RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Obama, Bigotry, and Balance … and Death Threats

by Ryan Rodrick Beiler 09-25-2009

There is some good conversation going around God’s Politics partner blogs about what role race is playing in the current wave of opposition to Obama’s policies, including Rep. Joe Wilson’s “You lie!” outburst and former President Jimmy Carter’s response. Jim Wallis’ post last week reminded us that, despite many principled disagreements with Obama, there is definitely a hard core of white racists in America. Friends of Justice head (and friend of Sojourners) Alan Bean offers some extensive analysis of this, including some truly disgusting propaganda images. And while Jim saw racism reflected in the disrespect shown by Rep. Wilson’s outburst, another regular contributor, Eugene Cho, questions the fairness of that allegation:

Wilson certainly deserved to be called out for his disruptive and outrageous outburst but to publicly declare [think] that Wilson’s outbursts were “based on racism” and rooted in fears of a black president was unfair and unfortunate.

While another GP partner blogger, Efrem Smith, suggests that yes,

You might not want to deal with it, but the reality could be that if you’re the President and happen to be Black, you can’t expect the same level of respect.

However, in the interest of fairness, Smith also reminds us in another post:

When George W. Bush was the President of the United States there were some liberals who labeled him as the anti-christ and some others even went as far as comparing him to Hitler. Now some conservatives and even some evangelicals are launching the same attacks at President Obama. … Don’t believe the hype or the hate. Neither Bush nor Obama are the anti-christ.

Like Smith, I personally remember the occasional, um, unhelpful sign or banner at anti-war rallies comparing Bush to Hitler. I believed then, as I do now, that any comparison of anyone to Hitler who is not Hitler is an insult to the real victims of real Nazi terror. Only Hitler is like Hitler, period. Also it makes the person making that comparison look really, really stupid.

UrbanFaith.com, yet another GP partner site, offered a similar reminder by

I’m taking this time to give liberals advance notice now, because it seems like most of them don’t remember exactly how severe a media beating was regularly unleashed on ol’ Dubya after all the weapons of mass destruction came up missing.

And don’t play dumb, either. I can hear some of you already.

I never behaved THAT badly. My friends and I were never THAT belligerent and obnoxious.

Maybe, maybe not.

All I know is, driving around my hometown of Portland during 2006 and 2007 was, among other things, an exercise in reading snarky leftist bumper stickers like “Fire the Liar,” “Somewhere In Texas There’s a Village Without Its Idiot,” and “When Clinton Lied, No One Died.”

Setting aside the distinction between a snarky bumper stickers and an outburst by a member of Congress during a presidential speech to a joint session, I want to affirm these bloggers’ expressions of fairness and balance — especially when the cable news channels that claim those values are anything but. Because, be honest, if a member of Congress had shouted, “You lie!” during a speech by George W. Bush about the Iraq War, WMDs, torture, warrantless wiretapping, environmental policy, etc. — would you have considered them a heel or a hero?

BUT, if you still can’t shake the distinct impression that there’s a qualitative difference between the vitriol aimed at Obama versus what was aimed at Bush, here is an under-reported fact (emphasis added):

In his new book, “In the President’s Secret Service,” author Ron Kessler writes that racists and white supremacists probably account for more than a third of the estimated 30 death threats that Obama allegedly receives every day, about four times as many as were directed at former President George W. Bush.

Lest you think this is an exaggeration with an agenda, note that Ron Kessler is the Washington correspondent for the conservative site Newsmax.com, and has in the past been accused of distorting Obama’s relationship with Rev. Wright. This is no Obama coddler. In fact, Kessler asserts that race is a significant factor in these threats, but unsurprisingly took issue with Carter’s recent statements:

“I think it’s reprehensible for (Carter) to attribute racial motives to people who simply disagree with Barack Obama’s policies,” Kessler said. “Quite a few of the threats are racially motivated, which doesn’t necessarily mean ‘right wing.’ It means they’re racists. It means they’re white supremacists. They’re jackasses, but it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re politically tuned in to any particular philosophy. I don’t know how they vote, but they’re not necessarily involved in any political movement.”

So perhaps, as Kessler asserts, these people are mostly freelance haters with unknown political affiliations. Perhaps. My point here is not to point a finger at a particular party — or cable news network — for whipping up that kind of animosity with inflammatory rhetoric. Though that’s a topic worth exploring.

My point here is that as we should follow Jesus’ teachings to love our enemies — yes, even our political enemies — it is important to remember that the hatred being aimed at our current president is quantifiably different than that unleashed on Bush — 400 percent more death threats per day different. And I’m not sure if that counts the pastors praying for his death. In such an atmosphere, it’s up to the rest of us to offer far more Christ-like prayers for those on all sides of these ideological divides.

Ryan Rodrick Beiler is the Web Editor for Sojourners and a photographer whose work can be seen at www.ryanrodrickbeiler.com.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • letjusticerolldown
    Agree.

    I don't have a problem with different persons providing a different analysis. It is as much about casting light on a subject and learning and becoming transformed; as it is about winnning a "Pro" or "Con" argument.

    But I am very disappointed in our capacity to speak and listen about race. If there is any racism behind some of the vitriol it seems impossible to dialogue about it. It would be like going to Washington DC, noticing that part of life there seems quite political, and saying "This is quite a politicized town."

    To which the hearers cannot even understand the word "politicized"--without tenderly walking them through a full history of the nation and its politics--and in the best case scenario (maybe 1 in 100) they come to a conclusion: "OK maybe Washington is a little politicized. But SO ARE YOU YOU HYPOCRITE!" And its right back to the name calling.
  • Ashleigh101
    "If there is any racism behind some of the vitriol it seems impossible to dialogue about it."

    This is because most of the racist accusations are aimed at all Repbulicans/conservatives as a collective group. Other than Beck, Limbaugh, and Joe Wilson, the comments aren't really aimed at individuals, nor are they based on some individual's actions or any words that are clearly racist.

    The accusations are assumptions. I mean, a white man says "You lie," and he's racist? Think about it? How do the words "you lie," indicate any racism, whatsoever?? They just simply do not. But liberals are just certain that he's racist becuase he said those two words to a black man.

    So, I think the dialogue is almost impossible because the accusations are so unfair and so unfounded. It's be one thing for Joe Wilson to say, "You lie, you nigg**" or something where it was clear he was racist, but these accusations being made... there is no proof of actual racism.

    You just simply cannot prove that someone's criticsm, desdain, or lack of support for Obama means that the person is racist.

    The other thing is is that the people making the accusations... they don't know us. They don't know Joe Wilson. And so they are making these accusations of people who are virtual strangers... and people who don't have records of any racist acts and/or words.

    Even your comments indicate that you believe these people to be racist, and you think it is just as clear as the nose on their face, but they refuse to see it.

    How would you expect any of us to be willing to dialogue with you when you have already found us guilty, and without having any true evidence and proof???
  • How would you expect any of us to be willing to dialogue with you when you have already found us guilty, and without having any true evidence and proof???

    Well, let's put the shoe on the other foot. You've already consistently (and falsely) suggested that "liberals" -- that is, those who don't fully agree with the conservative perspective -- are by definition persecutors, and we're thus supposed to believe that has nothing to do with the current rancor?
  • NC77
    Huh?
  • kansasmennonite
    Ashleigh, at some point you're going to have to quit supporting Wilson or take the blunt of his "mistake" on this blog.

    I've heard your arguments against BluleDeacon and I don't believe you can (or I) can understand him since we're not in his shoes. Just try and listen instead of argue for a change.
  • Knightscrossing
    Its worse than that. Wilson was just one example of stupidity. Lets try Congresswomen Michele Bachmann:

    "Take this into consideration. If we look at American history, between 1942 and 1947, the data that was collected by the census bureau was handed over to the FBI and other organizations, at the request of President Roosevelt, and that’s how the Japanese were rounded up and put into the internment camps. I’m not saying that’s what the Administration is planning to do. But I am saying that private, personal information that was given to the census bureau in the 1940s was used against Americans to round them up and put the Japanese in internment camps."

    Now we have a dead census worker hung with FED carved into his chest. We have gone from name calling to having people cause death because of a stupid statement by a Member of Congress...
  • letjusticerolldown
    I understand the point--but don't think it legitimate to draw a line between M Bachmann and the murder. The area in which the murder occurs has a history. There are folks there who don't need any encouragement from M Bachmann to do what was done.

    M Bachmann professes Christ. My message to her is that we, of all people, ought have an optimism that we can empower government, and limit government; and we can carry such optimism because we have learned that we can be self-controlled persons who can act powerfully in love and decline the temptations--in submission to God. If Christians cannot deliver that optimism--that mature balance--where do we expect it to come from? If we can't deliver it--we, in one way or another, will stoke fears; we will appeal to fears; we will live and act in fear; and we will neither represent God's love well nor have anything of real value to offer. The idea, lost on many Democrats and Republicans, is they are citizens of the same nation with a whole lot in common--submission to God, submission to the institution of government, submission to the People, submission to the Constitution, submission to conscience--and all these are unifying commitments more powerful than seeking their party's political power. We need Christians in political office to behave as such--regardless of political partisanship.
  • irish_annie
    precisely! i've lived amongst the hill folks... it is premature to assume that this murder of the census worker had anything to do with either race or politics. it is just as likely that he got too close to someone's moonshine still or marijuana patch and he was mistaken for a 'revenuer'. it's always too soon to rush to judgment. have we lost all grasp of calm reason?

    our family is interracial. i disagree with many of president obama's social policies. will i be named "racist"? has it entirely escaped the media and the general populace that OUR president is not 'black', but bi-racial - as much white as he is black?!!! cries of racism are but an attempt to silence the voices of dissent. and note that i said "dissent", not demonize. people of integrity and good will can agree that there should be peace on earth and all people should be cared for, yet disagree on the 'how' of bringing that about. can we possibly evolve beyond the animalistic "us vs them" to realize that there are no enemies, only brothers?

    i'm a bit disappointed in the new liturgical left. what an opportunity they are squandering in merely switching ditches, becoming a mirror image of the old religious right. just as polarizing, self-righteous, condemning of others, asserting that THEY alone know WWJD? and are the only authorized spokesmen for God. i'm growing weary of watching them preen on tv as the talking heads congratulate them for being so progressive for an evangelical.... selah.
  • 1Grace
    becoming a mirror image of the old religious right. just as polarizing, self-righteous, condemning of others, asserting that THEY alone know WWJD?


    Irish-annie I totally agree. Also from what I understand of the county the cenus taker was murdered in is into meth production . I agree with your understanding of where the religious left took the wrong turn as the right did, I believe some of it is has to do with the beliefs themselves . But the sin of making your religiousity something to be exalted and somehow give you superiority is not something only the right politcal machine got involved in , its part of the human condition.


    Jesus confronted it , but so many of us forget the desciples had a taste of its tempatation also when they talked about which one of them would be the greatest in heaven .



    The best thing for Soujourners would be to get rid of some of the kids they have working for them , or mentor them in the Gifts of the Spirit , and actually teach those gifts were a gift , and not something that they acquire because they are smarter or on the left side of the political fence. When the folks here that blog consistently blog and the essay actually put down the Christian Film Fireproof , a Hollywood production releases in the mockers based their opinion on some kind of womens rights ideology and pass idealogical debates with one of the actors. In doing so they ridiculed common shared Bibical truth in the movie, I realized they were just attacking anything based on some kind of jeaolusy/hatred that would come out of the right side of politics and worse yet , even the every day believers of Faith who have no sense of political discernment or understanding . They just love God like the left and are doing the best they can . . Almost like the Hatfield and the McCoys.

    This organization took off , then had its door slammed shut after the election . Only secular politics want them involved and those whose Bibical Understanding takes quite some leaps , plus heavy on condemnation on others . Not a mix for expansion .

    Our Lord is a God of Hope, Love , Mercy and Grace.
  • jazzact13
    --The best thing for Soujourners would be to get rid of some of the kids they have working for them , or mentor them in the Gifts of the Spirit , and actually teach those gifts were a gift , and not something that they acquire because they are smarter or on the left side of the political fence.

    You may have a point, but there is more to it than that. As the OP said, it was Wallis himself who made the outrageous claim that Wilson's statement was racist, even claiming to hear the racially charged word "boy" in it, which Wilson never said.

    (Though, in one of those sharp twists of irony that seem to only happen in reality, one can find an example of someone last year calling Obama "boy"--Jimmy Carter himself, in a television interview.

    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_091...

    About 3/4 down, you can find this.

    CARTER: It already has sent a wave of approbation and admiration in many countries around the world, just knowing that this black boy, who grew up with just a loving mother and a -- and grandparents and that was about all he had to start with, has now had the chance to become the nominee of Democratic Party for president.)

    So, while some of the young blood may need reined in a bit, the problem is just as much with the old blood.

    One of the more disturbing articles I read here was a few months ago, this one here...

    http://blog.sojo.net/2009/05/27/what-if-the-bib...

    Such statements as this were what were disturbing.

    "When she boldly “uncovers the feet” of Boaz during the night they spend together on the threshing floor, has she violated the “family values” that some religious folk now proclaim? Or has she affirmed that love engages the body as well as the heart, the mind, and the spirit, and that sometimes a loving body comes before a wedding?"

    If Sojo allows such things to be posted on the blog, is it not encouraging sex before marriage? Not to mention the blatant misinterpretation of the account in Ruth?

    Sojo may have a useful role to play, but when it compromised it's supposed pro-life stance to support a pro-death and even pro-infanticide presidential candidate, it lost much of its credibility. When it allows those who post to encourage sex before marriage, its credibility sinks lower. And it's those at the top who need to clean up their own acts, not merely get on the cases of those at the bottom.
  • letjusticerolldown
    If you had the power to determine the impact of your words: would your words

    A. Disagree and/or correct Sojo? or
    B. Defeat Sojo?
  • Ashleigh101
    "cries of racism are but an attempt to silence the voices of dissent."

    AMEN!
  • In this country, if you have any black blood at all you're considered black. Period.

    people of integrity and good will can agree that there should be peace on earth and all people should be cared for, yet disagree on the 'how' of bringing that about. can we possibly evolve beyond the animalistic "us vs them" to realize that there are no enemies, only brothers?

    We need something that actually works, not something that assuages the consciences of those who really don't want to do anything that costs. That's the real issue here -- MLK Jr. is still hated in some precincts because he shed light on the idea that we had not simply racism but, at bottom, a class struggle in this country -- and that's why you hear the cries of "Marxism!" in reference to Obama.
  • Ashleigh101
    You hear cries of "Marxism" and "Socialism" against Obama because of his POLICIES. Not because of racism.

    Tell me? What do you think of some blacks... like let's say those in the Crips, an L.A. criminal gang founded by two black men? Or how about this black guy in Oakland not long ago who shot and killed four officers, each of them white and/or Hispanic? Or how about some of the blacks in New Orleans, who during the flood, looted stores and stole things that did not belong to them?

    You know, I could very, very easily view all blacks as thugs, criminals, and thieves based on what many blacks have done in this nation, and that would be just like you are doing in the way you view white evangelicals.

    But, I know that not all blacks are thugs, criminals, and theives, just as not all whites and white evangelicals are not racist.
  • You hear cries of "Marxism" and "Socialism" against Obama because of his
    POLICIES. Not because of racism.


    Most of those people don't even know what Marxism and socialism represent, so
    they don't know what they're talking about.

    You know, I could very, very easily view all blacks as thugs, criminals,
    and thieves based on what many blacks have done in this nation, and that would
    be just like you are doing in the way you view white evangelicals.


    Except that white evangelical leadership and media support such
    things, and since conservatives tend to work from the top down and don't check
    things out for themselves it's pretty easy to assume what most actually
    believe.
  • Ashleigh101
    And yet another comment by BlueDeacon on the horrible "white evangelical." How many does that make?
  • Zero, but you're keeping track because you seem to be so easily offended.
  • Ashleigh101
    LOL! Zero? Really? Go back and reread all your comments at this website (on various blogs). It's not hard to "keep track" because those types of comments pervade most all of your posts.
  • Yes. Zero. Due to your hypersensitivity you apparently can't stand any
    criticism whatsoever of the conservative agenda; keep in mind that I have
    consistently provided specific instances of what I'm talking about, which is
    different from what you accuse me of. Yet you dish your own hate on this blog
    with impunity because you have regularly projected your own attitude onto us
    and, frankly, I won't stand for it. As far as I'm concerned, your bellyaching
    about "liberals" has no authority here.
  • Ashleigh101
    "Yes. Zero."

    You're in denial.

    "Yet you dish your own hate on this blog with impunity because you have regularly projected your own attitude onto us and, frankly, I won't stand for it."

    Apparently it is not me who cannot "stand any criticsm." Look at your own reaction. You "won't stand for it?" Oh brother.
  • BuckeyeDon
    Yeah, and I laugh every time I hear Obama being called a socialist. Define socialism, please. If Obama were a socialist, his health care proposal would be to have the government run all the hospitals and clinics and pay all doctors, nurses, nursing assistants, radiologists, etc. out of the government payroll.

    The real socialist was--guess who?--George W. Bush! He's the one who nationalized the banks and the auto companies. THAT'S real socialism!
  • canucklehead
    Hey Don, good to see you back. I spent some time in your country the last few days, trying to bring some light to those you identify - those who live in darkness regarding true socialism...anybody else happen to notice that at the G20 last week they were asking the Canadians for advice on banking so as to avoid more debacles like you've had down there in recent months. To listen to many Americans, they are convinced the Canadian banking system is socialist b/c we have a handful of chartered banks as opposed to a gazillion who are out to promote and protect their...you get my drift.

    Sadly, I was reminded again that there is none so blind as he who will not see.
  • BuckeyeDon
    You were in Pittsburgh? That's only about a three hour drive from where I live. Too bad; maybe we could have met somewhere.

    And since you were there, how do you think those Penguins will do this season?
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008