RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Is Obama’s Peace Prize Premature?

by Valerie Elverton Dixon 10-09-2009

Just peace theory proceeds from the premise that peace is a day by day effort.  It is a process that requires vision, skill, and courage.  The Nobel Committee awarded its 2009 Prize for Peace to President Barack Obama.  He had been in office for only a few weeks when the nominations for the prize closed.  He has been in office less than a year upon receiving this honor.  The question: Is the prize premature?

During the presidential campaign, candidate Obama took heat for his insistence that diplomacy meant talking to one’s enemies without preconditions. He acknowledged that United States foreign policy had not been flawless.  Our nation has made mistakes that have cause harm.  While he said he would continue U.S. efforts against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, he also spoke of removing U.S. combat troops from Iraq.  He spoke of international engagement and working with the world to solve problems.

A majority of the American people endorsed his ideas and made him the first African-American president of the United States.  People across the globe paused and celebrated his inauguration, a singular and unique event.  Since becoming president, he has continued to speak the truth about America’s responsibility for suffering in the world.  He has also articulated a just peace paradigm shift from “power over” to “power with” regarding international affairs.  Respect for the importance of other people in the world is an important aspect of just peace theory.

President Obama has underlined the necessity of nations working together.  It is an understanding that power is everywhere and that everyone has a role in making peace.  In his first speech before the UN General Assembly, he said: “We must embrace a new era of engagement based on mutual interests and mutual respect, and our work must begin now.”

Early in his administration, he reached out to the Muslim world.  Like Nobel Peace Prize winner Martin Luther King Jr., he spoke of the world’s interdependence, a network of mutuality.  In his speech in Cairo, he said:  “Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail.  So, whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners of it.  Our problems must be dealt with through partnership; progress must be shared.”

With that same commitment to international cooperation, President Obama chaired the UN Security Council and put the force of the United States behind an effort toward an end of nuclear proliferation.

The prize recognizes President Obama’s “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”  The chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Thorbjorn Jagland, said:  “We hope this will enhance what he is trying to do.”

The Nobel Committee gave the prize to President Obama in part because of his vision.  It said: “The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”   Wisdom teaches that where there is no vision the people perish.  The Nobel Committee has recognized that President Obama is a man with a vision — with the skill to articulate it and the courage to pursue it.  It has given him a just peace prize.

Dr. Valerie Elverton Dixon is an independent scholar who publishes lectures and essays at JustPeaceTheory.com. She received her Ph.D. in religion and society from Temple University and taught Christian ethics at United Theological Seminary and Andover Newton Theological School.

Categories: War & Peace
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Ivriniel
    Personally, I think it's a little early for him to be getting the Nobel Peace Prize. The steps he has taken are laudable, but I find it hard to believe that out of the 205 nominees this year that he was the most deserving.

    Seems to me that there are a lot of people and causes in that group who needed the money and publicity the Nobel Prize brings more that a President of the United States who has been in office for less than a year.
  • hammerud
    It seems to say more about the committee that gave the prize than the recipient of the prize.
  • Eric77
    Agreed.
  • kansasmennonite
    Them darn foreignors anyway! What do they know about the peace prize? They haven't helped us in Iraq like they should have and have disagreed with us on so many issues!
  • Well kansasmennonite, the foreigners created the peace prize. Alfred Nobel being from Sweden. You also have your facts wrong when it comes to helping you. I am from Norway and we have unfortunately helped USA with both military personal and finances in several of your unfortunate wars.
    We agree with you on many issues, but I pray to God we continue to disagree on some of the very unhelpful issues you continue to believe in.
  • kansasmennonite
    I was being sarcastic. I hear what you are saying.
  • irish_annie
    yes, and considering they gave it to carter in '02, gore in '07 and now obama in '09 when he's really done nothing, it's more about the committee trying to influence US politics and sticking their finger in bush's eye. interesting that reagan, who ended the cold war, never received the peace prize...
  • hammerud
    Agree
  • kansasmennonite
    You been listening to Rush again?
  • irish_annie
    LOL... you know what happens when we assume.... :)
    no, i'm one of those rare birds - a true moderate - who happens to think that both extremes of the ideologues have missed the point, rush included.

    only 1% of people think. 4% of people think they think. and 95% would rather die than think.
  • kansasmennonite
    Statistically, if you wouldn't rather die than think, you must be in the 4% who think they think :) or am I assuming again?
  • irish_annie
    roflol... wish i could credit the author of that little snippet, but he is unknown to me.
    however, such wisdoms are best used for self-analysis - unless one possesses clairvoyance :). selah.
  • canucklehead
    I heard Rush was going to buy the St. Louis Rams. Does that mean they'll set Rush-ing records?
  • irish_annie
    lol. one can only hope...
  • RadicalChristianLibrarian
    Reagan's strategy for ending the cold war was to win it by outspending the Soviets on nuclear weapons. Somehow I don't think that more nukes would be an easy sell to a Peace Prize committee.

    It has also not been mentioned that, as a Senator, President Obama worked with Senator Lugar to end nuclear proliferation. So if non-proliferation of nukes was one of the reasons for the award, perhaps Senator Lugar should have shared the prize with President Obama.

    Or perhaps they should give the award to Cheney, Wolfowitz, and the other authors of the PNAC documents and the idea of "Pax Americana"- peace at the barrel of a gun. Because we've seen how well that has worked out.
  • BuckeyeDon
    Reagan didn't really end the Cold War anyway. That's a manufactured myth. Read Tear Down This Myth, by Will Bunch. It's a good, evenhanded appraisal of the Reagan legacy and the attempt to distort it that has occurred since.

    The Cold War ended primarily because the Soviet system imploded in bankruptcy, not because of external pressure.

    Bunch also points out that the Reagan mythmakers, in their attempt to paint an ideological picture of him, tend to ignore or play down Reagan's authentic strong points, such as his willingness to dialogue and negotiate with enemies (!), and his pragmatic approach to tax policy (he actually increased taxes more than he cut them).
  • RadicalChristianLibrarian
    Yes, I was going to go into that, about Reagan not "winning" the Cold War all by himself. General Wesley Clark speaks eloquently about the years and years of covert diplomacy and preparation with Eastern bloc countries, whose populations were ready for change and democracy by the time the Soviet Empire collapsed. I imagine it went bankrupt in part because of the nuclear arms race, but I will read the book you suggest as well- sounds like a good one. I'll add it to my ever-increasing list of books-i'm-going-to-read-when-i-finish-gradschool (hopefully in may!).
  • BuckeyeDon
    Will Bunch mentions one historian who is claiming that Reagan's arms buildup actually delayed the Soviet Union's collapse and thus delayed the end of the Cold War. I don't remember who that historian is or what support or rationale he bases his assertion on, but it's interesting that others can look at the same evidence and draw differing conclusions.
  • BuckeyeDon
    What degree are you going for in your graduate work? My wife is a librarian; she has two masters degrees, one in library science.

    Best wishes on your studies!
  • RadicalChristianLibrarian
    I knew I liked you! Married to a librarian ;-)

    I'm getting my masters in library and info. science as well. I'm also considering a second masters, possibly in religious studies or theology.

    And thank you!
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008