RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

A Pastor’s Response to Glenn Beck’s Call to Leave ‘Social Justice’ Churches

by Michael Hidalgo 03-09-2010

090918-glenn-beckRecently Glenn Beck made some comments about leaving a church if the priest or pastor speaks about “social justice.” He instructed his listeners to “look for the words ’social justice’ or ‘economic justice’ on your church Web site” and then, should they find those words, told them to “run as fast as you can.” Why? Well Beck believes those are “code words” that have malevolent ties to communism and Nazism.

He spoke about his own church community and his pastor, and said proudly that if his church was about “social justice” he would report his church to the church authorities. So Beck postures his argument as a churchgoer.

I have received a few e-mails and texts from people about these comments, so I thought I would respond to the many e-mails here.

Let me begin by saying that I do not presume to know how Beck defines social or economic justice. Perhaps he is referring to the ethos of caring for the poor and needy, or the demand for human rights in this world of ours. Maybe he is referring to the tradition of the prophets in the Hebrew scriptures, like Amos, who says:

There are those who oppress the innocent and take bribes
and deprive the poor of justice in the court …
This is what the Lord says …
“Let justice roll on like a river,
righteousness like a never-failing stream!”

(Amos 5, click here to read chapter).

First, if Beck is speaking about justice along with Amos and the other prophets, then he is definitely talking about caring the for the poor and speaking about human rights. Many people are up in arms about his wanting to link this ideology to political theories such as communism and Nazism.

However, we need not become so upset. For true justice is rooted in the heart of God. As the psalmist says, “Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne” (Psalm 89.4). If justice is of God, then we need not listen to Beck’s assertions. For God is not a Nazi or a Communist. Nor is God Democrat or Republican. In fact, God has no political affiliation. The rule and throne of God’s kingdom is built on righteousness and justice.

Second, Beck calls for those who are a part of churches that preach social justice to run away. He goes on to instruct his listeners to report their pastors or priests to the church authorities. With this side of Beck’s argument I too have no issue.

Some may, no doubt, leave their churches because of preachers preaching about poverty, human rights, economics, and justice. And if they do, then I say, “Thank you Glenn Beck, now there is room for more who are desperate to see justice roll on like a river.”

And now, a word to Glenn Beck. I will not argue with your political viewpoint. Everyone is entitled to have his or her opinion, slant, or spin on any particular office, legislation, or politician. Each person also has a right to make his or her ideology known to whoever will listen.

However, when you speak as a churchgoer, and when you begin roping the Church into your rhetoric, things get a little more serious. I would encourage and exhort you to use more care, and to consider your words more carefully. You influence a lot of people in this world and have the potential and power to do much for good.

My hope for you is the same for myself: that your thoughts and words would move those who listen to you more toward the mind and heart of Jesus. May that be the end toward which we both strive.

portrait-michael-hidalgoMichael Hidalgo, his wife, and two children live in downtown Denver, CO. He is the the Lead Pastor at Denver Community Church, a holistic, Christian, missional congregation.

+ Click here to tell Glenn Beck: I’m a social justice Christian.

Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • Huntergreen
    What you say is true but if your going to communicate a Biblical worldview of ministry to the poor do not use coined phrases that are identified with Marxist ideologies. I have never seen those two words put side by side in the bible so why confuse people. In reality there are those of the so called "Social Justice" movement that are outright Marxist and the balance are just naive and gullible.
  • mommadona
    Glenn Beck is a shockjock who's surrounded by sycophantic enablers from his earlier drydrunk addiction days. He's a political "Elvis". Shallow, uneducated, dysfunctional by choice. Still a dry drunk and has not kicked his many addictions.

    He's a pile of u-know-what as a person.

    He could not give a fig about what you think or care. He's onna 'mission from Moroni' - do not discount his warped view of mormon cultism that enables this type of attack on other ideologies.

    Glad to see 'mainstream' organized religions finally forced to confront this creature.

    He is your Lonesome Rhodes who's decided to direct the conversation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SlobJX_Fl8&feat...
  • NCG8r
    Let me guess...by calling yourself a 'modernist/liberal Christian' I am guessing that you support 'Gay rights', abortion and other ideas clearly in violation of the Bible? That you view the Bible as a book that is out of touch with today's society and in need of revision?
  • liberalinlove
    I bet you teach your young people we need our Christian nation back and believe that means prayer in schools.
  • IraKare
    Social Justice as God intended means we take care of each other. Social Justice as envisioned by liberals/communist means the Government is all powerful and says who and what gets cared for!
  • Unless the church gets out of bed with the government, corruption will worsen within its ranks.
  • TRUTH will always prevail. Glenn speaks truth and is being smeared. God will come to his side and give him strength.
  • Government should NEVER be the means by which a society distributes wealth or handles charity. Churches and other local community organizations should be the funnell we use to best help others. Glenn Beck is correct. That is all he is saying. Support freedom in America and give power back to your church by helping educate others.
    Youth Pastor-14 Years, OKC
  • Having been a listener of Glenns for 8 years, and a youth minister for 14, I can tell you this, Glenn is only saying the government has no place in taking care of the poor, or anyone else for that matter. As Christians, we should only support charity through families and churches. PERIOD! Government is NEVER a good answer. Beck is 100% correct.
  • Agreed, but forcing, coercing, and imposing our ethics of "holiness" upon those who don't agree is tyrannical and unChristian. It's one thing to advocate, demonstrate, and proselytize. It's quite another to grab the hands of power (government) and make everyone live our way. I reject the latter approach.
  • rckk
    It depends on what church you are talking about. Matin Luther King started the Civil Rights Montgomery Bus Boycott from the pulpit of a church. On the other hand, there were many mainline churches in the Bible Belt that took the wrong position on the issue, saying that segregation was "in the Bible". Where it is in the Bible is still a mystery to me. This was a classic case of people who insisted that they go by scripture, but conveniently re-writing it when it doesn't fit the prejudices of society. Unfortunately, many American conservative evangelicals do this today. I have heard "Biblical" cases made for people concealing and carrying handguns, and in a church of all places!! The war in Iraq is a big issue for me for example. I don't begrudge a person of faith believing in the war, but I resent whole heartedly them implying that there is something wrong with my faith if i happen to question it. Anyway, the unfortunate fact of history is that anytime you find the country in the middle of a great social movement, you will find that churches have been both prime movers of social progress and impediments to it. This includes everything from the Abolitionist Movement to Civil Rights.



    Also, it doesn;t get a lot of attention in the history books, but there were, even in the Bible Belt, some (not nearly enough) but some Christian leaders who did the right thing. During the Little Rock Central High School Crisis in 1957, a group of white students decided to have an "open table" in the cafeteria and invite members of the Little Rock Nine to sit with them during lunch. That doesn't seem like much today, but at the time it was radical, and under the wrong circumstances quite risky. Where did these students make the decision to do this???? In Sunday School class at church. In 1963, Billy Graham received death threats from the Ku Klux Klan for insisting on integrated seating and prayer groups at his Birmingham Crusade. Of course, the other side of this is that some of the Klansmen who threatend to kill him probably sat in churches of their own on Sunday morning. Amid threats of violence and in a city where a black church had been bombed and four girls murdered earlier that year, 30,000 people attended the meeting and openly participated in the prayer groups.



    BTW- I'm an evangelical and I don't embrace segregation at all. My reason for not embracing it has nothing to do with whether it is politically correct or not....I married out of my race.
  • This is where "holiness" comes in. God created ancient Israel and later the church to display to the world just how life is supposed to be lived -- and be a blessing to the world in that way. The sermon I heard in church this week was on that very topic -- according to Acts, a number of converts in Ephesus publicly burned about $5 million of books and other materials on the occult that they had owned. That act did more for the Gospel in that part of the world than all the preaching because the visible change was evident. Gradually, as Christianity is seen to work, people begin to think, "They may have something here."
  • liberalinlove
    He does not exhibit a loving spirit at all and frequently does not tell the truth!
  • rckk
    You do have a point. Even political ideology doesn't determine whether or not a person is likeable or not. I am somewhat to the right of center but not comfortable with the tea party movement. My cousin out in Oregan is very liberal, but I would much better spend time listening to him say things with which I disagree than listen to Rush Limbaugh say things with which I do agree. I am concerned that many Christian believers listen emphatically to and put so much stock in Rush Limbaugh. He does not exhibit a loving spirit at all.
  • liberalinlove
    I'm an evangelical and never want to blast anyone. One of my employees and a dear friend was a delightful person and a mormon. Other's in her church not so much. I may take issue with his ideas or his actions, but his mormonism isn't for me the issue. Truly I'm telling you there are jerks in every denomination and cult and I think it can be as much a personality they are born with as an alignment with a doctrine.
  • Mihs
    Thank you for elaborating, Mr. Walker.

    Your explanation of church and state teleology sounds like a precarious appeal to essentialism at best, and a thinly veiled embrace of predestinarianism at worst. (If it's the latter we may have to agree to disagree.) Still, I appreciate your effort to explain how "God ordered society."

    If humans have free will the roles of church and state are dependent on the the cultural milieu from which those social institutions emerge. This is evidenced by the variety of (often conflicting) opinions on the proper role of each institution. History shows that church -- taken here to mean religion in the common understanding -- has changeable identities and roles. And what a state does, or is supposed to do, depends on the specific government in question and who you are asking. For example, by human design democracies should promote equality; similarly, dictatorships aren't expected to defend human rights.

    When you say "God ordains these teleologies the same way he [sic] ordains the laws of logic or physics," you are making an analogy between the purpose of certain social institutions and natural law which is a faulty comparison. The purpose or aim of church and state are determined by people (with God given free will), whereas the elegant natural laws (also God given) are unveiled through empiricism. The main difference being that natural laws are apparently immutable and the role of church and state evolve in adaptive processes. (Granted the epistemology and purview the church and the role of the state is informed and bound by natural law.)

    Interestingly, Jesus dares everyone to be compassionate regardless of religious affiliation -- see the Parable of the Good Samaritan. And if the people in a democratic society want their government to show compassion, the government should comply.

    In a democracy we the people can determine the reasonable role and boundaries of government; or in other words, the people of a democracy decide what's "within the teleology of the state."
  • Yes, we agree, but our agreement is based on a faith document that tells us that the world was created by God, and all that we "own" is not really ours but God. But you can't confuse our faith agreement with social agreements in a pluralistic society. Try telling an atheist or anybody else who doesn't believe in the Judeo-Christian god that our god owns everything.

    The "fact" that everything belongs to God is not disputed between you and me, but between us and those who do not subscribe to our faith, ethics, and morals. This is the point I've been making all along. For the most part, I think you and I agree on plenty of issues, but when it comes to imposing our mores on others, you seem to be willing to use power to enforce our ethics on others. I'm not willing to do that based on an ethic of peace and non-aggression.
  • WaveTossed
    " In the 1950's and 1960's some mainline churches embraced the Social Gospel. It started with the Civil Rights Movement, something that is good in and of itself. The big mistake came when these churches began to embrace every liberal issue with the zeal that they did, in many cases, ignoring whether or not the scripture supported the position on a given issue or not. Ordination of practicing homosexuals is an example. It degenerated in some cases, to something called 'Liberation Theology' which at its worst, went as far at times as embracing Marxism."

    "Embracing every liberal issue with zeal?" Having been active in the 1960s civil rights movement, I remember so well the zeal that many so-called "traditional" churches displayed when embracing segregation. Fast-forward a few decades and it's no longer politically correct for these churches to embrace segregation with the zeal that they once showed; the Black civil rights movement is now "something that is good in and of itself." I find that very interesting. Especially when I see the zeal that some of these so-called "traditional" churches embrace discrimination against Gays and condemn those churches that choose not to practice such discrimination.
  • kansasmennonite
    Quote:"Even with a flat tax, the rich will pay more in taxes than anyone else. The poorest will pay almost no taxes. So when the majority votes to give tax money to the poor, it is taking from the rich and giving to the poor. If the rich are in the minority, then the majority is forcing the rich to give what they don’t want to give. For that to be equivalent to voluntary giving, then only the rich could vote on laws about redistribution of wealth to the poor. "

    Do you want just landownder to vote? Let's see, that would set us back about 200 years or less in the south. In your view, justice deals with how "rich" one is? How convenient.

    In the other part of your post you're stating the obvious. We all know that there has to be wealth creation to sustain a country. Does exporting all of our jobs do that?

    We all know that poor can't be irradicated either. Are you saying there should be no programs by the gov't for the lower income families? How far do you take your libertairian views? Should the church even care about the poor if they can't be irradicated?
  • kansasmennonite
    I don't see blasting mormons here. I believe there were posts that said he was mormon and not christian (only God knows-right). I see posts that say he isn't acting in accordance with his faith. If attaching Beck is attacking Mormons than yes but when one says such controversial things with his ratings somethings going to happen.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008