RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

If They Are Too Big To Fail, Let’s Make Them Smaller

by Jim Wallis 01-04-2010

banner-Finding-Your-Way-in-the-New-Economy

We’re off and running. I am headed for the airport to go to Detroit for the first leg in our book tour for Rediscovering Values: On Wall Street, Main Street, and Your Street—A Moral Compass for the New Economy.

Yesterday the Washington Post ran a piece I wrote to begin the tour which they titled, “Let’s Topple the Idols of Wall Street” in the print version. I liked their title. The article describes the moral contradictions in how the government extended “grace” to the big banks in order to avoid financial meltdown, but that Wall Street won’t extend any grace to the homeowners on Main Street who need it. I suggest the similarities to a gospel parable of Jesus, and that a new modern parable is in the making, “The Parable of the Unmerciful Bankers.” Indeed, the article argues that there is a values crisis beneath the economic crisis and that a moral recovery will now need to accompany the economic one. The article, and the book in much greater detail, outlines how many of the values and practices from our diverse faith traditions — Christianity, Judaism, and Islam — offer critical correctives to the ways we have gone wrong economically and spiritually, and help point the way forward.

In particular, it describes the beginning of a potential new movement among people of good faith to move their money from the big banks who have behaved so badly to more local banks and financial institutions that have better served their communities. It ends with my two favorite lines from the piece, “The banks say they are ‘too big to fail.’ So let’s make them smaller. That should get the attention of Wall Street.”

The greatest danger of the economic crisis now, or the Great Recession as I call it in the book, is that we will learn nothing from it. If that happens, all the pain and suffering so many have known will have been in vain. But if we can learn from this and turn it into a “teachable moment,” then this crisis can still be redemptive. An analyst at Moody’s commented that “Fear has dissipated, greed has returned,” suggesting that Wall Street has learned very little. But another article from Sunday’s New York Times suggests that, as a result of these hard economic times, people are “doing more, buying less”: spending more time with family and friends, gardening, cooking, reading, and participating in civic or religious activities. My reason for writing this book was to help jump-start a national conversation about what we could learn from the crisis — not so much when it will end, but how it will change us. And I encourage you to use the book in a variety of small discussion groups to get this conversation going in your churches, schools, work places, and communities.

Each day, I will be doing a little diary reporting on how the conversation is going in the cities we will be visiting. And I would love to hear from you. Keep us in your prayers as we visit almost 20 cities before we are done. Watch the Sojourners Web site to find out when we will be near you. See you on the road!

Jim Wallis is the author of Rediscovering Values: On Wall Street, Main Street, and Your Street–A Moral Compass for the New Economy, CEO of Sojourners and blogs at www.godspolitics.com.

Click here to get e-mail updates from Jim Wallis

Categories: Economics
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • justintime
    I was never very enthused about Cap and Trade, Sam.
    It's just another casino game.
    James Hansen makes a very good case for the "Fee and Dividend" approach.
    Have you read his piece, "How to Solve the Climate Problem", linked above?
  • SamHamilton
    I'm glad to see you're moving away from the Cap and Trade boondoggle bandwagon justintime. Now if you'd only agree that a carbon tax is a much better way to go...
  • thebootedone
    It is not obviouse who is under all this. the US government representatives. People need to understand the government is corrupt and do something about it. As in vote the crooks out. And understand that the pres. is part of it. and its both the republicans and democrates. the government was not created to be our helper. it was created to protect us and our rights to choose. Sojo needs to stop creating the idea that the government can help in social justice, they have created most of the injustices there are. We need to show the representatives they are not their for power but to represent the people and to rule under the US constitution.
  • jonabark
    This is a good idea. If it happens it may succeed in causing some big banks to fail. What will then keep the Democrats and Republicans from joining in one of those warm fuzzy group hugs with their shared corporate and financial donors to move more taxpayer money to the gold men with the sacks?

    The real answer is a massive tax revolt with a demand to end all corporate political donations and all personal donations that exceed one week at minimum wage.
  • SamHamilton
    I like the perspective Jim takes in the Washington Post piece. Despite his joining this protest in Washington, the efforts he mentions in the column are community based and local. This is where the change has to come from. It's a bottom-up change rather than a top-down change. We can pass all the laws and regulations in Washington that we want (and they'll come with all their secondary and tertiary negative ramifications) but if we don't change how people think about these issues, we'll never see long term change. In addition, top-down, Washington-based solutions don't give Christians hands-on opportunities to show the love of Christ to their communities.

    Already, pastors, lay leaders and innovative faith-based practitioners are suggesting creative answers: mutual aid; congregational and community credit unions; and new cooperative strategies for solving such problems as hunger, homelessness and joblessness. If these initiatives succeed, the economic crisis may offer congregations a rare opportunity to clarify their missions and reconnect with their communities. This is also a great evangelistic tool that wouldn't be had with a Washington-based solution either.

    The one quibble I have is with Jim is that he leaves out one group of people that bears a heavy responsibility for the housing failures and that's public policymakers. Thankfully, one of those in that group saw the writing on the wall and is retiring from Congress rather than face probable defeat in Connecticut. Hopefully voters will consider this issue when choosing who will represent them.
  • pawheel
    Either way, there are still trillions in bad loans sitting somewhere that eventually have to be dealt with. The banks were allowed to assign on paper whatever value they wanted to the bad loans they are holding from the housing crash. This means that even though the housing markests lost trilions in value over the last year or 2, the banks can show values for those loans on their books that don't reflect their current value.
    Can I do that too? I would love to say that my house was still worth $150,000 instead of it's current $85,000ish value.
  • justintime
    Public Enemy Number One, Goldman Sachs, is positioning itself to profit from the next bubble - speculation in Cap and Trade carbon credits. This will most likely be bigger than the sub prime bubble.

    Read this article in The Nation, excerpted from climate scientist, James Hansen's new book, "Storms of My Grandchildren".

    How to Solve the Climate Problem
    http://www.thenation.com/doc/20100111/hansen

    In this article, Hansen discusses the two major proposed legislative solutions to the climate problem:
    1. Cap and Trade
    2. Fee and Dividend

    He fields convincing arguments against Cap and Trade and for the Fee and Dividend approach.
    He confirms that Cap and Trade will only result in another catastrophic bubble, with Goldman Sachs reaping the profits at the expense of the planet.
  • justintime
    Why are you defending Goldman Sachs when it's common knowledge that Goldman colluded with those so called "independent" ratings agencies, including Moody's?

    How Moody's sold its ratings - and sold out investors
    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/77244.html

    The Securities and Exchange Commission issued a blistering report on how profit motives had undermined the integrity of ratings at Moody's and its main competitors, Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor's, in July 2008, but the full extent of Moody's internal strife never has been publicly revealed.

    Goldman left foreign investors holding the subprime bag
    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/77844.html
  • fundamentalist
    Goldman did not rate these securities. Federal law and SEC regulations required that Goldman use the ratings of the top three independent ratings agencies.
  • judithod
    Didn't Jim Wallis head up the SDS chapter at Michigan State?
  • justintime
    Don't be naive, fundamentalist, Goldman knew they were pushing junk securities into the marketplace. Their accountants knew too - they fixed ratings on those securities whenever necessary to move the product, failed to advise the victims, colluded in creating the bubble and profited from fees.
    I hope the investigation into this colossal swindle results in indictments, convictions and recovery of some of the vast wealth stolen from our economy.
  • fundamentalist
    I agree with most of this article except the point that Goldman knowingly sold junk investments. No one knew that the mortgage backed securities were junk. They were AAA and AA rated securities, the best you can find outside of government debt. A few people were smart enough to recognize that those highly-rated securities had the potential to become junk if housing prices collapsed, but those were few and they didn't fear such an event. Since the crisis, there have been quite a few people who claim that they knew the investments were junk, but those same people refused to tell anyone at the time.
  • Well said, sir
  • justintime
    How Goldman Sachs Made Tens of Billions of Dollars from the Economic Collapse of America:
    by The Economic Collapse Blog

    Investment banking giant Goldman Sachs has become perhaps the most prominent symbol for everything that is wrong with the U.S. financial system, but most Americans cannot even begin to explain what they do or how they have made tens of billions of dollars from the economic collapse of America. The truth is that what Goldman Sachs did was fairly simple, and there may not have even been anything "illegal" about it (although they are now being investigated by the SEC among others). The following is how Goldman Sachs made tens of billions of dollars from the economic collapse of America in four easy steps....

    Step 1: Sell mortgage-related securities that are absolute junk to trusting clients at vastly overinflated prices.

    Step 2: Bet against those same mortgage-related securities and make massive bets against the U.S. housing market so that your firm will make massive profits when the U.S. economy collapses.

    Step 3: Have ex-Goldman executives in key positions of power in the U.S. government so that bailout money can be funneled to entities such as AIG that Goldman has made these bets with so that they can get paid after they win their bets.

    Step 4: Collect the profits - Goldman Sachs is having their "most successful year" and will end up reporting approximately $50 billion in revenue for 2009.

    So is it right for the biggest fish on Wall Street to make tens of billions of dollars by betting that the U.S. housing market will collapse? You see, when you are talking about a financial giant the size of Goldman Sachs, the line between "betting that something will happen" and "making something happen" gets blurred very quickly.

    In his very revealing article on Goldman Sachs in Rolling Stone, Matt Taibbi described how Goldman keeps making money from the bursting of these economic bubbles: "They achieve this using the same playbook over and over again. The formula is relatively simple: Goldman positions itself in the middle of a speculative bubble, selling investments they know are crap. Then they hoover up vast sums from the middle and lower floors of society with the aid of a crippled and corrupt state that allows it to rewrite the rules in exchange for the relative pennies the bank throws at political patronage. Finally, when it all goes bust, leaving millions of ordinary citizens broke and starving, they begin the entire process over again, riding in to rescue us all by lending us back our own money at interest, selling themselves as men above greed, just a bunch of really smart guys keeping the wheels greased.

    They've been pulling this same stunt over and over since the 1920s — and now they're preparing to do it again, creating what may be the biggest and most audacious bubble yet.

    The truth is that in this latest economic collapse there were millions of losers and just a few winners. Goldman Sachs was one of those winners. So will they lose next time? Not likely. In their recent article, Vanity Fair quoted an anonymous source in the financial industry as saying the following.... "Are they the Yankees? No, the Yankees actually lose! Goldman never loses."

    http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/how...
  • pawheel
    I have been in nothing but credit unions for 30 years with no problems. My wife was in Washington Mutual for years until it became Chase. They changed their policies to be FAR less useful for their customers. I go in there and it has changed from a more comfortable looking place to having all their employess in business suits, and other ways of making it have a different feel. Their policies are ones where your money isn't available as quickly as it was with WAMU and many other policies that are not as customer friendly.
    On a related subject; I get a pre recorded message from Capital One every weekday because my son used my phone number for his account (with my permission). This message is the same woman every day with a "special offer for me". After a month of deleting them I finally called and was told that I get it because my number is tied to my son's account, which I had JUST finished telling them!
    He checked and said there was no offer on the account, and I could stop the calls by mailing in a request to stop it, with my personal info included. I told him the only thing I am going to stop is my son from using their services, and that they are disrespecting their customers by sending messages that are not true so they can ask about the payment that is due.
    THAT is the problem in this country: Wall St and big business (and our Government) see us as nothing more than customers to be exploited for their profit.
  • pawheel
    I remember hearing that Congress was told if they didn't pass the bailout bill or bills in the fall of 08 that Wall St would "Crash the economy". Nice talk
  • justintime
    About a year ago, Washington Mutual, my bank for 20 years, was closed by the Fed and sold to JPM Chase for pennies on the dollar. Chase took over all the WaMu branches, changed the signs and many of my banker friends lost their 401K savings.
    A meeting with the local Chase branch manager revealed that Chase is not loaning to local small businesses. I don't use credit cards, but Chase's rates are usurious and their fees are extortion.
    Chase does nothing for my local economy except remove capital to Wall Street.
    So I did a little research on our local banks and discovered they are solvent, they ARE loaning to local businesses and their rates and fees are much more user friendly.
    If you do a little research, you will find reputable local banks and credit unions in your community.
    If you use revolving credit, get away from Wall Street loan sharks as fast as you possibly can.
    Moving my money into the local economy was a no-brainer for me.
    I urge all my friends to do the same.

    xfree posted the website: http://moveyourmoney.info
    Check it out.
  • letjusticerolldown
    You might infer meaning to identifying Wallis as a DC author. My only implied meaning is that Wallis is an author that lives in DC.

    The book is rediscovering values on different streets around the nation (if I understand the title). I only highlight that every person sees the world from a point of view. Every medium of communication shapes the message. Every mode of commerce/business (e.g. bookselling) shapes the message.

    It is interesting you add my comment about DC and New York up to mean something about an elitist boondoggle and liberal bastions. Apparently those places give rise to certain passions and ideas in the public mind--particularly as related to values and the economy. Which might lead some strange cynic to wonder about if the book might read different if it was written by someone in Nome, Slapout or Pine Ridge.
  • fundamentalist
    Wallis: “Clearly, the financial crisis is a structural meltdown that calls for increased government regulation of banks and other financial players.”

    Only if you don’t understand economics.

    Wallis: “Human beings are stewards of God's creation and should preside over the market -- not the other way around.”

    Humans do preside over the market because the market is nothing but a process in which humans engage each other to discover prices and purchases things they need. The crisis had nothing to do with markets and everything to do with state intervention in the economy.

    Wallis: “And the market's first commandment, "There is never enough," must be replaced by the dictums of God's economy -- namely, there is enough, if we share it.”

    That’s not a dictum of any market. Wallis is creating a straw man. But the last statement, “there is enough, if we share it” is dangerous. There is enough right now because capitalism has made us very productive. But if you destroy capitalism, then soon there will not be enough if we share it. That is the lesson history should have taught us, particularly the histories of the USSR, China, N. Korea and Cuba.

    Wallis: “In my home town of Detroit, which has been hit especially hard by the recession, with unemployment levels over 30 percent, the Capuchin Fathers are giving away hundreds of thousands of plants…”

    While those efforts are good, maybe you should consider giving away U-haul trailers instead.

    Wallis: “The banks say they are "too big to fail." So let's make them smaller.”

    I agree, but I also know that is nothing but wishing on a star. Please read about regulatory capture. The concept has been around for 50 years but few religious leaders know about it. The guv bailed out the big banks because the big banks have captured the regulatory agencies. Because the big banks control those agencies, making them smaller is impossible.

    My prayer for all religious leaders this year is for them to learn more economics. Christian leaders are acting like Muslims who claim that everything they need to know about economics is in the Koran. There is more to economics than appears in the Bible, just as there is more to medicine than anointing with oil and prayer. If they do, they will be surprised to learn that the crisis would have happened regardless of how moral people are or are not. It was not a crisis or morality, but a crisis of economic theory. A good place to start is with the book “This Time is Different” by Rogoff.
  • Nathan Bedford
    There's always the possibility that I misinterpreted your original post, and when that occurs, I'd be more than willing to recant and apologize. So I went back and reread your original post.

    The first part refers to Reverend Wallis as "a DC author and New York publisher" and to me it clearly implies that anyone who is currently living in Washington, DC cannot possibly have a clue as to what is going on about mainstream America. When you use terms that are clearly pejorative, you subject yourself to two fallacies - (1) that Wallis has always lived in DC and has no idea what is going on in the rest of the United States and (2) that the residents of Washington, DC are not also feeling the effects of the economic recession.

    The second part of your quote "running a book tour through the New York, DC, California book circuit..." clearly implies that Wallis's itinerary is limited to those liberal bastions. If you had only taken 5 minutes to check on the planned cities, you would have been disabused of that idea.

    So yes, I do reject your question because when the answer to your question is easily available to anyone who has a computer, it is not really a question. Instead of characterizing Wallis's tour as some kind of elitist boondoggle, I would suggest that you keep him in your prayers and if he comes to a city near you, confront him with your recommendations.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008