RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Biden on the Bailouts: ‘Socialism for the Rich, and Capitalism for the poor’

by Sheldon C. Good 11-18-2009

Joe Biden admitted last night on The Daily Show that the billions of dollars we’ve spent on big bank bailouts is “socialism for the rich, and capitalism for the poor.”

No kidding.  There’s been much consternation related to the bailout of Wall Street.  And even though the Obama administration says small businesses are important, unemployment at small (and large) firms continues to rise.  The unemployment rate is now at a 26-year high of 10.2 percent, while payrolls are falling.  Productivity aside, houses and businesses continue to close, leaving gaps in our infrastructure and personal day-planners.

Unfortunately, our financial institutions are clearly operating their businesses as usual.  For example, Goldman Sachs — the recipient of $10 billion in TARP bailout money — has committed $16.7 billion to pay its employees this year.  That’s $527,192 per person for nine months work.

Banks such as Goldman, which aren’t regulated by the pay czar, have been critiqued for their big bonuses.  The banks argue that their best employees will leave if they don’t receive proper pay.  So the employees benefit, while the vulnerable American workers and small businesses suffer.

Goldman is obviously aware of its current reputation.  Goldman recently offered a measly bribe for taxpayers — $500 million to aid small businesses — through an intiative called “10,000 Small Businesses.”  In comparison, that’s 3 percent of the money that Goldman employees get this year.

Goldman executive Lloyd Blankfein even offered a personal apology.  After claiming that Goldman is “doing God’s work,” Blankfein is now admitting that the bank “participated in things that were clearly wrong and have reason to regret.”

Blankfein is now using Warren Buffet — the company’s largest shareholder — to solidify his $500 million small business apology.  Oh yeah, and Buffet, often regarded as one of the world’s wisest (and most profitable) investors, will be on the initiative’s advisory council, along with Blankfein and others.  So even Buffet is looking for easy answers.  “They are making a lot of money now,” Buffet says.  “I am all for it and this program is a beneficiary.”

Goldman — the most profitable securities company in history — is clearly engaged in a public relations stunt.  And it’s not the first.  In October, the company doubled its charitable foundation by committing $200 million to business education.  And in November 2007, Goldman committed to raise as much as $1 billion for philanthropy.  One month later, the firm awarded its employees the largest bonuses ever in the securities industry.

But Goldman, and other banks, have not increased lending to small businesses — the main goal of the TARP program.  While Goldman repaid the $10 billion in TARP money, it now doesn’t have enough capital to stimulate our recovery.  Biden admitted it on “The Daily Show.”  “These guys are not the most likeable guys in the world,” he said, but “had we not bailed out the largest bank institutions in the world there would have been a flat depression.”

So we’re not in depression.  And the recession that we were in is now allegedly over.  But many people continue to lose their jobs, and banks haven’t increased lending to small businesses like they were supposed to.  In fact, as with Goldman, banks are dishing out big bonuses for executives and minute charity for taxpayers.  Small businesses need open lines of credit if we are to “get back to the business of lending,” as Treasury Secretary Timothy Geitner said.

Because people need jobs — whether green, blue, pink, or white.  And if we want to focus on job creation, we need to focus on small businesses.  Our banks took risks that spurred the recession, and it’s now time that they take risks to spur our recovery.  But $500 million is not enough.  Three percent is not “doing God’s work.”

Sheldon C. Good is the media assistant for Sojourners.

Categories: Economics
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • NC77
    Kind of a coincidence that $500 million a day is what our govrenment pays in interest on the federal debt. And they are only willing to spend that much on small businesses? Someone has their priorities in the wrong place. Small businesses would generate income for the U.S. The interest goes to China and other countries.
  • NC77
    The cool thing is, we get to reign with Christ on the new earth. No more of this bull.
  • NC77
    Change is coming but it won't be because of new regulations. The regulations already in place have not been enforced by the government officials responsible for enforcing them. No one in Congress will admit to their culpability in this financial mess. It's business as usual in Washington D.C. That hope and change thing was just a campaign slogan and a facade, a con to get elected. Geithner is on the hotseat from both sides, left and right. Things are changing.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp=3405016...

    You may need to do a refresh the URL for the page to load.
  • bryan_85
    Come on people, understand that the nwo has taken over. obama, like bush, is a puppet for the nwo. anyone who falls for this junk of blaming democrats or republicans are deceived. its all falling into place, the nwo is in control and us christians are almost out of here :)
  • krzyglu2
    Good question. It seems like it would be impossible for our nation, or any nation, to ever return to debt-free economic system. Debt is such a huge part of our lives and how our nation runs. I think the only debt that can really be controlled in consumer debt with choices made by individuals, although I know of churches that are debt-free and I'm sure there are other debt-free entities. But the way our nation runs, it'd be almost impossible for a business to not use credit, at least to get started.
  • krzyglu2
    I resent the White House saying things like the recession is over when clearly, things are not better, jobs have not been created in the way the President promised they would be, and unemployment rises each month. We are either being duped, or like you said, it's a psychological thing. But I think most people aren't denying that we still have a problem and still have a recession because either they, or someone they know, are out of a job and unable to find another one.
  • Surely you meant "preventing injustice and discouraging inequality"??? (Rick: I know, I know...)

    EDIT: Well, that depends on which equality you refer to - that of outcomes or of opportunities.
  • It's socialism because wealth is being redistributed - but even Marx etc. would abhor this socialism. It's even more perverse because, instead of a wrong approach to solve a problem, it's an attempt to hide a problem. What a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.

    But yes, the problem being hidden is a result of gambling.
  • ClayBarham
    The Purpose of Government

    Is government at any level, invented, designed or fashioned for the purpose of providing justice or preventing injustice? For those who look to government as our nation’s highest authority, the dispensing of justice its highest duty, instead of a nation based on freedom principles, where the people are the highest authority and government’s highest duty is to prevent injustice, yours is a happy lot under the modern Democrat. There is a major difference between justice given and injustice prevented, just like equality and inequality. Justice and equality inspire admiration, but preventing injustice and encouraging inequality made America the great nation it became. It is easy to decide which is best when comparing America’s prosperity to almost 200 other nations in the world where most starve, are whipped, beaten and murdered by their prosperous elite rulers. Claysamerica.com
  • jkc1945
    Thank you, Jeremy. It's nice to see a little light shed on this subject, every once in awhile.
  • jeremygreen
    It certainly isn't God's work to make poor people poorer.

    I remember when Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Barak Obama pressured banks from above, and ACORN pressured banks from below to make ARM loans to people that could not meet the credit requirements. They forced banks to loan money to people that could not pay that money back. Then, like clockwork, those poor people couldn't afford to keep their homes, and they were given the boot.

    Then, because of all the loan defaults as a result of Frank, Dodd, Obama, and ACORN, the banks went south too. The economy went down the toilet, and now unemployment is at 10.2% (but near 17% in reality). Lot's of people that were barley making it have now hit rock bottom. And, of course, more foreclosures are on the way as a new round of freshly-made poor people have no work, therefore no way, to pay for their homes.

    And let's not forget Goldman. Yes, they are a bad lot. It's especially troubling that they were in bed with Paulson and now with Geitner and Bernanke. It's frustrating that Goldman hasn't been held to the same regulating standards as the other TARP banks. It's also frustrating that the government/Fed allowed Goldman's biggest competitors to go under, leaving Goldman unscathed in the mess.

    It ain't just Goldman not doing God's work.
  • jamesnayler
    It would seem to me the more cogent point to call this Wall St. nonsense what it REALLY is - not socialism, but GAMBLING!
    If some citizen went to Las Vegas and lost his house through faulty machinations (organized by greedy people), would HE get a billion dollar bail-out? Is that not precisely what these Wall St. "thieves" did?
    How and where exactly does this Mr. Blankfein think robbing already poor people to give to already obscenely rich people is "doing God's work?"
    The man hasn't a nodding acquaintance with God or His work, I'm thinking.
  • chadbowen
    'Small businesses need open lines of credit if we are to “get back to the business of lending."'

    Is there any one at the moment pursuing questions of the Biblical morality of an economic system built on lending?

    I don't have any agenda here, I just want to know if there is anything out there. It seems that our hope is built very much on monetary credit these days.
  • timoyer
    These are some really insightful thoughts here Sheldon. I'm taking a small business class through MEDA and the prospect of raising capital to start any kind of business is very bleak. We've had people who work for banks teach our class and tell us that our chances of getting a loan are very slim.

    If the government is serious about generating more jobs they should invest in entrepreneurs. Most people who have skills and have been laid off for many months are now exploring the idea of creating their own businesses.

    I agree with Hector, saying the recession is over is more about psychology than truth. If you tell people there is no longer a problem, many believe there is not a problem.
  • hector1
    Leave it to Biden to tell it like it really is. Thanks Joe.

    As for the recession being over, what a joke. Saying it only makes Obama look bad because people know full well that it just ain't true.
  • SamHamilton
    Even though Biden said this, somehow I'm guessing that he'll find a reason to support the next bailout of a major corporation.
  • *gasp* The left actually used the term "socialism"?!

    (No, I can't find anything to disagree with; I just found that marvelous.)
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008