RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Five Christian Considerations for Health-Care Reform

by John Hay Jr. 08-25-2009

I approach the discussion about health-care reform from the perspective of an urban minister.  I’ve worked with urban core neighbors, neighborhoods, congregations, and community groups for more than 20 years.  I’ve watched people struggle to access basic health services in the shadow of world-class hospitals.  I know hardworking people caught in the “catch-22” level of income: They make too much to access Medicaid but too little to afford health insurance premiums.  They work for companies that either don’t offer health insurance or offer it partially at a level these employees can’t afford.  Workers are forced to use a patchwork of health fairs, free clinics, and doctors who will see them occasionally without cost (God bless these).  They put off illness or pain until it becomes chronic or unbearable and then make a dash to an emergency room. The health costs they incur are a greater portion of their household income than most Americans.  The cost to their dignity is inestimable.  But the cost to America’s integrity is even higher.

At the same time, I know that health-care costs are spiraling upward for higher-wage neighbors.  The monthly cost for my family’s health insurance is higher than our mortgage payment.  Our benefits are stripped down and our co-pays and deductibles are higher than ever.  I know people whose prescriptions are no longer covered, whose important procedures are denied, and whose insurance has been dropped.  Many people have filed bankruptcy due in large part to unpayable medical bills.  In short, while the health-care system has not been working for the working poor for a long time, it is not working for more and more middle-income neighbors.  None of this begins to factor in the significant levels of abuse of the system by those who game it — professional health-care providers, the insurance industry, and consumers of health-care services.  The current system is not sustainable, it is not reasonable, it is not just.  It does not reflect what we know is best about or for America.

So, I am completely on board with the call for quality, accessible, affordable health care for all citizens.  I’m advocating for this from the perspective of an urban Christian minister on the one hand, and as an American citizen on the other.  As a Christian minister, I am convinced that quality, accessible, affordable health care for all is a moral imperative.  As an American citizen, I am personally convinced it is a right that’s implied in the very intent of our Constitution and historic social contract.   But it is as a Christian minister that I offer the following considerations on health-care reform to the church I love:

1. The Samaritan principle sets the tone for the Christian church regarding care for the poor, uninsured, and desperate in our land. Simply put, in the care a Samaritan extends to a wounded, helpless victim, Jesus declares what it means to be an authentic neighbor. If we have the resources to help and heal, we should.  Not because we’ll get reimbursed.  Not because there’s profit involved.  Not because we’ll get recognized or rewarded.  But because it reflects the caring, healing intention of God for God’s people in relationship to one another and in witness to the world.  We cannot pass by because we presume somebody else will take care of uninsured people.  We cannot ignore what’s happening because it’s just bigger than us or beyond us.  Jesus calls us to see, respond, help, comfort, and restore — as if those left out and wounded were our very own.

2. Jesus’ ministry of healing was conducted in the face of structures and regulations designed to control, limit, and exclude. I’ve been reading the gospels again during this time of national concern about health care.  Health and healing was front and center for Jesus.  Undoubtedly, Jesus’ healings were a sign that he was the anticipated Messiah and that a new era was beginning.  However, Jesus’ healings also confronted, exposed, and undermined age-old systems that, in the name of health care, prevented healing from occurring.  Jesus cut through the red tape, system-serving regulations, and control-oriented rituals to actually offer what God desired for people — healing, restoration, and a future of dignity and hope. Instead of defending the current status quo practices that place ordinary folks in similar binds, the people who follow and claim to reflect Jesus should consider how he judged and exposed the ineffectiveness and meanness of structures that served themselves at others’ expense.

3. The context of community, inclusion, and sharing resources to assist the neediest — central in the early church witness — is a pattern and principle to renew. Beginning with Acts 2, we see the earliest believers holding things in common, pooling resources, and selling off assets in order to meet the needs of the weakest among them.  It was not about me and mine, but we and ours.  In the perspective of that early faith community, my personal self-interest includes your well-being.  They realized that we are deeply interconnected with one another.  The apostle Paul affirmed this principle with his counsel that we are members of one another, that no part can say to another, “I don’t need you.” To what extent are there such awarenesses or practices in the church today? And to what extent is our sense of community — over against asserting individual privilege and private right-bearing witness to the larger community and nation of what is good, possible, and godly?

4. Christian leaders should be leading the health-care dialog by seeking the truth and speaking the truth. To this point, it doesn’t seem to me that there has been a debate or dialog about health-care reform.  Much of the so-called debate to this point has focused on myths, distortions, and outright lies about proposed health reform legislation.  The news media focus has been on misinformed people shouting down congressional leaders, calling them Nazis, and burning them in effigy.  I’m convinced Christians should not only not be a part of those scenarios, but that we should make a contribution to the dialogue that is fact-based, truth-seeking, civil, and that moves all to find the common ground necessary to ensure that quality, accessible, affordable health care is available to all American citizens.  If the news media or partisan groups play to distortions and extremes, then people of Christian faith have a significant role to get the facts, convey them in understandable ways, and create conversations that deal in what’s real.  We are the people whose scriptures declare, “you will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free.”  We are the people who are reminded that “God has given us, not a spirit of fear, but of power, of love, and of self-discipline.”

5. Let us embody and advocate for the principles, practices, and norms of the beloved community toward which Jesus pointed. Christians have no stake in propping up old-order systems, or aligning ourselves with self-serving institutions, or playing to sub-Christian social stratifications.  At personal, community, and systemic levels, Christians are challenged to practice now the norms and promises of the future described in the scriptures.  I love the way Bible scholar Walter Brueggemann puts it: “God’s future is enacted as present neighborliness.”  Is not quality, accessible, affordable health care for all one such act of “present neighborliness” that is a signal of the direction God intends the future to move?  I think so.  And I invite Christians and people of other faiths to join me and others in this kairos moment — this period of unique opportunity to witness something magnanimous and restorative in our generation.

John Hay Jr., a longtime urban pastor and advocate in Indianapolis, Indiana, recently began working with international child sponsorship opportunities through the Free Methodist Church.

To learn more about health-care reform, click here to visit Sojourners’ Health-Care Resources Web page.

Categories: Health, Ministry, Poverty
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • The government interference in healthcare will not solve problems long term. Just like Social Security and Medicare this programs will suffer from not having enough financial resources, funded through tax dollars, to support the program and the inevitable cuts will come. A better solution is to allow faith-based and community-based health clinics to care for their own citizens within the community. Government grant funding could help these ministries and non-profits but these clinics are most effective when they are supported with local funds by individual contributors and local foundation grants.

    In my work with Here-4-You Christian Grant Consulting I meet ministries striving to provide healthcare services, healthcare sharing programs, free clinics, pregnancy centers, and other health related organizations. It is predicted that these programs will be harmed or even shut down by “healthcare reform.” The Christian and faith-based organizations are most concerned as to how new regulations may interfere with their missions.
  • binSchmidt
    But a *national scale*? You'd need thousands of those Mission of Mercy clinics all around the country. How do you propose finding the money for that? You can't. You have too much faith in man - you seem to think people will happily fork over all the money needed to run healthcare for those who can't afford it. But people are far too self-centred for that, whether or not they're in the church. It's for this reason that the most effective way you can be a good Samaritan, with regard to healthcare, is to support an organisation who do have the funds to provide healthcare for all - the government. It works in all the other developed nations of the world - why not the USA?
  • binSchmidt
    lol. You need to better than that. Churches should be applauded for the efforts they make to care for the worse off in the world. But given it seems they're too busy with Africa, who will take care of American citizens without healthcare?

    Incidentally, world-renown development economist Jeffrey Sachs reports that the USA provides a smaller proportion of its income in aid, even including private donations, to developing nations, than most of the rest of the Western world. How about supporting some government initiatives to provide some real aid to the world's dying and starving, instead of the pitiful private aid which is currently provided?
  • binSchmidt
    "Christ drew a clear distinction between His Kingdom and man’s institutions of government." Yes, but in the present day, Christ's Kingdom - the Church - has the opportunity to influence 'man's institutions of government'. The question then, is, how should a follower of Christ respond to an opportunity to provide for healthcare for all? His parable on the good Samaritan seems to a follower of Christ should provide that healthcare. In a perfect world, perhaps that could happen through private charity, rather than through government intervention. But until private charity finds the millions of dollars necessary to privately insure the millions of people unable to pay for their own medical care, a government plan seems to be the only method available.

    Hardly anyone in the entire developed world, Christian or not, would question importance of a decent public healthcare system. Why do US conservatives see it any differently?
  • ozdoc
    My copays and deductibles are both much higher than they were 30 years ago. Before that, my aunts/uncles/grandparents/etc. didn't need insurance because the costs were doable for a one-income family with 9 kids.
  • boatkitten
    The health care proposals are not hard to read either. Kaiser Family listed a synopsis of all the proposals on thier website. There is not a plan that says eveyyone will get free health care. The public plan is one that you will PAY FOR. The people without health care are either: 1. Not making enough to pay for the ourtrageous individual policy premiums 2. Self employed with a condition deemed uninsurable 3. Employer never provided/had to drop health care.

    Even non-Christian hospitals aren't so cold-hearted to push an accident victim into the alley just because he has no ability to pay. Hospitals will give service to those who need care.

    Across the globe, countries have found that to deny health care, your entire nation suffers. That's why health care is a 'right', from Austria to Columbia to New Zealand to Japan to Switzerland and 30 more of the most modern nations on this earth. It is just embarrassing to me that the USA ranks with Bangladesh in terms of offering universal health care.
    Switzerland was in our shoes 10 years ago, a crisis in health care, but changed their system so that everyone is now covered. The plan gaining most ground is very much like the plan they adopted - and staunch opponents are now quite happy with it.
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaro...
  • stratdad
    Actually, when the constitution was ratified, we gave over to the government the responsibility to protect our -existing- inalienable rights, and gave over the authority to use force in order to provide these protections. An individual didn't have a right to community resources before the ratification, and he didn't have them after. Rather, afterward, his private property and personal liberty were more secure. The governments role, as envisioned by the founding fathers, is as a protector of rights, not a provider of services. (Governments are instituted among men to preserve these inalienable rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness) The constitution is not difficult reading - way easier than researching the truth about the health bill. We all need to know what it says, and what it means. The constitution was never intended to address or fix the painful and real injustices of capitalism.
  • stratdad
    Here is a local Christian organization that helps people who cannot cover the cost of their treatments: http://www.ppfinc.org/AboutPPF.htm
    I think the assumption that this has to be solved on a national scale needs to be questioned. I do understand that some local communities have no resources, but there are ways for them to be on the front line, while getting financial help from sister churches. I understand that there may be some reforms that are necessary, and can only be accomplished thru regulation, but that is no reason to build a public option.
    Let me turn the question around a bit: how do we spread the Kingdom of God on a national scale? Think globally, love locally.
  • stratdad
    Mission Of Mercy is an organization doing exactly this. (http://www.amissionofmercy.org/) They pay the salary for a medical doctor to run the clinic, and he works with volunteers to meet the needs of patients. The argument for the public option always includes some form of 'early access' to treatment to prevent later emergencies. That is exactly where Mission of Mercy fits in, and where volunteers can be lights for Christ while being Samaritans to our neighbors. (I'm aware of this organization because the pastor of my church volunteers there every Monday.)
  • stratdad
    Christians have more of a world view than a national view. Since there is so much poverty in the rest of the world, that is where the focus has been. Those 40 million people are well off when compared to those with AIDS in Africa. Its the 4 billion that Christians have looked at. (Our church provides financial aid to a clinic in Africa).
  • myfanwy
    Why do you think the government would be forcing everyone into one program? Many of the countries with universal health care [and that is just about every industrialized nation except the United States] have various combinations of government and private care. You've been watching too much Fox News.
  • myfanwy
    Interesting. Do you have any ideas about how this would work in practice? Christians working to provide health care to our brothers and sisters on a national scale?
  • boatkitten
    Oh, you mean the Constitution suggests we provide all citizens with police protection, fire protection, judicial service, military service, but not general welfare items such as access to a doctor? Somehow, I highly doubt that.
    They clearly wanted a perfect union -- and that part we are ignoring is exactly what is making us far from perfect.
  • lmbjck
    I have no doubt God take a fairly dim view of just about all of man's historical attempts to govern. I would suggest religion and politics not be mixed, and leave governance to the secular activities of the day.
    However, when particular groups decide to exact their will upon the rest and press their agenda, it can easily begin to tramp upon the rights and freedoms of religion. Would you rather be trod upon, or fight to keep religious and secular policies from becoming mixed? When the percentage of my paycheck going to the government rises above 40%, 50%, or even approaches the EU’s 60%, how much do you think I’ll be able to give to my community? God did not call us to forced charity, but rather did not take the baited question about rising up against Caesar. If my neighbor asks for help, or I see a need, I will address it insofar as God has blessed me with the ability to do so. Uncle Sam is not my neighbor, and if he asks for my coat he’ll have to pass a law to get it.
  • lmbjck
    When something is a takeover, one should call it as such. I believe the familiar refrain begins "a rose by any other name..."

    The protesters he engaged and basically called irrational were part of the infamous LaRouch Political Action Committee (PAC). Thumb through the Washington Post photos of the event if you do not believe me.
  • lmbjck
  • lmbjck
    I agree! To John I would say it is unfortunate that your rhetoric so closely resembles that of the Administration that I actually had to conduct a quick search to make sure you had not simply copy and pasted your comments from the White House web site. Here are a few thoughts your readers might enjoy to have a bit more balanced debate:

    “As an American citizen, I am personally convinced it is a right that’s implied in the very intent of our Constitution and historic social contract.”
    I must have an out of date copy of our Constitution, for it only mentions ‘promote the general welfare [of our country].’ The only social contract here is providing an economic, regulatory, and political environment to foster innovation and success- two of poverty’s greatest enemies.

    1. “Simply put, in the care a Samaritan extends to a wounded, helpless victim, Jesus declares what it means to be an authentic neighbor. If we have the resources to help and heal, we should.”
    I believe He said "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's." That's a far cry from endorsing the Roman Empire or man's pathetic attempts at social policy. The only possible connection I can make is what you refer to as the Samaritan principle, but that is more efficiently done without running charity through the government.

    2. “Jesus’ ministry of healing was conducted in the face of structures and regulations designed to control, limit, and exclude.”
    You have in this one line summed up every reason to avoid government-run healthcare at any cost.

    3. The context of community, inclusion, and sharing resources to assist the neediest — central in the early church witness — is a pattern and principle to renew.
    The more the government takes, the less I have to give in my community. I promise that I as a congregational member and any pastor in the U.S. is better positioned to realize the needs of their community than any bureaucrat in Washington.

    4. “Christian leaders should be leading the health-care dialog by seeking the truth and speaking the truth…The news media focus has been on misinformed people shouting down congressional leaders, calling them Nazis, and burning them in effigy.”
    I agree, we should always use the best information we have available. The tactics you mentioned have been perpetuated by the infamous LaRouche PAC, not any conservative or Christian organization.

    5.” Let us embody and advocate for the principles, practices, and norms of the beloved community toward which Jesus pointed. Is not quality, accessible, affordable health care for all one such act of “present neighborliness” that is a signal of the direction God intends the future to move?”
    No, it is not. Christ drew a clear distinction between His Kingdom and man’s institutions of government. You have even highlighted the inadequacies of man’s governance, and at the same time adding a reason not to put an institution driven by politics in charge of something you believe demands neighborliness. The two cannot coexist.

    The democrat initiatives do not hit at some of the biggest cost drivers such as tort reform, carrying coverage across state lines, and folks going to the ER for cold and flu checkups. All of these drive up the costs for hospitals, often reflected in your bill for two $3 Advil tablets (here I am simply illustrating). Those bills, paid by your insurance company, are reflected in your premiums.

    Should all insurance be non-profit, or cooperatives set up by groups of individuals? Perhaps that could help. However, unless at the very least the three cost drivers I have mentioned are addressed successfully, even getting rid of ‘greedy’ companies will not help. Putting a government-run mandate in their place will also be of no benefit without real reform.
  • lmbjck
    John,

    It is unfortunate that your rhetoric so closely resembles that of the Administration that I actually had to conduct a quick search to make sure you had not simply copy and pasted your comments from the White House web site. Here are a few thoughts your readers might enjoy to have a bit more balanced debate:

    “As an American citizen, I am personally convinced it is a right that’s implied in the very intent of our Constitution and historic social contract.”
    I must have an out of date copy of our Constitution, for it only mentions ‘promote the general welfare [of our country].’ The only social contract here is providing an economic, regulatory, and political environment to foster innovation and success- two of poverty’s greatest enemies.

    1. “Simply put, in the care a Samaritan extends to a wounded, helpless victim, Jesus declares what it means to be an authentic neighbor. If we have the resources to help and heal, we should.”
    I believe He said "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's." That's a far cry from endorsing the Roman Empire or man's pathetic attempts at social policy. The only possible connection I can make is what you refer to as the Samaritan principle, but that is more efficiently done without running charity through the government.

    2. “Jesus’ ministry of healing was conducted in the face of structures and regulations designed to control, limit, and exclude.”
    You have in this one line summed up every reason to avoid government-run healthcare at any cost.

    3. The context of community, inclusion, and sharing resources to assist the neediest — central in the early church witness — is a pattern and principle to renew.
    The more the government takes, the less I have to give in my community. I promise that I as a congregational member and any pastor in the U.S. is better positioned to realize the needs of their community than any bureaucrat in Washington.

    4. “Christian leaders should be leading the health-care dialog by seeking the truth and speaking the truth…The news media focus has been on misinformed people shouting down congressional leaders, calling them Nazis, and burning them in effigy.”
    I agree, we should always use the best information we have available. The tactics you mentioned have been perpetuated by the infamous LaRouche PAC, not any conservative or Christian organization.

    5.” Let us embody and advocate for the principles, practices, and norms of the beloved community toward which Jesus pointed. Is not quality, accessible, affordable health care for all one such act of “present neighborliness” that is a signal of the direction God intends the future to move?”
    No, it is not. Christ drew a clear distinction between His Kingdom and man’s institutions of government. You have even highlighted the inadequacies of man’s governance, and at the same time adding a reason not to put an institution driven by politics in charge of something you believe demands neighborliness. The two cannot coexist.

    The democrat initiatives do not hit at some of the biggest cost drivers such as tort reform, carrying coverage across state lines, and folks going to the ER for cold and flu checkups. All of these drive up the costs for hospitals, often reflected in your bill for two $3 Advil tablets (here I am simply illustrating). Those bills, paid by your insurance company, are reflected in your premiums.

    Should all insurance be non-profit, or cooperatives set up by groups of individuals? Perhaps that could help. However, unless at the very least the three cost drivers I have mentioned are addressed successfully, even getting rid of ‘greedy’ companies will not help. Putting a government-run mandate in their place will also be of no benefit without real reform.
  • lmbjck
    I cannot find where Christ said we should love our neighbors as ourselves, AND make sure all our other neighbors are pulling their weight too. Can somebody post a reference?
  • lmbjck
    Perhaps a post well positioned to spur debate, but it is rather one-sided and light on facts.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008