RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Christmas Toy Drives Bring Protests of Anti-Immigrant Discrimination

by Larry James 12-04-2009

Last week we received word from Houston, Texas, that some charitable organizations would screen out the children of undocumented residents of the city when it comes time to distribute toys and other Christmas gifts.  You can read the original report published by The Houston Chronicle ( “Some toy drives check immigration status,” Nov. 30, 2009, by Jeannie Kever) here.

The original story reported that the Salvation Army and a toy drive associated with the city’s fire department would be requiring various forms of identification, including social security cards, birth certificates, and proof of income, to qualify families and children to receive toys and Christmas gifts this year.  The report set off reaction from groups working with immigrants in the city.

Last Thursday, the paper published a follow-up story that reported the decision by the Salvation Army not to require social security cards.

“It was never our intention to offend anyone with our registration requirement to provide a Social Security number, or to give the impression that we were discriminating against those individuals and families who do not have a Social Security number,” Major Chris Flanagan, Area Commander for The Salvation Army Greater Houston Area Command, said in a statement.

To read the entire report, click here.

My reading of the stories leads me to believe that the original intention was to eliminate the children of “illegal” immigrants from the Christmas gift program. Thankfully, the organizations involved reconsidered the hurtful policy.  As usual when a community rises up and cries out, things change for the better.

Still, the entire affair points up once again the intense hatred and the unapologetic discrimination lurking just beneath the surface of many of our communities that can be so quickly directed toward our immigrant neighbors.  Reading the reports and considering the attitudes that informed these policy decisions in the first place, I’m wondering if our faith communities and their leaders don’t need to do some work with us on just how God regards the “aliens” and the “strangers” among us.

Clearly, we need to remember and reconsider the clarity of our faith tradition regarding residents from other places, regardless of how they made their way to us.  I’m thinking of words like these:

“Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in Egypt.” Exodus 22:21

“Do not oppress an alien; you yourselves know how it feels to be aliens, because you were aliens in Egypt.” Exodus 23:9

“The alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.” Leviticus 19:34

“And you are to love those who are aliens, for you yourselves were aliens in Egypt.” Deuteronomy 10:19

“For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in ….” Matthew 25:35

In view of the clarity of our faith traditions, I’d say we need to reflect clearly and carefully on our attitudes and our actions. Maybe it’s just me, but this seems especially true during the Advent waiting as we consider the arrival of the Child who, himself an immigrant in more ways than one, comes to set us free.

Larry James is president and CEO of Central Dallas Ministries.

Categories: Immigration
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • "Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!
  • WaveTossed
    Actually, I wasn't trying to say that Mary and Joseph were immigrants, because you are correct; they weren't. They were going to pay their taxes.

    However, the craze for checking out each and everyone's immigration status before performing acts of Christian charity to celebrate the Birth of Jesus left me wondering: were people of the day concerned with checking immigration status of those coming in, including that of Mary and Joseph, as they were preparing for the birth of our Savior? Or perhaps people were more concerned with more important issues, such as the miracle that was to happen that night.

    As for immigration in the modern age in the U.S. check out some of the free-market sites, especially the Cato Institute.

    http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3638
  • rockstarlizzy
    Let's not complicate something so simple. The real question here, is how would Jesus treat people coming to him for free gifts? I don't think He'd be telling Little Timmy the Samaritan, "Sorry, kid, you don't qualify for a blessing today. Go home so I can give the Judeans these cool toys."
  • irish_annie
    i don't particularly like certain folks being treated differently from others... seems that james warned against being 'respecters of persons' and Jesus affirmed that our Father sends his rain on all equally. i'm thrilled that the SA amended their policy - one initially not well thought out evidently.

    however, the flip side: is this really helpful? to train children to have an entitlement mentality, as if somehow they are OWED christmas presents? selah.
  • Ngchen
    The issue, IMHO, is not so much the toys or lack thereof, as opposed to the de facto segregation that would take place. To clarify, imagine kids A and B. Kid A looks "native," so gets his stuff with no further questions asked. Kid B looks different, so IDs and so forth are demanded. It's not the toys as the treating of kids A and B differently that inevitably occurs under any sort of check scheme here.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    Ah, the "Joseph and Mary were immigrants too" meme. Comes up this every Christmas season. Please allow me to debunk this for the umpteenth time. It's been a whole year, maybe you forgot that:

    1. Joseph and Mary's trip from Bethlehem to Jerusalem wasn't immigration, it was in effect a business trip, one that they were forced into by a ham-handed Roman tax bureaucracy.

    2. Later on Mary and Joseph went to Egypt for a spell, but that wasn't really immigration either. Remember the Roman Empire? It was big. Mary and Joseph didn't cross the border between sovereign countries, but between provinces within the empire. The equivalent would be if they moved from Michigan to Texas, which a lot of people are doing without a peep from anyone.

    3. Even if you ignore all that, Mary and Joseph were not motivated by economics but by fear that their child would be killed by Herod. They returned when the danger subsided. In that sense they were temporary refugees rather than immigrants.

    That's the story that's in the Bible, at least. If you don't like it feel free to write your own.

    Look, I think the US should be relatively open to legal immigration, but that's not the same thing as mass illegal immigration.

    LV
  • codyhuf
    I have to say that I must agree with He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named to an extent.

    I do not like discrimination based on immigration status. Especially, for kids. In most cases, kids have no choice in the matter.

    However, I find it much more important that we make sure people are not discriminating when food/shelter/clothing are concerned. I would much rather make sure that these little children are fed than fight with someone so they can have toys. I work with homeless and formerly homeless families and still have mixed feelings about the overwhelming generosity when it comes to giving toys at Christmas time, while children often go hungry during the rest of the year.
  • kansasmennonite
    You're pretty cold this time of year-eh?
  • WaveTossed
    I wonder if Mary and Joseph's immigration papers were checked at the inn before they came to the stable.
  • Morna
    Discrimination need not qualify as oppression to be wrong.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    I'm sorry, but this just doesn't bother me all that much.

    If we were sentencing illegal immigrants who had committed no other crimes to long prison sentences, that would be oppression.

    Routine but consistent enforcement of immigration law? Not oppression IMHO, though I can understand why others might come to different opinions.

    Not giving kids toys? Oppression? Sorry, that doesn't even pass the giggle test.

    Robben Island was oppression. The Cuban gulags are oppression. Santa Claus not showing up is a disappointment.

    LV
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008