RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Haiti and Anti-Evangelist Pat Robertson’s ‘Gospel’ of Disgrace

by Jarrod McKenna 01-14-2010

Sam Harris, Richard Dawkin, and Christopher Hitchens have nothing on the greatest evangelist of atheism today, Pat Robertson. The Red Cross has reported up to 3 million of God’s children have been killed, injured, or left homeless in Haiti after a devastating natural disaster hit one of the world’s poorest nations. Lament and compassion are the dominant responses from most people around the world. We cry out with the psalmist, “How long O Lord,” and let these tear-soaked prayers [for God’s healing presence to penetrate the pain of our world] fuel our compassionate response to the suffering of these sisters and brothers.

Yet our heartbreak has turned to anger as another ‘televangelist’ offers ridiculous easy antidotes that are devoid of compassion (let alone sanity) and filled with self-righteous pretense.  It’s sometimes hard as an Australian to understand these aspects that populate the landscape of Christianity in the U.S. This first hit me while I was studying in the U.S. in 2001 and the horror that unfolded on the 11th of September that year. As people grieved, this horror was compounded with the words of Jerry Falwell who blamed the terrorist attacks on the queer community, feminists, and any number of other groups he found it useful to scapegoat. While some of my American friends were shocked but not surprised, I couldn’t get over how bizarre this was, coming from someone who claims Jesus of Nazareth is at the centre of their faith!! And now Pat Robertson has continued this tradition of Christians doing altar-calls for atheism by blaming the earthquake on the victims of it. (!?!?!) Robertson said Haitians had “made a pact with the Devil” to gain freedom from the French. Does he apply the same logic to the U.S. gaining independence from Britain?

No. We can’t expect logic nor any sense of history. Pat Robertson (who also called for the assassination of Hugo Chavez), would probably have had no problem with the CIA-backed coup that overthrew the democratically elected Aristide in Haiti, a Catholic Priest whose liberation theology drove him to work for improving the condition of the poor in a nation where people literally eat mud cakes to gain some nutrition.

I know Jesus asks us to pray for people like Pat Robertson, but at the moment I just feel angry. The spiritual immaturity that’s revealed in the inability to enter into our own pain and the pain of the world by offering such ridiculous ‘answers’ (blaming the victims!) is shocking.  What does it mean when self-proclaimed “Christian leaders” are against the message of Christ? What does it mean when “evangelists” seem to convert people to atheism?!? I think Olbermann’s comments articulate the anger of many who are bewildered by such callousness:

Maybe Pat Robertson’s comments are another example of ‘the primitive brain’ dressed-up in Christian-drag that Brian McLaren has recently blogged about. Still, I can understand why many people would hear Pat Robertson’s comments and think in comparison atheism is an attractive option. Jim Wallis would be quick to remind us that the answer to ‘bad faith’ is not ‘no faith’ but ‘better faith.’ Let us hope the church’s critique of Pat Robertson’s televangelism will be the practice of the good news of Christ-like compassion for the victims of Haiti.

portrait-jarrod-mckennaJarrod McKenna is seeking to live God’s love in a world where business as usual is costing us the earth (at the expense of the poor). He is a co-founder of the Peace Tree Community serving with the marginalised in one of the poorest of areas in his city, heads up Together for Humanity in Western Australia (an inter-faith youth initiative working for the common good), and is the founder and creative director of Empowering Peacemakers (EPYC), for which he has received an Australian peace award in his work for in empowering a generation of “eco-evangelists” and “peace prophets.”

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • kiramatalishah
    Welcome to the safest, easiest way to get a real work at home job. Work at home jobs can be hard to trust. That's why we research and publish only the best of the best... carefully pre-screened, 100% scam-free work at home jobs you can depend on. No get rich quick schemes. No scams. Just 100% real work at home jobs

    www.onlineuniversalwork.com
  • sacredsalvage
    If Pat Robertson or anyone else is knowledgeable enough to discern God's intention in a natural catastrophe, they have assumed a place of omniscience that I am uncomfortable with. This is similar to what is recorded in scripture about the tradition of believing that babies born with disabilities were the result of sin of the parents. The arrogance it requires to make such a statement is jaw-dropping. Clearly it was ill timed, but more than that it was self-assuming. Proverbs addresses the fact that the rain falls on the righteous and unrighteous. In fact, many times (as addressed in Hebrews 11), the righteous suffer more so. Is it easier to stare into the face of a suffering nation if you believe you have some sense of righteous indignation about why they are suffering? Pat Robertson lost his voice to me more than a decade ago. It is a shame that this has gotten the attention it has. I wish he would retire and step away from the media. There is a fine line between the voice of a prophet and the voice of presumption.
  • NC77
    The fact that he wished both Limbaugh and Robertson to rot in hell is all that is needed. There are many more reasons but what came out of his mouth, the content of his heart is plenty to prove he is not a Christian and is against Christ.
  • myfanwy
    Please cite your reasons for saying that Keith Olbermann is anti-Christian. I watch his show regularly. I think he is anti-hypocrites, not anti-Christian.
  • myfanwy
    Demshoff---

    Hmmm. Jesus was a person who loved outrageously and universally and whose heart in the end did indeed bleed, along with the rest of his body, as he was horribly tortured for the love of US. To me, "liberalism" means compassion and helping others to carry their load, something Christ also advocated. I would be interested in knowing how you envision your stereotypical "bleeding heart liberal."
  • myfanwy
    Probably.
  • myfanwy
    "Sadly, that reasoning isn't available to Christians. Once divine intervention is bought into, the dark times have to be explained through blame assignment. Either that, or one has to ignore the dissonance between the concept a loving creator who *can* intervene and the reality of one who doesn't."

    Please don't think that is true. I know many, many devout Christians who don't believe that at all. Just because we can't apply our somewhat imperfect logic to any given event and explain why it happened doesn't mean it isn't part of God's plan, or that God can't ultimately bring something good out of something bad. Robertson is a nut. Rush Limbaugh is just odious. God probably loves them both, and we all ought to be happy about that, because if he can love them, then we are in great shape. However, if their actions are any indication, Christian they are not.
  • DennisMoore1
    Hello, I am new to this discussion but cannot help but to offer some contribution to it...

    As it appears to me this is the situation as it stands:

    Skeptimal has rightly pointed out that:

    If we are to thank God for good things and take them as a blessing from him then we are going to need an explanation for why bad things happen ... but we don't (unless we count pacts with the devil as an explanation).

    This presents us with a real problem which I myself have bee struggling with (which is partly why I was compeled to write something down.

    Firstly: It is very important that we do not get drawn into language of randomness and chance, these words have very little meaning. We live in a logical and rational universe (Christians will attribute this to God having made it that way). The idea of an event being random does not fit in with notions of rationality and reason, chance is not a power in itself but a way to say that we do not understand all he factor which cuased something to happen. Eg: flipping a coin, this gives the illusion of a random 50:50 chance, but if we understood the upward force of the flip, the counter force of gravity the number of rotations etc etc we would know for sure whether the result would be heards or tails.

    The key point here is not that we don't understand the cause but that there is a cause, a reason why everyting happens.

    Everything that happens is subject to the laws of the universe and so an answer to a question about why an earthquake has happened is really a scientific one. This earth queake was not a random event, to be specific it probably happened due to a rupture on the Enriquillo-Plaintain Garden fault which had been locked solid gathering stress for 250 years or so. I don't imagine this is the kind of answer anyone wants or expects but it is true.

    Saying that an event such of this happened for no reason or was a random event is simply untrue. As Newton showed everything is the product of cause and effect cause and effect. This leads me personaly to the belief that, in terms of being intelectually satisfying, the notion that there was an origional cause (origional sin) to suffering is correct.

    That original cause (call it whatever suits you) had the effect of causing widespread destruction geologicaly (he earths crust is shattered like a broken egg shell) which has in turn caused numerous earthquakes and valcanoes which in turn can sometimes cause immense human suffering.

    I don't have this all figured out but that is sort of where I have arrived at so far.

    (it is worth mentioning here that our understanding of why there things happen is irrelevant, even if these people were getting what they deserved we as Christians should be the very first to try to help them since we of all peope know what it means to be given help when we do not deserve any, by this I mean grace and mercy).
  • Sue_DeNym
    We cannot just ignore Robertson. Some folks take our non-response as agreement, they believe that Robertson speaks for Christians, and they think, "Well, if that's the Christian viewpoint, I want nothing to do with it!" And one more person is turned away from the Gospel and Christ.

    Many people have a very negative, distorted view of Christianity because of people like Robertson, Fred Phelps, the Ku Klux Klan and other folks who call themselves "Christians" and act like
    un-Christlike bullies.
  • ToGodBeTheGlory
    BluegrassOhio...
    Maybe true, but like Ninevah, I am sure some of the population didn't take kindly to the government, but were still under the judgement. Luckily they as a whole turned to the forgiveness and love and opportunity that God provides, and they were released from the judgement. Did Haiti do the same? Will the US do the same? Will I do the same? We can only hope and pray so. And, one can argue multiple ways about the catholic faith and christianity as the original disciples (thinking Peter) and Jesus desired - after all, the position of pope, Mary, the Eucharist, etc aren't necessarily how Jesus and the disciples originated....
  • BluegrassOhio
    "He was just proposing a statement that due to Haiti's past defiance of God's way, and decision to adopt voodoo as a way"

    Baloney! Many years ago a leader and several followers did this, but not all of Haiti. Just a few people. 85% of the nation are Catholic.
  • BluegrassOhio
    Perhaps because when your biggest motive is to build a business empire you must know what the customers feel, need, and want, and Pat learned quickly he was making his customers mad?
  • ToGodBeTheGlory
    God judged in the Old Testament, and nations were impacted negatively (and positively) with these judgements (ninevah, Sodom, Gomorrah, Israel, Juday, Rome, Philistines, etc.). This occurred in the times of the New Testament as well - see Israel and Rome and Greece and what occurred to them after Jesus' time). Jesus came to fulfill the law, to fulfill the O.T. He and God are one. We cannot accept the Love and good stuff of Jesus without the wrath and justified righteousness of God as well. God is long-suffering and loving, and full of grace for us. But He also judges nations, and people, and you cannot deny past events as they were affected by God's judgements. Pat Robertson wasn't judging Haiti, though that is what everyone keeps saying. He was just proposing a statement that due to Haiti's past defiance of God's way, and decision to adopt voodoo as a way, that this might have been a connection between a natural disaster, and God's allowance for some kind of judgement. He wasn't putting judgement on Haiti, he was just presuppositioning and trying to put an understanding on what might be occurring... His timing was poor, his lack of putting correct verbiage to his thoughts might have been very bad, but his message might not be too terribly against understanding of current events through christian glasses. I believe that the U.S. will be held up to God's judgement as well, for its debasing of truth and moral christian living as God would desire, and I believe we are experiencing it now, and it will get worse. This is not me judging, but trying to understand how God sees sin, and our country's cesspool lifestyles. And we as Christians in America will be in the fray as well, unless we pray for God's forgiveness and turning His wrath from us as Ninevah did. You cannot take one side of Christianity without accepting the other side. Both the OT and the NT are part and one of the same Book of the One True God who is justified, righteous, and deserves to perform whatever He desires on this world. There are natural events that occur just because - such as earthquakes, etc which are proven to be natural events based on this world and how it functions. But God can intervene in each and every event - and does. And we forget that sometimes He takes His children home to Him in these events because it is their time, and we are left here to try and understand why some lived and some died, not seeing the full picture that God sees and works through.
  • BluegrassOhio
    The mega church pastors across America seem to be silent? They have an association/organization that has not spoken out has it?
  • BluegrassOhio
    I think you have the same Christian consevatives in Australia, they are not just in the U.S. as you claim. The difference is how much the media is willing to quote them and bait the viewing public. In the U.S., the media really want to titillate, in other countries they are more into informing.
  • scat
    You may try to minimize Robertson's remarks, but unfortunately he has a very large platform and those words will have an impact. He has thousands of followers who look to him for guidance and he has given the stamp of approval on mean-spirited, arrogant judgmental attitudes. For those who are not followers, this is just another reason to stay away from Christianity. It is remarks like his that have given Christiawnity such a black eye, that I do not describe my self as such but rather as one who aspires to follow Christ's teaching. Interestingly, that sometimes leads to discussion of what being a follower means.

    In addition, his kind of thinking is illogical. If tragedy only struck folks who deserved it because of thier own or ancestor's sins, then blessings would likewise be reserved for those who are without sin. Anyone with eyes to see and a mind to think know that is not true. Bad things happen to good people and vice versa.But if we feel qualified to judge people by the tragedies or blessings that fall on them,then we can justify our own self-righteousness, put ourselves up on a pedestal and judge away. Clearly that is not the teaching of Christ.

    I think the natural world is neither fair or unfair. We are given the opportunity here to use our heads and hearts to tame the destructive natural forces and produce a world that offers all of God's children a life that is productive, creative and appreciative. I think God may on ocassion interfere with the natural course of events, but for reasons we are not able to fathom. Maybe He will sometimes save one person while others perish, not because the one saved was so special but rather to give him a chance to improve his standing with God.
    It is best not to suppose we know God's reasons in such circumstances and rather focus on our own behaviour.

    Robertson has the right to say any foolish thing that comes to mind, but that doesn't mean it is right to do so. And although I hope his organization goes all out to help in Haiti, those remarks are not the sort to get the followers fired up.
  • NC77
    I think Olbermann’s comments articulate the anger of many who are bewildered by such callousness:

    Jarrod, are you serious? Keith Olbermann is Anti-Christian and often mocks them. You think what he said is the sentiments of other Christians, even though those Christians disagree with Robertson? I am sorry, but I see some duplicity here. What happened to the Christian ethic that you preach (as Jesus did) about not returning evil for evil, but rather return ood?
  • crystal_brooks
    This is really much ado about nothing. His comment is mild in comparison to what he said after 9/11. He is what he is. He has a right to his opinion whether you agree or not. It wasn't nearly as harsh as Rush Limbaugh's comments or Bill O'Reilly. Why don't you get angry about that? Does it bother anyone that 58% of those polled on CNN's website said they don't plan to give? And who cares about Keith Olbermann? No one is going to take Pat Robertson's comments and use that as an excuse to be a non-Christian. And bottomline, I don't care what Pat Robertson says. At the end of the day, his organization Operation Blessing will do more in the way of relief efforts than everybody combined on this blog and probably the author.
  • ckgmail
    What about it when they use religion as a basis for their own hardhearted conservative viewpoints.
  • ckgmail
    "We" do not judge individuals or nations. God is the judge.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008