RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

What?! Racism Still in America?

by Jim Wallis 09-17-2009

Here we go again. Some people raise the issue of race (this time about the ways others are talking about or treating the first black U.S. president) and the media goes crazy. “What racism?” many of the pundits cry. “Didn’t we just elect this black guy president?” (Implying “Doesn’t that prove that racism is over in America?”)

So let’s all just take a breath here, as we always need to do when talking about race in the U.S.

A few simple points:

First, on Nov. 4, 2008, the U.S. did what only one other country I know of ever has ever done — elect a president from a minority race in a country with a different majority race. (Peru is the only other country I can think of to have done that, electing as their president Alberto Fujimori, who is of Asian descent, in a predominantly Hispanic country.) That a still majority white U.S. would elect a black man as head of state was stunning to many — and, I must admit, to me. Frankly, it made me think that the country was better than I thought it was. That historic accomplishment is a sign of great progress and a hope of better things to come for racial equality and justice in the United States.

Second, the majority of Americans, and even of white Americans — whether they voted for Obama or not — seemed to feel proud and positive that the nation had finally reached this amazing milestone. Having elected Barack Obama made most Americans feel good about themselves and about their country on that Jan. 20 Inauguration Day. The new president’s approval rating climbed up to 70% in the week after the inauguration, which obviously meant that even some of those who voted against him were impressed by how he was handling his job at the outset.

Third, there are many people, most of whom voted against Obama, who have basic disagreements with the president on substantive political issues. To disagree with a black president on policy questions does not mean that you are racist. The 20% fewer people who now approve of his job performance did not suddenly turn into racists. And my conservative friends who admire Obama personally but disagree with him politically can hardly be called racists.

But fourth — and importantly — there was, and is still, a hard core of racially-motivated white people in this nation who did vote against Obama because he is black, and who virulently oppose him as president because he is black. And that racist core of angry white Americans resides on the extreme political right of U.S. politics. The Far Right in America have never supported racial equality. Their political representatives voted against both the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965, and most have never repented for it. And, let’s be honest, the loudest voices of right-wing talk radio and cable television appeal directly to that core with subtle and not-so-subtle racial messages, as has the right wing of the Republican Party for many years.

If you were paying attention, you could see signs of that underlying racism at the most heated town meetings this summer. Of course, not everybody who attended, or even was mad about health care or the government at those meetings, is a racist — most of those people weren’t, but some of them clearly are. There were blatant signs of racism at some of the town meetings and, indeed, many signs that carried overtly racial messages.

I see those racial subtexts in the intensity of the attacks on Obama — not in the disagreements per se, but in the viciousness of the rhetoric. Racism is often about disrespect, and many African-American citizens are now feeling that the black president in the White House is being disrespected. I also see it in supporters of the new “birthers” movement, who try to stir up doubts about Obama’s citizenship. I see it in the furor over the president speaking to the nation’s schoolchildren about studying and working hard. And, agree with me or not, I saw it in the disrespect shown toward a black president by a white Congressman from the South, whose less than enthusiastic apologies have now turned him into a fund-raising martyr, cheered on by a defiant rebel yell against the man (or is it “boy”?) in the White House.

We have all witnessed or experienced situations where someone has “played the race card” in inappropriate or unfair ways. And racism is not the cause or explanation of every social problem. Nor are legitimately different points of view obvious signs of racism. President Obama has not played the race card, expecting only to be treated as a man — not a “black man”– and to be judged as a president and not as an “African-American president.”

But let’s be honest. We all know racism still exists in the U.S. today. We know there is a hard core of our white fellow citizens who simply will not accept their black or brown brothers and sisters — especially one in the White House. So while we should not call every disagreement an issue of racism, it is time to call out the racism that indeed does still exist — that wounds our soul as a nation, and that obstructs the promise of the United States.

Categories: Diversity, Race
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • photoglyph
    well, he (Barack Obama) certainly came off more intelligent, calm and controlled than his opponent (or his disastrous choice for VP...) did in the election. I'd like to think blacks were as rational in their decision-making process as me.
  • photoglyph
    The ugliness exhibited by those with conservative/racist leanings that Blue Deacon is referring to is being exposed, but another part of the problem is the electorate or, more appropriately, the uninformed electorate; low-income, rural voters for instance.

    In Missouri, 'white, rural' recipients constitute the largest percentage of welfare recipients, yet traditionally view blacks in metropolitan areas as being the highest proportion of recipients.
  • Opinion_Honest
    Well, your topic says "What?! Racism Still in America?" and the content solely talks about the US President Obama and eventually concludes "Yes, this is not racism and that is not, so, its so and so". If you want to have a look at racism, then politics is not the place - Politics is backed by Power, Power is backed by People, People are backed by more and more People. My point is, if you want to see how much racism goes on in the US then you have to look into these places - Restaurants (waiters/ waitresses), Super Markets (salesmen guys), Grocery Stores (salesmen guys), Shopping Malls 9again salesmen guys). I know one thing, that these guys at these places are either partially educated or uneducated and so the low thinking that gets into their minds.

    Basically, there is someone or the other who is a racist, and they need to stop. When will they stop? No one knows that!
  • aaawwer
    Racism in America is a serious problem. I as an Iranian American (real minority) can assure you that I have taken shit from whites and other so called minorities. I am not a muslim and not an arab, but I still have to put up with racism that's going on in this country. Obama's election was a step forward, sure, but we are light years away from having true equality in this country. If you manage to get inside the circles of ethnic groups (like whites), you'll get to learn the new names and newly released jokes about other ethnic groups (seriously disturbing stuff). This kind of thing is not just conducted by say red necks or uneducated people. Some of the people that I deal with seem to be really nice people with high values and proper education.
  • Earlier I read a comment that commended Obama for trying to "diffuse the situation" and simultaneously undid his efforts. Why don't we all adopt that strategy against racism?

    Yes, there are still racists... I wager that the more intense ones are elderly, survivors of the 60s and 70s who shut up about racism because it's now uncool. One of my friends, for example, said his grandfather (probably about 70 years old) readily admits to being racist. He's quite a nice guy although I've never seen him around folks of other colors.

    But there are younger racists too... mostly because of racist parents, but I'm sure class division perpetuates stereotypes. Poor people are more ready to steal things outright, so when an entire race is mostly poor we conflate our expectations.

    And of course there's the core of racism in every race. These people antagonize both each other and the non-racists. In doing so they increase each other's membership because everyone "knows" the other race is full of racism (*puke*).

    The first group is relatively easy to get rid of... Let 'em die. The second group needs to be educated, and philanthropy would help to break the cycle to make education easier. (I will not, however, stand for a welfare solution to this part of the problem - partly because I hate welfare itself and partly because the third group can use it as a rhetorical tool.) The third group needs to be starved of attention; if no one hears, no one joins. If no one joins, the movement dies.

    To give an illustration of how I view the racist cores... Surely everyone here knows what an internet troll is? How are internet trolls defeated? Hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
  • markhayes
    Having given thought to this for some time it occured to me that referring to the President as a black man may be one of the most racist comments to make.

    I am something of a history buff and remember reading that in times past if a person had a "drop of negro blood" they were considered black. Using this formula, could make President Obama our sixth black President. I voted for the man because I thought he was the right man for the job period.
  • Blacks are far more sophisticated and pragmatic politically than most people give them credit for; I can assure you that only a small minority, perhaps one or two percent, voted for Obama primarily because of his color. If color really had been the issue they would have gone heavily for Jesse Jackson in 1984 and '88; they didn't because they knew he had no chance of winning and they don't do mere "symbolic voting." It's far more likely that an evangelical Christian would vote for another evangelical Christian just on that basis.

    In fact, at the beginning of last year's primary season Hillary Clinton actually had the black vote pretty much locked up and most black groups actually didn't trust Barack Obama at first because they really didn't know who he was. That began to change when Obama -- helped by young white volunteers -- began running up caucus victories and Clinton, in her desperation, began "pulling the race card" in Pennsylvania and South Carolina, turning blacks against her and toward him. That said, had Clinton won the nomination the Democrats would have closed ranks and supported her; blacks vote 90 percent Democratic anyway and their hatred of GWB in particular (consider Florida in 2000) and the political right in general would have motivated them to turn out in record numbers.
  • cohea
    This article states that a small % of "whites" probably voted against our President because he is black and that racism is still alive and well in the USA but I rarely hear anyone talk about the possibility that a very large % of "black" voters voted for him purely BECAUSE they perceive him as black. Was their vote racist? And one other thing that clouds this discussion of racism; is our President a black man with a white mother or a white man with a black father? The answer to that question can reveal much about our perception of race and reveal our racial prejudices. (Gal.3:28)
  • Ashleigh101
    I totally understand. I believe it's simply a bully tactic... intended to do just what it's done... cause us to feel exasperation, frustration, etc. But it's been done so much now that it's clear to see the motive behind it. I'm so thankful this is America, and we have our freedom of speech so that we can continue to dissent despite catcalls of "racism." And I think it's necessary we do, because if we allow ourselves to be silenced, then what does that mean for America... land of the FREE? And land where we have free speech?

    Just some thoughts! :)
  • Ashleigh101
    Very well said! The word "racism" is being tossed around nowadays in such a haphazard manner. People who are complete strangers think that they somehow know a person's "racist" heart based on something like a criticsm.

    No, dissrespect is not racism, and throughout history, national leaders have made attempts to squelch disrespectful and/or critical comments. Some nations have gone so far as to have communist regimes.

    Our nation is one of free speech, and all citizens ought to have the right to criticize, or even show dissrespect, without being labeled "racist." And it is, just like you said, very judgmental to label someone as racist based on remarks (like "you lie") that reveal no racism whatsoever but just happen to be aimed at someone who is black.

    It seems that people seem to think that disrespect is a worser sin than judging and condemning someone.
  • debbiek
    Thanks for your honesty. I think you have summarized my feelings as well. I am so tired of being called things I am not when I have serious policy concerns. I am tired of ad hominem attacks which obscure healthy discussion and debate. The name calling and generalizations are shocking.
  • debbiek
    I agree that racism still exists in this country. I hear it and see it. But to equate questioning the President's citizenship, his honesty about a specific issue or whether one should bring politics in the classroom, with racism is demeaning to the reality of racism. Disrespect is not racism. It is not disrespectful to bring up these issues. To yell "you lie" loudly is certainly disrespectful but it is not necessarily rascist. Disrespect is sinful and wrong, and is a tool used by racists, but it is also used by extremists and most every adolescent I know. As an adult and follower of Christ, I have been disrespectful to those I "even love" out of frustration when I am not being heard. One cannot peer into the heart of someone who is desrespectful and call it racisim. That is judgemental and disrespectful as well. In doing so you will only increase the frustration of those who do not feel heard. Thus leading to more disrespect and anger. Please do not contribute to this cycle of misunderstanding by catagorizing disrespect as racism.
  • JTatl
    Slavery and States Rights are synonomous. What other rights where southern states in jepardy of losing? They were fighting for their right to own slaves. The argument about "states rights" is just smoke and mirrors to deny the truth.
  • saranewmexico
    As a person of color, I was disappointed at how simple this article is. I hope you take some courses on racism. Racism is not just within a fringe group of the Republican party as your article implies. Racism is an institutional problem. Unless people of the white majority have spent time and reflection to change the learned behaviors of racism, there will be subtle ways of racism.

    Also as a woman of color I can tell you that I face racism on a regular basis from people who are Democrats. Just last week I gave a talk in my home state of New Mexico to an all white audience of people who describe themselves as liberal. The ways they spoke and interacted on issues of Native Americans was offensive--as if they were benevolent tourists who find native life intriguing and cute. Many of their homes have quaint paintings of brown people on the walls and they've studied anthropology and traveled the world to marvel at the brown people who they don't have any true friendships with. They make donations to good causes that impact predominately brown people but live insular lives that don't interact with the people in these causes. Most of the native people I work describe how uneasy the white people interact with them if conversations are frank and based on our assumption of equality.

    I've also found over and over again that after I give a talk there is applause and compliments but also many inappropriate demands--not requests but very much demands--for personal information about us again based on just curiousity as if we are entertainment. None of the people I am describing are Republicans.

    You will find this in the mainstream environmental movement and organic food movement also. Those mainstream movements tend to be homogenous and white and this does result in an appearance of effectiveness because of their skill in acting quickly and knowing the system/talking the jargon. But brown people in the US tend to work under the radar from these movements and then the white people in them make the incorrect assumption that we don't care as deeply about environmental/food/agriculture issues.

    I encourage white people to take classes and workshops on understanding oppression and privilege. It can make your life so much better, as racism negatively impacts you too.

    One last thing: Evo Morales is the president of Bolivia, and an indigenous person.
  • I'm actually in the media -- I actually get paid to do that.
  • Knightscrossing
    There is an old adage that goes like this....

    Don't let the media meld with your mind. Do your own research...

    And I will add...

    Don't let the opinions of others, become your opinion without a common frame of reference or basis in fact....
  • You still haven't convinced me based on this bill that it represents a
    re-institution of the Fairness Doctrine. More to the point, it apparently
    intends to diversify ownership from ClearChannel, which was identified as part
    of the "Republican Noise Machine" by the book of the same title.

    I ask where you got the info about ACORN because I have direct access to the
    Associated Press's stories, which also "minimize" the controversy. But here's
    the problem: Conservatives, who work in a top-down matter, believe that
    everyone else thinks the way they do, so naturally there must be corruption at
    the very top.

    The conservative movement operates in a manipulative way?? Unlike the
    liberal media who is fair and balanced?


    I'm in the "liberal media," by the way, and we are fair and balanced.
    But conservatives don't want "fair and balanced" because the truth doesn't
    support its bogus agenda. I stopped reading conservative print media in the
    1990s and have never watched the Fox News Channel for those reasons.
  • Nathan Bedford
    Ashleigh99 (2 points off for failing to read my post);

    If you had bothered to actually read my post before you responded, you might have noticed that I chronicled Joe Wilson's public record and did not (as you say) concentrate on merely two words that he "spontaneously" blurted out.

    The first state that seceded from the Union has not really undergone that many changes since 1860 and is still spawning its share of hate-filled bigots. And given your proclivity towards their leadership, I'm beginning to wonder what kind of ideas you have about racial equality?
  • Ashleigh101
    You can easily find the info on Durbin's proposed amendment at the Library of Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:54... (If that link does not work, try here: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/?&Db=d111...)) And click on #54.)

    S.AMDT.591
    Amends: S.160
    Sponsor: Sen Durbin, Richard [IL] (submitted 2/26/2009) (proposed 2/26/2009)
    AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
    To encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public airwaves are used in the public interest.

    TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S2574

    STATUS:

    2/26/2009:
    Amendment SA 591 proposed by Senator Durbin. (consideration: CR S2517-2520, S2522-2524; text: CR S2522)
    2/26/2009:
    Amendment SA 591 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 57 - 41. Record Vote Number: 70.



    I think it's pretty ridiculous that you dismiss "right wing" news the way you do. I read news at both Fox News website and MSNBC's website. I can figure out the bias for myself, but Fox definitely reports on things that MSNBC will ignore or minimize. If it doesn't support their agenda, they don't like to report it.

    What are you talking about "Where do I get my info" with regards to ACORN? Surely, you know about the two who took their video cameras in ACORN offices and exposed ACORN fraudulancy... reported the past 2 weeks. Even MSNBC and CNN reported on this (even though they reported on it late and minimized it as usual).

    Yah, Bush had czars in his EIGHT years in office. But Obama already has 32 in his first 6 months and shows no signs of slowing down. Not only that, but Obama's czars are mostly very radical, left-wing liberals, like Van Jones.

    People didn't worry as much about other President's "czars" because no other President was as Leftist and liberal as Obama is, nor did they have as many czars as he does nor did they appoint them at a rate that he is appointing them!! No other President has appointed an outspoken, self-proclaimed "Communist" (Van Jones) as a czar!

    The conservative movement operates in a manipulative way?? Unlike the liberal media who is fair and balanced? LOL!!
  • kansasmennonite
    There you go supporting old white men again. (Wilson).

    Obama I believe was just trying to difuse the situation. How comendable is that? Now you are telling my sis that she will be held accountable (more time in hell?). Great comment from someone that proports to be full of love.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008