RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Is Obama’s Peace Prize Premature?

by Valerie Elverton Dixon 10-09-2009

Just peace theory proceeds from the premise that peace is a day by day effort.  It is a process that requires vision, skill, and courage.  The Nobel Committee awarded its 2009 Prize for Peace to President Barack Obama.  He had been in office for only a few weeks when the nominations for the prize closed.  He has been in office less than a year upon receiving this honor.  The question: Is the prize premature?

During the presidential campaign, candidate Obama took heat for his insistence that diplomacy meant talking to one’s enemies without preconditions. He acknowledged that United States foreign policy had not been flawless.  Our nation has made mistakes that have cause harm.  While he said he would continue U.S. efforts against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, he also spoke of removing U.S. combat troops from Iraq.  He spoke of international engagement and working with the world to solve problems.

A majority of the American people endorsed his ideas and made him the first African-American president of the United States.  People across the globe paused and celebrated his inauguration, a singular and unique event.  Since becoming president, he has continued to speak the truth about America’s responsibility for suffering in the world.  He has also articulated a just peace paradigm shift from “power over” to “power with” regarding international affairs.  Respect for the importance of other people in the world is an important aspect of just peace theory.

President Obama has underlined the necessity of nations working together.  It is an understanding that power is everywhere and that everyone has a role in making peace.  In his first speech before the UN General Assembly, he said: “We must embrace a new era of engagement based on mutual interests and mutual respect, and our work must begin now.”

Early in his administration, he reached out to the Muslim world.  Like Nobel Peace Prize winner Martin Luther King Jr., he spoke of the world’s interdependence, a network of mutuality.  In his speech in Cairo, he said:  “Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail.  So, whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners of it.  Our problems must be dealt with through partnership; progress must be shared.”

With that same commitment to international cooperation, President Obama chaired the UN Security Council and put the force of the United States behind an effort toward an end of nuclear proliferation.

The prize recognizes President Obama’s “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”  The chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Thorbjorn Jagland, said:  “We hope this will enhance what he is trying to do.”

The Nobel Committee gave the prize to President Obama in part because of his vision.  It said: “The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”   Wisdom teaches that where there is no vision the people perish.  The Nobel Committee has recognized that President Obama is a man with a vision — with the skill to articulate it and the courage to pursue it.  It has given him a just peace prize.

Dr. Valerie Elverton Dixon is an independent scholar who publishes lectures and essays at JustPeaceTheory.com. She received her Ph.D. in religion and society from Temple University and taught Christian ethics at United Theological Seminary and Andover Newton Theological School.

Categories: War & Peace
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • dlowen
    The acceptance speech was quite an amazing bit of "self-congratulation." I only read it, but I'm sure if I had seen it on TV, I would have seen him flash the "O" sign the way his predescesor constantly did his "W" hand sign as he said, "I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many transformative figures who have been honored by this prize."
  • RadicalChristianLibrarian
    Yes, congratulations would be a normal, healthy, adult reaction. Perhaps this is further evidence that we are not living in normal times?

    The Chinese curse comes to mind- "May you live in interesting times."

    And boy howdy, are we living in interesting times...

    And yes, Jesus is the true peacemaker and the good news is that He lives inside of you and me and every other person who believes and trusts in His promises. He instills peace within each of us and for that we should rejoice and be glad as well!
  • Faydine
    I don't think President Carter is the one who loses -- but the public as a whole. The lifetime contribution thing is a huge example that takes your breath away everytime you think about it.

    A speech, or intentions can fail us.

    I don't think that belly-aching does any good, but critical thinking can have merit.

    I've thought a lot about this because I have often thought about writing a book. One day I realized that even if I did write it and won the Pulitizer for it, there would be some former bosses or friends who would discredit it. I don't want to do that to Obama, or any recipient of a major award.

    But I also think it can be delusional to think that the committee is infallible.

    I don't congratulate every friend of mine who gets married either. I only do it when I think they have a good marriage to look forward to. Maybe that's relavent, just with bigger stakes.
  • BuckeyeDon
    This is the best advice I've read. When someone wins an award, isn't the normal reaction to congratulate him or her? If we think Biblically, which I would believe most people reading this forum at least aspire to, can we say anyone, other than Jesus, really deserves a peacemaker award like this?

    Let's cut out the bellyaching, why don't we, and rejoice that some folks out there thought our president worthy of some honor.

    Thanks.
  • BuckeyeDon
    I just figured that anyone with the name Gordie must be a hockey player. I'm thinkin' of the famous Gordie Howe, of course.

    I remember Fleury, of course, but I don't recall that specific incident. Tragic story.

    Jackets are 3-1! We're playing your Flames tonight, here.
  • judithod
    The point is that Obama campaigned for the job; he wanted it and was elected to it. He did not "inherit" the presidency or the so-called "mess." In fact, nearly 4 million jobs have been lost since Obama became president. And since the Democrats controlled Congress during the last 2 years of the Bush administration, they certainly contributed to the "mess," particularly in regard to the Fannie and Freddie debacles.
  • Mennoman
    "To date, too many jobless Americans are still waiting for that "hope" promised by Obama to materialize." judithod

    You may be tired of him complaining about the mess he inherited, but he inherited it nevertheless.
  • Mennoman
    Don't disparage your neighbor there, canucklehead--when she isn't watching Russia, she's lookin' at you!
  • RadicalChristianLibrarian
    I think this video is the best evidence that President Obama is not the anti-Christ. After all, there's NO WAY the anti-Christ could be Irish.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Xkw8ip43Vk
  • RadicalChristianLibrarian
    LOL. Just had a chance to watch the video. The disclaimer at the end is priceless too- We just spent 4 1/2 minutes making the case that Barack Obama is the anti-Christ, but we're not really saying he's the anti-Christ, but aren't there just too many coincidences here for him not to be????
  • canucklehead
    I guess it's not surprising then that that particular YouTube clip wasn't receiving comments. As another "non-prophet" friend I have said after he watched it, "where was this guy ten years ago?"
  • David_Troughton
    I am puzzled. There is complaint when the White House involves in Wall Street or in industry, such as the automobile industry.

    There is a shout that the President should not interfere, and that the resolution of the problems should be left to the free market.

    But then comes the insistence that it is the President's role to provide jobs. So that is not the role of the free market,it seems.Apparently the Government which cannot be trusted with promoting health care efficiently can be trusted with job creation.

    Very puzzling.
  • RadicalChristianLibrarian
    What BuckeyeDon said.
  • RadicalChristianLibrarian
    Being surprised by it or thinking it premature I think is a natural initial reaction, even by Obama supporters. As has been said, President Obama was surprised as well.

    Can we move on from that initial surprise and be happy that our President received such an honor? And even if we still think it premature, can we hope that he will live up to its promise? I don't think former President Carter would have a problem with that.
  • judithod
    Not being George Bush is a ridiculous condition on which to consider basing Obama's winning of the Nobel. I'm not Bush. Does that make me a worthy candidate?

    If the committee awarded the Nobel on the basis of lofty speeches, Obama is deserving. He excels at the podium. On the other hand, those idealized phrases have yet to bear fruit, particularly on the homefront.

    To date, too many jobless Americans are still waiting for that "hope" promised by Obama to materialize. And frankly, I'm tired of Obama complaining about the "mess" he "inherited." Was he born to the presidency or did he seek it?
  • Faydine
    That's funny that you would say that, because the only people I've talked to about it are all for Obama, but they still think this is more than premature.

    The one (in Europe) couldn't believe he got it and also speculates that it's a political move, and the other thought it takes away from Jimmy Carter's lifetime contribution.
  • BuckeyeDon
    My son was in Tanzania when Bush came for a visit in early 2007. While he was welcomed warmly by the population at large, my son said not everyone was happy, not by any means.
  • ando
    Perhaps some of your students should go to Africa and see how people there perceive Bush
  • ando
    So why is Bush so popular in Africa? Perhaps because he allocated more money than any other president before him to meet the tremendous needs there. I don't it doesn't fit in your paradigm, but there are people in the world who do appreciate what W has done to alleviate sickness and poverty. One only hopes that the current adminstration will keep up the work going on there.
  • David_Troughton
    And Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. I think that was an inspired choice – and their reasons for doing so were interesting and valid. He has changed the world scene already into one where diplomacy and dialogue are emphasized. Actually, our service on Sunday was on the tongue, based on the reading in James. This was a marvelous example of how a tongue well used can envision, and bring hope.

    The Americans find it hard to believe. “O wad some Pow'r the giftie gie us
    To see oursels as others see us! It wad frae mony a blunder free us,
    An' foolish notion!” said Rabbie Burns when he saw a louse on the hat of the woman in front of him in church.

    Of course they ask the rhetorical question, “What has he done?” They do not realize how bad things were, and why the world breathes more freely again..

    We are the ones who have to do it!
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008