people, shout down the reformers, and disrupt the town meetings — to prevent a serious, honest, and civil public discussion about the best way to fix a broken system. There are also now some stories of left-wing groups organizing to confront these disruptions.  Left-right shouting matches and confrontational tactics will not create the civil discourse we need, and could finally sabotage needed health-care reform.

E-mails tell seniors that the reforms won’t cover them, assert that vulnerable people will be excluded from the system, and that Christian doctors and nurses will be forced to perform abortions. Pastors are telling me stories of distortion and fear; elderly parishioners are asking them, “Will I die under the new system?”

There are difficult and complicated issues involved with truly reforming the health-care system, and there isn’t even a bill yet. It will take the best efforts of our legislators and the best attention of our citizens to accomplish real reform. But the lies and intimidation are designed simply to shut down the discussion, to make people afraid, to poison the civic atmosphere, and kill any possibility of real reform (along with stopping the president’s capacity to move on other issues — which some of the opposition readily admit. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) has said, “If we’re able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him.”

Simply put, we must stop them from doing that. The faith community must protect the nation’s civil discourse from the clear threat of demagoguery.

The country needs a good, honest, and healthy debate on the best ways to reform the health-care and insurance system, but fix it we must, and in a way that includes all who are now left out.

It’s time for the faith community to unite around the moral imperative of health-care reform, defense of the most vulnerable, and support for moral conscience in a comprehensive reform of the health-care system.

It’s time for the faith community to confront the distortions and lies that are being told. It’s time for the ministry of “truth-telling” and to surround the nation’s discussion of health care with fervent prayer.

It’s time for the faith community to practice nonviolent tactics of reconciliation and resistance against those on either side who would threaten the public debate with intimidation, fear, and even the threat of violence.

It’s time for the faith community to make its voice heard — loud and clear.

So I am personally asking each of you to do some very important things:

1. Make it a point this August to talk to your representatives in Congress and your senator (or their staff). Tell them that as a person of faith you want serious and comprehensive health-care reform that covers everybody. They need to hear from you!

2. Write letters of support for health-care reform to the editor of your daily newspaper, or write an opinion-page commentary yourself.

3. Plan study, prayer, or Bible study groups on health care in your congregation for September. Use the new resource for congregations that we have helped to create.

4. Encourage your pastor, rabbi, or imam to preach a sermon related to healing and health care on the last Sunday of August. There are resources on our health-care reform Web page.

5. Pray without ceasing that the nation will not lose its soul at this critical moment.

The faith community has an important role in this growing debate — in the name of truth-telling, fairness, and social justice. Let’s lift up our voices on these fundamental moral issues.

A special note: Next week, on Wednesday, August 19 at 5 p.m. EST, Sojourners is co-hosting a call with President Obama, and I invite you to join us. But we need you to RSVP. This is an unprecedented opportunity for the faith community to hear from the president and unite around health-care reform. We want tens of thousands of people on this call to hear President Obama, so please let your family, friends, neighbors, and fellow congregation members know so they can be part of this historic event, too. Post this link on your Facebook page, Twitter, and other social networking sites. Visit Sojourners’ health-care page for more information.

Jim Wallis is CEO of Sojourners.

To learn more about health-care reform, click here to visit Sojourners’ Health-Care Resources Web page.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Yes , I agree you on this !
  • Jackafuss
    If you don't understand the difference between helping others and
    confiscating the property of one to give to another then I can't help you.
    I agree that Jesus encouraged us to help others. He did not call on Mathew
    to collect more taxes so that the money could be used by others.

    Jack

    ...the spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to
    pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes...Romans 8:26
  • jdquest
    I don't have the statistics of how many people are involved with a church in this day and age but I'm sure it it is not enough to cover the cost of healthcare for everyone who needs it and can't afford it Perhaps at one time this might have been possible but not now. This is a "civilized" country where no one should have to go without healthcare. It seems to me that people get confused about just who the government is. It is "We the People" . This includes any Christians there are out there. We have a moral obligation to see that this is done. The time for discussion is long past. We could go on and on trying to come up with the perfect plan while healthcare eats away at the economy and many lives are lost. This doesn't seem like a good option to me.
  • pdijk
    I've been an admirer of Sojourners for years, but am now alarmed that Jim Wallis is putting faith in Washington to deal with matters that we should deal with individually and in church. Where will this end up? Will we look to Washington for theological direction? Should we have Washington decide make decisions on Predestination and Free Will?

    Jim, please focus on the need to make personal and church based decisions about how we treat others. Please stop feeding the machine in Washington that is looking to govern more and more of our lives.
  • ProfTrish
    My 37 year-old husband suffers from Multiple Sclerosis, Ulcerative Colitis, Depression, and a list of other things that go along with these chronic illnesses. President Obama's current plan does not meet the needs of the chronically ill, and although my husband currently falls into the plan's age 15-to-40 "better healthcare" zone (http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/complete-lives...), he won't for long. By the time the MS alone takes over his body, he will be well out of that range. Our current healthcare system isn't perfect, but at least we have the confidence that my husband will get the care that he needs when he needs it.

    You wrote, "The "storm troopers" of political demagoguery, such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck, have mobilized their followers to disrupt town meetings and defeat comprehensive reform by yelling louder than anybody else."

    Not true at all. The liberal media is spewing lies about conservatives. As the spouse of a chronically ill husband, I do not like the current plan at all, and I hope and I pray without ceasing that it fails. Conservative media has been encouraging people to PEACEFULLY speak their minds. If you don't believe me, check out Glenn Beck's Twitter account where he encourages people to pray, and be "Smarter, quieter and never quit." http://twitter.com/glennBeck We have a right to freedom of speech and assembly, and based on recent polls, people are not happy with the current plan.

    Glenn Beck encourages prayer. President Obama, on the other hand, refused to partake in the 2009 National Day of Prayer. This speaks volumes to me, as a Christian. He is pro-abortion, which goes against God's plan. Obama's "friends" and much of his administration have shown little integrity (Rev. Wright spewing hate and racist banter into Obama's ears for 20 years, Geithner not paying his taxes, etc.). I see no reason to respect this man beyond his position of authority; he is my President and I pray for him, but I do not agree with his Socialist beliefs and methods.

    I am a conservative Libertarian; I did not like George W. Bush, nor do I care for the current administration. Obama is the liberal media's "Messiah" and darling, and I encourage people to read and listen to all sides, not just the liberal side. There are many sides to every story, and the media has failed to present all of them.

    "Pray without ceasing that the nation will not lose its soul at this critical moment." Too late. The constant "race card" being played (say anything against this administration and you're a racist), along with the speed at which this administration is spending our children and grandchildren's money has already torn the country apart. Of course, this was started by GWB (say anything against this administration and you're a terrorist).

    Yes, I want a health care plan for all...just not this one.
  • weneedjohngalt
    No one should be surprised. Wallis and company put their hope in the an unaccomplished opportunist, aka "the one".
    Broken promises:
    Transparency - 5 day public bill reviews? Oops!
    No lobbyists in administration? Oops!
    An administration of integrity - (Gietner/Daschle etc. etc. etc. etc.) Oops!
    Enhanced interrogation ? (but only when necessary) Oops!
    Green? (Air Force one flies more often than Bono on U2 tour)
    Public Option for Health Care? Oops!

    Remarkably, all this accomplished, while Democrats are in full control of the House, Senate and White House!

    Hey, at least Carter is smiling now.
  • We both agree on the need to keep power from getting concentrated either in government or in private capitalist hands.

    That's one reason I'm not entirely convinced that small-business level capitalism should be done away with (the operative words being "not entirely convinced").

    Some "mixed-economy" system MIGHT be best--an economy which on the one hand provides democratic, working-class controlled socialist checks on private wealth and the political power private wealth generally obtains, and socialist safety nets for the needy; and on the other hand, leaves a certain degree of economic decision making (and wealth) in private hands, which could provide an outlet for a certain level of healthy entrepreneurial spirit, and could provide a certain level of check on whatever democratic socialist mechanisms might be developed to provide the check on private wealth.

    The idea of "checks and balances" is certainly one American idea worth keeping and improving upon. The orginal American revolution only went so far--it provided for checks and balances within the formal democracy, within the government, but it provided no checks and balances for the real power in society: economic power.

    WaveTossed, do you have some ideas about how we could keep private small-business level capital from eventually becoming Big Business and achieving inordinate political power through its wealth? (I have trouble seeing how small-business capitalism can keep from becoming Big Business capitalism without very strong socialist checks on private capitalist wealth and power...so I'm wondering how you see it.)

    And, what do you see as the practical mechanism for getting the power necessary to transform society away from monopoly capitalism (and imperialism) and towards more Adam Smith, small-business capitalism? The Marxist answer to this, of course, is the power of the working class, which, given its position as the class which literally has its thumb on the capitalist productive button (it can stop the flow of profits whenever it wants--if organized), has the potential to organize and take power. So, what are you your ideas on how to do that? How do you suggest we challenge the power of monopoly capitalism and the governments doing its bidding?
  • josieperl47
    I just want to point out that the government can only provide assistance under the current laws that are in effect. Our laws, as they stand now, do not provide any assistance to people who were in your position. It's a shame what you went through but government did what the law provided for. The system worked as it was set up to.
  • josieperl47
    Nancy Pelosi did not say the debate was unAmerican; she said that shouting down other people and refusing to let them be heard is unAmerican. And I agree with that. And deep down, you do, too.

    I wrote several more paragraphs but have just deleted them all. I don't think a conversation between us is going to go anywhere so I'm going to spare us both the time and make that my last comment on the issue.

    I'm so bummed they're talking about taking the public option off the table. I can only make my payments for 2 more years so I'll be uninsured from age 61 until 65. And I was so hoping my son-in-law would be able to get insurance through the public option. I'm actaully considering canceling my insurance so I can put that money in the bank to help them out if he gets sick or is in an accident. Tough choices.
  • josieperl47
    Ah, I see. And that certainly clarifies your point better for me and is a good idea in an honest world. I think I'd rather have those people pay to enroll in Medicare. If our tax dollars are going to pay for their care, I'd rather have it be efficient and cost-effective.
  • josieperl47
    Stormtroopers to me, aside from the Star Wars usage, means a coordinated and well-orchestrated group assault. I'm absolutely certain that's how Mr. Wallis meant it.

    The term stormtroopers began in WWI, before the Nazi era.. Our good friend above is, well, I guess I'll just be honest and say it: he's wrong.
  • josieperl47
    I predicted it when the taxcuts were passed right after G.W. Bush became President. I've been following it closely and frequently scream at my TV when people cite "average incomes" rising as an indicator that the taxcuts were good for our country. Then the press and even some of the Progressives buy into it. "Average income" means nothing. If you have 10 people who each earn $1,000, their average is $1,000. If one of them earn $1,000,000, their "average" rises to $100,000. The only reason the average income went up is because the top income earners saw a HUGE increase in pay and bonuses. The median income is the key to our country's prosperity and it flatlined during the Bush administration. President Obama is absolutely correct when he says that we can't get this country's budget under control without reforming health care and reining in costs. He's not pushing health reform because he's worried about the uninsured guy down the street (although that's certainly a nice side effect); he recognizes that our country's financial well-being is at risk.
  • scat
    Please review the code of conduct for this site. LIke many others here I tend to disregard comments that are condescending and disrespectfful.
  • WaveTossed
    "using the term 'teabagging'"

    Could someone please tell me what is wrong with this term. As I recall (though I might be wrong), I thought I heard some tea party protesters use this same term to describe their activities. So now are we getting a bit into "political correctness?"
  • WaveTossed
    "The "vanguard" thing is the approach to "liberation" typical of people like Fidel, or Che or Mao: the "masses" get liberated by the guerilla liberators, instead of liberating themselves. And that, to me, is a distortion of socialism, and it leads naturally to dictatorial kinds of regimes, because once the "liberator" gets in power, he tends to stay there...."

    And this right here in a nutshell is the problem with the entire socialist theory. When power is concentrated in the government, it gets corrupted. Just as when monopoly capitalists get in power, we get (as Eisenhower termed it), a military-industrial complex.

    A truly just society will be decentralized with free markets.
  • WaveTossed
    "Tax incentives?"

    ONLY for those who are willing to insure high-risk patients at price comparable to the price that companies charge who deny high-risk patients. The tax incentives would make up for the higher amounts they would have to spend covering high-risk patients. This would be one way to assure coverage.

    And also another requirement: Only for those companies that don't pay those outrageous salaries and bonuses to CEO's.
  • jtyler
    First of all, I'm fairly confident that you are not so ignorant or out of touch to believe that only Democrats want health care reform. I firmly believe that reform is needed. That being said, I also would hope that you realize that just because reform is needed doesn't mean the only option is to push through the pathetic bill that is currently on the table. We must not allow Congress, or any administration, to shove things down our throats just because it sounds like it will accomplish what is needed. (Please reference the stimulus junk pushed through using "fearful" tactics by George W. and Barack H.). It's incredibly inaccurate and narrow-minded to think that Democrats are for reform and Republicans are not. That simply is not the case.

    Secondly, it is arrogant, disrespectful, mean-spirited, and self-defeating to protest in such a way as to wield swastikas and burn images in effigy. There are extremists on both sides of the aisle. But again, please do not act as if no one ever performed such acts towards the last administration. I'm not excusing it, but don't be like the media and put your own spin on various occurrences in attempts to prove some point about one side or another. That's called painting w/ a broad brush, and doing so leaves a lot out of the picture. As far as specifics of physical altercations on behalf of those that you narrowly labeled as "proponents of health care reform" (in other words, those who see nothing wrong w/ the currently proposed bill), you can do your own research and find instances of SEIU members lashing out at others who simply wanted their voices heard.

    Lastly, in 2006 Nancy Pelosi said that she's "a fan of disrupters." This was in reference to people who were extremely outspoken (today they would be labeled as "angry mobs") in their protests of George W. and his policies. I think she is a bit hypocritical in her current stance as compared w/ that statement. It's amazing how the perspective changes when you're the one being spoken against. In closing I'll quote Hillary Clinton from '03: "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree w/ this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say, 'We are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree w/ any administration.'" Well-spoken.
  • WitnessforPeace
    Replying to the very first post: Well put, clotfedave.
    Blessings,
  • WitnessforPeace
    Well put. Thank you.
  • jtyler
    I agree that reform is definitely needed. And I hope you meant to write "not unlike in Canada or the U.K.," because their health care is not great. You are exactly right in saying that it would be ridiculous to have a group of bureaucrats sitting around determining who needs care, i.e. rationing.

    And yes, we should reach out to even one person in need. However, helping one existing homeless person in a town of 100 does not call for the other 99 people to sell their houses in order to provide for that person in need. I know it's an extreme, absurd example, but that's kinda my point: the currently proposed legislation is almost that absurd. We do need reform, just not in the manner that is being pushed by one side of Congress. There are so many other viable, intelligent options that would work wonderfully in solving the problems of those who are uninsured, as well as keeping in check the outrageous increase in premiums. I like your idea about tax incentives for those who want to reach out and help. Another element should be tort reform. Portability needs to be revamped for those who lose their jobs. COBRA is awful!
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008