advertisement
RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Fort Hood Shootings and the Prophetic ‘IF’

by Rabbi Arthur Waskow 11-06-2009

One reader wrote me to ask: ” “What effect will the Fort Hood shootings have on the American public’s perception of Islam?” That question asks us to be foretellers, fortune tellers, to predict. But The Shalom Center has had the holy chutzpah to call ourselves a “prophetic voice,” and that voice is about “forth-telling,” not foretelling. About “if,” not “will.”

The prophets spoke always with an “if”:  If the community chooses to oppress its workers into slaves, then the owners will themselves become slaves to Babylonia. If the slave-owners will free their slaves, they will be freed from the yoke of Babylonia.” (That was Jeremiah, as the Babylonian army besieged Jerusalem, speaking forth a challenge, at once a warning and a promise, to the conventional practices and power structures of his society.)

From that perspective, the prophetic question today should be a challenge to power and convention: “What effect should the Fort Hood shootings have on the American public’s perception of the Afghanistan war?”

For anyone who lived through the Vietnam War, Fort Hood recalls the epidemic of “fragging” late in the war  – that is, enlisted men throwing fragmentation bombs at the officers who were ordering them into hopeless, senseless battle.

In Fort Hood, if the reports and claims from the police and military are correct (we already know that a number of falsehoods were reported as facts), an officer, a physician, trained to heal traumatized people from the maiming of their souls, was refused an exit from the soul-destroying prison he begged to leave.

If the reports are accurate,  it  seems that he broke, choosing murder rather than the nonviolent forms of resistance he might have chosen.  In that sense he replicated the violence of the war he abhorred and the violence that kept him in the Army against his will –- replicated the violence instead of resisting it in a deeper way.

One of the reasons that “fragging” came near the end of the Vietnam War is that the epidemic of fragging signaled to the higher officer corps that they had better end the war.  Coming on top of more and more evidence that the U.S. and NATO military presence in Afghanistan is itself multiplying the violent resistance it claims to suppress, the Fort Hood murders should signal the American public and its military and civilian leadership to take off the hoods we have put over our own eyes, see the truth, and start to take our soldiers out from Afghanistan.

If  – IF, the prophetic word — If we seriously want to help grow a grassroots democracy there, we might send teams of women from American community banks to provide grassroots micro-loans to those who are prepared to use them, especially women, while abandoning the self-destructive effort to impose democracy with Predators. Then Fort Hood might help Americans grow into a new relationship with the hundreds of millions of Muslims who seek to shape their own futures in peace.

IF instead the American public chooses to define Fort Hood as proof that Islam is a world of hatred, then the cage of violence that some Muslims, some Christians, some Jews, some Hindus  are helping to build will clang shut upon us all.

IF.

Rabbi Arthur Waskow is director of The Shalom Center, co-author of The Tent of Abraham, and author of Godwrestling–Round 2, Down-to-earth Judaism, and a dozen other books on Jewish thought and practice, as well as books on U.S. public policy. The Shalom Center voices a new prophetic agenda in Jewish, multireligious, and American life. Click here to receive the weekly online Shalom Report.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • alberto83
    Rabbi,

    Precisely what violence kept the alleged shooter in the Army against his will?
  • I suspect he means to draw on libertarian arguments for social liberty. If that's the case, the violence mentioned is the punishment he would have met had he just left - that is, the threat of violence.
  • jeffp
    And that violence would be?
  • They haul him back to Fort Hood, maybe put him in the cooler. Further resistance results in higher violence.
  • jeffp
    wow that's violent!
  • You've never read libertarian opinions, right? Please, go find some about why this is wrong. I'm not the best person to explain it because I don't agree with it.
  • squeaky
    Adding to Jesdisciple since he brought up Libertarianism...

    to parrot what I've heard libertarians say on another front, they have referred to paying taxes as "paying taxes at the point of a gun." So being forced to remain in the armed forces against one's will certainly seems like something they would call violence. If paying taxes is violence, so would be losing one's freedom.
  • Conservatives will try to paint this as an attack by a violent Muslim. In truth, it's really because they don't like people who don't look like them. You see, conservatives need to have an enemy to be successful. It's all about fear and racism.
  • kansasmennonite
    Unfortunately, my conservative upbringing drags me into that line of thinking easily. We had a muslim exchange student stay with us awhile and I found out a thing or two about myself which I didn't like.
  • jeffp
    Wow that's way off track even for you. So this story in your eyes is about conservatives hating Muslims and not liking people who don't look like them.
  • The stereotypical Muslim is also Arab. With that in mind, re-read this paragraph. Deacon is fully on topic, even if you disagree with his perspective.

    IF instead the American public chooses to define Fort Hood as proof that Islam is a world of hatred, then the cage of violence that some Muslims, some Christians, some Jews, some Hindus are helping to build will clang shut upon us all.
  • jeffp
    No it's not remotely on topic. We go from the stress of war and getting the troops out to a bigotted unwarranted accussation based on what Rick believes someone will do (not what they have done).
  • He's making a prediction based on perceived trends. And while I understand where the "bigot" part comes from, it shows how little you understand his thinking. He distrusts whites because of our history as a collective body. Whether you hold a collectivist worldview or not, I expect you to engage him with real discussion rather than ad hominem attacks.
  • alberto83
    Rabbi,

    What violence kept the alleged shooter in the Army against his will?
  • jeffp
    I think I'll print out this article and keep it on file. Whenever someone asks me about Jim Wallis or Sojo I'll pull out this article and say "this is Sojo".
  • JoannaCW
    It's a hard balance, isn't it? But I don't think the Rabbi is excusing the shootings or 'exploiting' them by observing that when we train a large body of people to solve problems or resist evil by killing people, and subject them to extreme stress and trauma, sometimes killings we didn't want will result. What else could we expect?

    God have mercy on us all.
  • Aren't future military physicians trained with firearms before being promoted to officers?

    EDIT: Never mind, that was supposed to go below a comment that was deleted...
  • jeffp
    It seems like my first comment was removed. All I asked was, Isn't too early to exploit this tragedy for political purposes? In the words of Rahm Emmanuel, "Never let a crisis go to waste."
  • So do you think the Rabbi is insincere? As in, he doesn't want to prevent further tragedies? Is prevention of tragedies not a valid reason to mention a recent one?
  • jeffp
    I think the Rabbi is sincerely an opportunist. Thirteen people are murdered on an army base, what a great opportunity to spin a story about getting the troops out of Afganistan.
  • squeaky
    It's your prerogative to think the worst of the Rabbi, and for all I know, you may well be correct in your interpretation of his motives.

    Nevertheless, please don't let that be an excuse not to reflect on the long-term effects war is having on the people who are directly involved in it. It may not be the reason this guy snapped (although I suspect it is), but it doesn't mean it isn't important to acknowledge or understand. Reflecting on that is not a politically-biased act.
  • squeaky
    Is it being exploited for political purposes? Jesdisciple asked a very good question. JoannaCW also made a very good point.

    I can understand how you might see it that way, and I admit it seems to have an air of justifying the perpetrator's actions. But I think the intent of the piece is not justification, but to show that we need to understand "why" this happened. It's a very important question to ask because if we understand "why" maybe we prevent it from happening again.

    I think we would be very remiss if we did not at least consider that this incident might be evidence of the tremendous stress that our men and women in the military are dealing with, and I also think we would be remiss if that stress were not taken into consideration when making decisions on troop deployment. The question of whether this is a symptom of the stress our military is under and whether they can continue to absorb this stress is incredibly relevant.

    I have a student whose husband came home for a two week leave from Iraq. I asked how they were doing, and she said she could already see he had changed, and it was clear the change was not a good thing. I tried to encourage her that he likely will have a hard time decompressing in just two weeks, but I also recognize he might never be the same, as is the case with their relationship. The stress our military families are dealing with is incomprehensible to those who do not have family or friends in the military--and sadly, I think it is often overlooked by those of us not directly affected in that way.
  • jeffp
    It would be tactful to wait until the facts come out (you will notice the liberal use of the word "if" in the article) before making assumptions and springing into the war in Afganistan. The Rabbi wants the troups out, I get that. But to pounce this early on a tragedy to make that point is tasteless.
  • squeaky
    I do agree that it would have been better to explore "why" later. Whenever these things happen, though, we tend to go immediately to that question. The fact that this guy survived the shooting actually helps us hopefully get some answers to what was going on in his head. Usually we are left to speculate.
  • He does use "if" twice to note we don't have the facts; the other instances are to make his "prophetic" point. So I concede that his article would carry more weight if he would wait. And the fact that he didn't wait does throw suspicion on his motives.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertisement
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008