advertisement
RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

The Elections You May Not Have Noticed

by Jim Wallis 11-05-2009

Most of the country probably didn’t notice.  Unless you live in Virginia, New Jersey, a couple areas in New York, or maybe even Maine or Washington state, it’s quite possible you heard little about Tuesday’s elections.  But to the chattering class of D.C., it is likely that the rest of the week, maybe even longer, will be spent reading the entrails of this off-year election.

To save you some time, let me sum up all the coverage for you.  Republicans won gubernatorial seats in Virginia and New Jersey by quite a bit.  Republican Mayor Bloomberg kept his seat in New York City, but it was a lot closer than most expected.  In New York’s 23rd Congressional District, a Democrat won even though polls had consistently shown the Conservative (a third party candidate) with a solid lead.  Maine rejected a gay marriage law and Washington expanded domestic partnership rights for gay couples.

What does it all mean? Republicans are declaring a comeback — proof that the nation has turned on Obama, his policies, and the role of government in almost anything. They see a resounding referendum that the country is tired of Democratic leadership.  Democrats are excusing the losses due to weak candidates and historical precedents in those states of poor performance in off-years; they’re also touting the 23rd Congressional District and Bloomberg’s weaker than expected performance as proof that the president and the Democrats still get it and have public support, or at least most of them.

I think there is a different lesson here — one I have been thinking about a lot lately.

People don’t care about Washington, D.C. as much Washington, D.C. thinks people care about it.

In fact, I think as people continue to see so much of politics as usual in this town –  partisan bickering and big money buying votes — they are increasingly likely to vote against whatever represents the old politics for them.  Obama campaign rallies in Virginia and New Jersey were not enough to convince the people there that the candidate with a “D” beside the name would be the best choice for their state.  New York’s 23rd District went to a Democrat for the first time since the Civil War despite  support for the Conservative, including an aggressive cable news campaign from Glenn Beck, a radio campaign from Rush Limbaugh and a visit from Sarah Palin. But high profile visits and endorsements from right wing luminaries and Republican presidential hopefuls were not enough to win a Congressional seat in one of the most conservative districts in New York state. Mayor Bloomberg is estimated to have spent over $100 million during the campaign (I saw it broken down to $170 per voter!) to win by just five points while his nearest challenger only spent one-tenth of that amount. Democrat Jon Corzine spent 25 million of his own dollars to outspend the Republican candidate in New Jersey, but it wasn’t enough to counter the popular reaction to another Wall Street tycoon wanting to keep buying political power.

I think people are tired of the power of money and the grip of power in politics. After 30 years in Washington, D.C., I know I’m tired of seeing the kind of influence money has in politics and was glad to see it resisted in several of the election results. I am sick of hearing the rants and raves of talk show hosts and demagoguery in politics, and the people of New York’s 23rd District showed quite clearly that they were not going to be steamrolled by it.  One year ago, the majority of the people in this country voted for “a change they could believe in,” and many are still waiting.

The importance and impact of a very few elections this week have already been greatly exaggerated. But the signs of discontent go far beyond the preference for one party over another; they indicate a deeper rejection of old politics. That discontent will soon turn into more cynical withdrawal unless people begin to see a “new politics” worth their energy and involvement. But that new politics will never exist if we simply wait for it to come from Washington; we must create it and help it grow by the social movements we build. And the voters who turned out in Virginia and New Jersey just demonstrated that they aren’t convinced yet that a new politics is coming from Washington, D.C.

Categories: Elections
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • marsjm
    We have a BINGO here......
  • jdchandler
    I wholeheartedly agree with you, Rev. Wallis. I truly believe that when we have our hearts and minds set on the purpose of government and "politics," we will suddenly see that those purposes can be espoused and accomplished by politicians and citizen of every conceivable affiliation. If we have a mutually agreed upon, community-supported mission, government becomes about governance and not about party affiliation. We are currently so blind to that concept.
  • I actually just started, on Tuesday, a conservative forum for what I've been talking about the last week. There's not much use giving an address here unless you're just curious, but I'll take any suggestions you have.

    But yeah, I really want to reform the political system so the wealthy have no advantage... This is one area where the free market must be absent.
  • amen and amen! river sims
  • PeterfromMI
    I'm waiting for someone to say "Republicans say it is a referendum on Obama, Democrats say it isn't a referendum, and therefore Sojourners must be in the pocket of the Democratic Party."

    At least that is what listening to the corporate media would lead one to believe. They've been hyping the so-called implications of all this for weeks, ad nauseum.
  • Well, given that Sojourners willingly points out right-wing connections, but deliberately ignores plausible left-wing connections, it's an easy thing to say about Sojourners. This article doesn't really demonstrate it, but it's easy to observe that conservative-bashing is a favorite pastime of writers on this blog. I don't blame them, of course. But if my wife serves the same meal every night, I'd get a little tired of it.
  • Well, given that Sojourners willingly points out right-wing connections, but deliberately ignores plausible left-wing connections, it's an easy thing to say about Sojourners.

    Because, truth be told, there aren't really any. If there were the conservatives themselves would give chapter-and-verse.
  • Irrelevant. And wrong too. In fact, Wallis was, in a way, saying it was a referendum on President Obama. Many young people, independents who usually vote for Republicans, and even some Republicans, were drawn to vote for Obama because they wanted him to change the way Washington works. As Wallis noted, this hasn't happened. Earlier this week, the youth didn't turn out to vote, the Republicans voted with their party and the independents swung back to the GOP. In this case, in truth, Wallis wasn't in the pocket of the Democrats, because the Democratic spokesmen have been saying the exact opposite.
  • Cease and desist using my handle.
  • junglecat
    Michael Bloomberg isn't a Republican.
  • letjusticerolldown
    "People don’t care about Washington, D.C. as much Washington, D.C. thinks people care about it."


    Jim might finally get run out of town with the full honor that prophets receive -- for noticing the elephant in the room.
  • brookr
    Thanks for the analysis; it certainly rings true.

    For the record, Referendum 71 here in WA state wasn't expanding any rights: it was keeping what was already put into place by the voters a while ago. Apparently, the voice of the voters setting that up in the first place wasn't enough, so we did it again!
  • And to add one more level of accuracy, the existing law was created in the legislature, signed by the governor, then challenged by (some of) the people. Referendum 71 was, in fact, the first time the expanded rights and responsibilities for domestic partners was presented for a popular vote.
  • letjusticerolldown
    I think the issue is deeper Jim, than you make it. I don't think it is simply a rejection of "politics as usual."

    I think we have a lost society with a lost government. People see a government not being able to cope and respond to a world--or respond to our own lostness.

    The need is not simply for a new politics from social movements attempting to exercise political influence.

    I watch how the society responds to crises such as 9/11; global climate; global financial collapse. We look to DC, a place we don't trust, to save us from a world of our making, that we don't trust.

    Research usually shows we actually feel pretty positive about our selves and those we love; but are pessimistic about the world and bureaucracies and institutions.

    I have confidence Obama is willing to take on almost any foe or issue; save one. The DC system. It is sacred.

    We need to envision not only a different politics but a different DC and different Federal structure. If we continue the same reactions to escalating crises we will not change until there is a very severe collapse in which half the global population perishes.

    I wish this was an overstatement.

    I think it imperative we get beyond the DC frameworks. Some people who sense the same thing are going to come across with very rough, confused, and questionable motives and methods. We really need to listen well and understand that even very dysfunctional persons are just being formed in reaction to a very twisted world.
  • Wow, you pretty much echoed what I had in my head, so I won't need to say it myself... but you're absolutely right. Most people try to wield influence or change by changing the driver, but in fact the entire engine needs to be replaced.
  • anastasiap
    I agree with you, and after this Tuesday, when we saw three big chunks of our democracy here in Ohio purchased away from us by big-money special interests, I don't believe this country can survive without serious campaign-finance reform. Massive money was spent here on a constitutional amendment that puts big agra firmly in the driver's seat of livestock and poultry famring, one assigned monopoly casino franchises to two wealthy business interests at laughably low returns to the taxpayers, and on convincing cuyahoga county voters that a vote for a charter cooked up behind closed doors by a handful of wealthy business interests was going to clean up "corruption." Instead it most likely will funnel more of our scarce resources — in the county that houses one of the nation's poorest cities — to the wealthy interests and away from human services. Yet $30,000 and $40,000 and $50,000 donations from corporations jusr purchased our government, leaving us with very little input anymore. There's pkenty else that is discouraging me about this particular issue, but we HAVE to get the money out of the process, even if it takes repealing corporate personhood to do it, and returning corporations to the original function of protecting resources.
  • cindylou2
    "But the signs of discontent go far beyond the preference for one party over another; they indicate a deeper rejection of old politics."

    And as much as Obama touts "hope" and "change," he's same 'ol, same 'ol but yet worse because he disregards the Constitution and is creating programs with far more massive "D.C." intrustion than ever before! A lot of people are rejecting it, including a lot of independents who voted for Obama.

    And by same 'ol, same 'ol, I'm talking about catering to special interest groups, breaking promises, raising taxes, spending foolishly, ignoring the voice of the people, etc. But then on top of it, Obama also does things no other President has done- he scolds, he starts "wars" with cable news stations because they fail to support him, he acts like he is still campaigning, and the list goes on.

    In the future I DEFINITELY without hesitation will be voting for any and all politicians who REJECT Obama's ideals of government expansion and intrustion!!!!
  • In the future I DEFINITELY without hesitation will be voting for any and all politicians who REJECT Obama's ideals of government expansion and intrustion!!!!

    Last time we did that we ended up with GWB as president. I don't need to say any more.
  • Truth be told, you really can't say any more because you have the mindset that the left is good, the right is bad. So I really hope you do stop saying crap like you do, because your blathering is useless, and divisive, and in the end, and invalid perspective.
  • Sorry you feel that way; however, I have never considered myself a "lefty." And as for being "divisive," MLK Jr. was also considered such in his day, so I guess I should consider that a compliment. Besides, the truly divisive people are -- and for the past 30 years have exclusively been -- on the right because they consistently refuse to work with people who don't agree with them. If that offends you, well ...
  • dcchap
    I disagree about people not caring about D.C. It's D.C. politicians who are mispending us into trillions of dollars of debt, who are trying to take over our health care system, who are buying our banks and indebting our car companies. This D.C. administration is making decisions that are enslaving us and our future generations, the ones who will have to repay all the debt being racked up in D.C.

    A lot of people care tremendously, and it took an Obama administration for many of them to start caring! Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade.

    Of course Democrats are going to dismiss the victories of Republicans in N.J. and Virginia, but they are in for a real awakening in 2010. They would rather be in denial and push their agendas than to face the conerns of their constitutients and the citizens of America, and it will only bite them in the butt in the long run as they are voted out of office.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertisement
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008