There are a few texts discussing each of the latter topics, but orders-of-magnitude more texts discussing the first set.

That depends on his reason for criticizing them. I don't read him much, but if he joins the PC crowd in railing against others for his brand of stereotypes then obviously that's hypocritical.

You seemed to say–”it's not more of the same if no one complains about it”

No, I just see the controversy itself as the problem rather than the controversial statements. So complaining about the type of statements that always causes unnecessary controversy is more of the same. If no one complained the problem would be solved.

The Moral Majority is a different animal. They didn't rely on getting the other side angry AFAIK; they focused on getting votes from people who would give them regardless of controversy.

That's my take.

There was a great mistake in thinking that because media and politicians recognized this new-found block of faith-voters–that leaders could step forth and exercise political power. That the church had found a new way to manifest Gods ways.

And Evangelicals quickly became the conservative, Republican, Right voting block with spokespersons we obediently followed.

Oh, never mind the truth. That the Evangelical vote was a divided vote in the 70's, 80's, 90's, 00's.

You want to jump on board and do this same thing again?

They criticize parties on all sides who do not seek the common good–but in the process pit themselves against all sides. Frankly, I don't think progressives care one whit more about the three issues he identifies than my dyed-in-the-wool conservative Republican parents (now deceased). But to say he was one and the same as my parents–would be to say progressivism is not–and his voice is not distinctive.

I find that quite strange .

All homosexuals try to molest children . How often has stereotypes like that been promoted , and the damage and hurt that came to homosexuals because of it . Because homosexuals were not around to prove the steretypes wrong from your perspective speading them is OK ?

I am somewhat the opposite , personal insult is about me , I can take it … stereotypes in this case are about people, Gods people, that are denigrated that never even gotten the chance to make it personal. They are already presumed to have a negative perjoritive hung around their neck, Thus your attempting to limit the outreach of the church in some cases.

There are, in fact, Christian Conservatives who do, in fact, hold the views he discusses. He's not demonizing or attacking them, just stating disagreement and saying what he favors. I would understand a comment expressing disagreement, but I see no example whatsoever of the author demeaning anybody.