RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

Bearing Witness Against Cyber-Smears in the Immigration Debate

by Brian McLaren 03-04-2010

Isn’t there something in the Bible about not bearing false witness? How is it then, whether in relation to the president’s religious affiliation, the health-care debate, and now the immigration debate as well, so many Christians do so by hitting “forward” when they receive the latest chain e-mail, forwarding a false witness on to their neighbors and friends?

Here’s my prediction. As the health-care debate moves toward a final up or down vote, more and more of these hysterical e-mails (often identifiable because they contain LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS! and even MORE exclamation POINTS!!!) will start being forwarded through cyberspace, spreading misinformation and religious terror about the latest CONSPIRACY THEORY! You’ll find out that the government wants to KILL YOUR GRANDMOTHER, or CONVERT YOUR CHILDREN TO SOCIALISM and that sort of thing.

And then, as soon as the health-care debate is over and we move on to immigration reform, I imagine that an even more dangerous kind of hysteria will be virusing its way to a computer near you. These e-mails will link God, country, and the good old days … which between the lines means those days when white people were in charge. That kind of nostalgia might sound good for suburban white folks like me who remember sunny summer afternoons playing kickball or riding skateboards with our friends in the 1950’s and 1960’s. But my African American, Asian, Latino, and other friends don’t have such great memories of those days. They remember being called “boy” or “chink” or whatever. They remember segregated schools and restaurants and neighborhoods where they didn’t dare go.

To be a follower of Christ means to join Christ in solidarity with our neighbors. He is the one, Paul says in 2 Corinthians, who was rich, but for our sake became poor. So if we’re rich and safe, we join Christ in solidarity with the poor and vulnerable. If we’re privileged and powerful, we join Christ in solidarity with the excluded and marginalized. If we’re righteous and religious, we join Christ in solidarity with the sinners and lost sheep. And if we get an e-mail asking us to break solidarity with other human beings, to form an us against them, to accept a caricature or stereotype of a human being made in the image of God … then we join Christ in solidarity with the ones against whom false witness is being born.

That means we don’t hit forward. Instead, we hit “reply,” and we kindly but firmly say, “This is misinformation. I find this offensive and inappropriate. Can I explain why by phone?” Then, if the sender is willing, we have a kind but firm conversation by phone (or face to face) where we offer a different perspective. We don’t condemn the person or attack the person who sent the e-mail to us. We just bear another witness, a true one, one in solidarity with the people with whom Christ stands. We don’t say, “You shouldn’t … you should … you’re wrong …” but we say, “I can’t … I feel … I see it this way …” Your job isn’t to convince or convert the other person; it’s just to bear witness … true witness in the face of false witness.

Maybe Edmond Burke’s famous words deserve to be adapted to today’s cyber-world: All that’s necessary for the forces of fear, misinformation, and hysteria to win in this world is for enough wise people to remain silent.

Brian McLarenBrian McLaren is an author and speaker whose new book is A New Kind of Christianity: Ten Questions That Are Transforming the Faith.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • liastar
    Yes, healthcare rationing takes place every day - thanks to insurance companies protecting their bottom line. As a Canadian who fully enjoys the privilege of a fine single-payer system, I can assure you - no one has ever threatened to pull the plug on my Grandma. My biggest complaint against Americans who trash the single-payer approach is this: You. Have. No. Idea. What. You're. Talking. About.
    Oh, and you have my blessing to keep on living the way you're living.
  • liberalinlove
    Thank you. I hope if my fruit gets rotten, someone is gracious enough to help me prune the dead wood.

    There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, REPUBLICAN, nor DEMOCRAT for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

    We march better with a left foot and a right foot, serve better with a right hand and a left hand.

    I love Stephen Covey's stuff on seeking first to hear and then to be heard. I love assuming people's hearts are in the right place. I love the fact that God had to do an incredibly mighty work with me to change my perspective AND HE DID NOT GIVE UP! I love looking for positive solutions and knowing that true wisdom from above is full of good fruit and peaceable and accessible to all who ask.

    Thanks again, for letting me know the changes in me are visible to others.
  • letjusticerolldown
    Thank you for your gratitude. Thank you for noticing fruit and seeking to reproduce it.

    Maybe the point is about such things as gratitude and fruitfulness that is the point--and not whether the family was Democrat, Republican or Green Bay Packers.
  • Sorry to hear that. All you have to do is post your email address in random places around the internet. You'll be caught up in no time!
  • scat
    I had a similar experience when I first gave control of my life to God's principles. I was in the process of examining the idea that you had be a right-wing Reopublican to be a Christian, which is essentially what fundamentalists taught. I re-conneted with my oldest friend whose strict religious upbringing was always in my mind a plus. I totally trusted in this friend's high moral character. As it turned out, this person had become arrogant, judgmental, bigoted and cruel. This old friend had been eaten up by an ideology that permits just about anything in the name of Goid. It exalts judgmentalism over charity, church attendance over living what Christ taught, arrogance over repentence.
    I know not all conservatives or right-wingers are like that. But as with any group, it's the noisiest ones that get noticed. I don't identify with either the right or the left, but rather try to make my decisions with guidance from Christ's teachings. I do not trust anyone who lies or distorts the truth. There is so mu;ch of that in everyday life as well as politics that it is pretty easy to identify. It does seem to me that the right seem less bothered about lying. It seems as long as it is for a good reason, it is OK with them. Then it gets to be a routine, a habit.
  • squeaky
    Totally agree. Maybe the thoughtful conservatives are afraid of the screamers because the screamers scream even louder at them than they do at the liberals, it seems. At least Meghan McCain seems to be standing up to the Tea Partiers, and getting hammered by them for it. And already Scott Brown has lost his shiny newness by not toeing the party line on the jobs bill.

    And totally agree about this new format, too. It's got its advantages, like not having to sift through all the posts to find the new ones. But having gotten used to the old format, I guess I kind of liked the fact you could easily follow who said what to whom.

    Alas, our protests will likely go unheard, as seems is the case with Disqus. Mostly I'm just glad when I the comment function works, which is rare. I will get out of this thread, and won't be able to comment again.
  • scat
    This new format is awful -- it is nearly impossible to follow discussions because replies are in the right place. Maybe everyone wnt home for the week-end. And I'm not on a Mac.
    I agree with your resopnse to LV -- the hard-to-find serious conservatives are the ones that should be responding to the screamers who just say anything they think will get attention. But it almost looks like they are afraid of the screamers. The screamers just keep doing it because it seems to work, and some of them are making a ton of money doing it.
    AS for people forwarding these hateful lying e-mails without reading them, doing that is in my opinion just as much a lie as is spreading gossip without even caring if it is true. I would never forward an e-mail to my friends and familyl without reading it. Pleading ignorance is just inadequate.
  • liberalinlove
    First rule of thumb for winning a good argument. If you can't win on merits of the debate, discredit the source.

    We all have our frame of reference and much of what we know is based on experience. I'm ashamed to admit it, but I honestly didn't know you could be a Christian and be a democrat until I was in my late 30's. That type of bigotry for me came from a deep desire to love God with all my heart soul and mind, and be the kind of Godly person, God would truly be proud of. I had any number of people, from my church members and family as well as those from Focus on the Family to keep my own focus and experience narrow.

    When I discovered my best childhood friend's family, who had attended our church, were staunch democrats, I literally could not wrap my mind around it. But their integrity and mentorship in walking out their faith kept me tethered to my own. Because I had become so disillusioned with all I had known, I sometimes felt I'd lost my moorings. Yet I saw Jesus daily in their home and in their personal lives. Instead of What would Jesus Do, my husband and I would often say, What would Don Do? We simply didn't recognize a Jesus we could relate to from others that we had known.

    I think a mind set is especially hard to break because there is often so much zeal in the purpose it is held. My cyber-friendly friends, would never believe their source for information could lie to them. They Love the Lord. They are seeking to be faithful to His cause. I stayed up until 4 a.m. backtracking the source of one post sent to me, that stated, Obama refused to place his hand over his heart during the National Anthem. The source was a church and a pastor's wife from Florida. I admonished her especially as a leader to her responsibility to not be a tale bearer, or bear false witness.

    Another post sent to me more than once over several years supposedly by Focus on the Family, was in fact according to Focus on the Family a hoax, Yet it continued to travel in loops from one evangelical faithful to the next year after dreary year. I responded to everyone whose e-mail showed on the petition explaining that even Focus on the Family said it was a hoax and please be more careful.
    This is how people line up behind pundits and pastors. The language of the faithful is spoken. For the crafty spin doctors, it doesn't take much to learn the language or take advantage of it.

    Today, I assume the best about the reasons why people believe what they believe and do what they do. I don't judge the heart, but I've become religious about inspecting fruit. Is it the peaceable fruit of righteousness I see coming through loud and clear, or does it smell rotten. I'm grateful for a Democrat family, who broadened my experience and allowed me to see a fruit bearing tree that nourished my impoverished soul.
  • Patricia
    Under your definition, ANY lying would be excused as long as the person doing the lying thought some greater good was going to come of it. That "moral heirarchy" is rather flat. Sorry, but at least in Catholic theology, the bar is quite a bit higher than that. And the sort of lying we're discussing here in the immigration, health care, and just plain politics "debates" just wouldn't come anywhere near clearing that bar.
  • kansasmennonite
    Should we kill an abortion clinic Dr? When the end justifies the means all kinds of things happen.
  • Lord_Voldemort
    1. All else being equal, snarks are better than rants. If nothing else, they tend to be shorter.

    2. You tend to find what you are looking for. If you want to hear reasonable conservative points of view, they aren't all that hard to find. If you want rants, we got those too.

    3. Look, my main beef is with Brian McLaren, who presents himself as a deep thinker but picks on anonymous folks who don't write for a living, and then doesn't even give us the benefit of letting us see what the heck it is he's all worked up about. Instead he just says they want to go back to a time when white folks ran everything. Well, maybe that's really what they're after, and maybe it's not. Without a link or a quote, God only knows what's in these mysterious emails. If someone wants to throw around accusations of racism, they might want to present some proof.

    4. Enough, you have the last word if you want it. I'm gonna do something more constructive. Did anyone happen to see a squirrel?

    LV
  • MommaN
    I like Brian McLaren. I also liked the heart of this message... I am a liberal-loving, Obama supporting, health care and immigration reform nut! But, in support of the very ideas BL is attempting to champion here, I take issue with one statement in this post:

    "These e-mails will link God, country, and the good old days … which between the lines means those days when white people were in charge.'

    I'm sorry, as much as we might see (or think we see) racist undertones in any attack against the President or his policies, we simply HAVE to stop taking every opportunity say this. If we expect to have a genuine community discussion, if we expect all people to abandon an "us vs them' mentalitiy, then we simply cannot continually attack using the words "racist." And whether you want to admit it or not, the racism charge is emotional and therefore an attack.

    Having a genuine conversation about racism and its role in the current political debate is one thing. But the off the cuff remarks like this one are the real problem: in one sentence McLaren has associated ALL people who forward anti-health care emails with the crazies who want to assassinate the president. Its downright unfair, and it excludes reasoned, non-racist conservatives from the debate.

    And by the way, I read the comments about how liberals don't do the email forward. I am not sure why not, but some of my CRAZY liberal friends are not shy about posting un-fact checked liberal craze all over face book and other social networking sites.
  • ellamoore
    I understand that yes, people do that, but people think of morality as a hierarchy. We shouldn't lie... unless it is to save someone's life, for example. Let's say my neighbor is hiding in my house because her husband is trying to kill her. If he knocks on my door, I am going to lie and say she is not there. This is because the preservation of life supersedes the duty not to lie. Perhaps that is exactly what forwarders of false emails are doing. Maybe they think it is for the greater good. And if you still think "false forwarding" to "advance their cause" is immoral, then you would have to be against moral hierarchy in all its forms- like when a pro-life activist claims that an abortion performed at 8 or 12 or even 20 weeks physically hurts the fetus (this is false witness testimony if I ever heard it) because the activist believes this lie might prevent an abortion. I think it is up to the receiver of the information to do their own research on subjects, because people do lie to further their own agendas- often because they think they are preserving the greater good.
    ella moore
    www.morellaty.com
  • arachne646
    Hi, in Canada we have no healthcare rationing, beyond booking appointments in advance for non-urgent problems--or choose another doctor. Depending on where you live, you may wait many weeks for elective surgery like knee replacement, or pay for it yourself at a private clinic like cosmetic surgery which isn't covered. Medication is, hospitalization and physicians are, and if your family insists (my inlaws did) you will get full ambulance, ER and advanced intensive care every time you turn blue at the nursing home even if you have Alzheimer's, heart failure, and many other medical conditions. We have world-class cancer treatment, surgeons and research.
  • Charles Kiker
    Voices of reasoned conservatism have not been completely silenced. I cite the op. ed. of David Brooks in NYT of March 5, "The Wal-Mart Hippies." Of course the ranting voices from the Tea Parties no doubt disown Mr. Brooks as a conservative. But in response I assert that he is more conservative than they.
  • letjusticerolldown
    If I articulated the ten most important commitments of my life related to public/political life--I would not feel at home in the Democratic Party, nor the Republican Party. I would not feel represented in either the mainstream media--nor world of punditry, commentary,opinion.

    I do not think I am alone.

    The primary facilitators of public discussion are political leaders and mainstream journalists. To what degree do you believe they are placing important issues on the table and leading reasoned discussion?

    What we are seeing is a free-for-all in response to this sector that either abdicates responsibility; or acts in an elitist manner. It does not matter whether they are elitist. That is how many perceive them--and feel treated by them.

    The reality is that virtually everyone--right up to the President--feels that powerlessness. And it tends to lead to propoganda at best and vulgar shouting/violence at worst.

    So I appreciate McLaren's call that we individually respond in dialogue to those who spread misinformation. He highlights, in spite of our sense of powerlessness, that we all have a level of power and responsibility. It highlights we all have a level of power in our hearing and in our speaking.

    My points: 1. It is hard to place great expectations on people with relatively little power when so many of the voice with primary responsibility for shaping the macro-discussions in our society act with such frequent childishness; and 2. I think our pushbacks towards responsible dialogue need to be separated out from our advocacy and partisan activity (ie it doesn't work to say "I'm right because you yell")
  • squeaky
    Is anyone else having problems commenting or getting the comment section to show up on their computer? Is it because this new format doesn't work on a Mac?
  • squeaky
    Rant Warning Alert: You have set me off, so buckle up!

    Why not just have said all that in the first place instead of offering the snark? Part of the problem with people not being able to communicate intelligently about important issues is the dismissive nature of snark. It is in fact, this exact tactic that drowns out the Conservative voices of reason you speak of.
    I used to think they existed, you know, those "Conservative Voices of Reason." But from what I have seen over the past year, they have gone the way of the dinosaur. As evidence, I cite elected officials being shouted down at town hall meetings where people just can't seem to express their views intelligently and respectfully. I cite "death panels" and other deliberate lies used to derail intelligent conversations about the very grim future we face with health care. My hope that that creature exists is dashed every time Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck opens their mouth. My desire to hear reasoned discussion on important issues went out the window when someone yelled "you lie" at our President. See, all these people I mention have driven my belief that the reasoned conservatives that you speak of have taken up residence with Big Foot and the Yeti (with an occasional visit from their friend Nessie). And in order to understand the gravity of those statements, you need to understand I used to be a moderate, and I have voted Republican in several elections. But such voices drove me leftward.
    So I ask you, if your reasoned conservative views are being misrepresented by those I just mentioned and these ridiculous e-mails, then doesn't it seem reasonable you should direct your disdain not towards those who are receiving the misrepresented conservative message, but towards those who are actually misrepresenting it? if you really care whether or not Conservative views are being represented fairly, then by all means, PLEASE express your concerns to those who are doing the damage. And please don't blame those of us whose ears are unwittingly filled with the voices of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, and Ann Coultier. These are the ones misrepresenting your views, and these are the ones yelling the loudest, and try as I might, I just can't hear the still small voice of reasoned Conservatives through all that din. By all means, if this concerns you, take aim at the annoying voices who do nothing, absolutely nothing, to further reasoned and respectful dialogue. But don't blame those of us who receive their message for not being able to sift through to find the gold among the gravel.
    Your argument sounds very much like the one I've heard atheists cite about Christians who plead "no, we're not ALL like that!" The voices we hear are what represent truth to us. All else seems like myth.
    And yes, as I'm sure you can tell by my tone, I'm angry about this. I'm NOT angry at you, so please don't take it as an attack on you. But I am sick and tired of reasoned discussion being drowned out by those who have no desire for it. There are far too many incredibly important issues at stake in this country for this kind of third grade mentality to drown out the reasoned voices from both sides of the issue. And I actually value diversity of opinion. But if such diversity comes only in the form of shouting and yelling and refusing to listen and discuss, I'd rather send those diverse voices to their room without supper so the adults can get some work done.


    Look! Squirrel!
  • Lord_Voldemort
    What? Shiny? Where? Oooh!

    My comment about Olbermann wasn't meant as either an argument or a distraction. It was plain old snark. But since we're on the subject...

    From what I've seen -- and I may be missing something here -- there probably are more crazy emailers on the right than on the left. There are plenty of possible explanations why, among them the plethora of left-leaning media out there willing to spread half-baked theories. (Keith?)

    But that's not my main problem. My real problem is McLaren picking a bunch of random, admittedly loopy emails and assuming that these anonymous amateurs speak for the conservative movement as a whole. Any of you guys ever hear of Charles Krauthammer? George Will? Bill Kristol? Fred Barnes? Jonah Goldberg? Heritage Foundation? American Enterprise Institute? National Review? Weekly Standard? Powerline?

    Seriously, its very rare to see anyone here address the arguments raised by the actual intellectual leaders of the conservative movement. The only exception to the general rule is Cato Institute. Every now and then someone at Sojo will cite them, but only when there's some intramural disagreement having to do with the fine points of libertarianism.

    Wallis, McLaren, et al are supposed to be political sophisticates here. So why do they spend all their time picking on novices who are blowing off steam? Why not take on someone in their own intellectual weight class?

    Or maybe Sojo's brighter lights are afraid that they can't hang in there intellectually with the Krauthammers? So they beat up on the Joe the Plumbers instead?

    Look, I could go on all day about Keith Olbermann, and Olby has a name and a face and a TV show. I can link to youtube videos of his rants. Brian McLaren has a bunch of anonymous emailers that he can't even bother to quote from. And we're supposed to take him seriously as a critic of conservatism? Please.

    LV
  • squeaky
    You make good points, and I agree with your general statements. However, LV was responding to my point that I have never seen the Liberal equivalent of these e-mail forwards. He was responding to that assertion by deflecting to Keith Olbermann. In other words, he failed to respond to my question by presenting evidence that Liberals send these ridiculous e-mails out, too.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008