RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Repeat After Me: Profit is NOT Satanic

by Chuck Gutenson 11-06-2009

Don’t you love it when someone tries to argue for one thing by distracting your attention to another?  Consider the claims of Barclay’s CEO, John Varley.  I mean, really now, while there may be a few diehards who would make the rather stark claim that “profit is satanic,” there are not many, statistically speaking.

The issue is rarely profit per se, but rather the conditions under which it is earned, the fundamental justice of the profit-taking, and the inequities created by injudicious profit-taking.  So, while one would be inclined to agree that profit-taking per se is not satanic, one can imagine numerous scenarios in which a particular case of profit taken is, well, if not satanic, at least demonic.

You have to love Varley’s argument, steeped as it is in scripture.  Consider this gem:

Is Christianity and banking compatible? Yes … And is Christianity and fair reward compatible? Yes.

Well, there you go!  That settles that.  Oh, wait … those are just naked assertions — no scriptural evidences to back up his claim (notice too, how he simply assumes the fundamental question in play, whether or not the rewards being paid out to bankers are fair).  One wonders what texts Varley has in mind to support these assertions.  Perhaps if he took time to consider, oh, say, St. John Chrystom’s take on the obligations that attend wealth, he would have found a somewhat different position.

My favorite distortion, however, had to be this one (this from Goldman Sachs International Advisor Brian Griffiths):

The injunction of Jesus to love others as ourselves is an endorsement of self-interest.

Now that is some clever exegesis!  If one looks carefully at the teachings of Jesus (and scripture more broadly), what one finds is a consistent call to overcome the natural human tendency toward self-centeredness by elevating the interests of others above our own interests.  The minimal standard is to love our others as ourselves.

Even here, though, one has to be stunned at the idea that the level of bonuses given out by banking companies such as Goldmans are good exemplars of biblical self-love!  The biblical standard is not “self” interest, but rather “other” interest (consider the second half of Matthew 25, Luke 12, Luke 16, the Sermon on the Mount from Matthew 5-7).

No, profit per se is not satanic, but that affirmation serves in no way to justify the injustices embodied in much of contemporary banking practice, including these outrageous bonuses.  I think Vince Cable got it more right when he commented that “people are very, very angry at the gross iniquities of rewards in society.”  Perhaps he meant “inequities,” but I’m good either way. Iniquity seems a good description, from a biblical perspective.

Chuck Gutenson is the chief operating officer for Sojourners.

Categories: Economics, Theology
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Huh. I agree with the author's points, and yet have the feeling that the heavy sarcasm of this article is not worthy of typical Sojourners' fare, and probably doesn't even fit in Sojourners' Commentary Guidelines.
  • Unfettered, unregulated capitalism encourages the individual, or corporation to seek maximum advantage, necessarily at the expense of others.

    This is simply not true in an actual free market, which we have nothing of the sort. We have corporatism, where government guarantees banks and large corporations its cooperation in their business, protecting them from competition, and producing a "moral hazard" by printing money whenever the most politically well-connected banks are in dire need after risking the people's money. What you describe is indeed horrible, deplorable, and evil. But it is not capitalism.

    Check out this piece by another believer: http://www.american.com/archive/2009/october/gr...

    He affirms that greed is not good, but he also combats the common myth that capitalism yields what you said it yields.

    You are rightly pointing out injustices, but you are not accurately pointing out the source. Capitalism doesn't "produce" anything; it is merely the manifestation of people voluntarily choosing to engage in consentual exchange. There's nothing wrong or unethical about that.
  • ford49
    I don't know if I agree with your first line...a brief review of world political history of the last 70 years leaves me spiritually quessy. Also, political ideology I think is best when not substituted for theology.
  • http://www.american.com/archive/2009/october/gr...

    There is nothing inherently godly nor demonic about any political ideology. They just work differently, perhaps some better than others.

    EDIT: And the crimes you mentioned are crimes against basic human rights. We need laws against them, sure - although I would prefer laws which are enforced by the judicial branch.

    And capitalism didn't cause those wrongs - people did. The people should be punished for misusing capitalism.
  • burningheretic
    Christ did not have a vote in the Roman Empire. I do. As such, I vote my social conscious and support help for the poor. This might be self-interest. Helping others out of poverty is self-interest for the common community (government) and for the individual. When people are not overwhelmed by worry of finding food, clothing, and shelter, they can contribute to the common good. They may not, but chances are higher if they are not suffering from poverty.
    But I think, more to the point is the incredible hubris of these 'titans' of finance trying to justify their obscene pay packages (and they are trying to justify them, probably most to themselves). There is nothing inherently Godly about capitalism. If fact, there is much evil that capitalism causes. Unfettered, unregulated capitalism encourages the individual, or corporation to seek maximum advantage, necessarily at the expense of others.
    One only has to think of child labor, debtors' prisons, deadly work places, and the rivers on fire to understand what wrongs capitalism has foisted on others. Those are just a few of the favorite things of unfettered capitalism.
    A Christian can not stand for those. Capitalism may be necessary for a productive society, but do not preach to me about 'Greed being good'. It is no such thing. Following the greatest commandments are good, and right. Love God, and love your neighbors as yourself. And vote like you like mean it! It is your God given duty.
  • Political ideologies are very difficult to draw from Scripture. But that conclusion is, I think, just as valid as its opposite - that because of the same injunction government should pro-actively help the poor.
  • Ngchen
    Actually, Jesus's statement there does not reference government. As such, I have a hard time believing that Jesus meant that particular statement to refer to government action at all, since government does not enter the picture.
  • Now that is some clever exegesis! If one looks carefully at the teachings of Jesus (and scripture more broadly), what one finds is a consistent call to overcome the natural human tendency toward self-centeredness by elevating the interests of others above our own interests. The minimal standard is to love our others as ourselves.

    He might have been more accurate to say, "The injunction of Jesus to love others as ourselves is an endorsement of the other's self-interest." The individual is encouraged by the same injunction to sacrifice his own self-interest for the sake of others. His point is that Jesus' words forbid government from doing this forcibly.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008