advertisement
RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

We’ve Crashed Our Cars into the Living Room of the World’s Poor

by Peter Illyn 09-28-2009

Proverbs 31:8 says “Speak out for those who cannot speak [for themselves].”

President Obama gave a speech last week to the UN General Assembly in which he did just that. He began his talk on climate change in stark and realistic terms, leaving aside for the moment the upbeat language about green jobs in a new clean energy economy. Here’s what he said, in part:

No nation, however large or small, wealthy or poor, can escape the impact of climate change.  Rising sea levels threaten every coastline.  More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent.  More frequent drought and crop failures breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive.  On shrinking islands, families are already being forced to flee their homes as climate refugees.  The security and stability of each nation and all peoples — our prosperity, our health, our safety — are in jeopardy.  And the time we have to reverse this tide is running out.

That’s different rhetoric than you hear in many of the communications of the environmental community. It’s true that there are many opportunities in clean energy for smart investments that will make America safer and more prosperous. But as people of faith, we must remind ourselves and the rest of the country that the hard work of getting to that new economy is answering the call to justice. In the next few years it is more important than ever that we “speak out for those who cannot speak for themselves.”

We’ve crashed our cars into the living room of the world’s poor — there’s no denying who bears the historical responsibility for the current climate crisis. We’ve got to do the bigger part of mitigating that damage and helping poor nations adapt to climate change already in the pipeline.

In our work with students on Christian college campuses, and with missional and emerging churches, we see a new willingness to be faithful witnesses to the need for just power. In our work with people affected by mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia, we see ordinary citizens doing extraordinary things to confront the power of the coal industry. In our relationships with Christian brothers and sisters overseas, we see Christians pleading for the American church to get its head out of the sand, and to show spiritual leadership on the world stage.

As people of faith become ever more informed about the social, economic, and environmental costs that dirty power systems deliver to the poor and vulnerable, we become ever more convinced that there is a moral cost to our carbon pollution that we bear in our own souls. We ignore the evidence about the impacts of global warming at our own peril, not just physically but spiritually.

We can speak the moral language that dares call it a sin, but that same language includes words like revival, renewal, and restoration. We can imagine a community of right relationships, with God, with our global neighbors, and with the Creation. We see it when the faithful “speak out for those who cannot speak for themselves.” We see glimpses of that coming kingdom, breaking through even now where faithfulness and hope prevail over recklessness and despair. That’s part of our message to the world as well.

Rev. Peter Illyn heads the non-profit organization Restoring Eden, which aims to make hearts bigger, hands dirtier, and voices stronger for God’s creation.

Categories: Environment
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Great Post!
  • letjusticerolldown
    In the late 1970's we had our first "Born Again" president. Evengelicals were on the radar screen of the culture. The Moral Majority had not yet been born.

    Jeremy Rifkin, social critic/author, wrote a book arguing this bloc of evangelical/charismatic citizens would come to prominence because of its embrace of a spiritual world (beyond reason) and an environmentalism based on a theology of stewardship (vs dominance). He was not writing from a Christian perspective.

    And interestingly, he did not argue this place of cultural prominence would occur because evangelicals would learn how to exploit issues for political power.

    In the 1960's Evangelicals could have gotten the civil rights question right and saved the nation huge agony.

    In the early 1980's Evangelicals could have helped open the door to just stewarding of the environment and saved the globe great agony.

    I affirm your work. I encourage you not to think of yourselves as trying to mobilize a progressive evangelical fringe--but rather that you are opening the door for Evangelicals to live out and express that which we have long been interested it, and called to do.
  • Ashleigh101
    Deleted by me-- I got you and BlueDeacon mixed up.
  • Ashleigh101
    oops
  • kansasmennonite
    Thankyou for shedding some light on the subject instead of sticking your head in the sand like some on this blog. I particularly liked the idea of theology of stewardship (vs dominance). This is so prevalent in the society around us. (dominance). Ashleigh is so gun ho on "sticking" up for her religious right folk that she's missing the part of stewardship.

    Watching the Ken Burns special on the natl parks puts great respect for the "liberal" enviormentalists that saved some spaces for us to enjoy. My hats off for them!
  • Ashleigh101
    You've got to keep in mind though, that some of our "carbon footprints" that have been left throughout history were left in order to sustain our lives. There was a time when we did not have the technology we have now, and yes, much of what we did (like make cars that run on gas) left a "carbon footprint," but yet, it also helped us survive... still helps us survive.

    Which is more important? Human survival or "green"whatever it is called! I believe that many environmentalists go too far and end up placing such emphasis on "green" and "save the planet," etc. that they value that more than they value human lives and survival.

    As for global warming... you know the end of the story, right? Jesus returns. Jesus destroys the earth. And what is most important? Salvation.

    Okay, so the earth is getting warmer. Well, the earth isn't going to be here forever. And okay, so we can do what we can to better it, but we shouldn't be acting like people whose greatest passion in environmental issues and who thinks it's sinful to mine or drive an SUV or to use plastic bags.

    That's not to say we shouldn't take care of the earth that God has entrusted us with, but we are not to worship it or place it above human life, and some environmentalists go to this extreme. So I can't help but kind of bristle at all the "green" talk, esp. when there are people who are more concerned about people inhaling polution than about whether or not those same people know the Lord and are saved.

    And I honestly don't undersatand how you bring "revival" and "restoration" to someone's live through environmentalism! Or what global warming has to do with our spirituality. You seem to be over-spiritualizing environmentalism if I am understanding your blog correctly.
  • kansasmennonite
    quote:"As for global warming... you know the end of the story, right? Jesus returns. Jesus destroys the earth. And what is most important? Salvation. "

    That's the problem with the religious right and their end times theology. The earth is going to be burned up so it doesn't matter now what happens. How long has this "end times" premillinialism been a part of theology? Last 50 yrs? 75 yrs? This view is just a "theory" but people have put it as an "absolute". This is dangerous.

    I do see some hope in how evangelicals are now starting to change their tune on this subject. With leaders like Rick Warren starting to "come around". Of course Rick Warren gets blasted by some on the religious right like your lovely onenewsnow.com site. (Ashleigh commented on how she loves that site in a previous post).
  • Ashleigh101
    Didn't say it didn't matter. Find where I did. You miss the point. We don't need to fear the destruction of the earth through global warming or some other catastrophe. If we are Christians, we know how the story ends. And LIKE I SAID, we do what we can to take care of the earth that God has entrusted to us, but we do not worship it or place that pursuit above our pursuit for God and to see lives changed through knowing Christ. There are some who are obsessed with envirnomental issues or who place the value of a fish or an animal or a landscape above the value of a human life. And that is wrong.

    My view is a BIBLICAL view, Kansas. Maybe instead of all these umpteen books you are always telling me to read, you should try focusing on and studying only one for awhile-- the Bible.

    And yep, I sure do love that site. I'm thankful for sites like that that report on things the liberal media fail to report on.
  • kansasmennonite
    Been watching the Ken Burns Natl parks series and found John Muir an interesting character. His dad made him memorize much of the OT and all the NT yet he is one that perhaps came to worship the earth yet did much to help with the preservation of the earth.

    There you go with your narrow view of the Bible. If I would read it more I would understand it just like you!!!! Great argument! You've been listening to AFR and onenewsnow way too much.

    Is that the liberal media or the elite media liberal that doesn't report on things? Seriously, onenewsnow and AFR are just a political wing. All of the news stories are blasting the left one way or another. This site is not in that mode. They try to search the net for everything they can against their beliefs and a lot of it is all huey. Today on the AFR program Today's Issues they were blasting Brian McClaren for dialoging with Muslims during Ramadan. Same ole thing time and time again. The religious right would have no quams about starting a war with Muslims right now in this country. Maybe that's why all the gun buying ammo, etc.? No concept of how to live out the peaceful side of christianity.
  • kansasmennonite
    There you go again saying how the earth will end. Doesn't it occur to you that that view hurts the earth? It's the religious right's right to not take care of it properly. I'm not the only one saying this. Look at how often the religious right attacks enviromentalists. Look at how few are taking the global warming issue seriously.

    I found this site and it deals with the politics of religion and how it's affecting how we think today. http://www.lewrockwell.com/barnwell/barnwell41....
  • henderda
    Gosh. . . In my bible it ends up with the earth being restored, made new, reconciled. In fact, Rev has words for those who destroy the earth ... that the time has come for destroying them!

    Too often people forget that the Christian eschatology is EARTHLY, BODILY. We hope for the resurrection of the body, not some disembodied heaven. New Jerusalem isn't heaven, it comes from heaven. Read it again.
  • NC77
    Well said and you are right along with Ashleigh 101. I happen to be a post tribber because I believe dispensationalism is a heresy. But ultimately it is a moot point because we should live as if Jeses were returning today. He will come like a thief in the night.

    It will be so exciting to see the new earth and Jesus finally with his bride. WooHoo.

    What I have to wonder is what those who do not believe in the second coming will blame for the tribulation. If they think global warming is bad, they ain't seen nothing yet :)
  • prk
    I would like that longer grower seasons would be a plus for all, including the poor. Certainly if we look at history our greatest advancements have been made in the warming periods.

    As for the ocean levels rising they have been rising for more than 10,000 years. I think this has given us plenty of time to move.
  • NC77
    In the opinion of the former Czech president, environmentalism is the new communism. For one, global warming has not been scientifically proved. It has been declared to be a consensus by a group of people with an agenda to suppress the poor by controlling all energy. Wealth cannot be created without energy. Most people are ignorant of the end times regardless of what side you take. When Jesus returns the old will pass away and a new earth takes its place. Those who belong to him will rule in eternity with Jesus.
  • Ashleigh101
    You're right that it has not been scientifically proved. Sure, there is most definitely consequences in our environment due to people. For instance, I live in an area that once had blue skies most of the time. Now, we have lots and lots of pollution.

    But it's like you said, "Wealth cannot be created without energy." Well, where I live, one of the reasons for all the pollution is all the people. Back when it was blue skies all the time, our population was small. It's tripled since then. You know who most of those people are? Mexicans who have come to America for a better life, and they come to my area because there are jobs for them.

    And they drive cars, live in houses, consume products, etc... all adding to our nation's "carbon footprint."

    Personally, I do not resent them for it. But I'd love to hear a liberal address the fact that illegal immigrants add to our "carbon footprint."

    Either you care about those people more, or you care about the environment more. Or... you have a balanced approach and realize that God created the earth for us. We are stewards of it, so yes, we should not just destroy it just to get our jollies. But most of our "carbon footprint" has been due to things like... we need food, we need coal, we need water, we need energy... and w/o those things, we die. Period.

    So, which is more important?

    When you've got people advocating for abortion as a means of saving the earth by reducing the poplulation, or you've got people who'd rather protect a fish than a baby, or you've got people wanting to name fish "sea kittens" (yes, there is a group who wants to do that-- RIDICULOUS!!) so that people won't eat them... even though they are FISH and God CREATED them to be EATEN!!! Then, you know you've got a lack of balance, and you've got an overemphasis on environmentalism, and for some people, it's an obsession and their god. And they place more importance on the earth than on human beings.
  • NC77
    Hey Ashleigh 101

    Sounds like we think the same about some of the things going on in this world. I am guessing if you have a pollution problem and illegals you live in southwest U.S. Namely California. But that is just a guess. I spent some time out there in San Diego in the 1970s, a Navy guy. It was beautiful back then.

    One thing that yanks my chain is when I see liberals at work throw recyclable materials in the trash can instead of the recycle barrel or bin. I see them throw away aluminum cans and printer paper. They are the ones who believe in global warming and make a big stink about it yet seem to have no concern in the way they live their daily lives and how it affects the environment and the use of energy.

    As a conservative I do not believe in global warming but I am a voracious recycler and conserve water and energy as much as I can. It keeps the electric and gas bill down. I save lots of money for things I need or want. When I am out and about I drag my own trash (plastic bottles, paper, cans, etc.) home just so I can recycle rather than throw it in the trash.

    Not sure if you know this or not. But peak oil is way off and it may never happen. Oil companies continue to make new finds and are finding old reserves that were once thought depleted to have been replensished. Some in the industry are promoting the idea that oil is an abiotic product that renews itself rather than it being a fossil fuel created from a limited number of dead dinosaurs. I haven't read enough about it yet to draw a conclusion.

    I agree with your comments on abortion and fish. On a similar subject, are you familiar with the farmers out in California being put out of business because of some little smelt fish that the environmentalists are trying save. They are in a man made drought courtesy of the federal government. I think its happening up in Fresno.

    Gotta go now. Later.
  • Ashleigh101
    You're right, I do live in CA, and I also live in the Central Valley where the smelt are being protected with the irrational thought that protecting smelt is more important than growing food and crops. And yes, our farmers are being put out of business, and it's very, very sad.

    There is so much farmland here, and we produce tons of crops, and now, much of that farmland lays barren. It's absolutely criminal what the environmentalists are doing. And it's only going to come back on them when food costs rise and/or we have to import fruits, vegies, etc. from other countries because the Valley here won't be able to produce it due to the protection of those stupid smelt fish!

    There is a lot of outrage here. It's amazing how much clout environmentalits have in D.C., and how little the voices of the people... the common citizens... are heard. Hannity was just here actually and thousands attended a rally with him reporting on it. Who knows if it'll do any good, but it's a pretty sad and infuriating situation.

    Funny thing is... lot of the farmers are Mexican immigrants. The Democrats/liberals claim to be the champion of immigrants, and yet, their environmental causes cost those people jobs. Just like with the pollution and how it is due to the huge population. They are outraged at conservatives who don't support the health care bill claiming that we don't care about the poor and yet, they do these things... like protect the fish, and as a result, the poor get even poorer! It's all talk with them.

    Your points about how liberals don't follow their own environmental beliefs in their daily lives is very true, although I'm sure some do. It's just like Al Gore flying private planes, and using tons of electricity for his big house. Think of all the environmental celebs that have mansions (think of the electricity needed and water... to keep their lawns green and on and on) and fly private jets and consume tons of material things (shoes, clothes, etc).

    I also try to conserve water and electricity, but I am not obsessive about it. I get tired of hearing all the "green" this and "green" that talk, and in certain areas of CA (like the coastal areas where there are LOTS of liberals), if you don't drive a Prius and/or you drive an SUV (heaven forbid), you seriously feel like a sore thumb. And I think it gets to the point it is overboard.

    BTW, there's an article I read today about how the Northeast is expecting its "coldest winter in a decade." http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087... So much for "global warming," eh? :)
  • kansasmennonite
    Have you not learned your lesson in a previous similar post about the water rights? Isn't it ironic that you have in the central valley the richest farmland in the world yet also have the most poverty? (at least in the most southern part) What happened there?
  • Ashleigh101
    What happened here? Um... let's see... California... close to Mexico... lost of immigrants willing to work hard in the fields. And they are very, very poor. I believe it is you that has berated me for not "loving the poor." Well, those poor that you claim to love are becoming even poorer due to the environmentalists. Would you like us to kick them out, Kansas? And what are you doing for them, Kansas? Would love to hear you explain-- which is more important... the smelt fish, or the poor immigrants who you want health care for? Hmmm... tough, eh? Considering that liberals are big environmentalists, pretty tough to explain when their environmentalism causes poverty for the same people who they claim to "love" and want health care for.

    There is no "lesson" to learn.
  • kansasmennonite
    First of all I'm talking about the citizens of that county and not the illegals. I said nothing about the smelt. I mentioned there is an injustice in your part of the country. Rich farmland owners-poor workers. Are you saying you don't want health care for these people?

    Did a quick search on the net and this is the site that came up first: Might explain some things.
    http://www.library.ca.gov/crb/97/09/
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertisement
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008