RSS
More Feeds

Looking for new books, music, etc.? Purchases made through this search box benefit Sojourners' ministry:














Culture Watch

Human Trafficking, Justice, and CSI

by Julie Clawson 11-23-2009

091123-csiI’ve gotten used to popular TV shows going the after-school special route and highlighting some issue or another.  Granted, it boosts their ratings, but it also brings attention to issues that need attention.  So I was intrigued recently when the CSI franchise did a story-arc across all three shows that focused on the issue of human trafficking.  It pulled no punches.  They showed the horror involved in trafficking and what a complicated system it is.  From moving girls around to sell for sex, or as wombs, or for body parts there are a lot of people making money off of the exploitation of others.  And there are so many people involved in such a large and complex system, that there are no easy solutions to the problems.  In other words, the CSIs weren’t able to solve the crime and and have all the perpetrators behind bars by the end of the 60-minute episode.  The writers were smart enough not to trivialize the issue by giving it a neat solution.  But they were also smart enough to make trafficking about real people.  These girls aren’t just nameless faces – they are someone’s daughter.  And even if those working for justice can’t fix the entire system, they can do something to help one girl, and that is significant.

They also hit the (obvious) nail on the head in trying to explain why this happens — basically, because the demand is there.  Trafficking isn’t just some evil crime committed by sociopaths; it’s done by corrupt and greedy guys who know that there is a high demand for human flesh.  If the businessmen at conferences in Vegas weren’t looking for sex on demand, then kidnapping, abusing, raping, and breaking women into submissive prostitutes wouldn’t be such a lucrative business.  But evil and injustice continue to exist because we demand it.  From cheap sex to cheap clothes or candy, we demand that others be oppressed for our benefit.

At one point in the CSI episode, the bad guy of the week, a Russian pimp (played by the amazing Mark Sheppard), tried to justify why girls supposedly choose to be prostitutes.  He said, “inside, [all women] are whores. They will love to hear the things they want to believe – they are so beautiful, so fascinating, so special that they deserve the best of everything, the finest clothes, champagne, and jewels that money can buy.  And you know how you get the whore to emerge? Tell her there is an easy way to get all of this.”  His words were ironic coming after the unfolding story of girls being kidnapped, drugged, raped, beaten, and murdered by traffickers.  Instead of describing the girls, they more accurately described the traffickers and the johns.  But they also describe all of us who have found easy ways to get whatever we want even if it is at the expense of others.  We will sell our souls because we believe we deserve the best of everything.

The sad thing is, there are no CSIs out there working to put us behind bars so that the oppression stops.  We are not going to be punished for benefiting from crimes like human trafficking and slave labor.  And we wont be rewarded either for choosing to step outside of systems of oppression.  There is no carrot or stick when it comes to making a deliberate choice to love others.  We just have to decide that we care enough for someone else’s daughter or son to stop demanding that they be oppressed so that we can have everything we desire.

Julie Clawson is the author of Everyday Justice: The Global Impact of Our Daily Choices (IVP 2009). She blogs at julieclawson.com and emergingwomen.us.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Lord_Voldemort
    "...there are no CSIs out there working to put us behind bars..."

    Is Julie Clawson trying to make us all feel guilty for human trafficking? If she is (and it's hard to read her conclusion any other way) then she fails miserably.

    Her biggest mistake is to equate sex-for-money with other consumer goods: "From cheap sex to cheap clothes or candy, we demand that others be oppressed for our benefit." This is silly. Prostitution is wrong regardless of the price. Modesty is virtuous regardless of whether one's outfit is expensive or more moderately priced.

    I know a lot of people won't want to hear this, but our failure to enforce immigration law has made human trafficking easier.

    On a related note, Sojo still has yet to condemn ACORN for a lackadaisical attitude towards human smuggling that is widespread throughout that organization.

    When Sojo is either ready to support meaningful immigration law enforcement without preconditions, or at least willing to call for sanctions against ACORN, then we'll know they are serious about human trafficking.

    LV
  • On a related note, Sojo still has yet to condemn ACORN for a lackadaisical attitude towards human smuggling that is widespread throughout that organization.

    You know this for a fact? Because what was reported on Faux News, as things turned out, was confined to only a couple of offices and the people responsible were let go.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    Funny you should mention this. The Los Angeles Times just ran a report on another ACORN office that got caught. This is the L-O-S A-N-G-E-L-E-S T-I-M-E-S, which to the best of my knowledge is Not Affiliated With Fox.

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009...

    The LA tape makes six, not "a couple", the first five were in.

    Washington DC
    Baltimore MD
    Brooklyn NY
    San Bernardino CA
    San Diego CA

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_O'Keefe

    (note: To the best of my knowledge Wikipedia is not affiliated with Fox either.)

    ACORN's Philadelphia office apparently filed a police report, so we'll give them that one. That means six out of seven ACORN offices were willing to aid in human trafficking, or at least turn and look the other way.

    That's not good, Deac.

    LV
  • Out of how many? We all know that ACORN was targeted because it was registering voters -- mostly as Democrats. Otherwise we wouldn't have heard a peep.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    Six out of seven, Deac. Six out of seven.

    LV
  • I mean, nationwide. The office in my city wasn't involved.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    Seven that we know of so far. What's your point? That we didn't do an exhaustive examination of every ACORN office in the country all at once? Sorry, there's only so many young Christian conservative women willing to dress up like hookers.

    LV
  • Not impressed, in the least. I don't fear "big government," and as someone in
    the media I choose my sources very carefully.
  • That's the primary source of the whole affair. Since you're in the media, maybe you would like to interview the PI.

    I know you don't fear big government; that's the point. There's a reason to do so.
  • I know you don't fear big government; that's the point. There's a reason to do so.

    The only time conservatives fear big government is when they're not running it. Period. Had Ronald Reagan governed as a "true conservative" he would have never lasted one term, let alone two.
  • I know Reagan didn't go as pure as I would have liked, but he did better than most. And anyway, that just means I need to fight both parties on certain points.

    The Repubs still grow the government, but they're slower than the Dems. Since I'm still holding out hope that we can repair it, I'm not gonna vote Dem so we crash faster and get it over with.
  • KentuckyBlue
    If this had been six McCain/Palin campaign offices committing some sort of fraud, you know as well as I that it would've been all over the news, accompanied by outrage and calls of "Off with their heads!" along with a bunch of polls asking Americans if they think McCain/Palin should quite the campaign.

    Oh, and I'm sure there'd be some public comments by Axelrod, or Obama himself, while meanwhile the "talking heads" would devote days worth of commentary, debate, and news coverage over the "astounding" story!

    It'd be a huge headline over at the Huffington Post accompanied by several blogs. The NY Times would surely have front-page articles entitled: "McCain/Palin: Human Trafficking Campaign? Is this the end of Saracuda?"

    And it wouldn't be reported as "only six offices?" with a roll of the eyes and a shake of the head. It would by "Wow, a whopping total of six offices!! Can you believe it?" with hands on the forehead and brows furrowed.
  • If this had been six McCain/Palin campaign offices committing some sort of fraud, you know as well as I that it would've been all over the news, accompanied by outrage and calls of "Off with their heads!" along with a bunch of polls asking Americans if they think McCain/Palin should quite the campaign.

    And you wouldn't have heard a peep from the Fox News Channel; more likely, they would have accused the government of overstepping its bounds and liberals of persecution. And you would have heard similar bellyaching in Christian media as well.
  • KentuckyBlue
    It's not just ACORN's affiliations/ties to the Democrat party. The federal government has also given ACORN hundreds of thousands of dollars. There needs to be an investigation into what's' happened, not only because of the legality of it all, but also because they receive government money.
  • KentuckyBlue
    It's also been reported today that a San Diego ACORN employee was caught dumping confidential records only 8 days after the state attorney general announced an inquiry into ACORN.

    Tens of thousands of records, including things like credit reports and other documents with people's sensitive information (bank account numbers, SS numbers, drivers license numbers, etc.), were literally tossed into a dumpster as a private investigator sat unnoticed in his car.

    You probably wouldn't have heard about this illegal, reckless, and unethical action if you listen to or watch liberal news media. I know I haven't heard it there. Big surprise.

    As always, it was reported by Fox News, and hopefully has been picked up by other news sources by now. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,576466,00.html

    You can read more about it at that link. There's a lot more information than what I'm sharing here, like about how the investigation into ACORN has revealed connections to the CA Teacher's Union and Citibank.

    As the White House would say... "fishy."
  • Lol, I actually just dropped this link above. It's the story as told by the PI who found it: http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/23/breaking-sa...
  • KentuckyBlue
    I just read today that Briebert has quite a bit more things (including those actual documents that were trashed) that he is threatening to reveal, slowly, one at a time, if the govt. does not investigate ACORN.
  • You probably wouldn't have heard about this illegal, reckless, and unethical action if you listen to or watch liberal news media. I know I haven't heard it there. Big surprise.

    The AP had little more than a brief when it first came out because, unlike right-wing media, it didn't jump to any immediate conclusions.
  • KentuckyBlue
    Have they, Deacon? I haven't been here long and don't know if they have or not? Do you know if they have? If not, I would have to agree that it does seem odd that Sojo, a social issue blog, would ignore the atrocities committed by ACORN employees as well as the lack of outrage among the liberal media and Democrat party.

    I know how you feel about the "sting" itself and the motives of the undercover videographers (because I read your comments here), but how do you feel about the advice given by the ACORN employees? How do you feel about their lack of concern about the "trafficking" and "prostitution?" You know, there are a lot of people in our society who have the same lack of concern.
  • TN_Horseman
    I am appalled, so far this has become a back and forth about ACORN, which is a story of its own, rather than the problem of human trafficking which is real blight on society.

    From the age of 19 to 21 I was stationed in one of the great fleshpots of the world, Clark Air Force Base, Philippines with side trips to Bangkok. The poverty there caused many families to sell their daughters into prostitution or seduced young women into the trade because of the money to be made.

    I will admit I was young, with raging hormones, and occasionally made my contributions to the local vice lords. Several years ago, while watching "Miss Saigon" on Broadway I realized that my sins were more than carnal. Thank you for holding this issue before us, the question is what are we going to do about it.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008