RSS
More Feeds












God's Politics

The Immigration Fight Isn’t Over

by Jennifer Kottler 07-29-2010

Yesterday, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton preliminarily struck down key provisions in Arizona’s infamous SB 1070 law and ruled that states cannot preempt federal law. While important, this is a victory that rings hollow for me and all those who care about the true reform of our immigration system. In many ways, the damage to neighborhoods and communities had already been done, as people did not wait to see how the law would affect them. Many mixed-status families pulled their children out of school and moved out of state, closing stores and restaurants and leaving many immigrant neighborhoods like ghost towns. This did not just affect undocumented immigrants but all those whose status might be called into question — including citizens, permanent legal residents, and temporary visa holders.

The court’s preliminary decision is only the beginning of the litigation process, which will unfold in the coming months. Yesterday’s ruling, however, is a necessary first step in affirming the principle that it is the federal government’s responsibility to set immigration policy and to enforce that policy. It affirms that even if the federal system is failing, states do not have the authority to set or enforce their own policies.

Immigration is continually labeled as an issue that “deeply divides Americans.” But is that true? Recent polling found widespread support for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. A new study sponsored by America’s Voice found that more than 75 percent of Americans who read a description of comprehensive immigration reform said they would support the measure. And according to Robert Jones, CEO of the Public Religion Research Institute, “More than 8-in-10 Americans — including overwhelming majorities of white mainline Protestants, Catholics, and white evangelicals — believe strongly that immigration reform should be guided by the values of protecting the dignity of every person and keeping families together, as well as by such values as promoting national security and ensuring fairness to taxpayers.” There is a strong and growing consensus around much of what needs to be addressed by comprehensive reform.

It won’t be enough simply to enforce the laws we already have. While we are indeed a nation of laws, we are also a nation made up largely of immigrants and the progeny of immigrants. Moreover, we are a nation made up largely of Christians and people of other faiths — faiths that teach and compel their followers to care about what happens to the other, and to honor the dignity of everyone created in the image of God. Granted, there is a vocal minority opposed to reform. And ironically, most — if not all — of the opponents are the children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, or great-great-grandchildren of immigrants. Most of these people’s ancestors would not have been able to immigrate legally under our current system.

So now what? First of all, as November creeps closer, Bolton’s decision assures that comprehensive immigration reform as a moral issue will be front and center this election season. But as people of faith, we must reject the use of this issue to drive fear into the debate and pit citizen against citizen, and citizen against immigrant. We have to reject the politicization of this issue, and the use of immigrant families as tools to win (or make the other lose) an election. And when we see it happening, we need to call it out.

Secondly, it’s not enough to repeal the most controversial parts of SB 1070, as important as that is. The overall law still goes into effect today, which will lead to a confusing patchwork of guidelines on the ground in Arizona. This is a costly byproduct of enjoining the law, as law enforcement will have to haphazardly interpret the remaining provisions.

Therefore, lawmakers must act to fulfill their duty to make laws and set federal policy on immigration. It will take fewer politicians and more statesmen and stateswomen to reform our broken system. President Obama must lead on comprehensive immigration reform, and Congress must be willing to lead as well — by having a fair and truthful debate on this issue and passing a bipartisan bill that will be good for our country. Clearly, the longer they wait, the more dysfunctional our system becomes.

Finally, each of us needs to be willing to lead on this issue. As difficult as it is to talk about issues like this with our friends and families, we have a responsibility to challenge falsehoods and myths about immigrants and talk about the contributions they make to our communities. We need to transform the rhetoric into truth. At the heart of our Christian tradition is the belief that true and lasting transformation is not only possible but necessary, and it can only happen when we are willing to do what needs to be done for the common good.

While I was at an interview yesterday about the Arizona law, I met a young woman. She asked me if I supported the Dream Act. (The Dream Act would allow students who graduate from college or go into the military the opportunity to become U.S. citizens.) I told her that we did, and she responded with thanks. She said a friend of hers just graduated from a prestigious East Coast university at the top of his class, but because he was undocumented, he is not able to get a professional job (despite his intellect and gifts) or go to graduate school. Instead, he is back home working in his family’s restaurant business, and our country and society lose out because we aren’t utilizing his gifts.

Also yesterday afternoon, children of immigrants — mostly U.S. citizen children, many or most of whom live in mixed-status households — held a march across from the White House to advocate for comprehensive immigration reform. These children live in fear of being separated from parents and family, many of whom came here for work they couldn’t find in their own countries. They came to provide for their families. They want what all parents want — for their children to be healthy and fed.

Transformation is not easy. In truth, it’s very, very difficult. While we need the political will to transform our society, and leadership to get it done, we also need to be personally transformed, and we need to act as agents of transformation. If we fail to think and act differently, if we fail to change the way immigration is understood and debated in this country, we will fail our neighbors, our children, and our God. We have to choose to be transformed, and we have to choose to be active participants in the transformation of our society for good.

portrait-jennifer-kottlerRev. Jennifer Kottler is the Director of Policy and Advocacy at Sojourners. A long-time advocate for justice, Jennifer has served in advocacy ministry for more than seven years through her work at Protestants for the Common Good (Chicago, IL), the Let Justice Roll Living Wage Campaign, and the Chicago Jobs Council.

Categories: Immigration
Share or bookmark this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
advertisement


Comment Code of Conduct

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

  • BloodBought357
    This is just to let you know I received your notice. I don't agree with
    your removal but I except your choices. I don't try to make others think
    the way I do but try to find a common ground we can both stand on without
    sinking.

    This issue will bring about a lot worse statements than mine. I wish you
    and Patricia luck in attempting stop dissenting thoughts.

    I spent 14 months in Hell so you would have the right to say whatever you
    think and not worry about retribution but it seems I will not have that same
    right.

    I hope you read the post I put up today with a different eye.
  • BloodBought357
    It seems to me that you are flaging every thing you disagree with. Have you been appointed watchdog for OPO. If you see people waring T-shirts the say "I'm not hispaish (can't spell this), I'm Mexican" you fell that’s what they want to be called. I would like to know if you are Spanish or Mexican. What is pregidical or sterotipical about the turm? I have lived around both afflount and dysinfranchised Spanish people and never had any one to object to being called Mexican. It is a badge of honour for most and just a word to others. Therefore, I would like to know where this distain for the designation of this comes from. It is all right to disagree but not to try to put down someones opinion at least that what the by-laws say.
    I run a ministry that deals with all dysinphranchised people, Blacks, Mexicans' Asians and even carcations. We are all part of a people that are supposed to be ruled by a set of laws that the public should be up holding. If one group has a disproportionate percentage in opposition a particular law, they are to work to get the law changed. That is what a democricy is all about.
    Love to all of you and though I disagree with Patricia, I will not stop fighting for her right to say what she feels. That is the reason I went to Vietnam and would go again if my country called for it.
  • duhsciple
    are you a Teacher?
  • mwalimu
    I support an equitable immigration reform. But let's ask another question. Why do these people come here?
    Let's look at the wages and working conditions of Mexico. Let's remember that many American corporations shut down factories in America to relocate in Mexico where they can pay slave labor wages and pollute the environment to their heart's content.
    We need to renegotiate NAFTA. We need to adopt strict environmental standards both here and abroad. We need to pass the Employee Free Choice Act in the US. We need to promote union-negotiated wages and working conditions both here and abroad. Workers need to be made a part of management decisions. We need a democratic work place, both here and elsewhere.
    These are the issues we must address. Simply building more fences and putting more gun men on the boarder will NOT solve the problem.
  • Charles Kiker
    Mainer: You seem pretty touchy. I do have a point. The US (lower 48) has two
    borders. The entire Southern land border is with Mexico. The Northern border
    with Canada. And Maine occupies a significant part of that Northern
    border. Admittedly, unauthorized immigration comes more from the South than
    from the North, for very easily explainable political and economic reasons.
    It remains true that we have not had, to my knowledge, any bomb plots
    emanating from the Southern border, and one very significant one from the
    North. And there is a distinct animus toward Mexicans which does not exist
    toward Canadians. I lived three years in Canada myself, and still like to
    hear "O Canada."

    By the way, I'd like to meet your third grade niece. She and I could
    probably have an intelligent and civil conversation. Give her my best.
  • BuckeyeDon
    You betcha! And then that evil Irish Catholic institution in northern Indiana got the nation wrapped up in that decadent game of football!!

    "Boy we've got trouble, right here in River City..."
  • hillbilly66
    "Immigration transformed America from a Protestant to a Christian nation..."
    I thought Protestants WERE Christians. And America has never been 100% Christian at any time. At any rate, I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

    Actually, Buckeye, our demise started when we started allowing all those Irish Catholics into our country. They brought their beer and their shamrocks, and we've been going down the road to perdition ever since.
  • tinkouse
    First of all, immigration policy needs to consider the whole globe, not just people from Latin America. The character of the United States is a mosaic of many cultures, including the ethnicities that have been oppressed by the immigrants from Europe - the Native Americans and the Africans who came as slaves. America "as it is" is not static and White. It is a growing and changing cultural group of people who embrace the talents and beauty of many. That mosaic is what makes this a great country.
  • BuckeyeDon
    I don't know much about social structures that existed in the past that helped immigrants to assimilate, but I think you're assuming way too much by thinking that modern immigrants are not assimilating the way that earlier generations of immigrants did.

    Columbus, Ohio, where I live, has a rather large population of Somalis. They are refugees--our government allowed them to move here to escape civil war and chaos in Somalia. Many of them have been my students. Somalis are culturally even farther removed from North Americans than Latinos--almost all are Muslim, for example. Yet the younger generation of Somalis are beginning to act a lot like Americans.

    "Immigration transformed America from a Protestant to a Christian nation..."
    I thought Protestants WERE Christians. And America has never been 100% Christian at any time. At any rate, I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

    "...it helped to drive the shift from a rural to urban society..."
    I think industrialism had more to do with urbanization than immigration per se, though it's probably a chicken-or-egg question; wasn't immigration at least partly a response to industrialism and the need for factory workers? Also, don't forget that industrialism spurred many Americans (i.e., those who had already been living here for a few generations) to migrate to the cities during that time; among them was my great-grandfather, who left the farm to go work for the railroad. They didn't move to the cities to be closer to immigrant communities!

    Furthermore, not all immigrants settled in urban areas--don't forget the Finnish and Cornish miners in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, the Welsh farming communities in southern Ohio, the Greek sponge divers on the west coast of Florida, or the Scandinavian farmers in the upper Midwest.

    "... and had an impact on our political system."
    I'm not sure what you are saying here, except that, yes, immigrants began voting and running for public office after they became citizens, and, yes, their political views began to be heard and felt. But that's part of what I meant when I said that immigrants have enriched our culture.

    Yes, immigration has changed American society many times before, and will do so again. You still haven't established why that should be a cause for serious concern. You don't, for example, give an example of a change caused by immigrants that produced something undesirable; you only asserted that it's possible to argue that way. Well, if it's possible--got any examples of that?

    I've never spent significant amounts of time in the US southwest, but I find it hard to believe that there are "millions of unassimilated immigrants" there. As with all immigrant communities, the older generations (in terms of how long they've been living here) are less assimilated than the younger generations (the children and grandchildren of that first generation of immigrants). Since immigration from Latin America has continued for decades, one would most likely find communities of people in various stages of assimilation or non-assimilation. And another thing: at least some recent Hispanic immigrants have probably connected with the Hispanic population whose ancestors had been in the southwest since before the region was part of the United States. Don't forget--the US southwest was once part of Mexico!

    One thing nobody has said here that should be said: the number of immigrants, as a percentage of the total population, was higher in 1910 than it is today.

    I simply don't believe that "millions of unassimilated immigrants" exist or are likely to exist for an extended period of time.
  • WaveTossed
    Outragex wrote: "Will some advocate of TOTALLY securing our borders explain how to do this exactly? How do we finance it's cost?"

    Great questions! Will some Repubs or Tea Partiers reject all of this spending -- think what all this spending will do to the deficit. After all, they claimed, we can't extend Unemployment benefits because of the deficit. <eyes a="" bit="" roll="">

    "How do we close the borders completely without becoming a police state subject to overbearing and intrusive law enforcement methods that our nation has traditionally rejects?"

    Some people disagree with Benjamin Franklin. He wrote, "they that can give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Truly, there are people who would disagree with Benjamin Franklin; they believe that a little security, while cutting into our liberty, is a very good thing. </eyes>
  • WaveTossed
    RealMainer wrote: "It raises the question of whether diversity is a strength, as the political class seems to believe. Is America great because of that diversity or in spite of it?"

    America is great BECAUSE of the diversity. Sure, it causes some difficulties. I don't know about you, but the last time I watched the Olympics opening ceremonies, I was so amazed and PROUD as I watched our American athletes; they were such a blend of myriad colors and nationalities, not the homogenous teams coming from other countries.
  • Stein
    As I read these comments I am saddened by the fact that (with a few exceptions), this blog could be any secular site.

    Folks, how does our relationship with Jesus and our following of God's Word enter into all of this? They appear to be things we toss aside as we roll up our sleeves and talk real politics.

    One person opined that the amnesty of the 80's was false compassion, since it gave people false hope -- as if the acceptable norm is for us to protect what is 'ours' and any charity should be avoided. Does this sound OK to you all? Does it comport with Biblical principles?

    Can we start from the solid Rock (e.g. "The earth is the Lord's, and the fullness thereof.") and let our reasoning flow from there?
  • outragex
    Will some advocate of TOTALLY securing our borders explain how to do this exactly? How do we finance it's cost? How do we close the borders completely without becoming a police state subject to overbearing and intrusive law enforcement methods that our nation has traditionally rejects? How do we balance compassion with law until our borders are totally closed? What other nations have totally closed borders (Isreal perhaps, but even North Koreans escape to China)?

    Completely closed borders are a political talking point, but are they realistic? Illegal immigrant smuggling/counterfit imigration documents is a world wide business with people going to many countries. Sure we need to suppress it, but how exactly do we stop it completely?
  • RealMainer
    Charlie, I have a niece in third grade and that's the kind of comment I'd expect her to make. Maine is not a border state in the context of illegal immigration or migrant farm labor any more than Connecticut (which is not a border state) or Vermont (which shares a border with Canada). Did you have a relevant point to make, or were you just trying to be snarky?
  • RealMainer
    Don, I realize that they're old arguments, but that doesn't negate them. Historically speaking, immigrants have fundamentally changed American society. Immigration transformed America from a Protestant to a Christian nation, it helped to drive the shift from a rural to urban society and had an impact on our political system. The America of the early 19th century no longer exists. One could make the argument that immigrants enriched and improved the culture, but others could just as easily claim the changes were less than desirable. It raises the question of whether diversity is a strength, as the political class seems to believe. Is America great because of that diversity or in spite of it? I don't think there are any easy or obvious answers to these questions, but I'm reluctant to stake the future of my homeland on it.

    My other concern is that the "melting pot" has been abandoned in favor of a "diversity salad." The social structures that existed to assimilate the immigrants of the past no longer exist. Many of them have been deemed inhumane, and rightly so, but it raises questions about how to integrate immigrants into America. How can our country sustain millions of unassimilated immigrants, concentrated primarily in the southwest?
  • WaveTossed
    "Eaglerock wrote: "As a Christian, we are commanded to be loving and compassionate, and the compassionate thing to do is forget another amnesty that occurred during the Regan administration."

    Actually, the Christian and compassionate thing to do is to unclog the logjam at INS that results in people having to wait for months, years, and sometimes even decades.

    I have yet to see, hear, or meet an anti-"illegal" immigrant person to advocate for unlocking this INS logjam. Which is why I get suspicious that the anti-"illegal" immigrant movement is actually an anti-immigrant movement. We need to get the protectionist Nanny State out of the way of the free trade of labor and the employers who wish to hire them.
  • BuckeyeDon
    First, the latest estimates put the number of undocumented immigrants at 10.8 million, not fifteen million. So please don't exaggerate the number.

    Second, they are HUMAN BEINGS, NOT "illegals."

    Finally, is it possible that one of the reason that those 10.8 million are living here illegally is because, unlike the folks who lined up at Ellis Island, they are unable to complete any paperwork that might give them legal residency; in other words, that there's no path for legal residency available to them?
  • but the 1880-1900 immigrants lined up at Ellis Island and completed the paperwork. We knew who they were and they were NOT 15 million illegals.
  • Eaglerock
    I can't help but notice a little insanity on the part of a country that confiscates shampoo and cigarette lighters at the airport for national security reasons, and at the same time allows lotty, dotty, and everybody who wants cross our border with not so much as knowing their name. Do you not think the Islamic extremist who are at war with us are aware of this situation?

    While I am not naive enough to believe all these people entering illegally have intentions to do us harm, their first illegal actions force them into doing other illegal things such as identity theft, tax evasion, theft, and other petty crimes. It's kind of like telling the first lie. Many others will be needed to prevent the light of truth from outing the first one.

    As a Christian, we are commanded to be loving and compassionate, and the compassionate thing to do is forget another amnesty that occurred during the Regan administration.

    This amnesty, while appearing compassionate, sent the message to potential illegal immigrants that all they have to do is brave the relentless heat of the desert, put their lives in the hands of lawless coyotes, and work for slave wages till the next amnesty rolls around.

    While I don't want to see our border turned into our very own DMZ, I don't think the status quo is sustainable. Either we allow our border states to become lawless no mans lands (not very compassionate for the legal residents of those states), or we have to enforce some kind of regulation on who we let in this country.

    There is simply no other choice.
  • Charles Kiker
    Real Mainer: "Maine is a long way from the border . . ." Oh? When I look at the map I see that Maine shares a lot of border with Canada. No major terrorist plot that I know of has come in from Mexico, but one did try to get in from Canada.

    Bloodbought: "Have you lived in a place where the Mexican population majority minority?" No, but I live in a place where Hispanics are a decided majority in the school system. Not a bad place to live. I would remind bloodbought that the same blood bought Mexicans, and that there are no racial distinctions in the Kingdom of God.
blog comments powered by Disqus
click here for comments tech support
advertise here
  • MOST VIEWED
  • MOST COMMENTED
  • MOST RECENT
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here
advertise here


HOME | SUBSCRIBE | DONATE | TAKE ACTION | MAGAZINE  
SOJOMAIL | BLOGS | MEDIA | EVENTS | RESOURCES | ABOUT US  
Sojourners | 3333 14th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20010  
Phone 202.328.8842 | Fax 202.328.8757 | sojourners@sojo.net  
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2008