RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

What?! Racism Still in America?

by Jim Wallis 09-17-2009

Here we go again. Some people raise the issue of race (this time about the ways others are talking about or treating the first black U.S. president) and the media goes crazy. “What racism?” many of the pundits cry. “Didn’t we just elect this black guy president?” (Implying “Doesn’t that prove that racism is over in America?”)

So let’s all just take a breath here, as we always need to do when talking about race in the U.S.

A few simple points:

First, on Nov. 4, 2008, the U.S. did what only one other country I know of ever has ever done — elect a president from a minority race in a country with a different majority race. (Peru is the only other country I can think of to have done that, electing as their president Alberto Fujimori, who is of Asian descent, in a predominantly Hispanic country.) That a still majority white U.S. would elect a black man as head of state was stunning to many — and, I must admit, to me. Frankly, it made me think that the country was better than I thought it was. That historic accomplishment is a sign of great progress and a hope of better things to come for racial equality and justice in the United States.

Second, the majority of Americans, and even of white Americans — whether they voted for Obama or not — seemed to feel proud and positive that the nation had finally reached this amazing milestone. Having elected Barack Obama made most Americans feel good about themselves and about their country on that Jan. 20 Inauguration Day. The new president’s approval rating climbed up to 70% in the week after the inauguration, which obviously meant that even some of those who voted against him were impressed by how he was handling his job at the outset.

Third, there are many people, most of whom voted against Obama, who have basic disagreements with the president on substantive political issues. To disagree with a black president on policy questions does not mean that you are racist. The 20% fewer people who now approve of his job performance did not suddenly turn into racists. And my conservative friends who admire Obama personally but disagree with him politically can hardly be called racists.

But fourth — and importantly — there was, and is still, a hard core of racially-motivated white people in this nation who did vote against Obama because he is black, and who virulently oppose him as president because he is black. And that racist core of angry white Americans resides on the extreme political right of U.S. politics. The Far Right in America have never supported racial equality. Their political representatives voted against both the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965, and most have never repented for it. And, let’s be honest, the loudest voices of right-wing talk radio and cable television appeal directly to that core with subtle and not-so-subtle racial messages, as has the right wing of the Republican Party for many years.

If you were paying attention, you could see signs of that underlying racism at the most heated town meetings this summer. Of course, not everybody who attended, or even was mad about health care or the government at those meetings, is a racist — most of those people weren’t, but some of them clearly are. There were blatant signs of racism at some of the town meetings and, indeed, many signs that carried overtly racial messages.

I see those racial subtexts in the intensity of the attacks on Obama — not in the disagreements per se, but in the viciousness of the rhetoric. Racism is often about disrespect, and many African-American citizens are now feeling that the black president in the White House is being disrespected. I also see it in supporters of the new “birthers” movement, who try to stir up doubts about Obama’s citizenship. I see it in the furor over the president speaking to the nation’s schoolchildren about studying and working hard. And, agree with me or not, I saw it in the disrespect shown toward a black president by a white Congressman from the South, whose less than enthusiastic apologies have now turned him into a fund-raising martyr, cheered on by a defiant rebel yell against the man (or is it “boy”?) in the White House.

We have all witnessed or experienced situations where someone has “played the race card” in inappropriate or unfair ways. And racism is not the cause or explanation of every social problem. Nor are legitimately different points of view obvious signs of racism. President Obama has not played the race card, expecting only to be treated as a man — not a “black man”– and to be judged as a president and not as an “African-American president.”

But let’s be honest. We all know racism still exists in the U.S. today. We know there is a hard core of our white fellow citizens who simply will not accept their black or brown brothers and sisters — especially one in the White House. So while we should not call every disagreement an issue of racism, it is time to call out the racism that indeed does still exist — that wounds our soul as a nation, and that obstructs the promise of the United States.

Categories: Diversity, Race
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • I actually see a proverbial silver lining in all this overt Obamaphobia. MLK Jr., quoting a historian whose name escapes me, said in a sermon that "Whom the gods would destroy they must first make mad with power." In other words, before God can truly deal with sin He needs to expose its ugliness -- and I think that's just what's happening now.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    The only question is -- to whom? I'm guessing we'll find out soon enough.

    LV
  • To as many as will see it. That's what MLK Jr. did in the South.
  • jim085
    racism is not just about skin heads it is about all of us and the way we have been shaped by a racist society. racism is about the disparity in employment, healthcare, environmental protection, housing, criminal justice...
  • curlygirl2004
    I agree! Jim has good list of systemic racism going. I'd like to add to it the personal racism experienced by people of color on a day to day basis. Just because you don't go to KKK meetings in a white hood, doesn't mean you're not racist. You may have even voted for Obama and still be racist!!
  • thewhiplash
    I believe that the single source of the cause of this discontent with our congress stems from the corruption in not just the corporate world, but in government, as well. Corruption does not recognize racism, sexism nor poverty. Its lense is so distorted by greed, power and influence that it cannot discern between these issues. There is no difference in the motives of our elected officials, save in the methods that they use. Unions, lobbiest, corporations all use their influence to manipulate policies. It does not matter if they are Republicans or Democrates, CEO's are labor union leaders, their motives are not altruistic; they simple want to protect what they have and increase their resources and influence. I wish that each person would take the spike out of their own eye before criticizing the speck in the eyes of others. We criticize the other party when we are doing the same thing. Examples of this are so many, and our memories are so short. The enemy is not your neighbor who is more conservative or more liberal than you are; the enemy is the source that promotes this discontent.
  • IME, that kind of analysis is a tad naive -- it sounds like "the devil made me do it." Sure, there is an Eneny who is trying to wreck God's world; that said, it's also important to give specifics as to which people and institutions are involved so that things can be addressed.
  • thewhiplash
    My point is simply, the people or institutions which give these specifics (i.e. the media, democrate, republican etc) have "only their agenda" that they are likely to support. I wish it were more like it is in the courtroom, when the judge says, " I want the truth, the "whole truth" and nothing but the truth". Unless you have a desire to find out the whole truth in any issue, you are often misled by the sources who give you only "one side of the issue".
  • Myself being in the media, I understand that we're also a business driven often by what people want to read. On top of that, there are some sources that are not always credible, so getting more than "one side of the issue" is not always possible or even desirable. (For example, quoting a Klansman at at KKK rally would basically be redundant.)
  • Knightscrossing
    There is an old adage that goes like this....

    Don't let the media meld with your mind. Do your own research...

    And I will add...

    Don't let the opinions of others, become your opinion without a common frame of reference or basis in fact....
  • I'm actually in the media -- I actually get paid to do that.
  • pkinva
    Man has not told you this, but our Father in Heaven. You are so right!!

    PKINVA
  • cohea
    This article states that a small % of "whites" probably voted against our President because he is black and that racism is still alive and well in the USA but I rarely hear anyone talk about the possibility that a very large % of "black" voters voted for him purely BECAUSE they perceive him as black. Was their vote racist? And one other thing that clouds this discussion of racism; is our President a black man with a white mother or a white man with a black father? The answer to that question can reveal much about our perception of race and reveal our racial prejudices. (Gal.3:28)
  • Blacks are far more sophisticated and pragmatic politically than most people give them credit for; I can assure you that only a small minority, perhaps one or two percent, voted for Obama primarily because of his color. If color really had been the issue they would have gone heavily for Jesse Jackson in 1984 and '88; they didn't because they knew he had no chance of winning and they don't do mere "symbolic voting." It's far more likely that an evangelical Christian would vote for another evangelical Christian just on that basis.

    In fact, at the beginning of last year's primary season Hillary Clinton actually had the black vote pretty much locked up and most black groups actually didn't trust Barack Obama at first because they really didn't know who he was. That began to change when Obama -- helped by young white volunteers -- began running up caucus victories and Clinton, in her desperation, began "pulling the race card" in Pennsylvania and South Carolina, turning blacks against her and toward him. That said, had Clinton won the nomination the Democrats would have closed ranks and supported her; blacks vote 90 percent Democratic anyway and their hatred of GWB in particular (consider Florida in 2000) and the political right in general would have motivated them to turn out in record numbers.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    "And, agree with me or not, I saw it in the disrespect shown toward a black president by a white Congressman from the South, whose less than enthusiastic apologies have now turned him into a fund-raising martyr, cheered on by a defiant rebel yell against the man (or is it “boy”?) in the White House."

    Jim, on the whole this was a thoughtful and balanced article, but I have to object strenuously to this part here. The simple fact is that grown men sometimes lie. You may think the President was right, that he was honestly mistaken, or that he was intentionally lying. The Congressman said "lie" He meant "lie". The word "boy" did not pass his lips.

    You can condemn the Congressman's actions if you want, but if you are going to condemn him then condemn him for what he said, not what you guess he might have thought.

    Judging is dangerous enough for a Christian -- "Judge not" and all that. Adding your own guesswork about what the Congressman might have been thinking only compounds things.

    LV
  • You may think the President was right, that he was honestly mistaken, or that he was intentionally lying. The Congressman said "lie" He meant "lie". The word "boy" did not pass his lips.

    Because that would have been obvious. For openers, when Wilson said "You lie" he was himself lying, and the reality is that he did that to curry political favor with people in his district who can't stand Obama. On top of that, Wilson belongs to the Sons of Confederate Veterans and led the charge to keep the "Stars and Bars" flying over the statehouse in Columbia, S.C. Furthermore, he -- and his upcoming opponent -- have raised a ton of money because of this dust-up.
  • WaveTossed
    "Because that would have been obvious. For openers, when Wilson said 'You lie' he was himself lying,"

    To add to what you said: Joe Wilson was invoking another form of racism -- against Latinos, particularly against Mexicans. Much of the loud, angry rhetoric against "illegal immigrants" is directed at Mexican immigrants. I read stereotypical remarks about how these "illegals" are coming to this country to go on welfare and get food stamps, Medicaid, etc. Which are lies in themselves. These remarks that I read feed into the entire "lazy Mexican" stereotype.

    The Cato Institute has some excellent articles that show that most immigrants -- from Mexico as well as from elsewhere -- come here to work and find jobs. They pay more in taxes than they take out in government services.

    In the case of Joe Wilson, we have the spectacle of a congressman pandering to those who are more worried about whether or not "illegals" will or will not get health care benefits. For him (and his supporters), this issue seems far more important than whether or not people end up having to go through bankruptcy because of medical expenses and inadequate or no insurance. Or else people who literally end up dying because of no or inadequate insurance or access to medical care. According to people of this mind-set that Wilson panders to , it's more important to keep "illegals" (those lazy, welfare-grabbing Mexicans) from getting benefits than it is to help out people who desperately need help in this health care crisis.
  • I wasn't aware of the Cato Institute's findings, but you confirmed what I always suspected -- "illegals" come here from Mexico because, and only because, that's where the jobs are. You may remember that Sojo recently posted "Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal."
  • WaveTossed
    Here is what the Cato Institute has to say about immigration:

    http://www.freetrade.org/issues/immigration.html
  • judithsihweil
    This is the same Wilson who also disrespected Strom Thurmond's
    illegimate daughter by a black lady !!!!!!!!!----
    from an idiot so we should expect this...kind of behavior- but not put up with it.. JUST A BIG DISTRACTION ALSO
    and Wilson got free publicity -which he doesn't deserve
    .......being from Louisiana-northern part -over 35 years ago
    I was very proud of our new president and very upset the way he is being treated. by all these ignorants and fraidy cats-Carter is absolutely Correct
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008