advertisement
RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

‘Illegal Alien’ Halloween Costumes Cash in on Racist Stereotypes

by César Baldelomar 10-20-2009

091020-illegal-alien-costume

For many in the US, Halloween is a time to dress-up as a character from a movie, a politician, a witch, vampire, and… alien looking-like immigrants. According to a CNN report, “The ‘Illegal Alien Adult Costume,’ manufactured by Forum novelties, includes an orange jumpsuit, similar to prison garb, with ‘Illegal Alien’ stamped in black across the chest; a space alien mask; and a fake green card. The ‘Illegal Alien Mask with Hat’ also includes a space alien mask, this time with a dark handlebar mustache and a baseball cap.”

The language we use daily can cause either division or healing. In this case, individuals are using language to cause violence and perpetuate oppression. “Illegal Alien” is a derogatory and xenophobic term. It implies that an immigrant to the US is not a human being who deserves human rights, but rather some space alien-monster that should strike fear in the heart of white America and so should be eliminated at any cost. The “aliens,” like in the movies Mars Attack and Independence Day, are here in the US to invade and alter the comfortable lifestyles of many “citizens.” And, the vigilantes and neo-nazis (I refuse to capitalize the “n”) are the heroes during these times, since they defend the US from foreign invasion. Unfortunately, many today in the US still use alien and illegal when describing their fellow human beings. This dehumanizes the many immigrants who come from South and Central America, Mexico, the Caribbean and several other locations to make an honest living.

Further, since America extends from Canada to Argentina, American is a misnomer when referring solely to US citizens. Anyone born on this great continent (South, Central, or North) is an American. Yet, reserving American only for US citizens excludes any other group – again, language used by the minority to oppress the majority.

It is important to note that the latest scientific data suggests that all humans originated on the African continent. The human race, according to biology, is the only race that exists. All other races are artificial constructions that serve to categorize groups from different ethnic backgrounds for legal and often racist purposes. Heeding the objective scientific data will help the human race recognize its common African origins. Indeed, we are all interconnected with and interdependent on each other and our great planet earth.

Bigotry, however, always seems to find its way. The “Illegal Alien” costumes foster xenophobia in a country that has long been and continues to be wounded by suspicion and hatred for those outside the arbitrarily normative US framework of white, Christian and straight.

Those who establish the “norm” in the US seek to buttress and perpetuate the violence against immigrants through language and now Halloween. Some may argue that it is just a Halloween costume. Why should I and other activists be getting all worked up over this? After all, haven’t politicians, musicians, actors, and others been ridiculed during Halloween? Yes, this is true, but these rich and powerful individuals aren’t the target of heinous hate crimes. They aren’t beaten to death by high school boys who have been fed the xenophobic propaganda by their parents, teachers, and politicians. And, immigrants, unlike these public figures, do not seek the attention they receive by the media. Many of them are honest, hard-working folk who seek to raise their children in a country that is supposed to protect the rights of all humans.

The costumes have been selling well at many stores across the US. What does this say about our country? Is this the U.S. that came together during 9/11? Is this the U.S. that elected an African-American to the presidency? Is this the same U.S. that was built on the backs and minds of immigrants from all over our wondrous planet?

Let’s keep Halloween from being coerced for the politically xenophobic purpose of a minority. It is my hope that Halloween costumes not turn into signs of oppression. Far too many oppressive mechanisms in our society already exist. Moreover, immigrants in the US already suffer enough hardships.

portrait-cesar-baldelomarCésar J. Baldelomar is a graduate student at Harvard Divinity School. He is also the executive director of Pax Romana Center for International Study of Catholic Social Teaching. You can visit César at his  Web site (www.cesarjb.org) and read his blogs at www.holisticthoughts.com.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Most usages I see are of "illegal immigrant" rather than "illegal alien." They used "alien" for this costume so they could make a pun that shouldn't have been made. But I'll keep the "illegal" part, thank you.

    EDIT: And no, you can't assume that all those who set the norm are behind this. Regardless, please don't feed the trolls when not necessary.
  • CarlosZaldivar
    I moved to the US from Mexico when I was 15 yrs. old. And truly this is not offensive as it is depicting Priests and Nuns as Halloween characters, which BTW, has been popular for decades with out much banning from Target or any other of their distributors!.. ...one more comment, there is nothing offensive about the costume at all! In fact it is kind of fun, maybe I'll get it for myself this Halloween!..
  • If you really think I support this costume, find the long conversation I had below. My post was an attempt to divorce the costume from my opinions about illegal immigration.
  • CarlosZaldivar
    Well I do not see anything offensive about the costume.
  • Kind of like I really don't think you're being sarcastic at all? Lol.
  • Guest
    I use to be a hobo. Someone could say from a politically correct position that was bigoted also . Sometimes we try to be offended.
  • LadyJess78
    I thought I was sickened by the costume, then I read the comments defending it. How can people be so willing to show hatred.
  • Guest
    I once protested the costumes worn by kids at the PTA Harvest Festival . There had been a discussion because some kids were wearing those Freddy Krueger costumes which I thought was a bit over the top also. He was a child molester , a heinous serial killer , etc.
    I of course was attacked on the freedom of speech issue by the more progressive crowd . But the next year they had a dress code .

    How people are so willing to show hatred is a good question . What do you think is why?
  • When you have a bucket of water that's starting to slosh, do you try to correct the water's tilt by tilting the bucket? Set the bucket down and the water will settle.

    We finally got over the hump with racism. Now we have racists still going at it, but the white ones are in hiding. They still have power, yes. But the water will settle, if we don't keep tilting the bucket.

    The trolls I referred to above are the racist cores that want everyone to keep fighting. Some of them get money off of it, maybe some of them get entertainment.

    But we need to adopt a second priority: If a statement seems racist but probably won't aggravate matters, leave it alone. We only need to mention the important ones, although I suppose that's a subjective category.

    Finally, Jess, would you mind being specific about that hatred you see? Maybe the source would like to explain or apologize. Just screaming "Hatred!" only makes matters worse.
  • LadyJess78
    I see your point about sloshing water. And that would make sense, if people were molecules of water, only motivated by gravity. Although there is some sense to letting the small stuff slide in order to foster peace, I don't think that problems are solved by pretending they aren't there until they go away. Racism should be discussed whenever it arises. I would argue that this is a broader representation of xenophobia than racism, but the end result is the same: language used as a weapon of hatred. Anytime a word is chosen for its dehumanizing properties it demonstrates hatred. That's why we use those words. It's harder to hate another person, but once you start separating that person from you with words like alien, it's easier to hate, easier to attack, easier to hurt, easier to kill. Use of those terms only spreads their power. In this country we have seen many examples of people being killed because of a label, be that a racist, homophobic, gender-based, or religious label. It's only by putting aside labels and looking at each person as a human being that we can begin to put aside hatred. And you can't put aside the label without addressing it when it arises.
  • I believe there are two contexts for these discussions. If a personal friend makes a statement that seems racist, address it; that's what friends are for. However, in the political arena I think we only have two priorities: making sure racism doesn't spread and allowing everyone's hurt feelings to heal.

    "Alien" is a political status; it's also a science-fiction creature. If someone uses it without derogatory connotation I see no problem. However, see my agreement above that this usage is over the top.

    "Illegal" and "immigrant" are milder terms that I have absolutely no problem with. I defy anyone to give me a good reason for these to be offensive. And no, the behavior of colonists isn't a good reason; I'm not that old.

    The problem with attacking anything and everything that seems racist is that you don't know the speaker. Maybe they didn't intend the comment that way? Maybe they don't think a stranger has any right to make that judgment? It's kind of the same reason you don't shout at a guy that his fly's unzipped.
  • LadyJess78
    I agree that we shouldn't "attack anything and everything that seems racist to you," but I don't think that addressing that a product mass produced for public consumption carries a racist and hate-filled statement in such a benign forum as a blog post can fit the definition of attacking. (Perhaps what you refer to as an attack is my use of the word hatred, but I stand firm that the use of hate-filled language is a demonstration of hatred.)

    As for "alien" not being a term that is necessarily derogatory, I can agree with that. But I can also agree that other labels aren't necessarily always hateful, but in some connotations can hardly help it. In this case, the label is used in conjunction with the costume to marginalize and mock and therefore, is hate-filled. I would also argue that any term can be offensive according to the time/place/attitude/culture. The term chick, while not necessarily offensive, can be used in a hate-filled manner by sexists. Does that mean that these words should be struck from the common vocabulary? No. But it does mean that we should use caution when we find ourselves reducing a person to a label.

    I did not intend to say that we should attack racist statements however they be made. We should address racism and other forms of hatred with the same love that we hope to see them replaced with. But, we should address them. Through one on one encounters with friends (as you said) but also through blogs or letters to the editor or any way you can.

    For my part, I am sorry if my post came off as an attack. I did not see it or mean it that way and I hope that I did not offend you or anyone else. I was offended by people defending the costume, but I did not mean that those commenters were showing hatred, but those who would produce, sell and purchase this costume.
  • Yes, that's an attack on the statement but I would join you if it's not frivolous. Businesses would be in the same context as personal friends because they (should) want to hear from you and fix any problems. I dunno whether I would support a lawsuit for something on the package, though. For not serving or not hiring, sure, but boycotting may be more appropriate if it's not a personal right that's infringed.

    *surprise* Yeah, I did think you sounded indignant at one of us:
    I thought I was sickened by the costume, then I read the comments defending it. How can people be so willing to show hatred.
    It sounds like there's something even more offensive in the comments than in the costume. For the life of me, I couldn't guess at it.

    So what were you getting at about the comments? Just that you read them?
  • LadyJess78
    No, I did think it was disgusting that people were defending the costume. Especially saying that any offense at this is "trying to be offended." I just didn't mean that the defenders were showing hatred.
  • We get a lot of that kind of criticism against things that seem frivolous to us. See below; Ngchen gave an explanation for this case and I think Titans1 would agree with it.

    I don't agree with the "joke" justification because the costume represents laughing "at" rather than "with." The optional handlebar mustache kind of gives that away.

    But why don't Wiccans find green witch costumes offensive? Is it just because this is an emotionally charged topic? Coming at it from this angle, the alien costume violates my rule about letting wounds heal. But I still wonder whether either costume is somehow more inherently offensive than the other.

    EDIT: And for the record, I do find this somewhat frivolous. It's a legitimate complaint, but not necessary for keeping xenophobia/racism at bay. On the other hand, I know that this post was intended to promote understanding and it might do more good than harm.
  • Ngchen
    FWIW, the "space alien" is not supposed to (or at least does not obviously) correspond to any particular human skin color. Would it be better if it was green?

    Now, the "illegal alien" is a humorous play on words, IMHO. Yes, it is true that immigrants are technically refered to as "aliens," and that many immigrants wish that it were otherwise. Let's hope that part changes. But to argue that the space alien costume somehow is pandering to xenophobic elements is unpersuasive.

    There is a big difference between condoning illegal immigration, and welcoming legal immigrants who follow the rules.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    "It implies that an immigrant to the US is not a human being who deserves human rights, but rather some space alien-monster that should strike fear in the heart of white America and so should be eliminated at any cost."

    Actually, the "space alien" in the costume looks very much like the aliens in "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", who in the Steven Spielberg film met up with some mostly white Americans at the foot of Devils Tower. As I recall aliens and mostly white Americans got along fairly well although the aliens did like to play their music kind of loud.

    LV
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    Keep Halloween (fill in the blank)?

    We don't even need to celebrate it in the 1st place. It's not a thing that Believers in Jesus should celebrate in the 1st place since it celebrates paganism.
  • BuckeyeDon
    Actually that's not true. Christians are way too quick to give credit for things to the pagans. To be sure, All Saints Day was set by the Church on Nov. 1 to counter a pagan holiday. But the origin of dressing up in grotesque costumes on "All Hallows Eve" was to make fun of the Devil, whose power had been vanquished by Christ. The same mentality led medieval Christians to carve equally grotesque gargoyles on their buildings.
  • Joe_Allen_Doty
    If the Roman Catholic Church had not substituted "Christian" names for pagan holidays, there would be no such thing as "All Saints Day."

    I don't self-identify by the pagan-created epithet "Christian." Neither did Jesus' followers in the 1st Century AD.

    I am not and never have been a member of any church that has the Roman Catholic Church nor any other catholic denomination in its official history.

    When I was a Spanish major in College, I discovered that those who practiced native religions in Mexico when the RCC arrived there merely adapted the RCC saints' names and gave them to their pagan gods.

    Believers in Jesus would never have created those ugly looking creatures and put them on top of building where worship of God took place.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertisement
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008