RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

‘You Shall Not Oppress an Immigrant’

by Anne Dunlap 10-16-2009

These remarks were presented on October 13, 2009 at a press conference in Aurora, CO urging Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-CO) to take a public stand in favor of comprehensive immigration reform. The event was one of hundreds of actions across the country taking place that day as part of the Reform Immigration For America campaign and in support of Rep. Luis Gutierrez’s (D-IL) presentation of principles for immigration reform. Aurora recently won an award for being an “All-America City,” and has an ICE detention facility.

Good afternoon.

I’m Rev. Anne Dunlap. I’m honored to be here in support of comprehensive immigration reform on this day of national action. I am the pastor of Comunidad Liberación/Liberation Community UCC here in Aurora, a faith community made up of immigrants whose points of entry range from Plymouth Rock in the east to the Sonoran Desert in the west. Each week when we gather together for worship we pray for a change in the heart of this country, that there would be immigration reform that assures that all people are treated with respect and dignity.

In the Christian faith tradition we turn to our sacred text to help us understand what kind of community our Creator calls us to be. We read, for example, that the people of Israel were immigrants in the land of Egypt. Generations earlier, they had left their homeland because of famine. They left their homeland and immigrated to Egypt in order to be able to feed their families, in order to be sure their children had a better future. But you may know the story: In Egypt they became slaves – as the text says, “The Egyptians became ruthless in imposing tasks on the Israelites, and made their lives bitter with hard service … [they] were ruthless in all the tasks that they imposed on them” (Exodus 1:13-14). The Israelites lived an oppressed and exploited life; even their children lived under the threat of death. Even the liberator, Moses, knew the pain of being a child separated from his mother when the Egyptian equivalent of ICE swept in to threaten the Israelite community.

When the Israelites were liberated from slavery, God gave them instruction in how not to become like Egypt, and one of the constant themes of that instruction is summed up in this verse from Exodus: “You shall not oppress an immigrant; you know the heart of an immigrant, for you were immigrants in the land of Egypt” (Exodus 23:9). To not become like Egypt, they are to remember the immigrant’s heart: a heart full of strength, wanting only to work hard to assure that their families and their communities will survive hard times.

We, here and now, in a nation of immigrants, in this “All-America City,” have forgotten the heart of an immigrant. We have become Egypt in the “ruthless tasks we impose,” through policies of death, fear, and exploitation:

  • policies that tear families apart, parent from hungry child, partner from frightened partner,
  • policies that disappear parents, partners, and children into a detention system in which violates their rights at every turn,
  • policies that depend on employers stealing wages from mothers and fathers who need that wage to feed their children,
  • policies that force desperate mothers into the Arizona desert to die with their babies still suckling at their breast.

As we as a nation consider the need for comprehensive immigration reform, the faith community urges all of us today, across the country, to turn back from the ways of Egypt and remember the heart of the immigrant. It is our own heart, a heart of strength wanting only to work hard to assure our families, all our families, and our communities, all our communities, will survive hard times, with dignity honored and justice protected.

Remember the heart of the immigrant.

Thank you.

portrait-rev-anne-dunlapRev. Anne Dunlap is the pastor of Comunidad Liberación/Liberation Community in Aurora, CO, a bilingual, multi-cultural base community in the Christian tradition, striving to live faithfully, to embody God’s vision of the beloved community, and to resist joyfully oppression and injustice. Comunidad is a ministry of Mayflower UCC in Englewood, CO.

Categories: Immigration, Theology
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • NMRod
    Instead of being like ancient Israel as we like to think, we are really more like Egypt. This is a powerful analogy, disturbing for its points of convergence.
  • abledsoe
    You rock, Anne! I LOVE this.

    And for those of you who'd like more info on Comunidad Liberación/Liberation Community, visit us at www.liberationcommunity.org
  • Faydine
    So, why would this persuade people who are not of the faith community?
  • NMRod
    Some of those in the faith community need to be persuaded to listen to their better angels.
  • Faydine
    No, she gave this to her congressman. The Hybels used the same arguement to congress, I believe.

    Many in the faith community don't believe the Old Testament stuff is still applicable since the New Testament took over. If you can't persuade them with this arguement, and we don't wish to mix church and state, I just don't get why proponents of immigration reform think this will work.
  • WaveTossed
    Halleluiah!! Amen!!!
  • Cav1
    Who is it that is Egypt? America has no covenant with God.

    By desiring federal policy comply with Exodus 1:13-14 is simply seeking to impose one's religious view on others.

    A follower of Christ one can act in accordance with Exodus 1:13-14 irrespective of federal immigration policy.
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    We have to be careful in how we proof-text Scriptures, especially those in the Hebrew section to support a "Christian" agenda.

    The ancestors of the Children of Israel (Jacob and his extended family) were treated with respect when they arrived in Egypt; but, they did not go back to the country of Canaan after the famine there was over.

    We are NOT like Egypt in the fact that the USA didn't invite the illegal/undocumented aliens to come here while they still lived in their home countries.
  • Mennoman
    I do not agree with the premise that the United States did not "invite" the undocumented immigrants into the country. Granted, we have laws on the books that prohibit the unlawful entry to this country and visa overstays. However the government has turned a blind eye to employers that hire undocumented workers. On top of that, we have pursued aggressive trade policies, particularly with respect to agriculture, that have cause massive displacement of people from the rural areas in Mexico. The displaced people could not find work in their home country and they came north, where they were faced with very weak enforcement actions.

    Actions speak louder than words. Our inaction in terms of enforcement at the very least constituted a tacit invitation to come to this country.
  • Ngchen
    Actions speak louder than words. Our inaction in terms of enforcement at the very least constituted a tacit invitation to come to this country.

    So what would you prefer, more enforcement (deportations) or less enforcement (letting illegal immigrants stay?) I am all for seriously penalizing employers who hire illegals, but what about the illegals themselves?


    Now, I have no doubt that we DO have a duty to treat legally admitted immigrants fairly, and giving them a fair shake at everything from housing to schooling to jobs. Perhaps it should be easier to come legally. That being said, illegals still have rights to be treated humanely, but don't really have a right to stay. In terms of deportation, isn't voluntary departure an option for almost all such people? If not, then it should be.
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    While I believe in treating people with respect, no matter what their country of origin, almost all of the undocumented aliens knew in advance that they would be breaking the law when the entered the USA.
  • Great Job Anne!

    I wonder how the discussion could be turned when we remember that most of us are immigrants to this land (Which Anne points out) who are in some way or another here illegally. Not to mention, for those of us who live in places like southern Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, California, Texas, and Arizona, we are most likely on land that was/is land that a lot of the folks that immigration policy targets the most (i.e. Latina/o folks) would be calling home legally if it were not for our rapacious lust for land that does not belong to us.

    So, who is actually illegal in these cases?

    And, did we not "invite" "illegals" in some way when we force them to comply with OUR economic policies that affect THEIR lives on a daily bases?

    Again, great job Anne!
  • Lord_Voldemort
    Oppression does not mean "enforcing the law". Now we can argue all day about what the law ought to be, but we should be able to agree on that much, right?

    LV
  • schroeder37
    Why do we not use the words that are abviously what you are talking about. ILLEGALS. Ask any law abiding immigrant and I dont very much you get the same problems. Is this not desception in speech, which is not christian at all. Could we at least be HONEST in the discussions. Does she actual prove he points and explain with facts. Maybe I missed that in her speech. LAWS are LAWS are they not. There is a need of reform, but it is not to avoid LAWS it to better inforce them, and or inforce them properly and fairly. the whole comparison to eygpt is just the usual play on emotions and making it sound as bad as possible to influence a favorable responce without actually providing clear facts. which happens all to often as well.
  • Good points, Schroeder. Anne, the premise of your article is absolutely right. However, where you take that premise is questionable.

    Here's what I think we should do about immigration: Revise and enforce the laws. Offer support to illegals who wish to go back home. Aid the Mexican economy by trading with them more. And of course, keep attacking racism (without going into the proper means of doing so).
  • BelovedFollower
    We need to stop subsidizing American farmers and companies allowing them to flood Mexicos markets with products cheaper than they can produce there! No wonder theyre looking for work. We're doing to Mexico what Walmart did to us!
  • Well, yes... That's why I said "aid." We could start outsourcing jobs to Mexico or just buying their stuff for market price instead of mining money just because we can.
  • BelovedFollower
    I'd like to request that we NOT use the word ILLEGALS....if you'd check your dictionary I'm sure you'd find in its proper usage illegal is an adjective, not a noun. Using the word in the manner you suggest would be like me calling someone an IGNORANT or a BEAUTIFUL!
  • Lol. I would never have expected a grammatical argument on that issue. I know my grammar, but I consider that a very effective piece of shorthand; it only takes 8 characters instead of 18. (I know you were addressing Schroeder, but I did it too.)
  • BelovedFollower
    This is not a grammatical argument as much as a value argument. People are NOT their individual attributes and/ or shortcomings or for that matter their legal status. To define them by one aspect of who they are seems to me severely shortsighted, one dimensional and dehumanizing. These are people created in Gods image and are as multifaceted as any of us! I just think it shows a lack of compassion and respect to reduce them to one condition they are currently in.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008