RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Calling Big Banks to Account

by Margaret Benefiel 11-03-2009

Thousands of protesters converged on Chicago last week to demand banking reform, challenging bankers gathered at the annual meeting of the American Bankers Association.  Chanting “the bankers got bailout, we got sold out,” the protesters, representing unions and community and religious organizations, called banks to serve their communities, not just themselves.

Chief among the protestors’ complaints was large banks’ “too big to fail” rationale for why they needed (and now need more) government bailout money.  “Bust up big banks” read protestors’ signs, trumpeting that their patience with big banks has run out.  Protestors also called for curbs on executive salaries, an end to lucrative bonuses, restored consumer lending, and reasonable credit card interest rates.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka addressed the bankers inside the hotel where they met:

You work for us — not the other way around.  Your job is to be stewards of our savings — to put and keep working families in homes, to lend the money companies need to create jobs.  And you have failed.  You’ve turned the American economy into your own private casino, gambling away our financial future with our money, driving us to the brink of a second Great Depression, then sticking out your hand for taxpayers to bail you out.

And bankers, let me tell you this:  We didn’t put you back in business so you can pay billions in bonuses to the suits; those bonuses have to go. And we didn’t put you back in business so you could pile money and lobbyists into Capitol Hill to fight the financial reform we so desperately need — while we’re losing jobs, losing our homes, losing our retirement savings, losing it all — because you treated the money we worked so hard to earn like Monopoly money.

While big banks claim that the protestors’ demands are unrealistic, banks that have already been putting responsible limits on executive compensation and addressing other issues the protestors raised are being ignored in the discussion.  Banks around the world have been proving for decades that they can attract good leadership and turn a profit, while at the same time keeping executive compensation at reasonable levels and lending to their clients at affordable interest rates.

For example, the annual sustainable banking awards, given by the Financial Times and IFC, recognize banks and other financial institutions that “have shown leadership and innovation in integrating social, environmental and corporate governance considerations into their operations.”  One of the characteristics of these institutions is their reasonable executive pay.  Another is affordable lending interest rates.

This year’s winner of Sustainable Bank of the Year, announced at the June 4 gathering of more than 250 bankers and sustainability leaders at the Renaissance Chancery Court Hotel in London, was the Triodos Bank of the Netherlands.  In other categories, Itau Unibanco of Brazil won the Emerging Markets Sustainable Bank of the Year, MicroEnsure of the U.K. won the Achievement in Basic Needs Financing Award, the Global Environment Fund of the U.S. won Sustainable Investor of the Year, and Root Capital of the U.S. won the Achievement in Banking at the Bottom of the Pyramid award.  The winners were selected from 117 entries from 42 countries, and runners-up and regional winners were also honored.

Banks honored at this gathering, as well as banks such as Wainwright Bank in Boston and the banks that constitute the Global Alliance for Banking on Values, all demonstrate that sustainable banking, with curbs on executive pay and lending to customers at reasonable levels of interest, is possible.

American banking is in a crisis worse than any since the Great Depression.  The big banks would have us believe that the only two choices are further bailouts that prop up their overspending or economic collapse.  But there is another way.  May American banking admit its failures and look to these quiet role models, both in the U.S. and abroad, to forge a new path to sustainable banking.

portrait-margaret-benefielMargaret Benefiel, Ph.D., author of Soul at Work and The Soul of a Leader, works with leaders in health care, business, churches, government, and nonprofits to help them stay true to their souls. Visit her Web site.

Categories: Economics
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • pawheel
    I recall reading that the approximate total of the financial crisis brought on by people taking bad mortgages was roughly a trillion dollars. The bigger problem was the banks and whoever taking this amount, using it to create value from thin air at a 10 to 1 ratio, which created over 10 trillion dollars out of thin air. That's responsible banking?

    Have you ever gone to a mortgage closing and actually read the pile of paperwork they throw at you? I have, and they get REALLY pissed off because they schedule 15 to 30 minutes of their time for the whole process.
    I have a close friend who is a functional illiterate. He went to get a mortgage about a year after a fire destroyed his house, about 3 years ago. He went to a lender and showed proof of $2000 monthly income. They put him into an $1800 monthly mortgage. Of course the blame is shared between him and the lender, but the lender took that bogus mortgage and no doubt got the responsibility for that loan out of their hands as fast as possible. That's responsible lending?
    Yes banks do have some level of responsibility to somewhat control their business, even if it is only a moral responsibility. It is for the greater good of the state or country they work and live in. That's part of where our country is creating it's own problems. Long term planning is putting other countries in a better position than the US, much like Ford is doing better than GM or Chrysler, because Ford saved some money for a rainy day and carried less debt.
  • letjusticerolldown
    Excuse me???Who had to be bailed out to prevent the collapse of the global financial system?? Oh yes, the poor helpless, ignorant, innocent banks who got beat up and defrauded by those big bad moms and dads buying a home.
  • Morna
    "The people buy houses they could never afford, run up credit card bills far beyond their means, and then the banks are at fault for not being these people's baby-sitters? Please."

    I agree that it is the individual's responsibility to use credit wisely, but something is wrong when large banks are able to increase rates (from 7% to 24% in some cases) without notice and for little or no reason. I also have a problem with the well-documented fact that banks used deceptive tactics and emotional manipulation to encourage "creative financing" for mortgages.

    People who sign up for credit should have the right to know what they are signing up for and to be treated in good faith by lenders. Those things have been denied to them.
  • nuclearferret
    The AFL-CIO is renowned for their knowledge of banking, as evidenced by this excerpted speech. The people buy houses they could never afford, run up credit card bills far beyond their means, and then the banks are at fault for not being these people's baby-sitters? Please.

    For profit banks are not built to "serve the community" any more than any other for profit entity. You want non-profit banking? Go to your local credit union. Choose a neighborhood bank, instead of a Chase or Citigroup.
  • I was going to suggest that anti-trust laws need a broader scope, but that's only a symptom of the problem. Maybe laws should address some of these specific issues the protesters mentioned. For example, set a maximum boss-to-peon wage ratio - maybe even replace the minimum wage with it.

    The one qualm I have with this is that, while the courts are probably one of the least threatening government institutions, they do like to read laws as what they would have meant by those words, or worse yet what they wish the words meant. Redefinition should not constitute legislation.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008