Get E-Mail Updates

Jim Wallis: Welcome!

Jim WallisI want to welcome you to the first edition of "God's Politics"--The Blog--a new project done in an exciting partnership between Sojourners and Beliefnet. The God's Politics Blog will provide fresh conversation about faith, politics, and society--every day-- from "Jim Wallis and friends." We've assembled an extraordinary group of writers and voices to help with the God's Politics Blog, including Brian McLaren, Amy Sullivan, Noel Castellanos, Robert Franklin, Diana Butler Bass, Obery Hendricks, Sister Helen Prejean, Ron Sider, Tony Campolo and others still being added.

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

And then there's you! We invite all of you to the fast moving discussion that is spreading across the country and the globe about how faith can change the world. And this will be an open, civil, and inviting discussion that welcomes a real dialogue--one not contained by the failed categories of right and left which have so polarized and paralyzed our public debate. That's because I find people across the political and religious spectrum who are looking for the "moral center" of our public life, for the moral choices and challenges below the surface of our political debates, for a true "values politics" that challenges the selective moralities of both the right and the left. So welcome to the new town meeting on spirituality and politics, and I hope you will join right in!

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Resources

Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

by: Michael Hayes

09-16-2006 @ 8:04am

Thanks to Jim Wallis and Sojourners for providing this opportunity, and best wishes! Mike Hayes I think that true bipartisan cooperation and discussion among members of congress and the administration will lead to confidence in our government by a significant majority of citizens, when and if that ever does occur. Otherwise, we will continue to have alternating periods of time in which either conservatives or liberals (at best, a slight majority of all citizens) have confidence in our government. I think the "Change the Wind" concept suggested in "God's Politics" may provide the opportunity for true bipartisan cooperation to begin to occur, in our national government.>

by: Sivin

09-16-2006 @ 9:12am

Those of us in Asia will be eavesdropping :-)>

by: M Southall

09-16-2006 @ 7:50pm

I would hardly call Mr. Reed a credible voice for principled religious conservatives, for he's discredited himself with his cynical and disingenuous involvement with disgraced lobbyists and played both sides of the fence on the gambling issue. He recently lost his bid for elective office due to religious conservatives abandoning their support for him. Religious conservatives are strongly opposed to gambling, and Mr. Reed's stunning hypocrisy exemplified by his own written statements now made public disqualifies him from representing anyone, save perhaps, his own cohorts who have done so much to damage both their country, and in his case, the name of Christ.>

by: Kitty

09-16-2006 @ 8:37pm

Hum, M Southall. I tend to agree, but perhaps we need to see what he writes. It will surely be very interesting.>

by: Michael Hayes

09-17-2006 @ 12:47am

M Southall and Kitty: After reading your posts I located a Wickipedia article about Ralph Reed, which was helpful to me and might also be helpful to others who, like me, aren't as familiar with who he is (the photo also helped). I do think the opportunity to observe and to participate in this bog will be very helpful to me. It surely will bring together persons whose views differ, greatly, which will benefit all of us. Wickipedia link follows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_E._Reed,_Jr. Mike>

by: Michael Hayes

09-17-2006 @ 3:21am

Jim Wallis says that this blog will be a place for real dialogue and that he finds "...people across the political and religious spectrum who are looking for the 'moral center' of our public life, for the moral choices and challenges below the surface of our political debates, for a true values politics that challenges the selective moralities of both the right and the left...". I hope we will have opportunity, here, to get some sense of that... opportunity for liberals and conservatives to realize that we do share in the values that are described in the book, and that, together, we can speak out to candidates and elected officials of both major parties (for example, in support of persons in poverty here in our country and in countries which experience extreme poverty). And, on what might be one of the most difficult topics, may we have the opportunity, here, to learn what liberals and conservatives might be able to do, together, to encourage candidates and elected officials to support programs that will actually do something to reduce the number of abortions in our country. Jim Wallis encourages us, liberals and conservatives, to "Change the Wind", a term he uses to characterize this outreach to candidates and elected officials of both parties. May this blog help us all gain some understanding of how conservatives and liberals might accomplish that, together, in our various legislative and congressional districts and states. Perhaps participation by well known conservative personalities (for example, Ralph Reed) will encourage participation by other conservatives, thereby allowing the necessary dialogue to occur, here, and thereby enabling us to begin the effort to "Change the Wind". I've been hesitant to try, in part because I don't want to do more harm than good. Being able to observe and participate on this blog may give me the wisdom and confidence to try.>

by: Tenoch

09-17-2006 @ 7:06am

An interesting proposal. Of course, dialogue between two or more people is a possiblility only if all parties are willing to participate in the exchange of ideas and the communal testing of valid arguments. Naturally, I hope that the religious Trolling that undermines dialogue in so many other areas of social life is not permitted to sabotage dialogue here.>

by: Joel Wasinger

09-17-2006 @ 10:20am

Ralph Reed has long represented and helped set direction for the Religious Right . . . and he is certainly not alone among those of his ilk who have been recently discredited. Frankly, I'm not sure Reed would have accepted the invitation before recent revelations; politically, I imagine he would have thought he had nothing to gain. And, personally, I find him no less credibly now than before. I'm sure that Wallis would be quite willing to accept others that aren't considered tarnished; the question is, would they accept the invitation? In the meantime, let's hear what Reed has to say. Besides, remember that Jesus guy--He was known for hanging out with bribe-takers and assorted other sinners . . . ;-)>

by: Mike

09-17-2006 @ 11:17am

Looking forward to hearing more from Jim...>

by: Bob K

09-17-2006 @ 9:35pm

Dropping by at the eaves ;)>

by: Ted Voth Jr

09-18-2006 @ 1:01am

Great; I'm looking forward to it. It's very necessary for Christ's Church in the US today, certainly A housekrrping detail: The comments window is riny, and has no option to enlarge the font that is, my old eyes can't read it! Help! Thanks! TV2 aka Ted Voth Jr>

by: wess

09-18-2006 @ 4:55am

Jim - Looking forward to it!>

by: Mark Bushor

09-18-2006 @ 6:41am

Best wishes with this new project! pax, Mark Bushor>

by: Ben

09-18-2006 @ 6:55am

Can't wait to read it, Jim. Thanks for putting this together.>

by: dlw

09-18-2006 @ 8:02am

My hopes are that Ralph Reeds will demonstrate a brokenness over how he has let himself become captivated into politics as usual and tarnished the Christian witness. I also hope that both Wallis and Reed will find time to consider my Pragmatic Prolife Manifesto, which I think could be something where common ground could be found. dlw>

by: Drina

09-18-2006 @ 9:53am

I was absolutely thrilled when I first heard about this project, and I'm even more excited now that I've read more of what's to come. Jim Wallace has single handedly renewed my faith in the power of the Christian community to be a powerful, but gentle, force for justice and peace in the world. So many times I've become frustrated and discouraged by the harsh, authoritarian Christian groups dominating the political landscape in America, but the people at Sojo have given me hope that humble dicipleship is still alive and well. I can't thank you enough. Best wishes on the blog!>

by: John Wren

09-18-2006 @ 5:42pm

Colorado and a few other states have a wonderful system of neighborhood meetings that are held every two years for the purpose of nominating to the primary ballot. This caucus system provides the average person with the best chance of getting on the ballot and getting elected to office. That is why powerful forces constantly work to undermine it. Here in Colorado there was a constitutional amendment put before the voters by these forces in 2002 which would have distroyed it in Colorado. GK Chesterton said that Jesus meant it when he said to love your neighbor, the people that live right next door. Local politics gives us the chance to meet these people. It's hard to love people if you don't know their name! I hope you'll address this issue, the grassroots in politics today, the positive side of party politics, and not just focus on issues and phone-banks politics.>

by: Drew Moser

09-18-2006 @ 6:15pm

Well...this should be fun!>

by: geoff

09-18-2006 @ 6:44pm

Looking forward to reading your insights, I might be an Australian, but your ideas are certainly something we need to hear!>

by: Dave

09-18-2006 @ 6:49pm

Welcome!!!! This should be fun... And please bring Anne Lamott aboard!!!>

by: fernando

09-18-2006 @ 8:31pm

All the best for the blog. Look forward to reading the future posts!>

by: Tim

09-18-2006 @ 9:05pm

I'm one more of your northern neighbours who will be eavesdropping. Hopefully people of good will on all sides of the political spectrum will be able to avoid labelling, stereotyping, and rancour, and exchange ideas with a healthy measure of humility. I strongly believe that Jesus calls us to love our enemies. I also strongly believe that we'd better start by learning to love the people whose political ideas we disagree with. There's not a lot of that around, even in the Christian world.>

by: Drina

09-18-2006 @ 10:30pm

And please bring Anne Lamott aboard!!! I second that...>

by: Anonymous

09-19-2006 @ 12:28am

It would be nice if Beliefnet hosted blogs by a Buddhist, Hindu, and Pagan, if they would. They should have like one blog for each major faith they have listed...>

by: christina

09-19-2006 @ 3:17am

Looking forward to the debate...>

by: Hal Hurst

09-19-2006 @ 4:15am

I would like to see you cover the following topic sometime in your blog; it may be able to shed some light on the road toward the middle: I believe that the call to help the poor and the hungry is clear in the message of Jesus, and that most Christians and I'm sure a great many of those in other religions agree. One of the sticking points seems to be "How?" I have heard it said that the difference between liberal and conservative approaches to poverty issues is that one group (conservative) sees the problems of the poor as arising from a lack of discipline or character, and that they are in need of a paternal influence to impose discipline upon them in order to correct the problem. The other camp assumes that "there, but for the grace of God, go I" and that all they need is a little help, perhaps a few tools to get them over their temporary setbacks, and that they will work to help themselves if given a chance. If seen in this light, it is understandable if conservatives believe that too much help will corrupt the poor and deprive them of motivation. So, is there truth behind the assertion that the poor need not money, but rehabilitation? If so, how much truth? Is there any way to resolve this dichotomy? How are we to best focus our efforts to bring hunger to an end?>

by: Sherry

09-19-2006 @ 4:21am

My comment is directed towards both sides of the spectrum. We need less folks hugging the fringe and a majority willing to attain a centrist view. I can say that the Republican party has pushed me to the Independent Party, and I look most forward to seeing the politicians who are operating for their own best interests, instead of ours, voted out of office.>

by: Jearl Wallace

09-19-2006 @ 4:30am

Definately Anne Lamott should be invited. A little earthy practicality would be a good thing.>

by: Esther

09-19-2006 @ 6:08am

I think a healthy dialogue among believers is a good thing. It helps us to develop the ability to love all people like Jesus did. He excelled in understanding all people's views, even of those who sought his distruction. However, I think we should be careful about linking God to anyone's politics, for He is above the affairs of this world. Remember, Jesus said to give to Ceasar, the things that are Ceasar's, and to our Father, the things that are His. He is concerned with our souls. The affairs of this world are important to Him only in the way they teach us how to become better souls. Modern politics have evolved from our ancestors' attempts to meld different family clans together into one tribe. These days, it becomes more important to meld all the 'nation-families' into a world tribe. (One Planet under God!) Just as we need those who want to conserve what has been -they help stablize society, we need those who stir up change -they keep us progressing toward perfection. Jesus was one of those who came to make changes -and he did! So even though the 'conservative right' have their purpose, they should remember that they don't have ALL the answers.>

by: Danny Woodall

09-19-2006 @ 6:11am

I think this project is great. As a Baptist Sunday school teacher in the state of Texas, it gets lonely. When I've had enough I tell then the Antichrist real win approval from a Republican President. There are few church members who are tired of the Religious Right. We're neither right of left, but bow at the foot of the cross. Ralph Reed is a good example of the failure of the Religious Right. He got caught up in the moment. He should've known better than to hedge his "bets." Thank, Jim>

by: maria

09-19-2006 @ 7:49am

"Science may have found a cure for most evils;but it has found no remedy for the worst of them all-- the apathy of human beings." Helen Keller I hope that this site can start a cure for what Helen noted as a problem so long ago. Because I am sure that some of the horrors that she witnessed are happening again and our goverment is responsible. Maria>

by: Michael Bindner

09-19-2006 @ 8:54am

Welcome to the blogosphere. What took you so long? Did you get a copy of my book, Musings from the Christian Left? Drop me a line and we will have coffee sometime. Also, check out my blog at xianleft.blogspot.com. All the best. Mike>

by: Roger Saner

09-19-2006 @ 3:40pm

Will be eavesdropping from South Africa (hat tip to Sivin) - the way America handles her politics has profound implications for the rest of the world, so this dialogue is greatly needed! Heard you speak at Greenbelt this year, Jim - thanks for the thoughts :)>

by: Jo

09-19-2006 @ 3:40pm

I'm excited about this blog. As a progressive Catholic feminist, prolife, anti-war, anti death penalty, pro social justice, no political party represents me. I believe the time is ripe for a third party as I talk to more and more people who share my views and concerns. I look forward to sharing with all of you and getting insights.>

by: patrick

09-19-2006 @ 8:44pm

way to go jim. as a christian man with a son in iraq, its about time somebody starts dialogue. amen>

by: Y'hudit Leah Fuller

09-19-2006 @ 8:55pm

RE: Mr. Reed - A number of years ago I heard him speak and I thought then "Oh boy, here is another one! He says one thing but behind his eyes he is thinking another." The words from his mouth were kind but the thoughts were decidedly less so. So why I am I not surprised he fell from wherever his sort fall from. The idea of this blog and others like it such as the one from Michael Learner will help go a long way in starting a 3rd meaningful political party. In the mean time we must stop trying to work inside the "box". Congress and the President will not be listening. (Unfortunately in this country, we all too often do not send our very best to Congress and even less so to the office of the Presidency.) So we must build a network outside the "box" to help the poor, the uninsured, the loss teens, the homeless, etc. We all know the list of the things that needs to be done. Conservatives will be of little help because they have become part of the problem and heady on the wine of power, so we, the liberals, spiritual and religious progressives, must do the work and take the lead. If we do and build with strength the rest will follow. Y'hudit Leah>

by: Kathy

09-19-2006 @ 9:17pm

As one new to the "centerist" beliefs, I look forward to gleaning all I can from these discussions. I simply look to see Jesus at the heart of our entries.>

by: seamus

09-20-2006 @ 1:58am

I like this discussion but hate the name. God doesn't have --or need-- politics. People do, and we do a disservice to both God and to our politics when we insist on mixing them. Yes, our political stances will be influenced by our spiritual understanding, but to put the responsibility on a Divine Agent out there, when it's our responsibility is like looking for an excuse in advance.>

by: Anonymous

09-20-2006 @ 4:36am

Satan Rides On High - And We Let him Unopposed What the scary part really is when you bring up the topic (the terrorist threat), most people don't want to hear about it, and brush it off with a statement akin to a woman who does not want to hear about her husband's cheating from a friend, or a mother who won't admit that her kids are on drugs. Too many people have their heads in the sand, and even when our president warns us about an imminent attack, they still won't believe it. Our enemy is cunning inasmuch that they know when we hear of threats that do not materialize, it makes us more complacent, and unbelieving. Like the boy who cried Wolf . Cunning indeed, and is it really a surprise, knowing that scriptures describe SATAN as a cunning and evil entity. His disguise as Allah has fooled millions who practice ISLAM into believing evil is good, and that slaughter is an acceptable means of achieving his goal of more souls in his domain, than ours in God's heaven. I pray every day, more than ever because I see how he, Satan, has taken control of the minds of the news media, many of our politicians (the dirty bakers dozen as you put it ) and now, even the Pope is being made to look like the bad guy, and Evil the good guy. Are you and I the only ones that can see the mendacity, Tom? ( I ) Insidious (S) sin (L) launched( A ) against (M) man ISLAM. God Bless America! Enough for now, I'll be back!>

by: KevinK

09-20-2006 @ 4:37am

Observing the incredible movement of so many away from the rigid ideology of the Christian Right to a more centrist position is akin to watching the Titanic making a turn to port...slow but certain and awesome to behold! It is sort of humbling to see our God at work in the Creation. It is a deep hole we are in and it will take much patience and great care to maneuver ourselves out of it. Respectful, substantive discussion offers the promise of God's reconciling grace. The tough discussions have to take place. Our many issues need to be addressed head-on. Misplaced motives always have a way of being exposed when confronted to the light of fact and truth. I sense that the radical Right has misinterpreted the silence of left as a lack of spiritual faith. The arrogance of our current Administration has awakened a sleeping (if reticent)giant, led by the courageous likes of Jim Wallis, Bill Coffin, and many others. I believe I begin to see a faint light at the end of a very long and dark tunnel. Praise God!>

by: Esther

09-20-2006 @ 6:04am

This is to the anonymous post above, the one who equated Allah with Satan. First of all, I'd like to clarify the etymology of the name Allah. It comes from the Semetic root 'l, meaning 'god'. Before Yahweh, the Hebrews had two names for God: El and Elelyon, one referring to God, and the other to the Most High. The more important point to note is that the majority of Moslems are righteous, God-loving people. The terrorists no more represent the majority of Moslems than David Koresh, the fanatical cult leader in Waco, Texas, represented the majority of Christians. Jesus taught us that Loving one another is far better than judging one another.>

by: Paul Hodel

09-20-2006 @ 6:21am

As this conversation continues I hope we will be active and support prophetic witness such as the thousans of people who demonstrated today outside the United Nations for an end to the war in Iraq and bringing all U.S. troops home. We are called to love all of our neighbors in this precious global village. Paul>

by: Elle Law

09-20-2006 @ 8:08am

Do we really believe that even sitting down and talking with folks like Reed, Gingrich, Frist etc. will change theirs or ours minds? Of coure put forth the effort, yet, don't be surprised when no one wants to budge. Defeatist? Pessimist? Perhaps. However,if a man like Dr. Bill Frist, calls himself a Christian,yet does not tend to those in need as put forth by both the Bible and the Hypocratic oath, but instead prefers the politics and the smarmy that are part of it, wouldn't that 1) make him a hypocrite and 2) not a very good doctor. (Seems to me if he was a really good Christian, then why would he prefer to reap material rewards via politics as opposed to serving Medicare/ Mediaid patients. Having been raised by staunch Catholic/Republicans I can tell you first hand that my father was the same way - "a man of principle" he was called. We never found a meeting point sadly. I wish you all good luck. I guess until these Christians admit they have failings like the rest of us, there will be no meeting point.>

by: Vince

09-20-2006 @ 8:25am

Wow, great to see a caring and educational discussion. All good points, but still, didn't the Master say something along the lines of "My Kingdom is not of this earth"?? I suspect the real release is in brining a bit of Heaven to the earth realm.>

by: Deborah Mapp

09-20-2006 @ 6:54pm

Jesus came that all men, women, boys and girls could be saved. He did not separate by color, class or anything else. We should do as the Bible says, not what men says. These are just man's opinion, God's Word is the truth and this is what we should abide by. How do men think they can go to Heaven, when they cannot do Go'd will in earth. If you live for God, he will direct your thoughts, ways and your path. Give all of these trival issues to God and let's get busy doing God's will. To God be the Glory.>

by: David

09-20-2006 @ 7:16pm

Everyone talks so much , when it all so simple , after 50 years of study the issues, here is what I have found: The right and republicans are on GOD's side The left and democrates are on Satan's side Islam is a satanic religion, Allah is a word meaning Satan , that is the islamic so called god = in english Satan So lets look if I am correct then we could expect the left to support items of death as Satan does, and they do ! Aboration ,left supports, pro Islamic and pro terrorist , left supports both , anti bible , again left supports , via aclu, The right and republicans of course are just the opposite, they support GOD and the bible , they are taking action againt world terrorist , they are taking out islam and allah , yes the satanic forces are fighting that hard , with the help of democrates So now you've got to decide , God or Satan ,,,right or left ,republican or democrate Yes its that simple !!! So now decide ,, its your choice Which will it be?>

by: Olavo de Carvalho

09-20-2006 @ 8:46pm

I would like to ask Jim Wallis if someday he rose his voice against the killing of more than ten million Christians in China, Sudan, North Korea etc. during the last four decades, at least as strongly as now he rises it against the death of "tens of thousands of Iraqis".>

by: KevinK

09-20-2006 @ 8:58pm

Esther, I appreciated your comments. IMO, God is all about relationship...in all its various permutations. I believe that the fact of relationship supersedes its form. During a discussion with fellow Christian a few years ago, this person observed that "where there is relationship there is grace, where there is no relationship there is judgment." I began to measure my ways of relating of people through the lens of that statement and it has changed my life. God's grace is truly amazing! Fundamentalists, much like the Pharisees are imposters. Jesus had harsh words for the Pharisees for judging instead of offering grace. Jesus persistence in offering grace got him killed. But in resurrection God had the final word. Grace won. We Christians must persevere. Those who attempt to hijack our faith must experience the grace of God or recall its power in their lives so that they might be transformed. Those contemporaries who chose to stay the course, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Oscar Romero among many others, paid a high price for their courage and persistence, but look what they accomplished! The Church must close ranks, stand firm, putting aside the false agenda of the radical Right. Is it possible that God may work his will for the creation through other faiths as well, i.e., Islam, Judaism, etc? But for the luck of the draw, you or I could have been born Muslim. We follow Jesus because of his compelling relationship to God. Could others throughout history have had similar compelling relationships that draw others toward God? We Christians must show God's reconciliation with the world in order to avoid a clash of civilizations that seems to be fomenting.>

by: MAVIS ADJEI

09-20-2006 @ 11:31pm

Circumstance of this World can never change who God is. God will always be God.>

by: Vince

09-21-2006 @ 1:18am

Well said, Ester! Thanks. I think there are many paths up the one mountain. Surely God in his mercy made paths for Muslims, and Buddhists, and every other religion. As for gay marriage . . . What is it that makes a marriage sacred? It is the bonds of love. This is what God has joined. It can occur between any number of individuals.>

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: Michael Hayes

09-16-2006 @ 8:04am

Thanks to Jim Wallis and Sojourners for providing this opportunity, and best wishes! Mike Hayes I think that true bipartisan cooperation and discussion among members of congress and the administration will lead to confidence in our government by a significant majority of citizens, when and if that ever does occur. Otherwise, we will continue to have alternating periods of time in which either conservatives or liberals (at best, a slight majority of all citizens) have confidence in our government. I think the "Change the Wind" concept suggested in "God's Politics" may provide the opportunity for true bipartisan cooperation to begin to occur, in our national government.>

by: Michael Hayes

09-16-2006 @ 8:04am

Thanks to Jim Wallis and Sojourners for providing this opportunity, and best wishes! Mike Hayes I think that true bipartisan cooperation and discussion among members of congress and the administration will lead to confidence in our government by a significant majority of citizens, when and if that ever does occur. Otherwise, we will continue to have alternating periods of time in which either conservatives or liberals (at best, a slight majority of all citizens) have confidence in our government. I think the "Change the Wind" concept suggested in "God's Politics" may provide the opportunity for true bipartisan cooperation to begin to occur, in our national government.>

by: Sivin

09-16-2006 @ 9:12am

Those of us in Asia will be eavesdropping :-)>

by: Sivin

09-16-2006 @ 9:12am

Those of us in Asia will be eavesdropping :-)>

by: M Southall

09-16-2006 @ 7:50pm

I would hardly call Mr. Reed a credible voice for principled religious conservatives, for he's discredited himself with his cynical and disingenuous involvement with disgraced lobbyists and played both sides of the fence on the gambling issue. He recently lost his bid for elective office due to religious conservatives abandoning their support for him. Religious conservatives are strongly opposed to gambling, and Mr. Reed's stunning hypocrisy exemplified by his own written statements now made public disqualifies him from representing anyone, save perhaps, his own cohorts who have done so much to damage both their country, and in his case, the name of Christ.>

by: M Southall

09-16-2006 @ 7:50pm

I would hardly call Mr. Reed a credible voice for principled religious conservatives, for he's discredited himself with his cynical and disingenuous involvement with disgraced lobbyists and played both sides of the fence on the gambling issue. He recently lost his bid for elective office due to religious conservatives abandoning their support for him. Religious conservatives are strongly opposed to gambling, and Mr. Reed's stunning hypocrisy exemplified by his own written statements now made public disqualifies him from representing anyone, save perhaps, his own cohorts who have done so much to damage both their country, and in his case, the name of Christ.>

by: Kitty

09-16-2006 @ 8:37pm

Hum, M Southall. I tend to agree, but perhaps we need to see what he writes. It will surely be very interesting.>

by: Kitty

09-16-2006 @ 8:37pm

Hum, M Southall. I tend to agree, but perhaps we need to see what he writes. It will surely be very interesting.>

by: Michael Hayes

09-17-2006 @ 12:47am

M Southall and Kitty: After reading your posts I located a Wickipedia article about Ralph Reed, which was helpful to me and might also be helpful to others who, like me, aren't as familiar with who he is (the photo also helped). I do think the opportunity to observe and to participate in this bog will be very helpful to me. It surely will bring together persons whose views differ, greatly, which will benefit all of us. Wickipedia link follows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_E._Reed,_Jr. Mike>

by: Michael Hayes

09-17-2006 @ 12:47am

M Southall and Kitty: After reading your posts I located a Wickipedia article about Ralph Reed, which was helpful to me and might also be helpful to others who, like me, aren't as familiar with who he is (the photo also helped). I do think the opportunity to observe and to participate in this bog will be very helpful to me. It surely will bring together persons whose views differ, greatly, which will benefit all of us. Wickipedia link follows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_E._Reed,_Jr. Mike>

by: Michael Hayes

09-17-2006 @ 3:21am

Jim Wallis says that this blog will be a place for real dialogue and that he finds "...people across the political and religious spectrum who are looking for the 'moral center' of our public life, for the moral choices and challenges below the surface of our political debates, for a true values politics that challenges the selective moralities of both the right and the left...". I hope we will have opportunity, here, to get some sense of that... opportunity for liberals and conservatives to realize that we do share in the values that are described in the book, and that, together, we can speak out to candidates and elected officials of both major parties (for example, in support of persons in poverty here in our country and in countries which experience extreme poverty). And, on what might be one of the most difficult topics, may we have the opportunity, here, to learn what liberals and conservatives might be able to do, together, to encourage candidates and elected officials to support programs that will actually do something to reduce the number of abortions in our country. Jim Wallis encourages us, liberals and conservatives, to "Change the Wind", a term he uses to characterize this outreach to candidates and elected officials of both parties. May this blog help us all gain some understanding of how conservatives and liberals might accomplish that, together, in our various legislative and congressional districts and states. Perhaps participation by well known conservative personalities (for example, Ralph Reed) will encourage participation by other conservatives, thereby allowing the necessary dialogue to occur, here, and thereby enabling us to begin the effort to "Change the Wind". I've been hesitant to try, in part because I don't want to do more harm than good. Being able to observe and participate on this blog may give me the wisdom and confidence to try.>

by: Michael Hayes

09-17-2006 @ 3:21am

Jim Wallis says that this blog will be a place for real dialogue and that he finds "...people across the political and religious spectrum who are looking for the 'moral center' of our public life, for the moral choices and challenges below the surface of our political debates, for a true values politics that challenges the selective moralities of both the right and the left...". I hope we will have opportunity, here, to get some sense of that... opportunity for liberals and conservatives to realize that we do share in the values that are described in the book, and that, together, we can speak out to candidates and elected officials of both major parties (for example, in support of persons in poverty here in our country and in countries which experience extreme poverty). And, on what might be one of the most difficult topics, may we have the opportunity, here, to learn what liberals and conservatives might be able to do, together, to encourage candidates and elected officials to support programs that will actually do something to reduce the number of abortions in our country. Jim Wallis encourages us, liberals and conservatives, to "Change the Wind", a term he uses to characterize this outreach to candidates and elected officials of both parties. May this blog help us all gain some understanding of how conservatives and liberals might accomplish that, together, in our various legislative and congressional districts and states. Perhaps participation by well known conservative personalities (for example, Ralph Reed) will encourage participation by other conservatives, thereby allowing the necessary dialogue to occur, here, and thereby enabling us to begin the effort to "Change the Wind". I've been hesitant to try, in part because I don't want to do more harm than good. Being able to observe and participate on this blog may give me the wisdom and confidence to try.>

by: Tenoch

09-17-2006 @ 7:06am

An interesting proposal. Of course, dialogue between two or more people is a possiblility only if all parties are willing to participate in the exchange of ideas and the communal testing of valid arguments. Naturally, I hope that the religious Trolling that undermines dialogue in so many other areas of social life is not permitted to sabotage dialogue here.>

by: Tenoch

09-17-2006 @ 7:06am

An interesting proposal. Of course, dialogue between two or more people is a possiblility only if all parties are willing to participate in the exchange of ideas and the communal testing of valid arguments. Naturally, I hope that the religious Trolling that undermines dialogue in so many other areas of social life is not permitted to sabotage dialogue here.>

by: Joel Wasinger

09-17-2006 @ 10:20am

Ralph Reed has long represented and helped set direction for the Religious Right . . . and he is certainly not alone among those of his ilk who have been recently discredited. Frankly, I'm not sure Reed would have accepted the invitation before recent revelations; politically, I imagine he would have thought he had nothing to gain. And, personally, I find him no less credibly now than before. I'm sure that Wallis would be quite willing to accept others that aren't considered tarnished; the question is, would they accept the invitation? In the meantime, let's hear what Reed has to say. Besides, remember that Jesus guy--He was known for hanging out with bribe-takers and assorted other sinners . . . ;-)>

by: Joel Wasinger

09-17-2006 @ 10:20am

Ralph Reed has long represented and helped set direction for the Religious Right . . . and he is certainly not alone among those of his ilk who have been recently discredited. Frankly, I'm not sure Reed would have accepted the invitation before recent revelations; politically, I imagine he would have thought he had nothing to gain. And, personally, I find him no less credibly now than before. I'm sure that Wallis would be quite willing to accept others that aren't considered tarnished; the question is, would they accept the invitation? In the meantime, let's hear what Reed has to say. Besides, remember that Jesus guy--He was known for hanging out with bribe-takers and assorted other sinners . . . ;-)>

by: Mike

09-17-2006 @ 11:17am

Looking forward to hearing more from Jim...>

by: Mike

09-17-2006 @ 11:17am

Looking forward to hearing more from Jim...>

by: Bob K

09-17-2006 @ 9:35pm

Dropping by at the eaves ;)>

by: Bob K

09-17-2006 @ 9:35pm

Dropping by at the eaves ;)>

by: Ted Voth Jr

09-18-2006 @ 1:01am

Great; I'm looking forward to it. It's very necessary for Christ's Church in the US today, certainly A housekrrping detail: The comments window is riny, and has no option to enlarge the font that is, my old eyes can't read it! Help! Thanks! TV2 aka Ted Voth Jr>

by: Ted Voth Jr

09-18-2006 @ 1:01am

Great; I'm looking forward to it. It's very necessary for Christ's Church in the US today, certainly A housekrrping detail: The comments window is riny, and has no option to enlarge the font that is, my old eyes can't read it! Help! Thanks! TV2 aka Ted Voth Jr>

by: wess

09-18-2006 @ 4:55am

Jim - Looking forward to it!>

by: wess

09-18-2006 @ 4:55am

Jim - Looking forward to it!>

by: Mark Bushor

09-18-2006 @ 6:41am

Best wishes with this new project! pax, Mark Bushor>

by: Mark Bushor

09-18-2006 @ 6:41am

Best wishes with this new project! pax, Mark Bushor>

by: Ben

09-18-2006 @ 6:55am

Can't wait to read it, Jim. Thanks for putting this together.>

by: Ben

09-18-2006 @ 6:55am

Can't wait to read it, Jim. Thanks for putting this together.>

by: dlw

09-18-2006 @ 8:02am

My hopes are that Ralph Reeds will demonstrate a brokenness over how he has let himself become captivated into politics as usual and tarnished the Christian witness. I also hope that both Wallis and Reed will find time to consider my Pragmatic Prolife Manifesto, which I think could be something where common ground could be found. dlw>

by: dlw

09-18-2006 @ 8:02am

My hopes are that Ralph Reeds will demonstrate a brokenness over how he has let himself become captivated into politics as usual and tarnished the Christian witness. I also hope that both Wallis and Reed will find time to consider my Pragmatic Prolife Manifesto, which I think could be something where common ground could be found. dlw>

by: Drina

09-18-2006 @ 9:53am

I was absolutely thrilled when I first heard about this project, and I'm even more excited now that I've read more of what's to come. Jim Wallace has single handedly renewed my faith in the power of the Christian community to be a powerful, but gentle, force for justice and peace in the world. So many times I've become frustrated and discouraged by the harsh, authoritarian Christian groups dominating the political landscape in America, but the people at Sojo have given me hope that humble dicipleship is still alive and well. I can't thank you enough. Best wishes on the blog!>

by: Drina

09-18-2006 @ 9:53am

I was absolutely thrilled when I first heard about this project, and I'm even more excited now that I've read more of what's to come. Jim Wallace has single handedly renewed my faith in the power of the Christian community to be a powerful, but gentle, force for justice and peace in the world. So many times I've become frustrated and discouraged by the harsh, authoritarian Christian groups dominating the political landscape in America, but the people at Sojo have given me hope that humble dicipleship is still alive and well. I can't thank you enough. Best wishes on the blog!>

by: John Wren

09-18-2006 @ 5:42pm

Colorado and a few other states have a wonderful system of neighborhood meetings that are held every two years for the purpose of nominating to the primary ballot. This caucus system provides the average person with the best chance of getting on the ballot and getting elected to office. That is why powerful forces constantly work to undermine it. Here in Colorado there was a constitutional amendment put before the voters by these forces in 2002 which would have distroyed it in Colorado. GK Chesterton said that Jesus meant it when he said to love your neighbor, the people that live right next door. Local politics gives us the chance to meet these people. It's hard to love people if you don't know their name! I hope you'll address this issue, the grassroots in politics today, the positive side of party politics, and not just focus on issues and phone-banks politics.>

by: John Wren

09-18-2006 @ 5:42pm

Colorado and a few other states have a wonderful system of neighborhood meetings that are held every two years for the purpose of nominating to the primary ballot. This caucus system provides the average person with the best chance of getting on the ballot and getting elected to office. That is why powerful forces constantly work to undermine it. Here in Colorado there was a constitutional amendment put before the voters by these forces in 2002 which would have distroyed it in Colorado. GK Chesterton said that Jesus meant it when he said to love your neighbor, the people that live right next door. Local politics gives us the chance to meet these people. It's hard to love people if you don't know their name! I hope you'll address this issue, the grassroots in politics today, the positive side of party politics, and not just focus on issues and phone-banks politics.>

by: Drew Moser

09-18-2006 @ 6:15pm

Well...this should be fun!>

by: Drew Moser

09-18-2006 @ 6:15pm

Well...this should be fun!>

by: geoff

09-18-2006 @ 6:44pm

Looking forward to reading your insights, I might be an Australian, but your ideas are certainly something we need to hear!>

by: geoff

09-18-2006 @ 6:44pm

Looking forward to reading your insights, I might be an Australian, but your ideas are certainly something we need to hear!>

by: Dave

09-18-2006 @ 6:49pm

Welcome!!!! This should be fun... And please bring Anne Lamott aboard!!!>

by: Dave

09-18-2006 @ 6:49pm

Welcome!!!! This should be fun... And please bring Anne Lamott aboard!!!>

by: fernando

09-18-2006 @ 8:31pm

All the best for the blog. Look forward to reading the future posts!>

by: fernando

09-18-2006 @ 8:31pm

All the best for the blog. Look forward to reading the future posts!>

by: Tim

09-18-2006 @ 9:05pm

I'm one more of your northern neighbours who will be eavesdropping. Hopefully people of good will on all sides of the political spectrum will be able to avoid labelling, stereotyping, and rancour, and exchange ideas with a healthy measure of humility. I strongly believe that Jesus calls us to love our enemies. I also strongly believe that we'd better start by learning to love the people whose political ideas we disagree with. There's not a lot of that around, even in the Christian world.>

by: Tim

09-18-2006 @ 9:05pm

I'm one more of your northern neighbours who will be eavesdropping. Hopefully people of good will on all sides of the political spectrum will be able to avoid labelling, stereotyping, and rancour, and exchange ideas with a healthy measure of humility. I strongly believe that Jesus calls us to love our enemies. I also strongly believe that we'd better start by learning to love the people whose political ideas we disagree with. There's not a lot of that around, even in the Christian world.>

by: Drina

09-18-2006 @ 10:30pm

And please bring Anne Lamott aboard!!! I second that...>

by: Drina

09-18-2006 @ 10:30pm

And please bring Anne Lamott aboard!!! I second that...>

by: Anonymous

09-19-2006 @ 12:28am

It would be nice if Beliefnet hosted blogs by a Buddhist, Hindu, and Pagan, if they would. They should have like one blog for each major faith they have listed...>

by: Anonymous

09-19-2006 @ 12:28am

It would be nice if Beliefnet hosted blogs by a Buddhist, Hindu, and Pagan, if they would. They should have like one blog for each major faith they have listed...>

by: christina

09-19-2006 @ 3:17am

Looking forward to the debate...>

by: christina

09-19-2006 @ 3:17am

Looking forward to the debate...>