Get E-Mail Updates

Pastor-in-Chief

In this week's town hall meetings, President Obama demonstrated an important aspect of his office: Pastor-in-Chief.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Americans do not elect a president on the basis of theology or denomination, but we do elect presidents on the basis of how well they comfort us in times of crisis and fear. In Elkhart, Indiana, and Fort Myers, Florida, President Obama listened to people's concerns and answered questions with a kind of intellectual and emotional honesty that is too often rare in public life. As President Obama heard homeless Henrietta Hughes plead for assistance, I thought of the many times I have held someone's hand at the church door after preaching and how people pour out their hearts to leaders who listen. As the president engaged the crowd, he maintained the demeanor of pastoral politics-holding the nation's metaphorical hand and offering comfort, reassurance, and help.

Although Americans separated church and state long before other western countries considered the possibility, we kept the longing that somehow our president would serve in the role of a communal comforter, a leader who would make meaning out of trials and suffering, and steady the rudder of hope. A "pastor" to the nation.

Of course, not every president has had to engage pastoral politics and not everyone has been good at it. And in peaceful times, the nation has no need of a pastor-in-chief. But this is not one of those times.

Abraham Lincoln, whose bicentennial we celebrate this week, was-among other things-a good pastor-in-chief. We do well to remember his words in 1865, at the time of the nation's worst political crisis:

With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: canucklehead

02-13-2009 @ 3:22am

THEN WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THIS TYRANNY!!! GOD KNOWS THE FIRST THING I DO EVERY MORNING IS CHECK MY POINTS TOTAL ON G-P. IF IT'S NOT POSITIVE, I HAVE TO RETURN TO BED FOR THE BALANCE OF THE DAY. STOP THE POINTS' NAZIS NOW!!!

by: squeaky

02-11-2009 @ 10:12pm

Why don't you think we are in economic free fall?

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 11:38pm

We haven't really seen how the economy responds, or whether new developments influence the economic cycle. In particular, social media has the power to reshape the way people utilize the Internet, which is going to create demand for new products and services.

If the innovation fails to restore the economy, then we know we are in trouble.

________________________________

by: judithod

02-13-2009 @ 9:03pm

SisterMarie, I would dislike recommending that Obama switch from $2000 suits to sackcloth and ashes. That downgrading of his wardrobe would be too extreme. What I would expect him to do is to lead instead of passing off the leadership to Pelosi and Reid. He was requested to submit suggested stimulus guidelines to Congress but demurred. Did he adopt this stance to avoid blame if the stimulus proves to be ineffective? "Congress engineered the bill, not I." As I stated in an earlier post, Obama has done a dismal job in explaining the provisions of the bill as well as why it must be passed in such a rush without proper vetting. His speeches, press conference, and writing (editorial in Washington Post) have been comprised exclusively of generalizations and dire warnings. Instead of presenting a calming, executive presence, he has chosen to behave frenetically, jetting around the country as if he were still campaigning, and implying that those who disagree with the plan are "unpatriotic" or playing the partisan card. What he has forgotten is that he's not the only one who can claim a mandate. Everyone elected to Congress has a mandate. And what happened to fulfilling that promise that American citizens would have 48 hours to review the stimulus legislation before votes were taken? If indeed he wants to try to reclaim his pledge to have an ethical, transparent administration, Obama should have insisted that the promise be fulfilled.

by: jeffp

02-12-2009 @ 6:09pm

Wow, I lost points for complementing someone.

by: SisterMarie

02-13-2009 @ 2:43pm

The current president has been in office for exactly 24 days. During that time, he has done more to address the problem (that he inherited) than George Bush did in 8 years. What presidential perks would you have him forgo? Should he don sackcloth and ashes

by: coffeeguy50

02-13-2009 @ 3:46am

Dear justice,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. I understand and share with you the sentiments that "government salvation" mindset seems to be on the upswing. That is to be expected though in a swing back to democrats, especially with the democrats being so angry about the prior administration, a strong effort away from those policies is not surprising. Not right, just expected. Sadly, we have become a polarized nation. The only way I see this changing though is with us the people demanding more of our leaders than the same old tired rhetoric. It may taken a generation but we have to start sometime and that time is now.

As far as the role of government, I have been in local community revitalization for nearly 30 years and at the local level I do see a role for government. The very real problem is the farther away from the local you go in terms of government (regional, state and federal) the less contact our leaders and government staffers with local issues. That reduced contact results in policies that are often mis-guided due to lack of real day to day understanding of people's situations. My "calling" is to do what I can within the local government employing me to focus efforts to meet the needs of those in need in my community. I want to encourage the churches in my community to get involved as well. Then perhaps life will improve for our community and fear, at least in our town, will be replaced by hope and trust.

Randy

by: coffeeguy50

02-13-2009 @ 3:35am

JeffP

And thank you for your response! It is good to here that others have been involved in this issue on the conservative side in other areas! I am encouraged by this. I am sad to here though that those on the left have been opposed to some of these efforts. When are we going to get past these whole left/right ideology and just focus on the call of Christ? If there is anything I can do, information, ideas that might be helpful to what the churches in your area are doing I would be more than happy to share them with you!

I am really enjoying this conversation by the way. This is my first foray into this Sojo blogging thing and it is good to be involved in an honest discussion and sharing points of view. I really appreciate your thoughts Jeff. A couple of others have responded to my post and I hope those discussion turn out as well as this conversation has.

God bless you Jeff!

R

by: canucklehead

02-13-2009 @ 3:22am

THEN WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THIS TYRANNY!!! GOD KNOWS THE FIRST THING I DO EVERY MORNING IS CHECK MY POINTS TOTAL ON G-P. IF IT'S NOT POSITIVE, I HAVE TO RETURN TO BED FOR THE BALANCE OF THE DAY. STOP THE POINTS' NAZIS NOW!!!

by: judithod

02-13-2009 @ 11:03pm

SisterMarie, I would dislike recommending that Obama switch from $2000 suits to sackcloth and ashes. That downgrading of his wardrobe would be too extreme. What I would expect him to do is to lead instead of passing off the leadership to Pelosi and Reid. He was requested to submit suggested stimulus guidelines to Congress but demurred. Did he adopt this stance to avoid blame if the stimulus proves to be ineffective? "Congress engineered the bill, not I." As I stated in an earlier post, Obama has done a dismal job in explaining the provisions of the bill as well as why it must be passed in such a rush without proper vetting. His speeches, press conference, and writing (editorial in Washington Post) have been comprised exclusively of generalizations and dire warnings. Instead of presenting a calming, executive presence, he has chosen to behave frenetically, jetting around the country as if he were still campaigning, and implying that those who disagree with the plan are "unpatriotic" or playing the partisan card. What he has forgotten is that he's not the only one who can claim a mandate. Everyone elected to Congress has a mandate. And what happened to fulfilling that promise that American citizens would have 48 hours to review the stimulus legislation before votes were taken? If indeed he wants to try to reclaim his pledge to have an ethical, transparent administration, Obama should have insisted that the promise be fulfilled.

by: Rustyskid

02-10-2009 @ 10:58pm

Is this a joke? Seriously.

by: squeaky

02-10-2009 @ 11:11pm

Well, I have to admit, I think the title is a bit strong. That said, I remember my aunt from Tulsa (a pretty strong Republican) telling me how much it meant to the citizens of Oklahoma City when Bill Clinton spoke there after the Oklahoma City bombing.

I wouldn't go so far as to say part of the job is "pastoring", but I do agree that part of the job is offering words that give comfort, hope, and encouragement during difficult times, as well as words to rally citizens around a common goal.

by: nuclearferret

02-10-2009 @ 11:15pm

Pastor-in-Chief? No. Being comforting to a homeless woman at a rally is a kind thing. Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before. The threat is different: It no longer is a Muslim waiting to blow up the Piggly Wiggly, it is a recession that will close said store. Unless Congress spends another $750B-$1T dollars on a huge variety of programs, most of which are operating on continuing resolutions because this "crisis" must be spent towards now.

Have to admit, Joe Biden's honesty is refreshing, even if the President doesn't know what he is talking about. 30% chance of failure, even if they do everything right (which, as demonstrated by the appointments of Tom Daschle and Timothy Geithner) won't happen.

by: kevin47

02-10-2009 @ 11:22pm

In fairness, DBB is Episcopalian. They let just about anyone be a pastor.

by: kevin47

02-10-2009 @ 11:25pm

"Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before."

I thought about that, too. Where is the hemming and hawing about the politics of fear?

by: littleroundtop

02-10-2009 @ 11:43pm

'They let just about anyone be a pastor."

Hey I was a pastor in the Episcopalian church . I double kid . ;0)

by: littleroundtop

02-10-2009 @ 11:52pm

Sure Squeak , I think the president takes on a role of somewhat like a Political Father , sort of taking care and protecting all of us . Its why I think some of us get so mad at each other when you put down a Presdent as a liar , fear monger , etc . Why even those on the left were disgusted with Bill Clinton with his sex capades . You don't want your Father acting like that .

But thinking well of Obama should not stop us from looking at things objectively . Dads can make mistakes .

I think that is where Dianna goofs up as far as being a blogger here . She allows her idealogy to get in her way of seeing "everything" and other sides of the problem . Regardless if even she agrees with them .

.

by: BuckeyeDon

02-11-2009 @ 12:21am

Okay, Kevin, I won't take a point away for your comment about Episcopalians, even though my father-in-law was an Episcopal priest. (Yes, I know; he's probably rolling around in his grave over some of the things going on there right now.)

But if it is illegitimate to refer to the president as "pastor in chief," then I suppose that Theodore Roosevelt illegitimately referred to the presidency as a "bully pulpit."

So far, from what I've seen, the new president has wielded that bully pulpit rather well. I refer especially to his comments about executive salaries. Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective.

by: PastorAlan

02-11-2009 @ 2:09am

President Obama was in Ft. Myers today. He was in Ft. Myers because the area has the highest foreclosure rate in the United States. He was trying to focus attention on the plight of working class American's to a Congress that has divided itself along partisan lines as it considers an economic stimulus bill.

Henrietta Hughes had arrived early in the day hoping for a chance to see the President. Henrietta and her son have been homeless since he lost his job in 2003. She was selected at random to ask a question of the President in the town hall meeting. When her turn came she meekly asked "I have an urgent need. We need something more than the vehicle and the parks to go to. We need our own kitchen and our own bathroom, please help"

The president asked her name. He was so moved he came off of the stage to touch and kiss her. He told her "We're going to do everything we can."

I first met then Senator Obama at the Sojourners Pentecost 2006 conference in Washington DC, at National City Christian Church, he was speaking about his faith journey, and he was speaking of Matthew 25. He said "For one thing, I believed and still believe in the power of the African-American religious tradition to spur social change. Because of its past, the black church understands in an intimate way the biblical call to feed the hungry and clothe the naked and challenge powers and principalities. In its historical struggles for freedom and human rights, I was able to see faith as more than just a comfort to the weary or a hedge against death, but rather as an active, palpable agent in the world, as a source of hope."

It was obvious to me that Barack had recognized Jesus in His distressing disguise in Henrietta.

God has a plan, a plan to prosper us and not to harm us. Mrs. Chene Thompson, wife of Florida State Representative Nick Thompson (R) Lee County also recognized our Lord embodied as He has shared with us in his Word. She offered the use of her vacant house (which she vacated on marrying Nick) to Henrietta rent free as long as she needs it.

Shane Claiborne has asked how there can be homeless people in a 'Christian Nation' if their are Christians with empty bedrooms?

I can remember my friend and mentor Rev. Howard Edington saying one of the people he'd like to meet most from the Bible, was the man who owned the colt that Jesus rode upon on Palm Sunday, who when told by the disciples that the Lord had need of his donkey, he knew and gave it to them. I think Mrs. Chene Thompson must be cut from that same lineage.

I thank God we have a President who can be as Diana Butler Bass said 'Pastor In Chief.' Remember though...a pastor is a shepherd, yes he might cuddle a cute little lamb, but he also carried a big stick to fend off the wolves and others who might harm his flock. Oh...one other thing a shepherd learns quickly in the first few days on the job...Sheep Bite!

by: littleroundtop

02-11-2009 @ 2:12am

"Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective."

Yes that was a great sermon . ;0) But I agree he is very Presidential and appears to have handled the bully pulpit quite well . I can not give the same high marks for Congress however. I do not think its democrats and republicans that are the problem , I just think we need new ones to replace the old ones we have in office.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 3:21am

"But if it is illegitimate to refer to the president as "pastor in chief," then I suppose that Theodore Roosevelt illegitimately referred to the presidency as a "bully pulpit.""

Very much so, now that I think about it, though to a much lesser degree.

"Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective."

Indeed. The Dow was off, what, 5% today? Going after executive salaries is a bad idea.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:43am

Its why I think some of us get so mad at each other when you put down a Presdent as a liar , fear monger , etc .

That had to to with political tactics to get one's agenda enacted, never mind the law or common sense. The truth is that GWB did do those things to pump himself up as a "leader" -- but he ended up falling on his face and many fell on their swords. Remember the "war on terror?" That cost the Republican Party big time.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:47am

False. GWB used the politics of fear to fight an enemy "out there," spending billions on a wasteful and unnecessary war to prop himself up. Obama is addressing problems right here, right now that affect virtually everyone in this country -- including yourself, I'm sure.

Are you ever willing to give Obama a break instead of just back-benching?

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 4:57am

Ditto that here.

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 4:59am

Empire abroad and an empire at home are the same false god, and using the politics of fear is wrong in both areas.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 5:22am

There's a difference, however, in being a servant and being a bully.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 5:49am

"Obama is addressing problems right here, right now that affect
virtually everyone in this country -- including yourself, I'm sure."

The domestic vs. foreign policy distinction is one without a difference. He is using fear tactics to short circuit debate.

"Are you ever willing to give Obama a break instead of just back-benching?"

Ever? Of course. When he is cramming an arbitrarily crafted trillion-dollar spending bill down my throat? No.

And I will never call him my pastor, in-chief or otherwise.

________________________________

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 1:32pm

Yep, there sure is. That doesn't excuse bullying at home. We are being bullied into agreeing with the Administration on his ideas to "save our economy" (which was largely caused by government interference in the first place).

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:23pm

That's the first misinterpretation because making a strong case does not equal bullying, as much as you may want it to. On top of that, Obama has a habit of listening to the other side to try to seek consensus. The conservatives who run the Republican Party, on the other hand, are the real bullies in all this -- they want their way BAMN and will hamstring their opponents in the process. Someone needs to tell them off but good, and he's about to do that.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:25pm

The domestic vs. foreign policy distinction is one without a difference. He is using fear tactics to short circuit debate.

This is utterly false -- and pure conjecture on your part. (Just because it's what you would do doesn't mean everyone else thinks that way.)

Ever? Of course. When he is cramming an arbitrarily crafted trillion-dollar spending bill down my throat? No.

How many "non-conservatives" have you ever given a break to on this blog? Please.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 3:27pm

Someone took away your point for no reason. I gave it back. Now you have a point again.

by: nuclearferret

02-11-2009 @ 3:44pm

Exactly. Conducting oneself under the guise of "servant" to achieve the empire is a strategic decision.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 4:03pm

"This is utterly false -- and pure conjecture on your part. (Just
because it's what you would do doesn't mean everyone else thinks that
way.)"

No, stating that the stimulus package is the only way to avert economic disaster is pure conjecture. That Obama is using fear tactics is incontrovertible.

"How many "non-conservatives" have you ever given a break to on this blog? Please."

Well, John McCain for starters. I fail to see any instances of you giving conservatives a break. I know, you're going to provide some tangential reason why I am required to give a break to those with whom I disagree, but you are not required to do so because you live in the same suburb as Richard Vigurie.

________________________________

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 4:20pm

He didn't say making a strong case equals bullying. He said, correct me if I'm wrong, that threatening economic collapse and telling the American people they "don't need to be convinced," is bullying.

by: derelicte

02-11-2009 @ 4:27pm

Okay, I gotta say something here. Thing is, if you think the Pelosi, Reid and the far Left crew isn't bullying here, you're kinda out of it. Moveon.org and a couple other groups actually ran commercials against Republicans who were causing trouble for the bill. Why? Silence the opposition and cause them to SUBMIT. If Obama were making a strong case, fine. But, here's the thing: He hasn't been. Even the people over at Salon.com and the Times could tell. No, what he's been doing lately is telling us that if we don't pass the bill, right now, without examining it a little more, modifying it, taking out the crap that even Democrats admit is nothing but wasteful, pork-barrel spending, then the economy will suffer. The amazing thins is that the vast majority of the bill is for spending in 2010 and 2011. Stopping, waiting for some debate and REAL consensus would be a good thing. But Obama isn't doing that. Instead he's taking his trump card, "I won", shoving it down the opposition's throat and then trying to scare us all into supporting the bill. Its the politics of fear. I don't care what you say about Bush or the Republicans, just don't be blind to what's happening currently.

by: derelicte

02-11-2009 @ 4:29pm

Who is Richard Vigurie? :)

Personally, I don't particularly care if they give conservatives a break. I'd just like to see fair criticism of liberals. I don't think we should give either side a break.

by: jeffp

02-11-2009 @ 4:41pm

Great contribution

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 4:38pm

Exactly, that's the whole point of having a Democracy.

________________________________

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 5:22pm

Excuse me -- but what's bullying about speaking the truth? Are you denying that we're in economic free fall? Or is it, as I suspect, that you object to both the messenger and the specific plan that he proposes? Let's see his critics come up with something better -- those in Congress can't because they helped cause the problem in the first place.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 5:25pm

NOW who's "bullying?" That's basically the same garbage that FDR had to deal with in the 1930s. I just came across a Washington Post article (which I haven't read yet) that suggests that the crisis then pales in comparison to today.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 5:30pm

That Obama is using fear tactics is incontrovertible.

That kind of comment is one reason conservatives have little authority to speak on such issues today -- they don't see anything good in anything their opponents propose.

I know, you're going to provide some tangential reason why I am required to give a break to those with whom I disagree, but you are not required to do so because you live in the same suburb as Richard Vigurie.

There's a difference between disagreeing and being a spoilsport; the latter represents pure childishness. Conservative ideals haven't worked, and yet too many conservatives aren't willing to say that, maybe we're wrong about this.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 5:38pm

Richard Viguerie is a former Nixon-Goldwater acolyte whose fundraising put modern conservatism on the map. Most notable to us Christians, he was the one who encouraged Jerry Falwell to form Moral Majority to add to his direct-mail empire. As recently as a couple of years ago he coauthored a book, "America's Right Turn" -- which seems irrelevant today.

Keep in mind, however, that this is an evangelical blog, and since conservatives are a majority in evangelicalism there's a tendency not to hear any dissenting voices. This blog exists for that reason.

by: derelicte

02-11-2009 @ 5:52pm

Thanks for the tip.

Yeah, you're right, conservatives are a majority of evangelicalism in general, that is true. But I'm 22, right in the age-group which contributing most to the rise of the evangelical Left. So, I get a good dose of the recent, bandwagon, pendulum-swing Evangelical liberalism. (I'm not saying that's you.) I guess I just wish the "dissenting voice" was a little more even-handed towards both sides. I'm not a big fan of the Republican cheerleading that goes on in much of Evangelicalism. I just don't think that the same mistake made on the Left will help anything.

Thanks again.

by: derelicte

02-11-2009 @ 5:56pm

I'm sorry if you see my comment as bullying. To me it just seems like I'm disagreeing with you and trying to make my case as forcefully as you've been making yours. If that's bullying, then sorry. (Incidentally that would explain why you think the minority party Republicans criticisms of the bill could count as "bullying", seeing as how they're at a total disadvantage numberically and rhetorically.)

by: BuckeyeDon

02-11-2009 @ 7:54pm

The points Nazi (and I'm beginning to think we have several of them) has been busy on this thread awarding and docking points for every post, based apparently on ideology, not on how ideas are expressed. Figures. They single people out for their treatment.

On an earlier thread, someone even docked points from every single one of Neuro_Nurse's comments. That's the first time that happened; now they have it out for him, too.

by: Rustyskid

02-10-2009 @ 10:58pm

Is this a joke? Seriously.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 8:25pm

"Are you denying that we're in economic free fall? "

He didn't say that we are in economic free fall. He said that we will be if we don't support the stimulus bill, which will doing nothing to stem such a free fall should it occur. At present, no I don't think we are in free fall.

________________________________

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 8:28pm

Again, people assign or take away points based on whether or not they disagree with a particular comment.

For the record, I assign points when:

1) Someone says exactly what I would have said. My point is a way of not having to reply and say "I agree completely".

2) Someone makes a compelling argument I had not considered.

I take away points when:

1) Someone makes a Hitler reference.

________________________________

by: squeaky

02-10-2009 @ 11:11pm

Well, I have to admit, I think the title is a bit strong. That said, I remember my aunt from Tulsa (a pretty strong Republican) telling me how much it meant to the citizens of Oklahoma City when Bill Clinton spoke there after the Oklahoma City bombing.

I wouldn't go so far as to say part of the job is "pastoring", but I do agree that part of the job is offering words that give comfort, hope, and encouragement during difficult times, as well as words to rally citizens around a common goal.

by: nuclearferret

02-10-2009 @ 11:15pm

Pastor-in-Chief? No. Being comforting to a homeless woman at a rally is a kind thing. Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before. The threat is different: It no longer is a Muslim waiting to blow up the Piggly Wiggly, it is a recession that will close said store. Unless Congress spends another $750B-$1T dollars on a huge variety of programs, most of which are operating on continuing resolutions because this "crisis" must be spent towards now.

Have to admit, Joe Biden's honesty is refreshing, even if the President doesn't know what he is talking about. 30% chance of failure, even if they do everything right (which, as demonstrated by the appointments of Tom Daschle and Timothy Geithner) won't happen.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: Rustyskid

02-10-2009 @ 10:58pm

Is this a joke? Seriously.

by: Rustyskid

02-10-2009 @ 10:58pm

Is this a joke? Seriously.

by: squeaky

02-10-2009 @ 11:11pm

Well, I have to admit, I think the title is a bit strong. That said, I remember my aunt from Tulsa (a pretty strong Republican) telling me how much it meant to the citizens of Oklahoma City when Bill Clinton spoke there after the Oklahoma City bombing.

I wouldn't go so far as to say part of the job is "pastoring", but I do agree that part of the job is offering words that give comfort, hope, and encouragement during difficult times, as well as words to rally citizens around a common goal.

by: squeaky

02-10-2009 @ 11:11pm

Well, I have to admit, I think the title is a bit strong. That said, I remember my aunt from Tulsa (a pretty strong Republican) telling me how much it meant to the citizens of Oklahoma City when Bill Clinton spoke there after the Oklahoma City bombing.

I wouldn't go so far as to say part of the job is "pastoring", but I do agree that part of the job is offering words that give comfort, hope, and encouragement during difficult times, as well as words to rally citizens around a common goal.

by: nuclearferret

02-10-2009 @ 11:15pm

Pastor-in-Chief? No. Being comforting to a homeless woman at a rally is a kind thing. Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before. The threat is different: It no longer is a Muslim waiting to blow up the Piggly Wiggly, it is a recession that will close said store. Unless Congress spends another $750B-$1T dollars on a huge variety of programs, most of which are operating on continuing resolutions because this "crisis" must be spent towards now.

Have to admit, Joe Biden's honesty is refreshing, even if the President doesn't know what he is talking about. 30% chance of failure, even if they do everything right (which, as demonstrated by the appointments of Tom Daschle and Timothy Geithner) won't happen.

by: nuclearferret

02-10-2009 @ 11:15pm

Pastor-in-Chief? No. Being comforting to a homeless woman at a rally is a kind thing. Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before. The threat is different: It no longer is a Muslim waiting to blow up the Piggly Wiggly, it is a recession that will close said store. Unless Congress spends another $750B-$1T dollars on a huge variety of programs, most of which are operating on continuing resolutions because this "crisis" must be spent towards now.

Have to admit, Joe Biden's honesty is refreshing, even if the President doesn't know what he is talking about. 30% chance of failure, even if they do everything right (which, as demonstrated by the appointments of Tom Daschle and Timothy Geithner) won't happen.

by: kevin47

02-10-2009 @ 11:22pm

In fairness, DBB is Episcopalian. They let just about anyone be a pastor.

by: kevin47

02-10-2009 @ 11:22pm

In fairness, DBB is Episcopalian. They let just about anyone be a pastor.

by: kevin47

02-10-2009 @ 11:25pm

"Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before."

I thought about that, too. Where is the hemming and hawing about the politics of fear?

by: kevin47

02-10-2009 @ 11:25pm

"Preaching a sermon of "Pass the pork or we may never recover from this recession," President Obama engages in the same politics of fear that President Bush engaged in before."

I thought about that, too. Where is the hemming and hawing about the politics of fear?

by: littleroundtop

02-10-2009 @ 11:43pm

'They let just about anyone be a pastor."

Hey I was a pastor in the Episcopalian church . I double kid . ;0)

by: littleroundtop

02-10-2009 @ 11:43pm

'They let just about anyone be a pastor."

Hey I was a pastor in the Episcopalian church . I double kid . ;0)

by: littleroundtop

02-10-2009 @ 11:52pm

Sure Squeak , I think the president takes on a role of somewhat like a Political Father , sort of taking care and protecting all of us . Its why I think some of us get so mad at each other when you put down a Presdent as a liar , fear monger , etc . Why even those on the left were disgusted with Bill Clinton with his sex capades . You don't want your Father acting like that .

But thinking well of Obama should not stop us from looking at things objectively . Dads can make mistakes .

I think that is where Dianna goofs up as far as being a blogger here . She allows her idealogy to get in her way of seeing "everything" and other sides of the problem . Regardless if even she agrees with them .

.

by: littleroundtop

02-10-2009 @ 11:52pm

Sure Squeak , I think the president takes on a role of somewhat like a Political Father , sort of taking care and protecting all of us . Its why I think some of us get so mad at each other when you put down a Presdent as a liar , fear monger , etc . Why even those on the left were disgusted with Bill Clinton with his sex capades . You don't want your Father acting like that .

But thinking well of Obama should not stop us from looking at things objectively . Dads can make mistakes .

I think that is where Dianna goofs up as far as being a blogger here . She allows her idealogy to get in her way of seeing "everything" and other sides of the problem . Regardless if even she agrees with them .

.

by: BuckeyeDon

02-11-2009 @ 12:21am

Okay, Kevin, I won't take a point away for your comment about Episcopalians, even though my father-in-law was an Episcopal priest. (Yes, I know; he's probably rolling around in his grave over some of the things going on there right now.)

But if it is illegitimate to refer to the president as "pastor in chief," then I suppose that Theodore Roosevelt illegitimately referred to the presidency as a "bully pulpit."

So far, from what I've seen, the new president has wielded that bully pulpit rather well. I refer especially to his comments about executive salaries. Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective.

by: BuckeyeDon

02-11-2009 @ 12:21am

Okay, Kevin, I won't take a point away for your comment about Episcopalians, even though my father-in-law was an Episcopal priest. (Yes, I know; he's probably rolling around in his grave over some of the things going on there right now.)

But if it is illegitimate to refer to the president as "pastor in chief," then I suppose that Theodore Roosevelt illegitimately referred to the presidency as a "bully pulpit."

So far, from what I've seen, the new president has wielded that bully pulpit rather well. I refer especially to his comments about executive salaries. Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective.

by: PastorAlan

02-11-2009 @ 2:09am

President Obama was in Ft. Myers today. He was in Ft. Myers because the area has the highest foreclosure rate in the United States. He was trying to focus attention on the plight of working class American's to a Congress that has divided itself along partisan lines as it considers an economic stimulus bill.

Henrietta Hughes had arrived early in the day hoping for a chance to see the President. Henrietta and her son have been homeless since he lost his job in 2003. She was selected at random to ask a question of the President in the town hall meeting. When her turn came she meekly asked "I have an urgent need. We need something more than the vehicle and the parks to go to. We need our own kitchen and our own bathroom, please help"

The president asked her name. He was so moved he came off of the stage to touch and kiss her. He told her "We're going to do everything we can."

I first met then Senator Obama at the Sojourners Pentecost 2006 conference in Washington DC, at National City Christian Church, he was speaking about his faith journey, and he was speaking of Matthew 25. He said "For one thing, I believed and still believe in the power of the African-American religious tradition to spur social change. Because of its past, the black church understands in an intimate way the biblical call to feed the hungry and clothe the naked and challenge powers and principalities. In its historical struggles for freedom and human rights, I was able to see faith as more than just a comfort to the weary or a hedge against death, but rather as an active, palpable agent in the world, as a source of hope."

It was obvious to me that Barack had recognized Jesus in His distressing disguise in Henrietta.

God has a plan, a plan to prosper us and not to harm us. Mrs. Chene Thompson, wife of Florida State Representative Nick Thompson (R) Lee County also recognized our Lord embodied as He has shared with us in his Word. She offered the use of her vacant house (which she vacated on marrying Nick) to Henrietta rent free as long as she needs it.

Shane Claiborne has asked how there can be homeless people in a 'Christian Nation' if their are Christians with empty bedrooms?

I can remember my friend and mentor Rev. Howard Edington saying one of the people he'd like to meet most from the Bible, was the man who owned the colt that Jesus rode upon on Palm Sunday, who when told by the disciples that the Lord had need of his donkey, he knew and gave it to them. I think Mrs. Chene Thompson must be cut from that same lineage.

I thank God we have a President who can be as Diana Butler Bass said 'Pastor In Chief.' Remember though...a pastor is a shepherd, yes he might cuddle a cute little lamb, but he also carried a big stick to fend off the wolves and others who might harm his flock. Oh...one other thing a shepherd learns quickly in the first few days on the job...Sheep Bite!

by: PastorAlan

02-11-2009 @ 2:09am

President Obama was in Ft. Myers today. He was in Ft. Myers because the area has the highest foreclosure rate in the United States. He was trying to focus attention on the plight of working class American's to a Congress that has divided itself along partisan lines as it considers an economic stimulus bill.

Henrietta Hughes had arrived early in the day hoping for a chance to see the President. Henrietta and her son have been homeless since he lost his job in 2003. She was selected at random to ask a question of the President in the town hall meeting. When her turn came she meekly asked "I have an urgent need. We need something more than the vehicle and the parks to go to. We need our own kitchen and our own bathroom, please help"

The president asked her name. He was so moved he came off of the stage to touch and kiss her. He told her "We're going to do everything we can."

I first met then Senator Obama at the Sojourners Pentecost 2006 conference in Washington DC, at National City Christian Church, he was speaking about his faith journey, and he was speaking of Matthew 25. He said "For one thing, I believed and still believe in the power of the African-American religious tradition to spur social change. Because of its past, the black church understands in an intimate way the biblical call to feed the hungry and clothe the naked and challenge powers and principalities. In its historical struggles for freedom and human rights, I was able to see faith as more than just a comfort to the weary or a hedge against death, but rather as an active, palpable agent in the world, as a source of hope."

It was obvious to me that Barack had recognized Jesus in His distressing disguise in Henrietta.

God has a plan, a plan to prosper us and not to harm us. Mrs. Chene Thompson, wife of Florida State Representative Nick Thompson (R) Lee County also recognized our Lord embodied as He has shared with us in his Word. She offered the use of her vacant house (which she vacated on marrying Nick) to Henrietta rent free as long as she needs it.

Shane Claiborne has asked how there can be homeless people in a 'Christian Nation' if their are Christians with empty bedrooms?

I can remember my friend and mentor Rev. Howard Edington saying one of the people he'd like to meet most from the Bible, was the man who owned the colt that Jesus rode upon on Palm Sunday, who when told by the disciples that the Lord had need of his donkey, he knew and gave it to them. I think Mrs. Chene Thompson must be cut from that same lineage.

I thank God we have a President who can be as Diana Butler Bass said 'Pastor In Chief.' Remember though...a pastor is a shepherd, yes he might cuddle a cute little lamb, but he also carried a big stick to fend off the wolves and others who might harm his flock. Oh...one other thing a shepherd learns quickly in the first few days on the job...Sheep Bite!

by: littleroundtop

02-11-2009 @ 2:12am

"Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective."

Yes that was a great sermon . ;0) But I agree he is very Presidential and appears to have handled the bully pulpit quite well . I can not give the same high marks for Congress however. I do not think its democrats and republicans that are the problem , I just think we need new ones to replace the old ones we have in office.

by: littleroundtop

02-11-2009 @ 2:12am

"Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective."

Yes that was a great sermon . ;0) But I agree he is very Presidential and appears to have handled the bully pulpit quite well . I can not give the same high marks for Congress however. I do not think its democrats and republicans that are the problem , I just think we need new ones to replace the old ones we have in office.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 3:21am

"But if it is illegitimate to refer to the president as "pastor in chief," then I suppose that Theodore Roosevelt illegitimately referred to the presidency as a "bully pulpit.""

Very much so, now that I think about it, though to a much lesser degree.

"Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective."

Indeed. The Dow was off, what, 5% today? Going after executive salaries is a bad idea.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 3:21am

"But if it is illegitimate to refer to the president as "pastor in chief," then I suppose that Theodore Roosevelt illegitimately referred to the presidency as a "bully pulpit.""

Very much so, now that I think about it, though to a much lesser degree.

"Agree with him or not, one has to admit that his calling these salaries "shameful" was quite effective."

Indeed. The Dow was off, what, 5% today? Going after executive salaries is a bad idea.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:43am

Its why I think some of us get so mad at each other when you put down a Presdent as a liar , fear monger , etc .

That had to to with political tactics to get one's agenda enacted, never mind the law or common sense. The truth is that GWB did do those things to pump himself up as a "leader" -- but he ended up falling on his face and many fell on their swords. Remember the "war on terror?" That cost the Republican Party big time.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:43am

Its why I think some of us get so mad at each other when you put down a Presdent as a liar , fear monger , etc .

That had to to with political tactics to get one's agenda enacted, never mind the law or common sense. The truth is that GWB did do those things to pump himself up as a "leader" -- but he ended up falling on his face and many fell on their swords. Remember the "war on terror?" That cost the Republican Party big time.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:47am

False. GWB used the politics of fear to fight an enemy "out there," spending billions on a wasteful and unnecessary war to prop himself up. Obama is addressing problems right here, right now that affect virtually everyone in this country -- including yourself, I'm sure.

Are you ever willing to give Obama a break instead of just back-benching?

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:47am

False. GWB used the politics of fear to fight an enemy "out there," spending billions on a wasteful and unnecessary war to prop himself up. Obama is addressing problems right here, right now that affect virtually everyone in this country -- including yourself, I'm sure.

Are you ever willing to give Obama a break instead of just back-benching?

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 4:57am

Ditto that here.

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 4:57am

Ditto that here.

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 4:59am

Empire abroad and an empire at home are the same false god, and using the politics of fear is wrong in both areas.

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 4:59am

Empire abroad and an empire at home are the same false god, and using the politics of fear is wrong in both areas.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 5:22am

There's a difference, however, in being a servant and being a bully.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 5:22am

There's a difference, however, in being a servant and being a bully.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 5:49am

"Obama is addressing problems right here, right now that affect
virtually everyone in this country -- including yourself, I'm sure."

The domestic vs. foreign policy distinction is one without a difference. He is using fear tactics to short circuit debate.

"Are you ever willing to give Obama a break instead of just back-benching?"

Ever? Of course. When he is cramming an arbitrarily crafted trillion-dollar spending bill down my throat? No.

And I will never call him my pastor, in-chief or otherwise.

________________________________

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 5:49am

"Obama is addressing problems right here, right now that affect
virtually everyone in this country -- including yourself, I'm sure."

The domestic vs. foreign policy distinction is one without a difference. He is using fear tactics to short circuit debate.

"Are you ever willing to give Obama a break instead of just back-benching?"

Ever? Of course. When he is cramming an arbitrarily crafted trillion-dollar spending bill down my throat? No.

And I will never call him my pastor, in-chief or otherwise.

________________________________

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 1:32pm

Yep, there sure is. That doesn't excuse bullying at home. We are being bullied into agreeing with the Administration on his ideas to "save our economy" (which was largely caused by government interference in the first place).

by: xfree9

02-11-2009 @ 1:32pm

Yep, there sure is. That doesn't excuse bullying at home. We are being bullied into agreeing with the Administration on his ideas to "save our economy" (which was largely caused by government interference in the first place).

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:23pm

That's the first misinterpretation because making a strong case does not equal bullying, as much as you may want it to. On top of that, Obama has a habit of listening to the other side to try to seek consensus. The conservatives who run the Republican Party, on the other hand, are the real bullies in all this -- they want their way BAMN and will hamstring their opponents in the process. Someone needs to tell them off but good, and he's about to do that.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:23pm

That's the first misinterpretation because making a strong case does not equal bullying, as much as you may want it to. On top of that, Obama has a habit of listening to the other side to try to seek consensus. The conservatives who run the Republican Party, on the other hand, are the real bullies in all this -- they want their way BAMN and will hamstring their opponents in the process. Someone needs to tell them off but good, and he's about to do that.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:25pm

The domestic vs. foreign policy distinction is one without a difference. He is using fear tactics to short circuit debate.

This is utterly false -- and pure conjecture on your part. (Just because it's what you would do doesn't mean everyone else thinks that way.)

Ever? Of course. When he is cramming an arbitrarily crafted trillion-dollar spending bill down my throat? No.

How many "non-conservatives" have you ever given a break to on this blog? Please.

by: BlueDeacon

02-11-2009 @ 3:25pm

The domestic vs. foreign policy distinction is one without a difference. He is using fear tactics to short circuit debate.

This is utterly false -- and pure conjecture on your part. (Just because it's what you would do doesn't mean everyone else thinks that way.)

Ever? Of course. When he is cramming an arbitrarily crafted trillion-dollar spending bill down my throat? No.

How many "non-conservatives" have you ever given a break to on this blog? Please.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 3:27pm

Someone took away your point for no reason. I gave it back. Now you have a point again.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 3:27pm

Someone took away your point for no reason. I gave it back. Now you have a point again.

by: nuclearferret

02-11-2009 @ 3:44pm

Exactly. Conducting oneself under the guise of "servant" to achieve the empire is a strategic decision.

by: nuclearferret

02-11-2009 @ 3:44pm

Exactly. Conducting oneself under the guise of "servant" to achieve the empire is a strategic decision.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 4:03pm

"This is utterly false -- and pure conjecture on your part. (Just
because it's what you would do doesn't mean everyone else thinks that
way.)"

No, stating that the stimulus package is the only way to avert economic disaster is pure conjecture. That Obama is using fear tactics is incontrovertible.

"How many "non-conservatives" have you ever given a break to on this blog? Please."

Well, John McCain for starters. I fail to see any instances of you giving conservatives a break. I know, you're going to provide some tangential reason why I am required to give a break to those with whom I disagree, but you are not required to do so because you live in the same suburb as Richard Vigurie.

________________________________

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 4:03pm

"This is utterly false -- and pure conjecture on your part. (Just
because it's what you would do doesn't mean everyone else thinks that
way.)"

No, stating that the stimulus package is the only way to avert economic disaster is pure conjecture. That Obama is using fear tactics is incontrovertible.

"How many "non-conservatives" have you ever given a break to on this blog? Please."

Well, John McCain for starters. I fail to see any instances of you giving conservatives a break. I know, you're going to provide some tangential reason why I am required to give a break to those with whom I disagree, but you are not required to do so because you live in the same suburb as Richard Vigurie.

________________________________

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 4:20pm

He didn't say making a strong case equals bullying. He said, correct me if I'm wrong, that threatening economic collapse and telling the American people they "don't need to be convinced," is bullying.

by: kevin47

02-11-2009 @ 4:20pm

He didn't say making a strong case equals bullying. He said, correct me if I'm wrong, that threatening economic collapse and telling the American people they "don't need to be convinced," is bullying.

by: derelicte

02-11-2009 @ 4:27pm

Okay, I gotta say something here. Thing is, if you think the Pelosi, Reid and the far Left crew isn't bullying here, you're kinda out of it. Moveon.org and a couple other groups actually ran commercials against Republicans who were causing trouble for the bill. Why? Silence the opposition and cause them to SUBMIT. If Obama were making a strong case, fine. But, here's the thing: He hasn't been. Even the people over at Salon.com and the Times could tell. No, what he's been doing lately is telling us that if we don't pass the bill, right now, without examining it a little more, modifying it, taking out the crap that even Democrats admit is nothing but wasteful, pork-barrel spending, then the economy will suffer. The amazing thins is that the vast majority of the bill is for spending in 2010 and 2011. Stopping, waiting for some debate and REAL consensus would be a good thing. But Obama isn't doing that. Instead he's taking his trump card, "I won", shoving it down the opposition's throat and then trying to scare us all into supporting the bill. Its the politics of fear. I don't care what you say about Bush or the Republicans, just don't be blind to what's happening currently.

by: derelicte

02-11-2009 @ 4:27pm

Okay, I gotta say something here. Thing is, if you think the Pelosi, Reid and the far Left crew isn't bullying here, you're kinda out of it. Moveon.org and a couple other groups actually ran commercials against Republicans who were causing trouble for the bill. Why? Silence the opposition and cause them to SUBMIT. If Obama were making a strong case, fine. But, here's the thing: He hasn't been. Even the people over at Salon.com and the Times could tell. No, what he's been doing lately is telling us that if we don't pass the bill, right now, without examining it a little more, modifying it, taking out the crap that even Democrats admit is nothing but wasteful, pork-barrel spending, then the economy will suffer. The amazing thins is that the vast majority of the bill is for spending in 2010 and 2011. Stopping, waiting for some debate and REAL consensus would be a good thing. But Obama isn't doing that. Instead he's taking his trump card, "I won", shoving it down the opposition's throat and then trying to scare us all into supporting the bill. Its the politics of fear. I don't care what you say about Bush or the Republicans, just don't be blind to what's happening currently.