advertisement
RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

How Deadly Viper Character Assassins Undermines its Message with Co-opted Culture

by Soong-Chan Rah 11-04-2009

An open letter to Zondervan and to Mike Foster and Jud Wilhite, authors of Deadly Viper Character Assassin: A Kung Fu Survival Guide for Life and Leadership.

Let me begin by stating that I applaud the intent and subject matter of your book.  Integrity and character in leadership needs to be discussed and should be an important part of leadership development.  But the “theme” you have chosen and the application of that theme (particularly in your media clips) reveals a serious insensitivity to Asian culture and to the Asian-American community.

My contention has nothing to do with the content of the book itself (i.e. the material that discusses integrity and character).  It is with the way in which you choose to co-opt Asian culture in inappropriate ways.  Let me cite Edward Said in Orientalism where he states:

Orientalism can be discussed and analyzed as the corporate institution for dealing with the Orient — dealing with it by making statements about it, authorizing views of it, describing it, by teaching it, settling it, ruling over it: in short, Orientalism as a Western style of dominating, restructuring, and having authority over the Orient.

Mike and Jud, you are two white males who are inappropriately co-opting another culture and using it to further the marketing of your book.  You are not from our cultural framework, yet you feel that you have the authority to represent our culture before others.  In other words, you are using what are important and significant cultural symbols to make a sale or to make your point.  It is an affront to those who are a part of that culture.  You’ll notice that there are a number of individuals that take offense at the ways you misuse Chinese characters.  You also confuse aspects of Japanese and Chinese cultures.  These are two very distinct and ancient cultures that you did not take the time to understand before using those symbols as a fun way to market your products.

Here are some examples of the more glaring and egregious offenses:

  • This video clip is extremely offensive and portraying Asians in a cartoonish manner in order market your merchandise.  Particularly offensive is the voiceover of a white person doing a faux Asian accent. And this image presents Asians as sinister enemies.
  • This quote reveals an insensitivity to the Chinese language and mocks Chinese names: “There is a killer called Zi Qi Qi Ren. No, this is not some communicable disease, but it certainly is deadly. This funky Chinese word…”
  • The use of Chinese characters and kanji in a non-sensical manner.

Other offenses:

  • The confusion and conflation of Chinese and Japanese cultures.
  • The use of Asian symbols, like a Japanese garden, kimonos, samurai swords in non-essential manner that does not honor the heritage or culture of Asians.
  • You are taking a caricature of Asian culture (the martial arts warrior, the ninja, etc.) and furthering the caricature rather than engaging Asian culture in a way that honors it.
  • The bottom line.  You are representing a culture that you do not know very well to thousands of people.  You are using another culture to make your message more fun.  That is offensive to those of us who are of that culture and seek to honor our culture.

What specific things you can do:

  1. Issue a PUBLIC apology on your blog and other venues.  To let the Christian community know that you have wounded your brothers and sisters in Christ.  Whether that was your intent or not, that was the outcome.  Admit your wrongdoings and seek forgiveness in a public manner because your offense was in a public setting.
  2. Immediately remove the offensive material or material that co-opts the Asian theme.  They can be reposted, but with significant edits and after significant consultation with the Asian-American community.
  3. Drop the entire martial arts theme.  It adds NOTHING to what you are trying to say.  And as evidenced by the outpouring of concern, it distracts from your true message.
  4. Consult with leaders in the Asian-American community (there are many to choose from) and discuss ways to increase sensitivity (both for the authors and for Zondervan).

I appeal to your sense of Christian brotherhood/sisterhood. Your actions have deeply wounded many of your brothers and sisters in Christ.  Lead with integrity by admitting wrong and be willing to make changes to address these wrongs.

I appeal to your sense of integrity to what is the main message of your work. Christians should be above this kind of childish characterization of another culture, particularly when the topic of your book is on character.  Show the character that you are calling others to emulate.

Take ownership of your actions.  Admit failure. Don’t justify it.  Seek ways to understand those that you have hurt and seek ways to redress these wrongs.  Isn’t that the ultimate expression of character and integrity?

Specifically to Zondervan:

This is your second egregious offense in the last few years.  Clearly something is wrong with the structure and system of this publishing company that allows and even promotes cultural insensitivity to this degree.  Maybe the answer comes from the pictures in your catalog and your Web site that show your editorial and publishing staff.  Every single person is white.  Please do not let this learning moment to pass by.  Address the structural issues at Zondervan that allow this sort of offense to continue.

UPDATE: I was told that Zondervan is asking that all complaints be directed to: this link. I think it is appropriate to continue to let Zondervan know about our concerns.

portrait-soong-chan-rahSoong-Chan Rah is the author of The Next Evangelicalism: Freeing the Church from Western Cultural Captivity and is Milton B. Engebretson Associate Professor of Church Growth and Evangelism.  Read more from him at www.profrah.com.

Categories: Books, Diversity, Race
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • abasch
    Maybe you guys should talk this over at lunch to understand each others views.

    PS - "Maybe the answer comes from the pictures in your catalog and your Web site that show your editorial and publishing staff. Every single person is white."

    I do not appreciate that, and that comes across to me as a racist comment. Not that I think you are a racist, it is just the way it was stated in this letter. It offends me as an italian, romanian, russian, polish, jewish, -american.

    Now in all seriousness, I hope that this can be resolved in a way that glorifies God. I think the open letter is a good start, but it may require something a bit more personal.

    Also consider starting a peaceful and respectful petition.
  • bltblt
    What was Zondervan's first egregious offense in the last two years? Saying the TNIV was a mistake?
  • It was their "Skits that Teach" book, which featured the following lines for use by youth groups:

    An excerpt from Zondervan's Skits That Teach by Eddie James and Tommy Woodward published in 2006. A skit book meant to be used by youth groups all over the US features the following:

    "Herro, Dis is Wok's Up Restaurant calling to confirm your order. . . . I think that, yes, you total is 14 dollar 95 cent."

    "Herro? This is Wok's Up Restaurant again. We have drive and drive, and we can't find you house. We don't find you house soon, you pu pu get cold. Pu pu good when it hot."

    (Hostile) "Okay, we drive for long time looking for you house. I tell you, you go outside and I look for you. I am driving a red Rincon (Lincoln) Continental. You pu pu still getting cold. Bye!

    "Okay, I drive for long time and I stil not find you house. So I am eating you pu pu! Ruckiry it still warm. I was hungry, so I eat it. Mmmmm . . . this pu pu is good. (Smacks lips a few times) You on my bad rist. You don't call us anymore. Bye!"


    Fortunately, last time, Youth Specialties president Mark Oestreicher took a proactive approach to resolving the issue once it was raised and the material was withdrawn. Here are some more thoughts on that episode from Next Gener.Asian Church.
  • I'm disappointed in Zondervan. It appears they have not learned anything since the "Rickshaw Rally" debacle.

    Eugene Cho has a terrific perspective on all of this.

    http://eugenecho.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/deadl...
  • JenniClayville
    I'm Chinese... and I am not offended by any of their marketing. In fact, I think if you are, you're not looking at the point of their message at all. It's almost as if you're just looking for something to complain or write about.

    No where do they claim to know the Asian culture. Are you really personally offended and hurt by their marketing?

    I am, however, impressed how clearly you got your message across without attacking them. Kudos!

    I hope this all gets cleared up for those who are offended... however... this is ONE Asian you don't have to feel you need to apologize to.
  • canucklehead
    Zondervan is owned by HarperCollins in turn owned by Rupert Murdoch and his media conglomerate which, last time I checked, said nothing about glorifying Christ or promoting Christian unity in its mission statement. What was it again that George Washington said about not being unequally yoked?
  • the unequally yoked sentiment is actually in the bible 2 Corinthians 6:14
  • jimgray69
    Please read Mike and Jud's statement here ...Please pass it on...
    http://www.deadlyviper.org/blog/?p=1970
  • tupetewalker
    Now that this issue is getting brought to the forefront (as it should be) can someone PLEASE call out Mark Driscoll for the same destructive attitudes toward women and homosexuals?
  • What destructive attitudes toward women? That husbands ought to love them, and lay down their life for them?

    Have you ever listened to Driscoll speak?
  • Thank you Jenni.

    This is so frustrating.
  • Ok so we are choosing to hold on to worldly symbolism and worldly ideas that define who we are instead of sheding the worldly ideas and looking to the cross as the only symbol we should be allowing to represent us as the body of Christ I respect my brothers and sisters but I morn for the idea that no matter how much we clame to want to be joined together as the body of Christ we hold on to worldly ideas an images that we choose to let separate us. I think we should ask ourselves if our soul's have a race or if it is indeed our flesh and therefore our flesh's problem? and if holding on to these worldly symbols is in fact a way of holding on to idols? do these Icon's really matter. I have to tell you that these images in no way gave me a nagitive perception of Asians nor do I now hold any nagitive perception I think it using the idea of Ninja assassins to represent these character flaws was affective in conveying the message of stealth that these character flaws can come to destroy us. are all Asian's ninja assassins? to my knowledge no should you be insulted if you are a ninja Assassin? maybe... but are you one? I think the problum here is that you feel that because of the way one sect of your culture was "misrepresented" as an allegory you think that it will reflect on your society as a whole. for the most part I think most of us saw it as merely an allegory not a representation of the whole Asian culture. I'm sorry you are offened by this.
  • ObserverBill
    Incidentally, the proof of Rah's own (perhaps subconscious) racism is revealed in his closing words: "Maybe the answer comes from the pictures in your catalog and your Web site that show your editorial and publishing staff. Every single person is white. Please do not let this learning moment to pass by. Address the structural issues at Zondervan that allow this sort of offense to continue."

    Does Rah actually believe that just because people are white they are, de facto, racists?

    Can you imagine the crap-storm that would ensue if a white person looked at a company's employee roster and concluded that just because its employees are black or Asian that there's something inherently wrong with the company, that it can't possibly be anything other than racially insensitive?

    Wow.

    As I wrote earlier, Rah should apologize profusely.
  • Amy_Sojo
    I don't think Mr. Rah should apologize, I think he's absolutely right.
    I'm a white woman and I didn't read anything racist into his comment about the staff at Zondervan. He didn't accuse them of being racists, he said they had allowed and promoted cultural insensitivity, which is obviously true. The president/CEO of Zondervan seems to agree, he has issued an apology and discontinued the material. It's already gone from their website.

    I don't think he's saying that white people are by nature incapable of depicting other cultures with any accuracy, just that these authors obviously didn't do their homework and whether intentional or not, their book and the marketing of it is offensive. and I agree.
  • adrianvender
    Mr. Rah,
    Although I don't believe you intended to make a racist comment regarding the Zondervan staff, it still came across as racist. You imply that perhaps they are culturally insensitive because they are white. Even assuming that you're right about their carelessness in allowing insensitive messages come out of their products, you can't just look at them and automatically blame it on their race. That would be racist. So, to kindly use your words:

    "Whether that was your intent or not, that was the outcome. Admit your wrongdoings and seek forgiveness in a public manner because your offense was in a public setting."
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertisement
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008