advertisement
RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

‘Offensive Play’: Why I’ve Watched My Last Superbowl

by Ernesto Tinajero 10-27-2009

Humans drug themselves with violence. Violence has been and continues to be a path for cathartic release and for entertainment. Only when we confess this sin in ourselves can we hope to hear the quiet voice of grace and forgiveness.

Most of us have heard of Bumfights and are rightly appalled. These videos pay homeless men (sometime women) to fight each other and to commit other acts of violence upon others or themselves. They have been rightly condemned — condemned as inhuman, condemned as hatred, condemned as exploitation of human suffering. I trust no good follower of Jesus could justify such evil.

I found myself equally convicted when I read Malcom Gladwell’s essay, “Offensive Play.” Mr Gladwell tracks how football players suffer head injuries due to playing the sport. After reading the article, I felt the prompting of the Spirit to abandon any support for football. The article hit me like ton of bricks.

Now, mind you, I have been a fan of the game since boyhood. I have been a Washington Redskins fan for over thirty years. I rooted for Sony Jurgensen, Billy Kilmer, John Riggins, the Posse, and Doug Williams. I think Coach Joe Gibbs was a genius. I think Coach Jim Zorn still deserves a chance to prove himself. Yet just one article made me rethink and give up being a fan.

I think I believed the sport’s equipment was protecting the players. It is not. In reality, playing the sport leads to head trauma, leads to lifelong pain, leads to lifelong needless suffering. One would think that the head trauma comes from the spectacular hits in the heat of the battle, and with the right policing, it could be contained. But the reality is even more forbidding. Even just practice has too many damaging head collisions. I simply feel it is immoral to get entertainment from an activity that is so damaging to another human being.

I know the arguments: the players are both aware of the dangers and are paid handsomely for playing in the NFL. I also know that similar arguments can be made for the Bumfights, with the exception in terms of scale of glory and payment. But would paying homeless people millions to beat on each other make it any more moral? I am unconvinced.

I know it is true that the players are free to choose to play or not, but I can’t get the images of Mike Webster, Terry Long, and Andre Waters out of my head. They all died lonely deaths after their once powerful bodies where betrayed by too many hits to their heads. Their suffering has become a moral wall I have run into. For me, it is a matter of repentance and following the prince of peace. I have watched my last Superbowl.

portrait-ernesto-tinajero1Ernesto Tinajero is a freelance writer in Spokane, Washington who earned his master’s degree in theology from Fuller Seminary. Visit his blog at beingandfaith.blogspot.com.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • I've long had problems with this myself... Then again I don't get into sports, so it's not much repentance for me.
  • BrotherMarcus
    I have been a Washington Redskins fan for over thirty years ...

    You might as well give up the sport. Go Pats!
  • kansasmennonite
    Where you been brother? I can't stand football (I think it's about as boring as baseball) so I don't know why I'm writing so much about it. Give me basketball anyday!
  • titopoet
    Go Zags!!
  • I'm torn over whether to agree or not. I grew up in a football/sports family, but once I got to college I never really stayed with it. Unless my kids get into sports, in some ways it's sort of a waste of time for me.

    On the other hand, regardless of the payout, large or small, these folks are voluntarily beating themselves up. I'm sure some definitions are in play here, but I'm not sure that qualifies as "violence" when it is voluntary. Violence inherently has the intention to do harm to another.

    For once, this is a place I"m not that strongly opinionated :-) !
  • titopoet
    Yes, I was torn to, and I wrote about how torn I am in www.life-and-faith.org I have even be tempted to check scores and teams. What pushes me is that I too though it was voluntary, but I am not sure if the players knew how damaging it is before the lastest research. I thought the pads and helmets helped, but they don't.
  • kansasmennonite
    Doesn't your libertarianism allow almost anything if willing adults consent? Why should anyone have any say what other people do? :)
  • ...There is no government intervention at play here. This is a function of the free market. But that's not at all what the article's about.
  • kansasmennonite
    Jesdisciple. Xfree has been spouting his libertarian economic ideas on taxing, etc. and thought that I would help him out with his libertairiansm since he's struggling with this one.

    BTW: have you read any of Wallis' books? Any books by the authors that post articles on this site? Would be a good start. I know you weren't too keen on Frank Schaeffer (and I'm not sure either) but he's a good read and has some helpful info into the conservative right that helps explain some things.
  • That's not just light-hearted jousting is it? Sounds like some of the conservative humor that I shouldn't get a kick out of.

    No, I've read very few hard-copy books for several years. Once I discovered the Internet I wondered why I needed them, although I do see how the extra effort would filter out low-quality works.
  • ando
    After (or before )reading Wallis, I suggest just about anything from Ron Sider. One of his best works is the Scandal of Evangelical Politics. After reading the book, you won't know where he stands politically, but you will know that he is committed to combining word and deed ministry.
  • kansasmennonite
    It's probably my conservative upbringing rearing it's ugly head unfortunately. Canucklehead chimes in once in awhile just to keep things more light headed. He knows where I come from!
  • O.O He's just messing around? I thought he was trolling.
  • canucklehead
    Hey girls, careful, Big Sister is listening.
  • Why do you have such a problem with what consenting adults do? What authority do you have to tell others how they should act? Do you think your beliefs override others if they don't agree with you? Which set of beliefs should society live by? Yours? Mine?
  • kansasmennonite
    Actually I'm pretty libertairian in the social arena. I was just giving you a hard time because of your libertarian economic instincts. Don't take it so serious.

    BTW: I noticed when I did a little research on the flat tax (thorugh your link) that I probably wouldn't want to live in most of the countries that have the flat tax. Just on observation. I doubt it'll happen here any time soon so can we please get onto some discussions that actually might make a difference instead of theoritics?
  • Libertarians don't have much to go on other than theory and history. And the history is a convoluted legal mess.
  • kansasmennonite
    You're going to get into trouble saying that here! Maybe it'll take some of the heat off of my back.
  • *epiphany* I wonder how much I can generalize that to conservatives... Dry humor doesn't work well for me, especially in text. (I like emoticons. =D)

    EDIT: Touche... You used one.
  • kansasmennonite
    You and I had better get some sleep soon.

    BTW You used the word epiphany. I never heard the word used in my conservative upbringing but came to a more progressive church and the pastor was preaching on epiphany Sunday (is that right?). Anyway, I consider that a liberal term (probably incorrect) and have noticed many, many people using it even non religious people. Also have noticed the word narrative used a lot lately especially a couple of yrs ago and never heard the word from my upbringing. Again I would consider that a liberal word. Conservatives don't use that word. What's your thoughts? Are you turning more liberal than you realize?
  • Epiphany = "Ohhh..." *light goes on*

    http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=epiphany&... (definition 3a)

    I thought it was a cool word when I heard it on my bro's CD player long ago:

    http://www.lyricstime.com/andrew-peterson-the-c...

    More liberal than I know? Well, I've seen possible hints of liberal theology in Peterson's lyrics but never thought much of it. Guess the vampire's teeth are rather subtle.

    But you probably just saw the root of the problem: I'm a hopeless geek for multiple things including politics. If I disappear, it's because the things are multiple.

    EDIT: Oh, and narrative? In theology, that's a pomo word... A conservative pomo sounds like an oxymoron.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertisement
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008