RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Personal and Pragmatic Reasons for Health Reform

by Ernesto Tinajero 10-02-2009

Jesus is a healer — of body, spirit, and heart. He also called Christians to be peacemakers and healers. As the center and source of our Christian life, Jesus has to be the beginning and end (alpha and omega) of how Christians view health care. I have come nose to nose, fingers to fingers with this truth because of my son’s condition. I come to the debate not as a Democrat or Republican but as a scared father, a father praying every day, and a father finding hope within the words of God. We need heath-care reform. I know I could be disregarded as simply an emotional father, and there maybe truth to my being emotional. But others, like businesspeople, are coming to see the need for health care.

The capitalists’ and business leaders’ reasons for seeing the need for health-care reform are logical and rational. If we continue down the same road, we will lose ground to other countries. American businesses will be beaten by more efficient competitors. Adam Smith’s invisible hand will become a fist pounding down the American dream. If we do nothing, we betray both our ancestors and descendants as we did not meet the challenges of our generation. Do not mistake me; this is not simply blind support for President Obama’s plan, as there have been some other ideas out there, such as the Baucus bill. It is an endorsement for the goal of health-care reform — affordable health care for all Americans.

The story that keeps coming up for me in my prayers is the feeding of the 5,000. Jesus took what seemed to be meager provisions and fed all who needed it. The assumption has been that health care is a small pie, which has to managed lest it be misused. Our current system is a system of rationing based on money. My faith tells me differently. My faith tells me that God has given us more than enough and only wants to share it with us. If Jesus fed 5,000 with only a bit of fish and bread, surely the richest country in the world can take care of its own.

portrait-ernesto-tinajero1Ernesto Tinajero is a freelance writer in Spokane, Washington, who earned his master’s degree in theology from Fuller Seminary. Visit his blog at beingandfaith.blogspot.com.

Categories: Economics, Health
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Thank you for sharing your story. I think some of the fundamental changes in the health care "system" are changes that challenge the foundations of the system itself. That "insurance" is the model for providing for what could be competitive services that drive costs down is a major problem. Licensing is an incredibly cost-increasing regulation that needs to be reformed. Many services that do not require the services of a doctor can be rendered by qualified nurses, which mean more services delivered at lower costs. "More tests" are a result of doctors covering "all bases" for fear of litigation.

    Take a step back and look at our entire nation and the many major functions of our society. What are the two areas in the most dire need of reform? Health care services and education. Is it mere coincidence that the federal government is massively involved in both arenas? Could it possibly be that removing the federal government's role in both, while relying upon it to protect against fraud and abuse, could drastically reduce the costs of both and improve quality? President Obama indicates often the need for competition, yet the federal government itself is the reason for the lack of competition. True competition always drives prices down. And the same applies to education, but that isn't what this discussion is about.

    Also remember the Constitution. As Christians, we must always ask, "Is it biblical?" As Americans, we must always make Congress ask, "Is it Constitutional?" If it isn't, then let's make it so.
  • Individuals may complain as such, but many organizations, such as the CATO Institute, respond to various specific proposals, such as co-ops, public option, etc., rather than just "THE proposal sucks" sort of comment.

    It's kinda similar to complaints about "Congress" when in fact most people aren't complaining about specific Congressmen, just the whole bunch of them together. But that doesn't mean it isn't worth criticizing some of them.
  • I believe that if we are to be true peacemakers, and if we truly believe in the power of the gospel to heal society's brokenness, not just our personal and individual brokenness, then we are to pursue as purely as possible solutions to our sick and troubled world.

    When it comes to health care reform, we must not make the grave mistake of crossing ethical and moral boundaries in order to do justice. In every other industry in society, history has proven that costs go down when competition and innovation are permitted to flourish. Education and health care are two industries that are heavily influenced by government, and costs are rising and quality is declining. Coincidence? I don't think so.

    We must act peacefully toward our neighbor, and that means our wealthy neighbor, too. If they have something we wish they could put to better use, then let's peacefully act to bring that person to the knowledge and spirit of the Kingdom and do justice that way. Otherwise we are just using power-over tactics to ostensibly accomplish "justice." Few of us would have the stomach to personally confront a neighbor, or even a total stranger, and do to him what we thoughtlessly approve of government officials routinely doing to millions of others through their collective authority.
  • kansasmennonite
    Quote:"It's a typical pattern of the government. Why do you think the biggest insurance companies favor the Obama plan? It's because the alternative is to open competition across state lines and they lose their practical monopolies."

    The only advantage I can see to opening up the insurance across state lines is to "level" some of the costs. Some will pay more and some will pay less. Who will regulate the insurance? The states now have their own insurance commissioner to handle problems.

    If you want to handle preexisting conditions how do you propose to do that without a mandate? Todd Tiahart is my state's congressman and on his site there is no republican plan (on his site) to cover preexisting conditions-hardly surprising is it? How can you have reform without covering preexisting conditions? Can't be done-sorry. I understand that some republicans were for a mandate that everyone had to get covered and then backed out as it became "political" and too hot an issue when the election is coming up. Pure political move.

    If there isn't enough money to pay the bills you're admitting there is a major need for medical procedures that aren't getting care of right now. What's your proposal for that? Good luck!
  • Thank you for comment. I do believe it is a Christian issue as well. There are so many people who cannot afford their insurance, also many of the underinsured do not know they are underinsured until they have something major happen. It is like playing a unaware game of Russian Roulette.
  • wmholt
    As a Christian physician, I'm a little mystified by some of the comments here. There are 45,000 deaths in the U.S. each year from lack of health insurance, which amounts to one every 12 seconds.

    There are bankruptcies every day due to the crushing weight of medical bills, too large to ever hope to pay. There are 70 million uninsured and under-insured citizens in this country.

    I do not think that it is the insurance companies that are being deprived when you read anything written by Wendell Potter, a Cigna and Humana executive, who turned whistle-blower after being shamed by the people attending "free" health clinics being held in a pasture for those without health insurance.

    My concern is not the insurance industry. Something tells me that they will do just fine. What I am praying for, and working for, is a health care program that will allow so many of our uninsured and under-insured fellow U.S. citizens to avoid bankruptcy and death.

    Mathew 25 speaks so loudly to me:

    "39 And when did we see You sick or in prison and came to visit You?

    "40 And the King will reply to them, Truly I tell you, in so far as you did it for one of the least in the estimation of men of these My brethren, you did it for Me."
  • letjusticerolldown
    Please specify what the truth is you are talking about.
  • scout2
    This bears repeating: Unfortunately the health care reform that is being proposed will lead to more families in crisis and not less. Let's not deny this truth.
  • natcoz
    "It's a near-universal assumption of the healthcare debate that the current system is a market system and it is broken, and hence we should try a government system. The people who assume this aren't considering the last 100 years of healthcare policy. Government is deeply involved at all levels, from medical licensure and patents, to direct subsidies and provision, to employee mandates and insurance-pooling controls, at all levels."

    "It's been a steady path to medical serfdom all the way, under both parties, and this is precisely what accounts for most of the problems that people complain about. Meanwhile, the private dimensions of the healthcare system is what accounts for its merits."

    "So what are we doing? The very opposite of what we should be doing: more control instead of more freedom, more spending instead of less, more mandates instead of fewer. The logic of interventionism is taking over: problems are being addressed by more of what caused the problems. The sick patient is being given more poison with the claim that it is the cure."

    The following link provides a means of gaining a deeper understanding of cause and effect. And once we understand cause and effect, we can begin talking about meaningful reform.

    http://mises.org/story/3737
  • First, thank you for the well wishes and prayers. Baby Tito needs them as we all do. The question I have is which one? The house bill, the Baucus bill? I agree that it would great to have insurance companies compete across state lines. Changing the pay per service system that rewards more tests would be a needed change. The point is that reform is needed.
  • I'm always a bit mystified when people complain about "the health care reform that is being proposed" as if there's only one, or even one definitive, plan being proposed. For the most part, that's never been the case in this entire debate. At best, we've got a couple of elements that key figures want to see included. But we still don't have a single "plan" that brings it all together yet, that we can talk about faults (or strengths!) in it without first spelling out more specifically (as I don't see you doing here, to be honest) what we're talking about.
  • Hannity2
    Ernesto,

    I feel for you about your son's condition. I can't imagine going through that. I pray for him. Unfortunately the health care reform that is being proposed will lead to more families in crisis and not less.

    One of the key reasons we have this mess in health care is the government is already involved in it. The regulation in the health insurance industry keeps true competition from being possible.

    Too much govt regulation keep insurance companies from being able to compete. Then the govt claims it is screwed up because there isn't enough government oversight. Then they step in and screw it up even more with "reform".

    It's a typical pattern of the government. Why do you think the biggest insurance companies favor the Obama plan? It's because the alternative is to open competition across state lines and they lose their practical monopolies.

    If passed, this Health Care Crisis will lead to a financial crisis unseen in this countries history. There isn't enough to pay the bills.
  • bwsgirl
    Mr. Tinajero, God bless your son and your family. My thoughts and prayers are with you.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008