RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Obama’s Call for Civility Amid Prayer Breakfast Controversy

by Jim Wallis 02-04-2010

President Obama spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast this morning, with a plea for civility in our political discourse.  Noting how Americans come together in times of danger or tragedy, he spoke specifically about the response to the recent earthquake in Haiti.  Then he went on to note that such a spirit seems lacking when dealing with other long-term issues:

At times, it seems like we’re unable to listen to one another; to have at once a serious and civil debate.  And this erosion of civility in the public square sows division and distrust among our citizens. It poisons the well of public opinion. It leaves each side little room to negotiate with the other. It makes politics an all-or-nothing sport, where one side is either always right or always wrong when, in reality, neither side has a monopoly on truth. And then we lose sight of the children without food and the men without shelter and the families without health care. Empowered by faith, consistently, prayerfully, we need to find our way back to civility.

This year’s gathering had become more controversial than usual because of allegations that some members of the sponsoring organization, a loosely affiliated network of Christian leaders known as The Fellowship (or The Family), had connections to Ugandan lawmakers advocating imprisonment and execution of homosexuals. Other members of The Fellowship have condemned the legislation, and those who advocated it were disinvited from the prayer breakfast. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton criticized this legislation in her speech to the breakfast, and following her, President Obama said:

We may disagree about gay marriage, but surely we can agree that it is unconscionable to target gays and lesbians for who they are — whether it’s here in the United States or, as Hillary mentioned, more extremely in odious laws that are being proposed most recently in Uganda.

Despite the controversy, the National Prayer Breakfast has a history as a forum for some of the most profound statements of faith in public life, including Bono’s speech in 2006, Sen. Mark Hatfield’s prophetic challenge against the moral “shame” of the Vietnam War with Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger in attendance, and when Mother Theresa spoke on abortion and the sacredness of life.

And, as the president concluded:

progress doesn’t come when we demonize opponents.  It’s not born in righteous spite.  Progress comes when we open our hearts, when we extend our hands, when we recognize our common humanity.  Progress comes when we look into the eyes of another and see the face of God.  That we might do so — that we will do so all the time, not just some of the time — is my fervent prayer for our nation and the world.

portrait-jim-wallisJim Wallis is the author of Rediscovering Values: On Wall Street, Main Street, and Your Street — A Moral Compass for the New Economy, CEO of Sojourners and blogs at www.godspolitics.com.

+Click here to get email updates from Jim Wallis

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • SamHamilton
    Cost does a good job of distilling Obama's thought process down to this:

    We're the ones who are (mostly) public-spirited and rational; they're the ones who are (mostly) self-interested and using propaganda. Thus, bipartisanship will come when they mend their ways. In so doing, they will start to agree with us. While there may be some lingering divisions, many will disappear. After all, if both sides are motivated by the public interest and making recourse only to rational argument - how much divergence can there possibly be?

    While I think both parties think like this, the Democrats are particularly prone to it because they see themselves as the party of the little guy while Republicans are the party of "big business" and "the rich". They dismiss out of hand the idea that Republicans may be operating from principles from time to time.
  • Patricia
    Do you understand that GM DECLARED BANKRUPTCY? And, do you understand that there is a specific, set, procedure for the amount of money one is reimbursed in bankruptcy proceedings? And that bankruptcy proceedings are different from the TARP funds President Bush authorized for AIG?

    I'm not saying one is better than the other, but that they can't be truthfully compared because they are not the same. Two different situations, two different processes, two different results. Not quite fulfilling the requirements of the definition of demonization :).
  • NC77
    Thanks stevie I forgot about that one. But I did recall one over the weekend. Calling the GM and Chrysler bond holders speculators in a way as if they were greedy and evil. They got ripped off in the bankrupcies of those two companies while the govenment gave GM 45 billion that just disappeared (most likely used to prop up unions). Goldman Sachs got dollar for dollar compensation from AIG in the bailout.
  • kansasmennonite
    You made a point about Mass's health care coverage. I wonder too if that's why he was elected (their health care needs were already taken care of). Thanks for pointing that out. I haven't seen that point in the media but have thought about it myself.
  • kansasmennonite
    Do you attend church and do you appreciate people calling your faith into question?
  • kansasmennonite
    His campaign was nothing but bashing the opposing side. And than he got Sarah to do his "bashing" and that didn't work either. Remember her lines about the "true Americans", etc.? Calling into question the patriotism of anyone who didn't think llike they did? Can you name a time when the democrats called into question the patriotism of people?

    Side note: Bob Dole was pushing for the reform on health care but the republicans wouldn't listen but in the last election his wife Elizabeth called her opponent an athiest to try and win the election. Talk about demonizing! ( her opponent was a Sunday School teacher).
  • Patricia
    The more I read you, the sadder I become that you are so consumed by blind, irrational hate and bitterness. I pray for healing for you.

    And BTW - the people of Massachusetts already have universal health coverage that is MORE generous than that being offered in the national plan, so they have absolutely nothing to lose if national health care fails. It's everyone else who will be left in the lurch.
  • What is sad is that McCain has a true track record of being bipartisan and could not get elected

    Because he had to kiss the conservatives' collective heinie even to get the nomination.
  • Patricia
    Try to calm down :).

    I did not say he is perfect, I did not say and do not think he is an innocent, do-no-wrong, above-all type person. All I said was that, in comparison to the slanders and insults routinely launched by Republicans and FOX news, the examples cited by NC77 are rather weak.

    Sarcasm doesn't help civility - perhaps you can try another path.
  • Sounds to me like what people are truly angry about is the exercising of free specch as done by certain vocal conservatives (Palin, Limbaugh, Beck). But that is their legal, Constitutional right.

    It's a moral issue, not one of free speech; the First Amendment doesn't give you the right to shout "Fire!" in a crowded theatre. This Christian does not countenance distortions or outright lying for the sake of political or economic gain, which is what these people do regularly, and for that they deserve to be taken to account.

    BTW, Bush was "demonized" largely for his actions while in office, not for what he believed, and consider that liberals didn't criticize him at the time around 9/11 the way conservatives hounded Obama -- and Bill Clinton before him -- because they don't answer to them.
  • Patricia
    Why, specifically, are you so convinced the President doesn't understand, and doesn't like, the fact that our nation is a democracy? What, specifically are you basing those judgments upon?

    How, specifically, are you so assured that President Obama is advocating one-party rule? What actions that he has actually proposed, or taken, are you basing your opinion upon?

    What, specifically convinces you that President Obama is anti-Constitution and anti-free speech? What has he specifically done or said that proves this allegation?

    Every time I speak with my friends with these convictions, they are unable to come up with any TRUE, SPECIFIC underpinnings for their fear and anger. It's all just a generalized hatred based on what they hear on networks like FOX.

    Did you ever, really have a sense of respect for President Obama to lose? Or is this just more of the fear and anger you had before he was elected, in accordance with our Constitution?
  • FWIW, he was describing people in the center of my state right before the primary election -- and he was right (and was proven such).
  • kansasmennonite
    Look at the gun sales and ammo sales and the replublican party and tea party acting like a religion!

    I had a cousin that claimed that Obama wanted to take his guns away. Put his guns above his chrisitan peace stance. Way to go. I believe Obama was right on with those words. He was describing a very real attitude that has no place in our christian walk.
  • kansasmennonite
    You don't have a clue what demonization is.
  • steviewonfan
    Thank God for the people of Massachusettes and the election of Scott Brown, because now, the "reform" bill (more like a control, we-will-micromanage-your-lives bill) is almost dead! And I am celebrating!!

    We need health reform but we do NOT need Obama being the god of our lives!! WE do NOT need him contolling not only car companies, banks, Wall Street, and everything else he is atempting to control, esp. health care!!

    I have no problem with the accusations that he is Socialist/Marxist/Leninist. Not sure yet which he is for sure, but he certainly is a narcissistic, control-freak, and we need to call it like it is. Speaking the truth is not demonization. If Obama is Socialistic,which by his very comments and actions, he certainly appears to be, there is no demonization in labeling him as such.

    I am grateful for the Republicans. Thank God they have spoken out and obstructed certain things. For many Democrats, including Obama, Pelosi, Reid, etc.... they want nothing more than for Republicans to just be dumb/blind/mute so that they can have total control over this nation, and ram all their agendas through. In their dreams, there would be no Republican party.

    Is that what America is all about? A one-party rule? Nope. And for that, I am thankful, because living under liberal leadership, as we are living under, is sheer misery!! And a whole heck of a lot of people, as polls and recent elections indicate, seem to agree. Can't wait until November we can get our voices back!!
  • steviewonfan
    I, too, have been greatly saddened (disgusted actually) by Obama's demonizing of the Republican party. He is an EXTREMELY partisan President. I have no doubt he'll go down in history as being the most divisive and partisan President and for creating the most divisive, partisan atmosphere among the public that has ever existed. He, too, totally "turns me off," although he seems to be getting the message that the pubic is "turned off" of his divisive partisanship, but although in word he says he's open to Republican input, I doubt it. He just says it for the public benefit... hoping they'll believe it so that they will reelect him.
  • steviewonfan
    Ah, the beauty of free speech and living in a nation where we have that right.

    Sounds to me like what people are truly angry about is the exercising of free specch as done by certain vocal conservatives (Palin, Limbaugh, Beck). But that is their legal, Constitutional right. Just like Olbermann (who, btw, called Scott Brown a "racist homophobe" who "supports violence against women") has the right to spew his ignorant, arrogant venom to anyone who can stomach his foolish ranting.

    But the bottom line... we live in a land where we have free speech. It really has nothing to do with Jesus other than that our forefathers wanted to create a nation in which people had freedoms, like free speech.

    But who decides who "deserves" critism? IMO, Obama deserves critism because he is the President of the U.S.!! And because he's hired a bunch of loons on his administration (tax cheats, incompetents, etc.), and I could go on, but just like Bush was severely demonized (and still is), so is Obama. It goes with the territory. If he can't handle it, he shouldn't have run for President, and we shouldn't have been dumb enough to elect him!!
  • steviewonfan
    Okay, let's just agree to it... Obama is perfect. Perfection with an angelic halo over his head. He'd never (gasp!) dare to even demonize anyone. He's so kind, so wonderful, so charming. He can do no wrong. He wouldn't ever stoop to doing anything like demonizing someone. He just loves and adores his enemies, in fact. Loves Fox News. Loves Limbaugh. Loves it when people critize and oppose him. He's practically God. Well, at least according to Newsweek!

    Okay, yes, I am being sarcastic, but I get so exasperated with how people seem to think that Obama is this innocent, do-no-wrong, above-all type of person!! He's NOT!
  • steviewonfan
    No. They don't attend church. And he told people at the prayer breakfast not to question his faith.
  • steviewonfan
    Let's not forget the snide, rude, arrogant comment about the middle Americans who "cling to guns and religion."
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008